Abstract
In today’s world, the level of digital integration plays an important role in the development of the state. One aspect of digital integration is the implementation of digital government. The concept of digital government emerged relatively recently, and the beginning of implementation in many countries is at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st century. Now this direction of development is significant as an indicator of digital development of the country. The creation and implementation of the digital ecosystem of government allows optimizing the process of interaction between public authorities and the population, as well as improving the efficiency of public bodies through the use of digital technologies. The purpose of the study was to formulate proposals to improve the efficiency in the development of state digital ecosystem of the Russian Federation, based on the positive experience of the leading countries in the world rating of e-Government program implementation. The research methods used in this article are theoretical research methods: analysis of statistical data and documents within the scope of the research topic. A comparative analysis of the implementation of e-Government program in Russia and the top three countries in the ranking of countries for the development and implementation of digital government was also carried out. This was followed by identifying the reasons for the success of the leading countries in terms of the effectiveness of government e-ecosystem development. As part of the study, measures were proposed to improve the efficiency of the Russian state’s digital ecosystem development. These measures included: solving the problems hindering the development of e-Government in Russia, as well as borrowing the successful experience of the leading countries in the digital government rating.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dobrinskaya, D.: Empirical studies. Sociol. Sci. Technol. 12(2), 112–130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.24412/2079-0910-2021-2-112-129
Zaytsev, A., Sun, P.K., Elkina, O., Tarasova, T., Dmitriev, N. Economic security and innovative component of a region: a comprehensive assessment. Sustain. Dev. Eng. Econ. 2, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.48554/SDEE.2021.2.4
Ivanova, M., Yakovleva, T., Selenteva, T.: The models of information asymmetry in the context of digitization of government. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference - Digital Transformation on Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Service (DTMIS 2020), pp. 1–6. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3446434.3446512. Article 32
Tunisskaya programma dlya informatsionnogo obshchestva, https://www.un.org/ru/events/pastevents/pdf/agenda_wsis.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
López, N.R., Milán García, J., Uribe Toril, J., de Pablo Valenciano, J.: Evolution and latest trends of local government efficiency: worldwide research (1928–2019). J. Clean. Prod. 261, 121276 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121276
Reyting stran mira po indeksu razvitiya elektronnogo pravitel’stva. https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/e-government-development-index. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
UN E-Government Knowledgebase. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Data-Center. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
Fixed telephone subscriptions (per 100 people). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.MLT.MAIN.P2. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
Active mobile-broadband subscriptions per 100 inhabitants. https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/h1e032144?country=BRA&indicator=24703&viz=line_chart&years=2010,2019. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.BBND.P2. Accessed 20 Dec 2021
Individuals using the Internet % of population. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS. Accessed 28 Dec 2022
Government Online Service Index, 0–1 (best). https://tcdata360.worldbank.org/indicators/entrp.govt.idx?countryBRA&indicator=3451&viz=line_chart&years=2012,2016#table-link. Accessed 28 Dec 2022
Human Capital Index (HCI) (scale 0–1). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/HD.HCI.OVRL. Accessed 28 Dec 2022
Law, M., et al.: Characterization of Calcium Fluoride Optical Surfaces. In: NIST Special Publication 752—Symposium on Optical Materials for High Power Lasers. Precision Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 67 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-6359(91)90245-E
Zhang, Y., Kimathi, F.A.: Exploring the stages of E-government development from public value perspective. Technol. Soc. 69, 101942 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2022.101942
Pérez-Morote, R., Pontones-Rosa, C., Núñez-Chicharro, M.: The effects of e-government evaluation, trust and the digital divide in the levels of e-government use in European countries. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 154, 119973 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2020.119973
Informatsionnoye obshchestvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii 2020. https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/lqv3T0Rk/info-ob2020.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2022
OECD: Denmark: Efficient e-Government for Smarter Public Service Delivery. OECD e-Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris (2010). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264087118-en
How Denmark made it to the top in e-Government. https://digileaders.com/how-denmark-made-it-to-the-top-in-e-government/. Accessed 28 Dec 2022
Hvidt, E.A., Grønning, A., Brøgger, M.N., Møller, J.E., Fage-Butler, A.: Multilevel structures and human agency in relation to email consultations: a strong structuration theory analysis of the Danish general practice setting. Soc. Sci. Med. 282, 114155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCSCIMED.2021.114155
Trust in Government. https://data.oecd.org/gga/trust-in-government.htm. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Falch, M., Henten, A.: Digital Denmark: from information society to network society. Telecommun. Policy 24(5), 377–394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00028-8
Reyting stran po urovnyu valovogo natsional’nogo dokhoda na dushu naseleniya. https://nonews.co/directory/lists/countries/gni-per-capita. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Otchet o rezul’tatakh obuchayushchego vizita delegatsii Federal’nogo kaznacheystva v Ministerstvo strategii i finansov Respubliki Koreya. https://roskazna.gov.ru/dokumenty/inaya-deyatelnost/mezhdunarodnoe-sotrudnichestvo/drugie-meropriyatiya/15990/. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Anuardo, R.G., Espuny, M., Costa, A.C.F., Oliveira, O.J.: Toward a cleaner and more sustainable world: a framework to develop and improve waste management through organizations, governments and academia. Heliyon 8(4), e09225 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E09225
VVP na dushu naseleniya, PPS - Klassatsiya stran. https://ru.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/gdp_per_capita_ppp/Europe/. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Individuals using the Internet (% of population). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.ZS. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Dexter, A.S., Janson, M.A., Kiudorf, E., Laast-Laas, J.: Key information technology issues in Estonia. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 2(2), 139–152 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8687(93)90005-U
Styrin, E., Mossberger, K., Zhulin, A.: Government as a platform: intergovernmental participation for public services in the Russian Federation. Gov. Inf. Q. 39(1), 101627 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101627
Reyting stran mira po indeksu razvitiya elektronnogo pravitel’stva. https://gtmarket.ru/ratings/e-government-development-index. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Kolichestvo grazhdan, kotoryye vospol’zovalis’ servisami yedinogo portala Gosuslug v 2020 godu, sostavilo 56 mln chelovek. https://digital.gov.ru/ru/events/40942/. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
Zhao, J.J., Zhao, S.Y., Zhao, S.Y.: Opportunities and threats: a security assessment of state e-government websites. Gov. Inf. Q. 27(1), 49–56 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2009.07.004
Rochlitz, M., Mitrokhina, E., Nizovkina, I.: Bureaucratic discrimination in electoral authoritarian regimes: experimental evidence from Russia. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 66, 101957 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2020.101957
Grigoryeva, I.A., Dmitrieva, A.V.: ICT use as a new consumer practice of elderly people, and their quality of life. In: Proceedings of Scientific Articles of the XIX Joint Conference “Internet and Modern Society” IMS-2016, St. Petersburg, 22–24 June 2016 (2016)
Komarova, A.V., Filimonova, I.V., Novikov, A.Y.: The impact of the resource and environmental factors on the economic development of Russian regions. Energy Rep. 7, 422–427 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EGYR.2021.07.109
Ivanova, M., Degtereva, V., Lukin, G.: Evaluation of digital transformation of government: Russian and international systems of indicators. In: Proceedings of the 2019 International SPBPU Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy (SPBPU IDE 2019), pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3372177.3373330. Article 34
Schirmer, W., Geerts, N., Vercruyssen, A., Glorieux, I.: Digital skills training for older people: the importance of the ‘lifeworld. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 101, 104695 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARCHGER.2022.104695
Srinivas, J., Das, A.K., Kumar, N.: Government regulations in cyber security: framework, standards and recommendations. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 92, 178–188 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUTURE.2018.09.063
Balashov, A., Barabanov, A., Degtereva, V., Ivanov, M.: Prospects for digital transformation of public administration in Russia. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy (SPBPU IDE 2020), pp. 1–7. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3444465.3444506. Article 13
Teplova, T.V., Rodina, V.A.: The reinvestment risk premium in the valuation of British and Russian government bonds. Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 55, 101319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2020.101319
Gasova, K., Stofkova, K.: E-government as a quality improvement tool for citizens’ services. Proc. Eng. 192, 225–230 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2017.06.039
Chen, Y.-C.: A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations: the potential of improving information transparency and efficiency. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 553–563 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.05.009
Uwizeyimana, D.E.: Analysing the importance of e-government in times of disruption: the case of public education in Rwanda during Covid-19 lockdown. Eval. Program Plann. 91, 102064 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2022.102064
Ivanova, M., Putintseva, N.: Approaches to evaluation of digital transformation of government: comparative analysis of indicators in the central and eastern European countries. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy (SPBPU IDE 2020), pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3444465.3444508. Article 14
Epstein, B.: Two decades of e-government diffusion among local governments in the United States. Gov. Inf. Q. 39(2), 101665 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2021.101665
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nazmetdinova, K., Kalmykova, S. (2023). E-Government in Russia: Developing and Improving the Quality of Implementation of the e-Government Program. In: Ilin, I., Petrova, M.M., Kudryavtseva, T. (eds) Digital Transformation on Manufacturing, Infrastructure & Service. DTMIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32719-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32719-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32718-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32719-3
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)