Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ontology Integration by Semantic Mapping for Solving the Heterogeneity Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
International Conference on Information Systems and Intelligent Applications (ICISIA 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 550))

Abstract

In recent years, ontology integration has received an increased focus in ontology engineering. Ontology integration is a complex process that has some difficulties such as semantic heterogeneity. The goal of this research is to use semantic mapping to reduce integration complexity and solve semantic heterogeneity. What is ontology engineering? What difficulties haven't been solved until now by ontology integration? What is the effective role of semantic mapping in semantic heterogeneity? This research seeks to address these questions. The expected contribution of this research is to build a comprehensive view of ontology integration and support interoperability. The significance of using semantic mapping to improve interoperability on ontology integration is confirmed by researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ren G, Ding R, Li H (2019) Building an ontological knowledgebase for bridge maintenance. Adv Eng Softw 130:24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang X, Zanni-Merk C, Crémilleux B (2019) Enhancing Deep Learning with Semantics: an application to manufacturing time series analysis. Proc Comput Sci 159(2018):437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang J, Li H, Zhao Y, Ren G (2018) An ontology-based approach supporting holistic structural design with the consideration of safety, environmental impact and cost. Adv Eng Softw 115:26–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shang Z, Wang M, Su D (2018) Ontology based social life cycle assessment for product development. Adv Mech Eng 10(11):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karray MH, Ameri F, Hodkiewicz M, Louge T (2019) ROMAIN: towards a BFO compliant reference ontology for industrial maintenance. Appl Ontol 14(2):155–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Otte JN, Kiritsi D, Ali MM, Yang R, Zhang B, Rudnicki R, Rai R, Smith B (2019) An ontological approach to representing the product life cycle. Appl Ontol 14(2):179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Slimani T (2014) A study on ontologies and their classification. Recent Adv Electr Eng Educ Technol 2014:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed M, Romli A, Mohamed R (2021) Existing semantic ontology and its challenges for enhancing interoperability in IoT environment. In: 2021 International Conference on Software Engineering & Computer Systems and 4th International Conference on Computational Science and Information Management (ICSECS-ICOCSIM). IEEE, pp. 22–26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hobbs J, Fenn T (2019) The design of socially sustainable ontologies. Philos Technol 32(4):745–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mohd M, Bilo M, Louge T, Rai R, Hedi M (2020) Computers in industry ontology-based approach to extract product’s design features from online customers’ reviews. Comput Ind 116:103175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng H, Zeng P, Xue L, Shi Z, Wang P, Yu H (2016) Manufacturing ontology development based on Industry 4.0 demonstration production line. In: 2016 Third International Conference on Trustworthy Systems and their Applications (TSA), IEEE. pp 42–47

    Google Scholar 

  12. He Y, Hao C, Wang Y, Li Y, Wang Y, Huang L (2020) An ontology-based method of knowledge modelling for remanufacturing process planning. J Clean Prod 258:120952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi H, Rahmani T, Gerhard D (2013) An ontological approach for the integration of life cycle assessment into product data management systems. In: CIRP Design 2012. Springer, London, pp 249–256

    Google Scholar 

  14. AN MM, Romli A, Mohamed R (2021) Eco-ontology for supporting interoperability in product life cycle within product sustainability eco-ontology for supporting interoperability in product life cycle within product sustainability. In: IOP conference in series of materials science engineering

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammed M, Romli A, Mohamed R (2021) Using ontology to enhance decision-making for product sustainability in smart manufacturing. In: 2021 international conference on intelligent technology, system and service for internet of everything (ITSS-IoE). IEEE, pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  16. Okikiola FM, Ikotun AM, Adelokun AP, Ishola PE (2020) A systematic review of health care ontology. Asian J Res Comput Sci 5(1):15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Salman R (2020) Literature review to compare efficiency of various machine learning algorithms in predicting chronic kidney disease (CKD), pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ocker F, Vogel-Heuser B, Paredis CJJ (2022) A framework for merging ontologies in the context of smart factories. Comput Ind 135:103571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Babalou B, König-Ries S (2020) Towards building knowledge by merging multiple ontologies with co merger. arXiv Prepr 2020

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xue X, Yang C, Jiang C, Tsai P, Mao G, Zhu H (2021) Optimizing ontology alignment through linkage learning on entity correspondences. Complexity 1:2021

    Google Scholar 

  21. de Roode M, Fernández-Izquierdo A, Daniele L, Poveda-Villalón M, García-Castro R (2020) SAREF4INMA: a SAREF extension for the industry and manufacturing domain. Semantic Web 11(6):911–926

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li L (2018) China's manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0”. Technol Forecast Social Change 135:66–74

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xingsi X (2019) An automatic biomedical ontology meta-matching technique. J Netw Intell 4(3):109–113

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu H, Xue X, Jiang C, Ren H (2021) Multiobjective sensor ontology matching technique with user preference metrics. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput 2021:5594553

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xue X, Wang H, Zhang J, Huang Y, Li M, Zhu H (2021) Matching transportation ontologies with Word2Vec and alignment extraction algorithm. J Adv Transp 2021:4439861

    Google Scholar 

  26. Osman I, Yahia SB, Diallo G (2021) Ontology integration: approaches and challenging issues. Inf Fusion 71:38–63

    Google Scholar 

  27. Salamon JS, Reginato CC, Barcellos MP (2018) Ontology integration approaches: a systematic mapping. In: ONTOBRAS 2018, 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  28. Salamon JS, Reginato CC, Barcellos MP (2018) Ontology integration approaches: a systematic mapping. In: ONTOBRAS, pp 161–172

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohammed M, Romli A, Mohamed R (2021) Eco-design based on ontology: Historical evolution and research trends. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2339, AIP Publishing LLC

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fernández-Izquierdo A, García-Castro R (2022) Ontology verification testing using lexico-syntactic patterns. Inf Sci 582:89–113

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Tartir S, Arpinar IB, Sheth AP (2010) Ontological evaluation and validation. In: Theory and applications of ontology: Computer applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 115–130

    Google Scholar 

  32. Berners-Lee T, Chen Y, Chilton L, et al (2006) Tabulator: exploring and analyzing linked data on the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international semantic web user interaction workshop, vol. 2006, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fonseca FT, Egenhofer MJ, Davis CA, Borges KAV (2000) Ontologies and knowledge sharing in urban GIS. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24(3):251–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lemaignan S, Siadat A, Dantan JY, Semenenko A (2006) MASON: a proposal for an ontology of manufacturing domain. In: IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems: Collective Intelligence and Its Applications (DIS'06). IEEE, pp 195–200

    Google Scholar 

  35. Aldana-montes JMJF (2011) Evaluation of two heuristic approaches to solve the ontology meta-matching problem. Knowl Inf Syst 26(2):225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hooi YK, Hassan MF, Shariff AM (2014) A survey on ontology mapping techniques. Adv Comput Sci Appl 2014:829–836

    Google Scholar 

  37. Raunich S, Rahm E (2012) Towards a benchmark for ontology merging. In: OTM Confederated International Conferences “On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems”. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 124–133

    Google Scholar 

  38. Konys A (2018) Knowledge systematization for ontology learning methods. Proc Comput Sci 126:2194–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gracia J, Kernerman I, Bosque-Gil J (2017) Toward linked data-native dictionaries. In: Electronic Lexicography in the 21st Century: Lexicography from Scratch. Proceedings of the eLex 2017 conference, pp 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lv Y, Xie C (2010) A framework for ontology integration and evaluation. In: 2010 third international conference on intelligent networks and intelligent systems. IEEE, pp 521–524

    Google Scholar 

  41. Châabane S, Jaziri W, Gargouri F (2009) A proposal for a geographic ontology merging methodology. In: 2009 International Conference on the Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT). IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pileggi SF, Crain H, Yahia SB (2020) An ontological approach to knowledge building by data integration. In: International Conference on Computational Science. Springer, Cham, pp 479–493

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stoilos G, Stamou G, Kollias S (2005) A string metric for ontology alignment. In: International semantic web conference. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 624–637

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ju SP, Esquivel HE, Rebollar AM, Su MC (2011) CreaDO—A methodology to create domain ontologies using parameter-based ontology merging techniques. In: 2011 10th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IEEE, pp 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cheatham M, Pesquita C (2017) Semantic data integration. In: Handbook of big data technologies. Springer, Cham, pp 263–305

    Google Scholar 

  46. Solimando A, Guerrini G, Jiménez-ruiz E (2017) Minimizing conservativity violations in ontology alignments: algorithms and evaluation. Knowl Inf Syst 51(3):775–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Petrov P, Krachunov M, Todorovska E, Vassilev D (2012) An intelligent system approach for integrating anatomical ontologies: an intelligent system approach for integrating anatomical. Biotechnol Equip 26(4):3173–3181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ndip-agbor E, Cao J, Ehmann K (2018) Towards smart manufacturing process selection in cyber-physical systems. Manuf Lett 17:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kumar J, Reddy S (2013) Implementation of ontology matching using Protégé. Int J Comput Appl Technol Res 2(6):723–725

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported in this study is conducted by the researchers at University Malaysia Pahang (UMP), it is funded by FRGS/1/2018/TK10/UMP/02/3 grant. The researchers would like to thank Ministry of Higher Education and UMP for supporting this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Computing, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pahang, Malaysia

    Moseed Mohammed, Awanis Romli & Rozlina Mohamed

Authors
  1. Moseed Mohammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Awanis Romli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rozlina Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moseed Mohammed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The British University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Mostafa Al-Emran

  2. Sunway University, Selangor, Malaysia

    Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi

  3. The British University in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    Khaled Shaalan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mohammed, M., Romli, A., Mohamed, R. (2023). Ontology Integration by Semantic Mapping for Solving the Heterogeneity Problem. In: Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M.A., Shaalan, K. (eds) International Conference on Information Systems and Intelligent Applications. ICISIA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 550. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16865-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation