Skip to main content

Facing Death: An Ethical Exploration of Thanatophobia in Combat Casualty Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resource Scarcity in Austere Environments

Abstract

This paper is going to explore the adverse effects of exposure to combat death on medics’ holistic well-being, which, if ignored could decrease individual readiness and negatively impact the mission. We rely on the experience of United States Air Force Special Operation Surgical Teams (AF SOST) whose exposure to mass casualty scenarios in austere environments could serve as approximations of conditions of future battlefields. Over the past two decades, the ability to deliver advanced medical care on and off the battlefield along with a rapid casualty evacuation platform has allowed for unprecedented survival rates exceeding 90%. While laudable, these medical achievements have also set up a casualty management paradigm in which medical decision-making singularly focuses on life-saving care. Confronting peer-peer adversaries in large scale combat operations (LSCO) on a multi-domain battlefield will make casualty management frighteningly more complex by introducing major infrastructural, personnel, and resource constraints. When considering the high number of casualties expected in LSCO alongside enormous limitations in medical resource and resupply capability, the current casualty management paradigm will not be sustainable. The resource constrained environment in LSCO will shift medical decision-making away from a singular focus on life-saving care to triage, which hinges on the ability to determine futile medical interventions—a skill that has been lost in the past two generation of combat medics. As such, a broad ethical challenge that arises in preparation for LSCO is the need to set new expectations concerning dying and death. However, medical decision-making focused on death and dying has not been explicitly addressed in military medical training, research, or policy. Relying on a body of literature known as terror management theory (TMT) and ethnographic data from our study with AF SOST medics, we are going to argue that it is important to expose medics to death in mass casualty and triage training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, we will use the word medic as a general term for all military service members involved in combat casualty care. While we will be focusing on those who provide medical interventions and the military medical culture, it is important to note that the military chaplain is also a member of the combat casualty care team.

  2. 2.

    When presenting data to various audiences as well as during various field observation, this in-fighting has been noted across various forward surgical teams. For instance, members of the United States Army Forward Surgical Team (FST), the Joint Special Operations Command’s (JSOC) Joint Medical Augmentation Unit (JMAU), and the United States Air Force Ground Surgical Teams (GST) have engaged in dismissive commentaries the value of the other surgical teams worth. This suggests that thanatophobia plays into identity conflicts across medical teams. It also suggests in-group exclusive behaviors in reference to combat casualty care and understanding who is best prepared, equipped or capable of managing combat casualties. While this is not the topic of our study, the observation that forward surgical teams appear to compete for status power instead of collaborate seems to reinforce the notion that in-group identity causes friction that could decrease surgical interoperability on the battlefield.

References

  • Becker, E. 1997. The denial of death. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. 2009. Ambiguous loss: Learning to live with unresolved grief. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, F.K., D.J. Smith, and R.H. Carmona. 2015. Implementing and preserving the advances in combat casualty care from Iraq and Afghanistan throughout the US military. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 79 (2): 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M.R., and T.E. Rasmussen. 2019. Winds of change in military medicine and combat casualty care. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 87 (1S): S1–S2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, N., and S. Krupar. 2019. Deadly biocultures: The ethics of life-making. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V.E. 1985. Logos, paradox, and the search for meaning. Cognition and psychotherapy, 259–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V.E. 1988. The will to meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy. Expanded ed. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., and A. Arndt. 2011. Terror management theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology: Collection: Volumes 1 & 2, ed. P.A.M.V. Lange, A.W. Kruglanski, and E.T. Higgins, 398–415. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janak, J., Z. Stockinger, E. Mazuchowski, R. Kotwal, J. Sosnov, H. Montgomery, F. Butler, S. Shackelford, J. Gurney, M. Spott, L. Finelli, and D.J. Smith. 2018. Military preventable death conceptual framework: A systematic approach for reducing battlefield mortality. Military Medicine 183 (suppl_2): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usy149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke, E. 2019. Damage control Interdisciplinarity: An antidote to death despair in military medicine. Louis UJ Health L. & Pol’y 13: 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempf, S. 2018. Saving soldiers or civilians?: Casualty-aversion versus civilian protection in asymmetric conflicts. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kübler-Ross, E. 1969. On death and dying. Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacquement, R.A. 2004. The casualty-aversion myth. Naval War College Review 57 (1): 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. 1994. The courage to create. WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academies of Sciences, & Medicine. 2016. A national trauma care system: Integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S., J. Greenberg, and T.A. Pyszczynski. 2015. The worm at the core: On the role of death in life. Random House Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jeschke, E.A., Martinez, H.R., Choi, E.M., Dorsch, J., Huffman, S.L. (2023). Facing Death: An Ethical Exploration of Thanatophobia in Combat Casualty Care. In: Eagan, S.M., Messelken, D. (eds) Resource Scarcity in Austere Environments. Military and Humanitarian Health Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29059-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics