Abstract
This chapter looks at a relatively new area of disability and communication: AI. It contends that discourses, language, and representation of disability in relation to AI need to be understood against the backdrop of evolving ideas of disability and technology. It critiques the dominant social imaginaries of AI and disability, which obscure the flaws in the mainstream ways that autonomous intelligent systems such as AI developed. The chapter concludes that AI and its dominant social imaginaries are in the throes of a severe crisis of legitimacy. Accordingly, alternative imaginaries are discussed as ways to reimagine and remake AI, machine learning, intelligent systems, and other technologies as sustainable, just, and conducive to the goals of extending accessibility, inclusion, participation, and rights for people with disabilities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alper, M. (2015). Augmentative, alternative, and assistive: Reimagining the history of mobile computing and disability. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 37(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2015.3
Alper, M. (2017). Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality. MIT Press.
Alper, M. (2019). Future talk: Accounting for the technological and other future discourses in daily life. International Journal of Communication, 13, 715–735. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9678
Bennett, C., & Keyes, O. (2020). What is the point of fairness?: Disability, AI and the complexity of justice. ACM SIGACCESS: Accessibility and Computing, 125(article 5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386296.3386301
Blanck, P. (2021). On the importance of the Americans with Disabilities Act at 30. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073211036900
Bostad, I., & Hanisch, H. (2016). Freedom and disability rights: Dependence, independence, and interdependence. Metaphilosophy, 47(3), 71–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12192
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton & Company.
Bunch, M., Johnson, M., Moro, S.S., Adams, M.S., & Sergio, L. (2021). Virtual reality hope machines in a curative imaginary: Recommendations for neurorehabilitation research from a critical disability studies perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1982024
Chennat, S. (Ed.). (2019). Disability inclusion and inclusive education. Springer.
Couldry, N., Rodriguez, C., Bolin, G., Cohen, J., Volkmer, I., Goggin, G., Kraidy, M., Iwabuchi, K., Qiu, J. L., Wasserman, H., Zhao, Y., Rincón, O., Magallanes-Blanco, C., Thomas, P. N., Koltsova, O., Rakhmani, I., & Lee, K.-S. (2018). Media, communication and the struggle for social progress. Global Media and Communication, 14(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766518776679
Crawford, K. (2021). The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Danforth, S., & Gabel, S. L. (Eds.). (2016). Vital questions facing disability studies in education (2nd ed.). Peter Lang.
Deitz, S., Lobben, A., & Alferez, A. (2021). Squeaky wheels: Missing data, disability, and power in the smart city. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211047735
Delgado, M. R. (2019). Disability in the fourth industrial revolution. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 61(9), 993. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14296
Dengel, A., Devillers, L., & Schaal, L. M. (2021). Augmented human and human-machine co-evolution: Efficiency and ethics. In B. Braunschweig & M. Ghallab (Eds.), Reflections on Artificial Intelligence for humanity (pp. 203–227). Springer.
Digital Asia Hub. (2017). AI in Asia: AI for Social Good. Conference, March 6–7, Waseda University. https://www.digitalasiahub.org/2017/02/27/ai-in-asia-ai-for-social-good/
Donner, J. (2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile Internet. MIT Press.
Elliott, A. (2019). The culture of AI: Everyday life and the digital revolution. Routledge.
Fazelpour, S., & Danks, D. (2021). Algorithmic bias: Senses, sources, solutions. Philosophy Compass, 16(8), e12760. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12760
Fielden, S. L., Moore, M. E., & Bend, G. L. (Eds.). (2020). Palgrave handbook of disability at work. Palgrave.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2020). How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00213-5
French, S., & Corker, M. (Eds.). (1999). Disability discourse. Open University Press.
Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (2019). “Not dead yet”: Changing disability imaginaries in the twenty-first century. In V. Das & C. Han (Eds.), Living and dying in the contemporary world (pp. 525–541). University of California Press.
Goggin, G. (2017). Communications rights, disability, and law: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in national perspective. Law in Context, 35(2), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.26826/law-in-context.v35i2.21
Goggin, G. (2021). Apps: From mobile phones to digital lives. Polity.
Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Rowman & Littlefield.
Goggin, G., Yu, H., Fisher, K. R., & Li, B. (2019). Disability, technology innovation and social development in China and Australia. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 12(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2018.1492067
Google. (n.d.-a). AI for Social Good. Retrieved February 25, 2022, from https://ai.google/social-good/
Google. (n.d.-b). Project Euphonia. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://sites.research.google/euphonia/about/.
Grue, J. (2015). Disability and discourse analysis. Routledge.
Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K. (2019). Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst, 5(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607
Hendren, S. (2020). What can a body do? Riverhead Books.
Hofmann, M., Kasnitz, D., Mankoff, J., & Bennett, C.L. (2020). Living disability theory: Reflections on access, research, and design. In T. Guerreiro, H. Nicolau, & K. Moffatt (Eds.), 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1-13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416996
Intel. (n.d.). AI for Good. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/artificial-intelligence/ai4socialgood.html
ITU. (2021a). Artificial Intelligence for good. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/backgrounders/Pages/artificial-intelligence-for-good.aspx
ITU. (2021b). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2021. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2021/
Jasanoff, S. (2015). Imagined and invented worlds. In S. Jasanoff & S.-H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 321–341). University of Chicago Press.
Katz, J., Floyd, J., & Schiepers, K. (Eds.). (2021). Perceiving the future through new communication technologies: Robots, AI and everyday life. Springer
Kittay, E. F. (2011). The ethics of care, dependence, and disability. Ratio Juris, 24(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9337.2010.00473.x
Kögel, J., & Wolbring, G. (2020). What it takes to be a pioneer: Ability expectations from brain-computer interface users. Nanoethics, 14, 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-020-00378-0
Kurzweil, R. (2003). The future of intelligent technology and its impact on disabilities. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness., 97(10), 582–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X0309701002
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin.
Lanzara, G. F. (2016). Shifting practices: Reflections on technology, practices, and innovation. MIT Press.
Lazar, J., & Stein, M.A. (Eds.) (2017). Disability, human rights, and information technology. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lazar, J., Goldstein, D., & Taylor, A. (2015). Ensuring digital accessibility through process and policy. Morgan Kaufmann.
Lillywhite, A., & Wolbring, G. (2020). Coverage of artificial intelligence and machine learning within academic literature, Canadian newspapers, and Twitter tweets: The case of disabled people. Societies, 10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10010023
Lillywhite, A., & Wolbring, G. (2021). Coverage of ethics within the artificial intelligence and machine learning academic literature: The case of disabled people. Assistive Technology, 33(3), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2019.1593259
Ling, R. S. (2012). Taken for grantedness: The embedding of mobile communication into society. MIT Press.
Mansell, R. (2015). Imaginaries, values, and trajectories: A critical reflection on the Internet. In G. Goggin & M. McLelland (Eds.), Routledge companion to global Internet histories (pp. 23–33). Routledge.
Mansell, R., & Raboy, M. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of global media policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Microsoft. (n.d.). Seeing AI: An app for visually impaired people that narrates world around you. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/garage/wall-of-fame/seeing-ai/
Mills, M. (2022). Hearing loss and the history of information theory. Duke University Press.
Morris, J., Thompson, N., Lippincott, B., & Lawrence, M. (2019). Accessibility User Research Collective: Engaging consumers in ongoing technology evaluation. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 13(1), 38–56.
Morris, M. R. (2020). AI and accessibility. Communications of the ACM, 63(6), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3356727
Nakada, M., Kavathatzopoulos, I., & Asai, R. (2021). Robots and AI artifacts in plural perspective(s) of Japan and the West: The cultural–ethical traditions behind people’s views on robots and AI artifacts in the information era. Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 15, 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12626-021-00067-8
Nakamura, K. (2019). My algorithms have determined you’re not human: AI-ML, Reverse Turing Tests, and the disability experience. In J. P. Bigham (Ed.), ASSETS ’19: The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353812
Park, S., & Humphry, J. (2019). Exclusion by design: Intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 934–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606266
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Pasquale, F. (2020). New laws of robotics. Harvard University Press.
Pathakji, N. (2018). Corporations and disability rights: Bridging the digital divide. Oxford University Press.
Pullin, G. (2009). Design meets disability. MIT.
Roberge, J., & Castelle, M., Eds. (2021). The cultural life of machine learning: An incursion into critical AI studies. Springer.
Roulstone, A. (2016). Disability and technology: An interdisciplinary and international approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sætra, H. S. (2021). AI in context and the Sustainable Development Goals: Factoring in the unsustainability of the sociotechnical system. Sustainability, 13(4), 1738. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041738
Samsung. (2021). Accessibility for everyone. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://www.design.samsung.com/global/contents/accessibility_design/
Sandry, E. (2020). Interdependence in collaboration with robots. In K. Ellis, G. Goggin, B. Haller, & R. Curtis (Eds.), Routledge companion to disability and media (pp. 316–326). Routledge.
Shuttleworth, R., & Meekosha, H. (2013). The sociological imaginary and disability enquiry in late modernity. Critical Sociology, 39(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511435709
Smith, B. (2018, May 7). Using AI to empower people with disabilities. Microsoft on the Issues blog. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2018/05/07/using-ai-to-empower-people-with-disabilities/
Sterne, J. (2021). Diminished faculties: A political phenomenology of impairment. Duke University Press.
Titchkosky, T. (2019). Disability imaginaries in the news. In K. Ellis, G. Goggin, B. Haller, & R. Curtis (Eds.), Routledge companion to disability and media (pp. 13–22). Routledge.
Tkaczyk, V., Mills, M., & Hui, A. (Eds.). (2020). Testing hearing: The making of modern aurality. Oxford University Press.
Tomašev, C. J., Hutter, F., Mohamed, S., Picciariello, A., Connelly, B., Belgrave, D. C. M., Ezer, D., van der Haert, F. C., Mugisha, F., Abila, G., Arai, H., Almiraat, H., Proskurnia, J., Snyder, K., Otake-Matsuura, M., Othman, M., Glasmachers, T., de Wever, W., et al. (2020). AI for social good: Unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nature Communications, 11(1), 2468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15871-z
Treviranus, J. (2016). The future challenge of the ADA: Shaping humanity’s transformation. Inclusion, 4(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.1.30
Treviranus, J. (2019). The value of being different. In A. Hurst & C. Duartes (Eds.), W4A ’19: Proceedings of the 16th International Web for All Conference (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1145/3315002.3332429
Turner, D. M., Bohata, K., & Thompson, S. (2017). Introduction. Special issue. Disability, work and representation: New perspectives. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i4.6101
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. UNESCO. Document code: SHS/BIO/REC-AIETHICS/2021. UNESCO. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455
Wald, M. (2020). AI data-driven personalisation and disability inclusion. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5(571955), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.571955
Whittaker, M., Alper, M., Bennett, C.L., Hendren, S., Kaziunas, L., Mills, M., Morris, M. R., Rankin, J., Rogers, E., Salas, M., & West, S. M. (2019). Disability, bias, and AI. AI Now Institute, New York University. Retrieved March 22, 2022, from https://ainowinstitute.org/disabilitybiasai-2019.pdf
Williamson, B. (2019). Accessible America: A history of disability and design. New York University Press.
Wolbring, G. (2016). Employment, disabled people and robots: What is the narrative in the academic literature and Canadian newspapers? Societies, 6(15), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020015
Wolbring, G., & Yumakulov, S. (2014). Social robots: Views of staff of a disability service organization. International Journal of Social Robotics, 6, 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-014-0229-z
Yumakulov, S., Yergens, D., & Wolbring, G. (2012). Imagery of disabled people within social robotics research. In S. S. Ge, O. Khatib, J.-J. Cabibihan, R. Simmons, & M.-A. Williams (Eds.), Social robotics. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, ICSR 2012, Chengdu, China, October 29–31, 2012 (pp. 168–177). Springer.
Zajko, M. (2021). Conservative AI and social inequality: Conceptualizing alternatives to bias through social theory. AI & Society, 36, 1047–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01153-9
Acknowledgments
Research for this chapter has been supported by a 2019–2021 NTU Start-Up Grant for the project Smart Equalities, as well as a Micron-NTU Institute of Technology for Humanity (NISTH) Responsible AI grant for the project Designing AI to Stop Disability Bias. Thanks to Jocelyn Tay for her research assistance on disability and AI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goggin, G., Prahl, A., Zhuang, K.V. (2023). Communicating AI and Disability. In: Jeffress, M.S., Cypher, J.M., Ferris, J., Scott-Pollock, JA. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disability and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14447-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14447-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14446-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14447-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)