Abstract
Biopsy and histological evaluation are safe and affordable ways to determine the nature, extent, and severity of oral lesions. In this chapter, we review the indications, contraindications, surgical techniques, and care in performing an oral biopsy. We also emphasize the importance of correctly sending the sample to the pathology laboratory for histopathological examination, directing the clinician to the appropriate treatment of these oral diseases.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
The word “biopsy”, from the Greek Bios (life) and Opsis (sight), was created by the French dermatologist Ernest Besnier in 1879 to designate procedures consisting of the removal of a fragment of living tissue to study its histological characteristics for diagnostic purposes.
Initially, the patient should be informed about the following points:
-
The request for a biopsy does not mean suspicion of cancer.
-
Biopsy is a relatively simple procedure that is usually performed under local anesthesia in the dental office. In children, general anesthesia may be needed.
-
The size and location from which the sample will be removed are important.
-
The sample will be sent to an oral pathology laboratory, and the oral pathologist will perform a thorough analysis of the samples with the naked eye (macroscopy) and under the microscope (microscopy).
1 General Aspects
-
The time to arrive at a diagnosis may vary. It is not an automated diagnosis printed quickly by a machine.
-
The activity requires years of professional trainning, experience and study to interpret the cells and issue their opinion through a histopathological report.
-
Chemical processes for tissue preservation and staining and cutting will be performed so that histological slides can be analyzed.
-
The slides and the sample are safely stored for a certain period to aid in future treatments, prognostic information, or even scientific research.
-
The oral pathologist usually correlates clinical data with microscopic analysis to determine the disease in question, contributing to the choice of the best treatment for the patient.
-
In the oral and maxillofacial region, a biopsy is contraindicated in situations where:
-
The patient has complex systemic diseases.
-
The clinical diagnosis is sufficient.
-
The lesion regresses or disappears after 2 weeks of clinical follow-up.
-
The lesion shows a probable high-flow vascular origin.
-
The lesion is in the major salivary gland, producing an extraoral volume increase.
-
-
Oral biopsies are indicated in situations where:
-
The lesion shows clinical features of malignancy.
-
The lesion without apparent etiology persists for more than 2 weeks.
-
The lesion of inflammatory origin does not respond to local treatment.
-
The lesion produces progressive growth in volume.
-
The lesion interferes with local function.
-
The intraosseous lesion cannot be diagnosed radiographically.
-
-
There are two types of biopsies. The excisional biopsy (Fig. 1) consists of the total removal of the lesion, is usually indicated for clinically benign lesions, is pedunculated, and is smaller than 2 cm. An incisional biopsy consists of the removal of part of the lesion and is indicated mainly in lesions with suspected malignancy or larger than 2 cm.
2 Instruments and Materials
-
The materials usually used are gauze, suture thread, scalpel blade, short or long needle (selected according to the anesthetic technique of choice), surgical suction device, table and fenestrated drapes, focus protector, surgical gloves, chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% (alcohol-free), and povidone-iodine (or 2% chlorhexidine) for extraoral antisepsis and saline solution.
-
Instruments such as curettes, chisels, or motor-driven surgical burs should be used only in cases of intraosseous lesions. Every intraosseous lesion, should be submitted previously to exploratory aspiration to rule out the possibility of a vascular lesion, a situation in which biopsy in an ambulatory environment should be avoided.
-
In the case of very small biopsies, it is suggested to place them on filter paper before introducing them into the vial. This procedure guarantees a better orientation of the fragments, facilizing their manipulation in the laboratory (Fig. 2).
-
Biopsy container containing 10% buffered formaldehyde should be properly identified and sent to the oral pathology laboratory (Fig. 3). In cases of multiple lesions in different locations of the oral cavity, when removed, they should be packaged in different biopsy containers, which should be properly identified through a label containing the name of the patient and the location of the fragment removed.
-
The arsenal to perform the biopsy and the choice of the most appropriate instrument is mainly related to the nature and location of the lesion and the experience of the professional.
3 Guidelines
-
Incisional biopsy are mandatory in the suspicion of malignant tumors.
-
Make an incision that is preferably elliptical or wedge-shaped to facilitate suturing and deep enough to include enough tissue for analysis.
-
Perilesional tissue have to be included to ensure the inclusion of healthy tissue in the analysis of vesiculobullous lesion samples.
-
Involve multiple areas in heterogeneous lesions (with leukoplakia and erythroplakia areas, for example) because histological features may vary in these regions.
-
Avoid areas of necrosis.
-
Never split the sample to send to two different pathologists.
-
Be careful when manipulating the tissues, avoiding traumatizing them with forceps and/or sucker (Figs. 4 and 5).
4 Surgical Technique
-
Place the tissue immediately into a sample container with a volume of formalin 20 times the size of the sample.
-
Photographic documentation of the lesion (more details in Chap. 2) and election of the area to be removed.
-
Preparation of the surgical field.
-
Local anesthesia.
-
Incision and manipulation of the removed sample (Fig. 6).
-
Removal of excess blood with gauze without macerating the tissue.
-
Suturing the surgical wound.
5 Bone Biopsy
Intraosseous lesions that do not allow a radiographic clinical diagnosis may also be submitted to incisional or excisional biopsy (Fig. 7). The decision will depend on the size of the lesion and the diagnostic hypotheses. After the evaluation of imaging exams (radiographs and computed tomography), the best surgical access is chosen (region of least resistance), followed by incision and detachment of soft tissues until the bone is exposed, proceeding with the removal of any remaining cortical bone (which should not be included in the same specimen container as the material to be examined) and collection of intraosseous pathological tissue, finishing with suture.
6 Information Shared with the Oral Pathologist
The oral medicinist or oral & maxillofacial surgeon must send the clinical information to the oral pathology laboratory, including at least the full name and date of birth of the patient, the description of the clinical and/or radiographic appearance of the lesion, the clinical hypotheses of diagnosis, and a brief medical history of the patient, including consumption of medication, alcohol, and tobacco. Sending clinical photos and radiographic exams contributes to a better clinicopathological correlation. The information can be sent in the histopathological exam request form along with the specimen container containing the sample or digitally by e-mail or smartphone apps.
Sources
Avon SL, Klieb HB. Oral soft-tissue biopsy: an overview. J Can Dent Assoc. 2012;78:c75.
Chen S, Forman M, Sadow PM, August M. The diagnostic accuracy of incisional biopsy in the Oral cavity. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(5):959–64.
Golden DP, Hooley JR. Oral mucosal biopsy procedures. Excisional and incisional. Dent Clin N Am. 1994;38(2):279–300.
Handlers JP. Diagnosis and management of oral soft-tissue lesions: the use of biopsy, toluidine blue staining, and brush biopsy. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2001;29(8):602–6.
Mota-Ramírez A, Silvestre FJ, Simó JM. Oral biopsy in dental practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12(7):E504–10.
Pérez-DE-Oliveira ME, Heerden WV, Motta ACF, Rodrigues-Fernandes CI, Romañach MJ, Agostini M, Gueiros LAM, Vargas PA, Lopes MA, Ribeiro ACP, Brandão TB, Almeida OP, Khurram SA, Santos-Silva AR. The need for communication between clinicians and pathologists in the context of oral and maxillofacial diseases. Braz Oral Res. 2022;36:e008. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0008. PMID: 35081226.
Sardiña LA, Pinto A, Elston CA, Bergfeld WF, Stojanov IJ. Oral and maxillofacial disease: a model for interprofessional education and care. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020;130(5):471–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2020.04.812. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
Acknowledgments
The São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP, São Paulo, Brazil, grant number JFS 19/09419-0), the Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, grant number JCN 272817), and the Coordination of Training of Higher Education Graduate Foundation (CAPES, Brasilia, Brazil, finance code 001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Romañach, M.J., Rocha, A.C., Fonseca, F.P., Scarini, J.F., Innocentini, L.M.A.R., Agostini, M. (2023). Biopsy of the Oral Mucosa and Histological Assessment. In: Santos-Silva, A.R., Lopes, M.A., Scarini, J.F., Vargas, P.A., Almeida, O.P.d. (eds) Clinical Decision-Making in Oral Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14945-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14945-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14944-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14945-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)