Abstract
A novel understanding of mountain science is afforded with an innovative approach of the convergent, transdisciplinary mountain science. Unlike past understandings of the physical environment influenced by altitude and harsh meteorological conditions, montological approaches incorporate social dimensions to understand mountains as socioecological production landscapes. The crosscutting of disciplinary silos and the integrative nature of noetics and consilience help to create a modern framework with decolonial scholarship to grapple with challenging realities of the binaries of globalization, such as North-South, rich-poor, urban-rural, and other dualism that frame sustainable and regenerative development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sus- tainability and for the sustainable development goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 73–83.
Avriel-Avni, N., & Dick, J. (2019). Differing perceptions of socio-ecological systems: Insights for future trans- disciplinary research. Advances in Ecological Research, 60, 153–190.
Baer, H. and Singer, M. 2014. The anthropology of climate change: An integrated critical perspective. Advances in Climate Change Research. New York: Routledge.
Bandyopadhyay, J. & Perveen, S. (2004). Moving the mountains up in the global environmental agenda. OP-CDEP 3. Center for Development and Environment Policy (CDEP). Calcutta: Indian Institute of Management.
Bernbaum, E. (2022). Sacred Mountains of the world. Cambridge University Press.
Bernstein, J. H. 2015. Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice 11(1): Article R1. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/510/412. Accessed 28 Nov 2021.
Boillat, S. (2020). Decolonizing ecological knowledge: Transdisciplinary ecology, place making and cognitive justice in the Andes. In The Elgar companion to geography, transdisciplinarity and sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Borsdorf, A., & Stadel, C. (2016). The Andes: A geographical portrait. Springer.
Bradley, S. (2014). Design principles: Visual perception and the principles of gestalt. Smashing Magazine, March 28.
Carey, M. (2010). In the shadow of melting glaciers: Climate change and Andean society. Oxford University Press.
Castree, N. (2017). Unfree radicals: Geoscientists, the Anthropocene, and left politics. Antipode, 49(S1), 52–74.
Clement, C. R., & Cassino, M. F. (2018). Landscape domestication and archaeology. In C. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of global archaeology. Springer-Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51726-1_817-2
Debarbieux, B. (2008). Le montagnard: imaginaires de la terrotorialité et invention d’un type humain. Annales de géographie, 660, 90–115.
Debarbieux, B., & Rudaz, G. (2015). The mountain: A political history from the enlightenment to the present. University of Chicago Press.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.
Edelson, D. C. (2011). Geo-literacy. National Geographic Education. March 25 (revised May 28, 2014).
Fairclough, S. (1982). The mountain environment collection of M.I.T.’s Dewey Library and Associated Bibliographies. Manuscript.
Gregory, D. (1994). Geographical imaginations. Blackwell.
GTZ. (1974). Münchener Konferenzbericht (Vol. 1, p. 186). GTZ.
Haller, A., & Branca, D. (2020). Montology: A mountain perspective on transdisciplinary research and sustainable development. Journal of High Andean Research, 22(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.18271/ria.2020.193
Hansson, D. (2012). Unpacking Spinoza: Sustainability education outside of the Cartesian box. Journal of Sustainability Education, 3, 1–17.
Haslett, J. R. (1998). A new science: Montology. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters, 7, 228–229.
Ives, J.D. (ed.). 1980. Geoecology of the Colorado Front Range: A study of Alpine and Subalpine environments. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ives, J. D. (2005). Himalayan misconceptions and distortions. What are the facts? Himalayan Journal of Science, 3(5), 15–25.
Ives, J. D. (2013). Sustainable mountain development: Getting the facts right. Himalayan Association for the Advancement of Science.
Ives, J. D., & Messerli, B. (1989). The Himalayan dilemma: Reconciling development and conservation. Routledge.
Ives, J. D., Messerli, B., & Sarmiento, F. O. (2016). Obituary for a mountain champion: Lawrence Hamilton, 1925–2016. Mountain Research and Development, 36(4), 569–570.
Jodha, N. S. (2003). La Agricultura de Montaña. In F. O. Sarmiento (Ed.), Montañas del Mundo: Una Prioridad Global con Perspectivas Latinoamericanas (pp. 403–428). CEPEIGE – Ediciones Abya-Yala.
Kakalis, C., & Goetsch, E. (Eds.). (2018). Mountain, mobilities and movement. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.
Lewis, M. W., & Wigen, K. (1997). The myth of continents: A critique of metageography. University of California Press.
Lima, M. (2013). The book of trees: Visualizing branches of knowledge. Princeton Architectural Press.
Ludwig, D., & Poliseli, L. (2018). Relating traditional and academic ecological knowledge: Mechanistic and holistic epistemologies across cultures. Biology and Philosophy, 33(43), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-018-9655-x
Mahat, T. J., & Boom, D. (2008). Concept note 13. E-conference on “Overcoming fragmentation in mountain research and development. Is montology an answer?” Manuscript submitted to FAO’s international mountain conference. ICIMOD.
Mainali, K., & Sicroff, S. (Eds.). (2016). Jack D. Ives, Montologist: Festschrift for a mountain advocate. Himalayan Association for the Advancement of Science.
Massey, D. (1999). Space-time, “science” and the relationship between physical geography and human geogra phy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24(3), 261–276.
Messerli, B., & Ives, J. D. (Eds.). (1999). Mountains of the world: A global priority. Parthenon.
Moss, L. A. (Ed.). (2006). The amenity migrants. Seeking and sustaining mountains and their cultures. Wallingford.
Naveh, Z., Lieberman, A., Sarmiento, F. O., & Ghersa, C. (2002). Ecología de Paisajes. Teoría y Aplicación. Edición de estudiantes. Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires, EUDEBA.
Painter, J. (2008). Cartographic anxiety and the search for regionality. Environmental and Planning A, 40, 342–361.
Pitches, J. (2020). Performing mountains. Palgrave Macmillan.
Polk, M. (2014). Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: A critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 439–451.
Price, M. F. (2015). Mountains: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Price, M. F., Byers, A. C., Friend, D. A., Kohler, T., & Price, L. W. (Eds.). (2013). Mountain geography: Physical and human dimensions. University of California Press.
Prieto, E. (2011). Geocriticism, geopoetics, geophilosophy, and beyond. In R. T. Tally Jr. et al. (Eds.), Geocritical explorations (pp. 13–27). Palgrave Macmillan.
Prieto, E. (2016). Geocriticism meets ecocriticism: Bertrand Westphal and environmental thinking. In R. T. Tally Jr. & C. M. Battista (Eds.), Ecocriticism and geocriticism (pp. 19–35). Palgrave Macmillan.
Provan, I. (2013). Convenient myths: The axial age, dark green religion, and the world that never was. Baylor University Press.
Resler, L., & Sarmiento, F. O. (2016). Mountain geographies. Oxford bibliographies in geography. Oxford University Press.
Rhoades, R. E. (2007). Listening to the mountains. Kendall/Hunt.
Rogaski, R. (2018). Knowing a Sentient Mountain: Space, science, and the sacred in ascents of Mount Paektu/Changbai. Modern Asian Studies, 52(2), 716–752.
Sarmiento, F. O. (1987). Antología Ecológica del Ecuador: desde la selva hasta el mar. Editorial Casa de la Cultura Ecuatoriana.
Sarmiento, F. O. (1999). Mount Chimborazo: In the steps of Alexander von Humboldt. Mountain Research and Development, 19(2), 77–78.
Sarmiento, F. O. (2000). Human impacts in man-aged tropandean landscapes: Breaking mountain paradigms. Ambio, 29(7), 423–431.
Sarmiento, F. O. (Ed.). (2002). Las Montañas del Mundo: Una Prioridad Global con Perspectivas Latinoamericanas. Editorial AbyaYala.
Sarmiento, F. O. (2012). Contesting Páramo: Critical biogeography of the Northern Andean highlands. Kona Publishing, Higher Education Division.
Sarmiento, F. O. (2015). On the antlers of a trilemma: Rediscovering Andean sacred sites. In R. Rozzi, S. T. A. Pickett, J. B. Callicot, F. S. T. Chapin III, M. E. Power, & J. J. Armesto (Eds.), Earth stewardship: Linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice (pp. 49–64). Springer.
Sarmiento, F. O. (2016a). Neotropical mountains beyond water supply: Environmental services as a trifecta of sustainable mountain development. In G. Greenwood & J. Shroder (Eds.), Mountain ice and water (pp. 309–324). Elsevier.
Sarmiento, F. O. (2016b). Identity, imaginaries and ideality: Understanding the biocultural landscape of the Andes through the iconic Andean lapwing (Vanellus resplendens). Revista Chilena de Ornitología, 22(1), 38–50.
Sarmiento, F. O. (2020). Montology manifesto: Echoes towards a transdisciplinary science of mountains. Journal of Mountain Science, 17(10), 2512–2527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5536-2
Sarmiento, F. O., & Hitchner, S. (Eds.). (2017). Indigeneity and the sacred: Indigenous revival and the conservation of sacred natural sites in the Americas. Berghahn Books.
Sarmiento, F. O., Ibarra, J. T., Barreau, A., Pizarro, J. C., Rozzi, R., González, J. A., & Frolich, L. M. (2017). Applied montology using critical biogeography in the Andes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 107(2) (special issue on Mountains), 416–428.
Sarmiento, F. O., Oliva, M., & Fernandez, S. (2020). Montology: Transformative frame for education about mountains. Mountain Research and Development, 40(4), A15–A27. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-20-00031.1
Scheiber, L. L., & Zedeño, M. N. (Eds.). (2015). Engineering mountain landscapes: An anthropology of social investment. University of Utah Press.
Scott, J. C. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
Soja, E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
Tadaki, M. (2017). Rethinking the role of critique in physical geography. The Canadian Geographer, 61(1), 73–83.
Tadaki, M., Sinner, J., & Chan, K. M. (2017). Making sense of environmental values: A typology of concepts. Ecology and Society, 22(1), 7–19.
Tally, R. T., Jr., & Battista, C. M. (2016). Introduction: Ecocritical geographies, geocritical ecologies and the spaces of modernity. In Tally et al. (Eds.), Ecocriticism and Geocriticism: Overlapping territories in Environmental and Spatial Literary Studies. (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan.
Taylor, B. R. (2010). Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. University of California Press.
Termorshuizen, J. W., & Opdam, P. (2009). Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology, 24(8), 1037–1052.
Troll, C. (1968). Geo-ecology of the Mountainous Regions of the Tropical Americas. In Proceedings of the UNESCO Mexico Symposium 1966. Colloquium Geographicum 9. Bonn, Germany: Ferdinand Dümmlers Verlag.
Ueno, K., Balsiger, J., & Price, M. (2020). Education for sustainable mountains development: Preliminary insights from a web-based survey of opportunities. Mountain Research and Development, 40(4), R1–R8. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-20-00026.1
Westphal, B. (2011). Geocriticism: Real and fictional spaces. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wilcock, D. A., & Brierley, G. J. (2012). It’s about time: Extending time–space discussion in geography through use of “ethnogeomorphology” as an education and communication tool. Journal of Sustainability Education, 3, 1–27.
Wu, J., & Hobbs, R. (2002). Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: An idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology, 17(4), 355–365.
Wulf, A. (2015a). The forgotten father of environmentalism. The Atlantic, December 23. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2015/12/the-forgotten-father-of-environmentalism/421434/. Accessed 28 Mar 2019.
Wulf, A. (2015b). The invention of nature: Alexander von Humboldt’s New World. Borzoi Book, A.A. Knopf.
Xishi, D., & Yuanchang, Z. (1996). The second discussion on montology. Mountain Research, 2. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-SDYA602.003.htm
Yuanchang, D. X. Z. (1986). A preliminary discussion on montology. Journal of Mountain Research, 3. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SDYA198603000.htm. Accessed 28 Mar 2019.
Zhong, X. H. (2000). Montology outline and mountain research in China. Sichuan Science and Technology Press.
Zimmerer, K. S. (1994). Human geography and the “new ecology”: The prospect and promise of integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(1), 108–125.
Zimmerer, K. S., Cordova Aguilar, H., Mata Olmo, R., Jiménez-Olivencia, R., & Vanek, S. (2017). Mountain ecology, remotedness, and the rise of agrobiodiversity: Tracing the geographic spaces of human-environment knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 107(2), 441–455.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sarmiento, F.O. (2022). Montology along Geopolitical and Cultural Appropriations: “Mountain” as a Social Construct. In: Sarmiento, F.O. (eds) Montology Palimpsest. Montology, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13298-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13298-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13297-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13298-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)