Skip to main content

Application of Kohonen Maps in Predicting and Characterizing VAT Fraud in a Sub-Saharan African Country

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Self-Organizing Maps, Learning Vector Quantization, Clustering and Data Visualization (WSOM+ 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 533))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes the use Self-Organizing Maps (or Kohonen Networks) in helping to detect Value Added Tax (VAT) fraud. The sub-Saharan African Country presented as a case study has had its largest share in tax revenues since the introduction of VAT, nearly two decades ago, but still has a relatively modest tax efficiency when compared to European or worldwide standards. This trend can be reversed by strengthening the audit and inspection processes of its Revenue Authority (RA) with Data Mining, taking advantage of historical data stored by different information systems. A Case Study in the southern region of this country is presented, where historical data available from tax audits are compared with the VAT returns using Kohonen Maps. Comparing the experimental results with other anomaly detection algorithms, Kohonen maps prove to be of great value in predicting and characterizing VAT fraud in this case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Approximately 0.44% of the taxpayers, among which 91.6% are positive cases of fraud, typically unbalanced and biased dataset [29].

  2. 2.

    Samples from other VAT regimes or with invalid/non-existent TIN are excluded.

  3. 3.

    States that once registered as a positive case of fraud, the Taxpayer tends to relapse into fraudulent practices in future fiscal years.

  4. 4.

    https://github.com/JustGlowing/minisom/.

References

  1. Hajdúchová, I., sedltačiková, M., Viszlat, I.: Value-added tax impact on the state budget expenditures and incomes. Procedia Econ. Finance, 34, 676–681 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G.: Pattern Classification, 2nd edn., pp. 1–19. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Krever, R.: VAT in Africa, pp. 71–80. Pretoria University Law Press, Pretoria (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. La Feria, R., Schoeman, A.: Addressing VAT fraud in developing countries: the tax policy-administration symbiosis. Intertax 47(11), 950–967 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. IMF: Digital Revolutions in Public Finance (2017). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484315224.071. Accessed 25 May 2021

  6. Mwanza, M., Phiri, J.: Fraud detection on bulk tax data using business intelligence data mining tool: a case of Zambia revenue authority. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Commun. Eng. 5(3), 793–798 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Roux, D., Pérez, B., Moreno, A., Villamtl, M.D.P., Figueroa, C.: Tax fraud detection for under-reporting declarations using an unsupervised machine learning approach. In: KDD, 19–23 August 2018, London, UK, pp. 215–222 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jihal, H., Talhaou, M.A., Daif, A., Azzouazi, M.: Predictive analytics as a service on moroccan tax evasion. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 7(432), 90–92 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jupri, M., Sarno, R.: Data mining, fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS for optimizing taxpayer supervision. Indonesian J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 18(1), 75–87 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kohonen, T.: Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43(1), 59–69 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00337288

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wendel, J., Buttenfield, B.: Formalizing guidelines for building meaningful self-organizing maps. In: GIScience 2010: Sixth international conference on Geographic Information Science. Zurich, 14-17th September (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tu, L.A., Thai, V.D., Hoan, N.Q.: Improving feature map quality of SOM based on adjusting the neighborhood function. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. (IJCSIS) 14(9), 1–6 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohonen, T., Schroeder, M.R., Huang, T.S.: Self-Organizing Maps, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Ultsch, A: U*-Matrix: a Tool to visualize Clusters in high dimensional Data. DataBionics Research Lab, Department of Computer Science University of Marburg, Technical report no. 36 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Serrano-Cinca C.: Let Financial Data Speak for Themselves. In: Deboeck, G., Kohonen, T. (eds.) Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-Organizing Maps. Springer Finance. Springer, London. pp. 3–18 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3913-3_1

  16. Kiviluoto, K., Bergius, P.: Maps for analyzing failures of small and medium-sized enterprises. In: Deboeck, G., Kohonen, T. (eds.) Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-Organizing Maps. Springer Finance. Springer, London. pp. 59-71 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3913-3_4

  17. Tian, J., Azarian, M.H., Pecht, M.: Anomaly detection using self-organizing maps-based k-nearest neighbor algorithm. In: PHM Society European Conference, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–4 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Steinhaus, H.: Sur la division des corps matériels en parties. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 4(12), 801–804 (1957)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Fix, E., Hodges, J.L.: Discriminatory Analysis. Consistency Properties. USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Randolph Field, Texas, Nonparametric Discrimination (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Breunig, M.M., Kriegel, H., NG, R.T., Sander, J. : LOF: identifying density-based local outliers. In: SIGMOD Rec, vol. 29, 2 June, pp. 93-104 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schölkopf, B., Williamson, R.C., Smola, A.J., Shawe-Tay, J., PLATT, J.C.: Support vector method for novelty detection. In: NIPS 1999 Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, November, pp. 582–588 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cnossen, S.: Mobilizing VAT revenues in African countries. Int. Tax Public Fin. 22(6), 1077–1108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-015-9348-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, R., Ou, C.S., Lin, H., Chang, S., Yen, D.C.: Using data mining technique to enhance tax evasion detection performance. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 8769–8777 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Basta, S., et al.: High quality true-positive prediction for fiscal fraud detection. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vanhoeyveld, J., Martens, D., Peeters, B.: Value-added tax fraud detection with scalable anomaly detection techniques. Appl. Soft Comput. J. 8640, 1–20 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mittal, S., Reich, O., Mahajan, A.: Who is bogus? using one-sided labels to identify fraudulent firms from tax returns. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, in COMPASS 2018. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 24:1–24:11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Matos, T., Macedo, J.A.F., Monteiro, J.M.: An empirical method for discovering tax fraudsters: a real case study of Brazilian fiscal evasion. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Database Engineering No. 38, Applications Symposium, in IDEAS 2015. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 41-48 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pironet, M.: Classification for Fraud Detection with Social Network Analysis. Master’s Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico. Department of Computer Engineering. Master in Informatics and Computer Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guarascio, M.: Data Mining Techniques for Fraud Detection. Ph. D thesis, Universitádella Calabria. Dipartimento di Elletronica, Informatica e Sistemistica. Dottorato di Ricerca in Ingegneria dei Sistemi e Informatica. Ciclo XXII (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Santos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A - Component Maps

Appendix A - Component Maps

Fig. 2.
figure 2

Case study components maps.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Santos, R., Moura, R., Lobo, V. (2022). Application of Kohonen Maps in Predicting and Characterizing VAT Fraud in a Sub-Saharan African Country. In: Faigl, J., Olteanu, M., Drchal, J. (eds) Advances in Self-Organizing Maps, Learning Vector Quantization, Clustering and Data Visualization. WSOM+ 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 533. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15444-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics