Skip to main content

Smith’s Laissez Faire Capitalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Business Leader’s Guide to Philosophy
  • 123 Accesses

Synopsis

Although the phenomenon of capitalism predates Adam Smith he is often characterised as its architect. His main influence in the history of capitalism was demonstrating how the mercantile capitalism of his era was inhibiting the flowering of entrepreneurial trade within and between nation states. His vision of laissez faire capitalism enables an ‘invisible hand’ to distribute wealth to all participants in the enterprise, trickling down from the richest to the poorest. This chapter also compares and contrasts the main themes of Smith’s Wealth of Nations with his other major work, Theory of Moral Sentiments. The latter, not read by many economists, is relevant to my approach to business ethics in Part IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Smith (1950). Smith’s other important work is The Theory of Moral Sentiments (2001).

  2. 2.

    Smith, TMS, Part I, Sect. III, Ch. ii, para. 1, p. 61. See also Mandeville (1988), Vol. I, Remark (P.), # 182, p. 69.

  3. 3.

    Smith, TMS, Part IV, Ch. I, para. 6, p. 211.

  4. 4.

    Smith, WON, Vol. II, Bk. V, Ch. i, Part ii, p. 231; Vol. I, Bk. III, Ch. ii, p. 412.

  5. 5.

    Smith, TMS, Part I, Sect. III, Ch. iii, para. 1, p. 72.

  6. 6.

    Smith, TMS, Part IV, Ch. ii, para. 10, p 215. See a similar theme in Mandeville, Vol. I, Remark (L.), para. 109–10, p 108.

  7. 7.

    Smith, TMS, Part VII, Sect. II, Ch. iv, para’s. 6–13, pp. 363–70.

  8. 8.

    Smith, TMS, Part II, Sect. II, Ch. iii, para. 2, p.100.

  9. 9.

    Smith, WON, Vol. I, Bk. IV, Ch. iv, p. 433. This is the opposite view to that of noted contemporary economist/philosopher Amartya Sen who says good government providing the infra-structure for education, health and justice is a pre-requisite for economic prosperity as is evident for Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea. Predominant Third World development agendas over the last 50 years have been based upon Smith’s view. See Sen, Development as Freedom, pp. 145, 50.

  10. 10.

    Smith, WON, Vol. I, Bk. IV, Ch. ii, p. 475; Vol. II, Bk. V, Ch. i, Part ii, p. 232.

  11. 11.

    Ibid, Vol. II, Bk. IV, Ch. v, pp. 49–50.

  12. 12.

    Ibid, Vol. I, Bk. I, Ch. ii, p. 17, Ch. iv, p. 26.

  13. 13.

    Ibid, Ch. ii, p. 18.

  14. 14.

    Ibid, Ch. x, p. 118.

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., Ch. ii, p. 18.

  17. 17.

    Ibid, Bk. IV, Ch. iv, p. 478. See also Smith’s TMS, Part IV, Sect. II, Ch. ii, # 17, p. 275.

  18. 18.

    Smith, WN, Vol. I, Bk. I, Ch. i.

  19. 19.

    In 34 years at Ford, including a few years managing in an assembly plant, I never came across the word ‘Fordism’. I only discovered it later in academia, mostly used pejoratively in the social sciences to denote the de-humanising effects of working on assembly lines in the division of labour. From my office in the front of the plant I used to see assembly line workers, men and women, coming to and leaving work each day. They were always laughing and smiling. They often waved or nodded to me as I gazed out the window because they were familiar with my participation in various line-side meetings with plant management. I must say, none of them ever looked de-humanised. They always engaged enthusiastically with plant management over their participation in improvements to work processes.

  20. 20.

    Smith, WN, Vol. I, Bk. IV, Ch. ii, p. 475.

  21. 21.

    Ibid, Vol. II, Bk. V, Ch. i, Part II, Art. iii, pp. 302–3.

  22. 22.

    Ibid, Vol. I, Bk. I, Ch. x, Pt. ii, p. 142.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., Ch. i, p. 13.

  24. 24.

    Ibid, Vol. II, Bk. V, Ch. i, Part III, Art. ii, pp. 302–6.

  25. 25.

    This global division of labour trend is not one-sided. India is rapidly becoming a highly sought-after knowledge worker source, particularly in IT enterprises.

References

  • Mandeville, Bernard. 1988. The Fable of the Bees, or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Liberty Classics: Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1950. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Edwin Cannan, 6th ed. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Knud Haakonssen. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dawson, L. (2023). Smith’s Laissez Faire Capitalism. In: A Business Leader’s Guide to Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33042-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics