Abstract
Elimination and reduction of causative or contributing occupational exposures effectively prevent occupational dermatoses. Thus, full prevention is achievable with a legislation framework for elimination, substitution, and reduction of skin irritants, urticariogens, allergens, and carcinogens at the workplace. Measures to maintain the natural protective function of the skin barrier are pivotal to keep healthy skin among workers. Moreover, early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of work-related skin problems will avoid chronification, and a severe and recalcitrant course with high social costs.
This chapter will present evidence-based standards for the prevention of occupational dermatoses from the legislative level to daily medical practice.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Work-related and occupational dermatoses lead to frequent use of health care services, high occurrence of sick leave, job loss, job change, and mental distress [1]. Both occupational dermatoses and its consequences are highly preventable by eliminating and reducing exposure to occupational hazards.
Scope of Preventive Measures
Prevention can be defined as:
“measures adopted by or practiced on persons not currently feeling the effects of a disease, intended to decrease the risk that disease will afflict them in the future” [2].
The ultimate goal for prevention in occupational dermatology is to maintain a healthy skin in a safe work environment. Thus, prevention focuses on human, organizational, and technical and organizational measures for avoidance and limitation of exposure to skin irritants, urticariogens, allergens, and carcinogens at the workplace according to legislation and the provision of regular training in the use of personal protective measures adapted to the needs of the employees [3].
Thus, from a public health perspective preventive measures comprise:
-
1.
Universal measures: include strategies for health promotion to benefit the full population. Legislation regulating the availability of skin irritants, allergens, and urticarigens is the best example of universal measures. For instance, a significant decline of occupational contact urticaria attributed to latex in gloves was observed in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom after legislation to reduce occupational exposure [4,5,6]. Preservatives such as methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (CMIT/MIT, also known as MCI/MI, Kathon CG®), methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDBGN), and several formaldehyde releasers are substances which have caused a rapid and alarming increase in contact allergy and dermatitis [7]. Liquid soaps, industrial hand cleansers, detergents, skin care products, paints, metal-working fluids, and their biocides, as well as fountain solution additives in printing work, are the most common sources of exposure to MIT or MCIT/MIT. Julander and a group of experts from the Nordic countries summarize important dates concerning legislation, classification, and restriction of sensitizing preservatives in Europe [8].
-
2.
Selective measures: include specific preventive actions focusing on specific risk factors and risk groups. Examples include education about risk factors for developing work-related skin problems, training on skin protection such as proper use of protective equipment, provision and training on use of moisturizers, and periodical health surveillance in risk occupations. The effectiveness of these measures to prevent work-related and occupational dermatoses depends on the knowledge, awareness, and motivation of both employers and employees. Firstly, employers should be aware about the risks at work to develop immediate contact reactions and provide the workers with proper skin education and protective elements. Secondly, workers should be motivated to carry out or seek out specific preventive measure. Occupational health professionals and health educators have an essential role to facilitate the effective design and implementation of these actions.
-
3.
Indicated measures: comprise the application of specific diagnostic procedures in workers with already established skin problems. Indicated prevention is most commonly applied in the clinical setting, as indication is ordinarily one discovered through medical examination or laboratory testing, and many of the preventive measures require professional advice or assistance for optimal results [2]. The German “Dermatologist’s procedure” serves as a model on how to identify early work-related skin problems by mandatory reporting and prevent its social, psychological, and economic consequences [9].
Figure 8.1 summarizes the scope of prevention based on a population approach for whom the measure is advisable according to scientific evidence and cost-benefit analysis.
International Standards for Prevention
Scientific evidence-based criteria and standards are necessary to assess workers at risk for developing work-related and occupational dermatoses and patients with these conditions in order to prevent and treat occupational dermatoses.
Evidence-based recommendations for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria were first developed by Nicholson et al. after a systematic review of the literature (Table 8.1) [10].
Minimum standards for effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of work-related and occupational skin diseases (Fig. 8.2 and Table 8.2) have been established by a consensus-based approach by means of the Delphi method with over 80 experts (dermatologists, occupational physicians, health educators, epidemiologists) from 31 European countries (COST Action TD 1206, STANDERM) [3].
Primary Prevention
Primary prevention measures aim to avoid the development of work-related dermatoses in healthy workers [3]. The implementation of risk management processes involving risk analysis, risk assessment, and risk control practices constitute a basis for primary prevention [12].
Table 8.3 presents the STOP concept (Substitution, Technical measures, Organizational measures, and Personal protection), which is practically orientated for prevention at the workplace [13].
If substitution, technical and organizational prevention measures are not available or are insufficient, personal protective equipment (e.g., gloves and moisturizers) must be available as well as regular training on correct application/use. Several studies have shown that protective strategies are applied insufficiently; therefore regular instructions on use and application are necessary [14, 15].
Recommendations for the Use of Protective Gloves
Accelerators-Free Gloves
Protective gloves can lead to skin irritation and allergy due to skin occlusion and the presence of allergens. For instance, while an effective reduction in the occurrence of occupational contact urticaria due to natural rubber latex has been registered [4,5,6], rubber additives are still causing occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria [22]. Low-protein rubber gloves, vulcanization accelerator-free, or gloves containing antimicrobial agents or moisturizers new technologies are now available [22]. These gloves are useful for primary prevention among healthy workers in risk occupations, and among workers with already established skin problems in terms of secondary prevention. Unfortunately, these gloves may be more expensive than regular non-accelerator-free gloves as cheaper options gloves are usually not tested for allergy and may still contain both allergens and urticariogens. Table 8.4 shows an overview of some available accelerator-free gloves.
It is highly recommended that food handlers do not use natural rubber latex gloves, as latex proteins can be transferred to food [23, 24]. Subjects with known latex allergies can develop severe allergic reactions to foods handled by latex gloves [25]. The website of the American Latex Allergy Association provides an extensive list of alternative latex-free products at http://latexallergyresources.org/latex-free-products.
Moisturizers
A healthy skin assures protection against physical agents, chemicals, mechanical injuries, impact, light, UV radiation, cold, and heat. Extrinsic factors such as occupational exposure to chemical, physical, and mechanical exposures may threaten skin integrity and proper restoration leading to skin barrier disruption.
Skin barrier disruption leads to irritant contact dermatitis, facilitates the penetration of skin urticariogens and allergens with further sensitization. Proper use of moisturizers promotes regeneration and reparation of a disrupted skin barrier [27, 28] and contributes to keeping a healthy skin. A lipid-rich moisturizer free from fragrances and with preservatives and the lowest allergen potential is highly recommended [29].
Moderate evidence is available on preventive effect of the regular application of moisturizers to avoid the development of occupational contact dermatitis [10, 30]. Moreover, strong evidence, from high-quality independent studies, supports that the use of moisturizers before work (“pre-moisturizers”) may help to prevent the development of occupational contact dermatitis. However, the denomination “barrier cream” is highly discouraged as it may provide with a false feeling of full skin protection.
After a literature review focusing on primary prevention through the use of skin creams in healthy populations, an expert panel suggested three moments, for skin cream application to prevent irritant contact dermatitis in the workplace: before work; during work after hand washing; and after work [31]. This suggestion can be applied to all industrial sectors, with evidence drawn from different workplace scenarios such as hairdressers, food handlers, timber, building trade, machinists, and metalworkers.
More randomized controlled trials including long-term controlled observations as well as intervention studies in risk occupations are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this suggestion.
It has to be emphasized that proper use of gloves and moisturizers should not be a substitute elimination, substitution, and reduction of hazardous skin exposures through legislation, risk assessment, and training on health and safety at the workplace.
Secondary Prevention
The aim of secondary prevention is to provide workers with accessible facilities for early diagnosis and intervention to avoid disease progression. Thus, secondary prevention measures are implemented to detect and treat early stages of the disease, to prevent relapses or chronicity by improvement of hazardous workplace situations, behavioral change, and proper skin protection at both work and free time.
Unfortunately, a significant delay between the onset of work-related skin problems and seeking health care varying from 9 months [32] to more than 30 months [33] often leads to a poorer prognosis [34].
Chapter 10 presents the basics of a proper diagnosis of work-related and occupational dermatoses and will not be repeated here. An individual approach to the worker with occupational dermatosis should ensure timely and accurate diagnosis as well as a better prognosis if early diagnosis and interventions are possible [35].
As Fig. 8.2 shows notification and surveillance systems for work-related and occupational dermatoses are necessary for early intervention, to initiate diagnostic, treatment, and interventions at the workplace.
Tertiary Prevention Measures
The aim of tertiary prevention is medical, occupational, and psychosocial rehabilitation of workers with an established disease. These measures aim to facilitate social rehabilitation and quality of life of workers who are at risk of losing their jobs or even had already suffered job loss because of their occupational dermatoses. Experiences from Germany suggest that tertiary individual programs including psychological interventions contribute to improving mental health in patients with severe occupational hand eczema [36].
Knowledge dissemination by Interdisciplinary teams composed of dermatologists, occupational physicians, allergists, safety engineers, and health educators are necessary for effective measures in all levels of prevention [37].
Conclusion
The most effective preventive measures to prevent occupational dermatoses include legislation, elimination, substitution, and reduction of exposure to skin hazardous substances. When substitution, technical, and organizational measures are not feasible, skin protection by the terms of proper use of protective gloves and moisturizers is highly encouraged.
Continuous training and education will contribute not only to keeping a healthy skin in safe workplaces, but also to recognizing early signs of skin disease and facilitate rehabilitation. Hence, early diagnosis and intervention will prevent a relapse and chronic disease course. When an occupational disease is already established, measures aim to facilitate medical, occupational, social, economic compensation and psychological rehabilitation should be available.
The practical implementation of the already developed standards for the prevention of work-related and occupational skin diseases is essential for effective prevention.
References
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Occupational skin diseases and dermal exposure in the European Union (EU-25): Policy and practice review; 2008. Available at: https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/TE7007049ENC_skin_diseases. Accessed 20 Nov 2017.
Gordon RS Jr. An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Rep. 1983;98:107–9.
Alfonso JH, Bauer A, Bensefa-Colas L, et al. Minimum standards on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of occupational and work-related skin diseases in Europe – position paper of the COST action StanDerm (TD 1206). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(Suppl. 4):31–43.
Allmers H, Schmengler J, John SM. Decreasing incidence of occupational contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:347–51.
Bensefa-Colas L, Telle-Lamberton M, Faye S, et al. Occupational contact urticaria: lessons from the French National Network for occupational disease vigilance and prevention (RNV3P). Br J Dermatol. 2015;173:1453–61.
Turner S, McNamee R, Agius R, et al. Evaluating interventions aimed at reducing occupational exposure to latex and rubber glove allergens. Occup Environ Med. 2012;69:925–31.
Schwensen JF, Uter W, Bruze M, Svedman C, et a (2017). The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone: a European prospective study. Contact Dermatitis;76:272–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12733.
Julander A, Boman A, Johanson G, Lidén C. Occupational skin exposure to chemicals. Arbete och Hälsa (Work and Health) Scientific Serial. 2018; 52(3). http://hdl.handle.net/2077/56215. Accessed on 13 March 2022.
Voß H, Gediga G, Gediga K, et al. Secondary prevention of occupational dermatoses: first systematic evaluation of optimized dermatologist’s procedure and hierarchical multi-step intervention. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges J Ger Soc Dermatol. 2013;11:662–71.
Nicholson PJ, Llewellyn D, English JS, on behalf of the Guidelines Development Group. Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, identification and management of occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria. Contact Dermatitis. 2010;63:177–86.
Thyssen JP, Schuttelaar MLA, Alfonso JH, et al. Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14035. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34971008
Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work. OSHA. Available at https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Occupational_safety_and_health_risk_assessment_methodologies Last accessed 19 Mar 2022.
Wulfhorts R, John SM, Strunk M. Worker’s protection: gloves and cream. In: Duus Johansen J, Lepoittevin JP, Thyssen JP, editors. Quick guide to contact dermatitis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2016. p. 275–87.
Diepgen TL, Andersen KE, Chosidow O, et al (2015) Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and treatment of hand eczema--short version. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges J Ger Soc Dermatol JDDG; 13:77–85.
Oreskov KW, Søsted H, Johansen JD. Glove use among hairdressers: difficulties in the correct use of gloves among hairdressers and the effect of education. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:362–6. 215–220
Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Schwanitz HJ. Hand dermatitis in a prospectively followed cohort of hairdressing apprentices: final results of the POSH study. Prevention of occupational skin disease in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41:280–6.
English J, Aldridge R, Gawkrodger DJ, et al. Consensus statement on the management of chronic hand eczema. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009;34:761–9.
Held E, Mygind K, Wolff C, Gyntelberg F, Agner T. Prevention of work related skin problems: an intervention study in wet work employees. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:556–61.
Korinth G, Geh S, Schaller KH, Drexler H. In vitro evaluation of the efficacy of skin barrier creams and protective gloves on percutaneous absorption of industrial solvents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003;76:382–6.
Korinth G, Lüersen L, Schaller KH, et al. Enhancement of percutaneous penetration of aniline and o-toluidine in vitro using skin barrier creams. Toxicol Vitro Int J Publ Assoc BIBRA. 2008;22:812–8.
Korinth G, Weiss T, Penkert S, et al. (2007) percutaneous absorption of aromatic amines in rubber industry workers: impact of impaired skin and skin barrier creams. Occup Environ Med. 2007;64:366–72.
Crepy MN. Rubber: new allergens and preventive measures. E J Dermatol. 2016;26:523–30.
Beezhold DH, Kostyal DA, Wiseman JS. The transfer of protein allergens from latex gloves. A study of influencing factors. AORN. 1994;59:605–14.
Palosuo T, Antoniadou I, Gottrup F, Phillips P. Latex medical gloves: time for a reappraisal. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;156:234–46.
Bernardini R, Novembre E, Lombardi E, et al. Anaphylaxis to latex after ingestion of a cream-filled doughnut contaminated with latex. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:534–5.
Lind ML, Boman A, Sollenberg J, et al. Occupational dermal exposure to permanent hair dyes among hairdressers. Oxford J Ann Occup Hyg. 2005;49:473–80.
Held E, Agner T. Comparison between 2 test models in evaluating the effect of a moisturizer on irritated human skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:261–8.
Loden M, Andersson A. Effect of topically applied lipids on surfactant-irritated skin. Br J Dermatol. 1996;134:215–20.
Agner T, Held E. Skin protection programmes. Contact Dermatitis. 2002;47:253–6.
Winker R, Salameh B, Stolkovich S, et al. Effectiveness of skin protection creams in the prevention of occupational dermatitis: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82:653–62.
Hines J, Wilkinson SM, John SM, et al. The three moments of skin cream application: an evidence-based proposal for use of skin creams in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis in the workplace. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31:53–64.
Rusca C, Hinnen U, Elsner P. ‘Patient’s delay’ – analysis of the preclinical phase of occupational dermatoses. Dermatology. 1997;194:50–2.
Keegel T, Cahill J, Noonan A, Dharmage, et al. Incidence and prevalence rates for occupational contact dermatitis in an Australian suburban area. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;52(5):254–9.
DeKoven JG, DeKoven BM, Warshaw EM, et al. Occupational contact dermatitis: retrospective analysis of north American contact dermatitis group data, 2001 to 2016. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;86(4):782–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.03.042. Online ahead of print.
Houle MC, Holness DL, DeKoven J. Occupational contact dermatitis: an individualized approach to the worker with dermatitis. Curr Derm Rep. 2021;10:182–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-021-00339-0.
Breuer K, John SM, Finkeldey F, et al. Tertiary individual prevention improves mental health in patients with severe occupational hand eczema. J Eur Acad Derm. 2015;29:1724–31.
Wilke A, Bollmann U, Cazzaniga S, et al. The implementation of knowledge dissemination in the prevention of occupational skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(3):449–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.14653.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alfonso, J.H. (2023). International Standards for Prevention of Occupational Dermatoses. In: Giménez-Arnau, A.M., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Handbook of Occupational Dermatoses. Updates in Clinical Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22727-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22727-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-22726-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-22727-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)