Abstract
The assessment of range of motion (ROM) of a joint is an important component of physical examination. The universal goniometer, considered the gold standard, is usually used to measure the ROM of the ankle and the joints of the foot. With technological advances, new systems to measure ROM, such as smartphone inclinometers, are emerging.
This chapter describes the reliability of the data obtained with the smartphone inclinometer compared to those obtained with classical goniometers to measure the ROM of the ankle and foot. A smartphone inclinometer provides reliable results, and patients have the advantage to be able to self-evaluate, once appropriately trained, changes in the ROM of a given joint during rehabilitation with an immediate feedback.
The smartphone inclinometer is a reliable and easy-to-use tool to evaluate the range of motion of the ankle and other joints of the foot. Although familiarity with the relevant application is required, it provides important advantages in the medical field, from the point of view of accessibility, costs, and practicality.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
When planning the management of orthopedic patients following injuries, an important part of physical examination is the evaluation of joint function in terms of measuring range of motion (ROM) [1], classically defined as distance and direction of joint movement between flexion and extension.
ROM expresses quantitatively the motion of a joint, and its evaluation allows to ascertain the presence of impairments and evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs, guiding the choice of interventions during rehabilitation and defining the progress of treatment [2]. ROM is joint specific and changes according to the sex and age of the subject.
Recently, advanced smartphones, which integrate a series of functions that can be used in the medical field with different purposes, have become widespread. Modern smartphones are equipped with various movement sensors, including accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer, all of which can perform various inclinometric functions.
The accelerometer allows to detect the linear acceleration (m/s) of the device along the three axes of space (Fig. 66.1), thus allowing to determine the linear displacements of the device.
A gyroscope measures the variations in angular speed (degrees/s) of a given device to provide information on rotational movements.
The magnetometer, based on the earth’s magnetic field, allows to detect the orientation of the device in space.
These sensors and their dedicated software can be used in the musculoskeletal system to evaluate the ROM of various joints quickly and reliably
1 Applications
Several applications are able to exploit these digital sensors, taking advantage of the potential of the smartphone for measuring the ROM of different joints [3].
The applications which use these sensors, therefore, in addition to being recreational, as with flight simulation apps, can measure and quantify the ROM of many joints [4, 5], with the advantage of not requiring specialized training [6].
Some of these applications allow to directly measure the angular excursion of the joint, while others require the acquisition of a photo of the joint in the initial and final phases of the movement and then calculate the angle of movement by means of a virtual protractor that overlaps the image.
The important advantage of using the smartphone as an ROM measurement tool is that, being commonly used, it can also be useful for rehabilitation purposes: patients themselves can obtain direct feedback with a self-assessment of the ROM; moreover, being equipped with a display, the smartphone can also be used to view the sequence of exercises that the patient must complete.
In this way, it is possible to avoid resorting to other more complex and expensive measuring instruments such as the three-dimensional motion capture system, which are difficult to access [7]. Consequently, more and more developers have produced dedicated medical applications to facilitate rehabilitation [8].
With the introduction of these new ROM measurement systems, the need arose to evaluate their reliability and validity. Therefore, numerous studies have focused on these smartphone applications designed to measure ROM, comparing the results obtained with those relating to instruments considered the gold standard [9].
2 Fields of Use
In several studies, the smartphone inclinometer has been tested and compared with the preexisting measurement systems considered gold standards for the evaluation of ROM, including the ankle (Fig. 66.2). Some of the apps validated for ankle ROM measurements are shown in Table 66.1.
The foot and ankle are frequently injured, both in the general population and in athletes [14]. Ankle sprains are the most common cause of attendance of an emergency department [15]. Although ankle sprains in most cases recover completely [16, 17], in some patients they may have adverse outcomes [18, 19].
Foot and ankle injuries are generally responsible for pain and decrease of ROM, with poor quality of life in affected patients [20, 21]. Therefore, a primary goal of management is to obtain the greatest functional recovery of the affected joint. For this purpose, the measurement of ROM has an extremely important role both for the initial clinical evaluation and for the evaluation of rehabilitation [11].
Many ankle conditions may require the evaluation of the ROM, including sprains, dislocations, and fractures [22]. However, the evaluation of the ROM has an important role in degenerative conditions such as osteoarthritis as well [23].
Different methods can be used to evaluate ROM, including radiographic measurement [24, 25]. However, these are not practical in clinical practice, and the gold standard is the universal goniometer [26].
3 Ankle
In the evaluation of patients with ankle injuries, the measurement of plantar flexion is commonly used and carried out using a goniometer [26] (Fig. 66.3), with a fulcrum, a fixed arm (stationary arm), and a movable arm.
The fulcrum of the goniometer must be placed at the center of the joint and in the case of the ankle, for the measurement of plantar flexion, the fulcrum must be at the lateral malleolus. The fixed arm is aligned with the fibula, and the mobile arm is in line with the shaft of the fifth metatarsal.
The alternative to the use of the goniometer is represented by the digital inclinometer, which, for the measurement of plantar flexion, is positioned in contact with the sole of the foot and aligned with it [26,27,28].
With the introduction of smartphone applications dedicated to ROM measurement, there has been a progressive increase in the use of inclinometry. Among the various applications available, one already considered valid for the measurement of shoulder ROM is the Clinometer app (Smartphone ApplicationTM produced by Plaincode App).
The measurement is carried out with the patient sitting keeping the knee extended and the foot outside the examination couch. With the smartphone aligned to the foot, the application is started and, after calibration, the patient is asked to perform an active plantar flexion to measure the ROM.
In 2018, the validity of this measurement was compared with the use of the goniometer [12]: the measurements were repeated three times per each limb in a sample of 100 individuals. The results were compared, with no statistically significant differences between the two procedures, reporting an average plantar flexion value of 62.79° (7.90°) with the goniometer and average values of 62.96° (7.85°) with the Clinometer app. Similar results were obtained by Alawna et al. [29] in 2019.
An important aspect is also the evaluation of the weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion using the Dorsiflex iPhone, now renamed My ROM, application [13].
The latter allowed to analyze the validity and reliability of the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion with the iPhone inclinometer, comparing it with a professional digital inclinometer [13]. The study highlighted a perfect correlation between the measurements obtained with the two methods, demonstrating that a smartphone app can replace a professional tool to measure ankle dorsiflexion [13].
Many authors have proposed weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion (WBDF) measurement as a relevant parameter in assessing the risk of injury to the lower limbs [30], such as anterior cruciate ligament injury [31], patellar tendinopathy [32], and plantar fasciitis [33]. During exercises such as the squat or landing after a jump, the joints of the lower limbs must absorb and shield an important force that acts on the sagittal plane: a decreased WBDF produces limitation of movements of the knee and trunk, with greater valgus strain at the knee [34].
To measure WBDF, the patient stands with the sole of the foot in contact with the floor. The patient is asked to flex the knee by moving the weight forward to dorsiflex the ankle. During the exercise, the digital inclinometer, or the smartphone, is applied to the anterior tibial surface immediately below the tibial tuberosity. The measurement is carried out bilaterally to establish the possible asymmetry between the two limbs, which represents an additional risk factor for injury [35]. The use of the smartphone as an inclinometer can provide valid and reliable measurements of the WBDF angle of the ankle, not different to those of the goniometer or professional digital inclinometer.
Other applications for the measurement of ankle ROM, whose results have been validated by comparison with gold standard instruments, are the iHandy Level app for iPhone to evaluate ankle dorsiflexion and the TiltMeter to evaluate dorsiflexion under load, for example during the weight-bearing lunge test [10, 11].
4 Results
The use of the inclinometer in the smartphone is a useful and easy-to-use tool to measure the ROM of the ankle, with reliable results comparable with those obtained with the use of instruments considered to be gold standards such as the goniometer and the digital inclinometer. The technological evolution therefore provides important advantages in the medical field, from the point of view of accessibility, costs, and practicality, allowing to improve the physician’s clinical evaluation skills. In addition, another advantage lies in the possibility for patients themselves to use the smartphone to self-evaluate their motor skills during the rehabilitation phases, so as to have immediate feedback during the exercises.
However, for a correct use of this instrument in the clinical setting, a familiarity with the application is required, and adherence to developer’s instructions is necessary.
References
Verrall GM, Slavotinek JP, Barnes PG, Esterman A, Oakeshott RD, Spriggins AJ. Hip joint range of motion restriction precedes athletic chronic groin injury. J Sci Med Sport. 2007;10(6):463–6.
American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Phys Ther. 2001;81(1):9–746.
Braden HJ. Goniometry apps: do they measure up? Exploring the accuracy of Mobile device apps. GGS. 2019;5(2):GGS.000609.2019. https://crimsonpublishers.com/ggs/fulltext/GGS.000610.php
Peters FM, Greeff R, Goldstein N, Frey CT. Improving acetabular cup orientation in Total hip arthroplasty by using smartphone technology. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(7):1324–30.
Shin SH, Ro DH, Lee O-S, Oh JH, Kim SH. Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone. Man Ther. 2012;17(4):298–304.
Cunha AB, Babik I, Harbourne R, Cochran NJ, Stankus J, Szucs K, et al. Assessing the validity and reliability of a new video goniometer app for measuring joint angles in adults and children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(2):275–82.
Charlton PC, Mentiplay BF, Pua Y-H, Clark RA. Reliability and concurrent validity of a smartphone, bubble inclinometer and motion analysis system for measurement of hip joint range of motion. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(3):262–7.
Hafeez K, Kaim Khani GM, Jawaid M, Bux M. Is smartphone a necessity or luxury among orthopedic specialty? J Pak Med Assoc. 2014;64(12 Suppl 2):S27–9.
Rothstein J, Echternach J. Primer on measurement: an introductory guide to measurement issues. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 1993.
Williams CM, Caserta AJ, Haines TP. The TiltMeter app is a novel and accurate measurement tool for the weight bearing lunge test. J Sci Med Sport. 2013;16(5):392–5.
Vohralik SL, Bowen AR, Burns J, Hiller CE, Nightingale EJ. Reliability and Validity of a Smartphone App to Measure Joint Range. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94(4):325–30.
Cox RW, Martinez RE, Baker RT, Warren L. Validity of a smartphone application for measuring ankle plantar flexion. J Sport Rehabil 2018;27(3).
Balsalobre-Fernández C, Romero-Franco N, Jiménez-Reyes P. Concurrent validity and reliability of an iPhone app for the measurement of ankle dorsiflexion and inter-limb asymmetries. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(3):249–53.
Hunt KJ, Hurwit D, Robell K, Gatewood C, Botser IB, Matheson G. Incidence and epidemiology of foot and ankle injuries in elite collegiate athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(2):426–33.
Cooke MW, Lamb SE, Marsh J, Dale J. A survey of current consultant practice of treatment of severe ankle sprains in emergency departments in the United Kingdom. Emerg Med J. 2003;20(6):505–7.
Birrer RB, Fani-Salek MH, Totten VY, Herman LM, Politi V. Managing ankle injuries in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 1999;17(4):651–60.
Wilkerson GB, Horn-Kingery HM. Treatment of the inversion ankle sprain: comparison of different modes of compression and cryotherapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;17(5):240–6.
Braun BL. Effects of ankle sprain in a general clinic population 6 to 18 months after medical evaluation. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(2):143–8.
Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Rowe BH, Assendelft WJJ, Kelly K, Struijs PA, van Dijk CN. Immobilisation and functional treatment for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;(3):CD003762.
Ferran NA, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Ankle instability. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2009;17(2):139–45.
Fereydounnia S, Shadmehr A, Talebian Moghadam S, Olyaei G, Jalaie S, Shiravi Z, et al. The comparison of dynamic postural control and muscle activity in time domain in athletes with and without chronic ankle instability. Muscle Ligaments Tendons J. 2019;08(04):552.
Dehghan N, McKee MD, Jenkinson RJ, Schemitsch EH, Stas V, Nauth A, et al. Early Weightbearing and range of motion versus non-Weightbearing and immobilization after open reduction and internal fixation of unstable ankle fractures: A randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(7):345–52.
Khlopas H, Khlopas A, Samuel LT, Ohliger E, Sultan AA, Chughtai M, et al. Current concepts in osteoarthritis of the ankle: review. Surg Technol Int. 2019;10(35):280–94.
Coetzee JC, Castro MD. Accurate measurement of ankle range of motion after total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:27–31.
Dayton P, Feilmeier M, Parker K, Otti R, Reimer R, Kauwe M, et al. Experimental comparison of the clinical measurement of ankle joint dorsiflexion and radiographic Tibiotalar position. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56(5):1036–40.
Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. 4th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis; 2009. p. 450.
Cosby NL, Hertel J. Relationships between measures of posterior Talar glide and ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Athl Train Sports Health Care. 2011;3(2):76–85.
Denegar CR, Hertel J, Fonseca J. The effect of lateral ankle sprain on dorsiflexion range of motion, posterior Talar glide, and joint laxity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32(4):166–73.
Alawna MA, Unver BH, Yuksel EO. The reliability of a smartphone goniometer application compared with a traditional goniometer for measuring ankle joint range of motion. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2019;109(1):22–9.
Malloy P, Morgan A, Meinerz C, Geiser C, Kipp K. The association of dorsiflexion flexibility on knee kinematics and kinetics during a drop vertical jump in healthy female athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(12):3550–5.
Amraee D, Alizadeh MH, Minoonejhad H, Razi M, Amraee GH. Predictor factors for lower extremity malalignment and non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries in male athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(5):1625–31.
Malliaras P, Cook JL, Kent P. Reduced ankle dorsiflexion range may increase the risk of patellar tendon injury among volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport. 2006;9(4):304–9.
Petraglia F, Ramazzina I, Costantino C. Plantar fasciitis in athletes: diagnostic and treatment strategies. A systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017;7(1):107–18.
Dill KE, Begalle RL, Frank BS, Zinder SM, Padua DA. Altered knee and ankle kinematics during squatting in those with limited weight-bearing–lunge ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion. J Athl Train. 2014;49(6):723–32.
Bishop C, Turner A, Read P. Effects of inter-limb asymmetries on physical and sports performance: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(10):1135–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 ISAKOS
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Quaranta, M., Oliva, F., Maffulli, N. (2023). Ankle Joint Range of Motion Evaluation (ROM) Using Smartphone Calculators. In: Lane, J.G., Gobbi, A., Espregueira-Mendes, J., Kaleka, C.C., Adachi, N. (eds) The Art of the Musculoskeletal Physical Exam. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24404-9_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24404-9_66
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24403-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24404-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)