Abstract
This study examines and compares the accuracy of several machine learning algorithms (ML) for predicting Port a Cath complications using ensemble learning (EL) approaches, in order to aid doctors in selecting the most effective treatments for saving lives. The data collection of 794 instances served as the primary database for the training and testing of the built system. 10-Fold Cross-Validation has been applied to expand the data set, which would not have been possible otherwise. The techniques are developed using the Python language. Different classifiers, namely Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbor (K-NN), Naïve Bayes (NB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) have been employed. The dataset has also been used for the ensemble prediction of classifiers, bagging, voting, and stacking. The study’s findings indicate that using the voting strategy in conjunction with the MLP, NB, KNN, DT, and SGD methods yields results with an overall accuracy of 92.5% higher than those obtained with the other methods described above.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Faraj, W., et al.: Complete catheter disconnection and migration of an implantable venous access device: the disconnected cap sign. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 24(5), 692-e11 (2010). Vescia, S., Baumgärtner, A.K., Jacobs, V.R., et al.: Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. Ann. Oncol. 19, 9–15
Maki, D.G., et al.: The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin. Proc. 81, 1159–1171 (2006)
Yildizeli, B., et al.: Complications and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports. J. Vasc. Access 5, 174–178 (2004)
Hartkamp, A., et al.: Totally implantable venous access devices: evaluation of complications and a prospective comparative study of two different port systems. Neth. J. Med. 57, 215–223 (2000)
Sousa, B., et al.: Central venous access in oncology: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann. Oncol. 26(Suppl 5): 152–168 (2015). Learning tools and techniques (2016)
Springer. https://springerlink.bibliotecabuap.elogim.com/book/9789811962226
Alpaydin, E.: Machine Learning: The New AI. MIT Press, USA (2016)
Google Colab. https://colab.research.google.com/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
El Oualy, H., Hajji, B., Mokhtari, K., Omari, M., Madani, H. (2023). Evaluation of Machine Learning and Ensemble Methods for Complications Related to Port a Cath. In: Motahhir, S., Bossoufi, B. (eds) Digital Technologies and Applications. ICDTA 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 668. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29857-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29857-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29856-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29857-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)