Abstract
Estimates reveal a consistent failure to fulfill climate finance targets, with adaptation finance receiving proportionately less than finance directed to mitigating climate breakdown. Financing for loss and damage is even more critically inadequate. Though likely an underestimate, official figures peg adaptation costs at approximately $70 billion per year presently, growing to an estimated $140–300 billion by 2030 and $280–500 billion by 2050. Much of the scholarly literature and policy work is thus focused on determining how sufficient funds to finance adaptation will be raised and from where they will come. This challenge is perceived as especially acute given the absence of incentives for private sector investment in adaptation projects. The purpose of this chapter is to offer a critical intervention into discussions and debates on the related themes of adaptation finance and adaptation to climate breakdown with a particular focus on carbon markets. Abundant and well-documented evidence shows that carbon offsetting under the Kyoto Protocol allowed polluters in the Global North to avoid taking action, shifting the burden of responsibility for lowering emissions to distant nations and communities; that an overwhelming share of offset projects failed to fulfill their emission reduction commitments resulting in an overall increase in global emissions and that carbon offsetting today represents a dangerous obstacle to achieving real and lasting emission reductions consistent with limiting heating to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This chapter offers an intervention into critically oriented research on adaptation to climate breakdown in the Global South. Much of this literature has documented the problems with adaptation interventions—that they fail to problematize how pre-existing inequalities at the community level shape outcomes and heighten marginalization; that they fail to interrogate multi-scalar sources and structures of vulnerability and oppression, including relations of production and social reproduction, class, gender, race, and more, thereby threatening to reproduce them; that they fail to offer spaces for democratic dialogue, mutual learning and participatory practice in adaptation projects and that they conceptualize adaptation as a technical fix in response to external climate threats, thereby mystifying the imperative to understand climate breakdown and the need for adaptation as deeply enmeshed in, and constituted through, globalized socio-economic and political structures to which we must respond as part of adaptation interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
While the Protocol’s second commitment period ended in 2020, the CDM Executive Board continues to issue CERs from projects that operated during the second period and continue to produce them.
- 2.
The value of CERs vary by project type. During mid-July 2021, CERs generated from wind projects and recorded by the Ecosecurities International Carbon Offset Index were valued at $.79 per tCO2e, while CERs generated from cookstove projects were valued at $15 per tCO2e (Lithgow, 2021b). In selling CERs for the Adaptation Fund, the World Bank is thus able to take advantage of price differentials to earn above average prices when possible (Michaelowa et al., 2019: 9).
- 3.
A database of party submissions to the UNFCCC regarding Article 6 negotiations can be found on the UNFCCC website. Those dealing with the SOP are available here: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/cooperative-implementation/submissions-informal-technical-expert-dialogues-on-article-6-of-the-paris-agreement#eq-1.
References
Badgley, G., et al. (2021). Systematic over-crediting in California’s forest carbon offsets program. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
Baird, I. G., & Green, W. N. (2020). The Clean development mechanism and large dam development: Contradictions associated with climate financing in Cambodia. Climatic Change, 161(2), 365–383.
Bassett, T. J., & Fogelman, C. (2013). Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum, 48, 42–53.
Böhm, S., & Dabhi, S. (Eds.). (2009). Upsetting the offset: The political economy of carbon markets. May Fly Books.
Bond, P. (2012). Emissions trading, new enclosures and eco-social contestation. Antipode, 44(3), 684–701.
Bumpus, A. (2011). The matter of carbon: Understanding the materiality of tCO2e in carbon offsets. Antipode, 43(3), 612–638.
Bumpus, A., & Liverman, D. (2011). Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development. In R. Peet, P. Robbins & M. J. Watts (Eds.), Global political ecology, (pp. 203–224). Routledge.
Cames, M., et al. (2016). How additional is the clean development mechanism? Analysis of the application of current tools and proposed alternatives.' Prepared for DG CLIMA.
Care International. (2021a). Hollow commitments: An analysis of developed countries’ climate finance plans. CARE International.
Care International. (2021b). Climate adaptation finance: Fact or fiction? (CARE International).
Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T., & Khan, M. (2013). The politics of international climate adaptation funding: Justice and divisions in the greenhouse. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 49–68.
Climate Action Tracker. (2021). Global Update: Climate Summit Momentum. https://climateactiontracker.org/publications/global-update-climate-summit-momentum/. Accessed May 13.
Coffield, S. R., et al. (2021). Climate‐driven limits to future carbon storage in California’s Wildland ecosystems. AGU Advances, 2(3).
Cullenward, D., & Victor, D. G. (2020). Making climate policy work. Polity.
Dooley, K. (2014). ‘Misleading numbers: The case for separating land and fossil based carbon emissions.’ In FERN (Ed.). FERN.
Eriksen, S., et al. (2021). Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: Help, hindrance or irrelevance? World Development, 141, 105383.
Eriksen, S. H., Nightingale, A. J., & Eakin, H. (2015). Reframing adaptation: The political nature of climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 523–533.
Ervine, K. (2014). Diminishing returns: Carbon market crisis and the future of market-dependent climate change finance. New Political Economy, 19(5), 723–747.
Ervine, K. (2018). Carbon. Polity.
Fearnehough, H., et al. (2021), Analysis of options for determining OMGE, SOP and Transition within Article 6: Implications of policy decisions for international crediting under the Paris Agreement.
Gardner, T., Adomaitis, N., & Nickel, R. (2021). Clean crude? Oil firms use offsets to claim green barrels. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/climatechange-fossilfuels-offsets-insigh/clean-crude-oil-firms-use-offsets-to-claim-green-barrels-idINKBN2C31AO
Gatti, L. V., et al. (2021). Amazonia as a carbon source linked to deforestation and climate change. Nature, 595(7867), 388–393.
Gifford, L. (2020). You can’t value what you can’t measure: A critical look at forest carbon accounting. Climatic Change, 161(2), 291–306.
Gifford, L., & Knudson, C. (2020). Climate finance justice: International perspectives on climate policy, social justice, and capital. Climatic Change, 161(2), 243–249.
Gleckman, H. (2018). Multistakeholder governance and democracy: A global challenge. Routledge.
Haya, B. (2019). The California air resources board’s U.S. forest offset protocol underestimates leakage. University of California.
Haya, B., et al. (2020). Managing uncertainty in carbon offsets: Insights from California’s standardized approach. Climate Policy, 20(9), 1112–1126.
Hoch, S., et al. (2015). Methodology for CDM eligibility criteria definition. Perspectives GmbH.
Hornborg, A. (2019). Nature, society, and justice in the anthropocene: Unraveling the money-energy-technology complex. Cambridge University Press.
IEA Global carbon dioxide emissions are set for their second-biggest increase in history—News—IEA. (2021a). https://www.iea.org/news/global-carbon-dioxide-emissions-are-set-for-their-second-biggest-increase-in-history
IEA. (2021b). Net Zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector.
IETA. (2021). IETA’s input on financing for adaptation and the share of proceeds under Article 6 of the Paris agreement.
IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5 °C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
Kahn, D. (2021). Wildfires rage and a tool to combat climate change goes up in smoke. Politico. https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/27/wildfires-rage-carbon-credits-500830?nname=the-long-game&nid=00000171-5b34-d92d-a5ff-db3ee8890000&nrid=00000170-7960-d847-a5f1-f9e047f70000&nlid=2672637&fbclid=IwAR1UYDp5boegq13G_CYOc9T0cJtdh52aujGSaKhshSV5IIMyu5EQ_MNk64U
Khan, M., et al. (2020). Twenty-five years of adaptation finance through a climate justice lens. Climatic Change, 161(2), 251–269.
Kollmuss, A., Schneider, L., & Zhezherin, V. (2015). Has joint implementation reduced GHG emissions? Lessons learned for the design of carbon market mechanisms. SEI Policy Brief. Stockholm Environment Institute.
Lithgow, M. (2021a). Washington fire torches second-largest California offset project. Carbon Pulse. https://carbon-pulse.com/134578/
Lithgow, M. (2021b). VCM Report: VER issuances, retirements blossom in Q2 as prices increase further. Carbon Pulse. https://carbon-pulse.com/133518/. Accessed July 16, 2021.
Lohmann, L. (2001). The dyson effect: Carbon “offset” forestry and the privatisation of the atmosphere. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 15(1), 51–78.
Lohmann, L. (2005). Marketing and making carbon dumps: Commodification, calculation and counterfactuals in climate change mitigation. Science as Culture, 14(3), 203–235.
Michaelowa, A., et al. (2019). Operationalizing the share of proceeds for Article 6. Climate Finance Innovators.
Michaelowa, A. (Ed.). (2012). Carbon markets or climate finance? Low carbon and adaptation investment choices for the developing world. Routledge.
Newell, P. (2012). The political economy of carbon markets: The CDM and other stories. Climate Policy, 12(1), 135–139.
Newell, P., & Bumpus, A. (2012). The political ecology of the clean development mechanism. Global Environmental Politics, 12(4), 49–67.
Nightingale, A. J., et al. (2020). Beyond technical fixes: Climate solutions and the great derangement. Climate and Development, 12(4), 343–352.
NOAA. (2021). Despite pandemic shutdowns, carbon dioxide and methane surged in 2020—Welcome to NOAA Research. https://research.noaa.gov/article/ArtMID/587/ArticleID/2742/Despite-pandemic-shutdowns-carbon-dioxide-and-methane-surged-in-2020. Accessed May 13.
OECD. (2020). Climate finance provided and mobilised by developed countries in 2013–2018. OECD.
Oxfam. (2020). Climate finance shadow report 2020. Oxfam.
Pontecorvo, E., & Osaka, S. (2020). This Oregon forest was supposed to store carbon for 100 years. Now it’s on fire. Grist. https://grist.org/climate/this-oregon-forest-was-supposed-to-store-carbon-for-100-years-now-its-on-fire/
Power Shift Africa (PSA), ACT 2025 consortium & institute for climate and sustainable cities. (2021). COP 26 delivering the Paris agreement: A five-point plan for solidarity, fairness and prosperity. Accessed 8 July 2022. https://climatenetwork.org/resource/cop26-five-point-plan-for-solidarity-fairness-and-prosperity/
Ratajczak-Juszko, I. (2012). The adaptation fund: Towards resilient economies in the developing world. In A. Michaelowa (Ed.), Carbon markets or climate finance: Low carbon and adaptation investment choices for the developing world, (pp. 92–116). Routledge.
Reklev, S. (2021). Oil and gas majors stoke Australian offset demand, analysts say. Carbon Pulse. https://carbon-pulse.com/135048/
Roberts, J. T., et al. (2021). Rebooting a failed promise of climate finance. Nature Climate Change, 11(3), 180–182.
Scott, D., et al. (2016). The ‘virtual economy’ of REDD+ Projects: Does private certification of REDD+ Projects ensure their environmental integrity?. International Forestry Review, 18, 231–246.
Song, L., & Moura, P. (2019). If carbon offsets require forests to stay standing, what happens when the Amazon is on fire? ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/if-carbon-offsets-require-forests-to-stay-standing-what-happens-when-the-amazon-is-on-fire
Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2–3), 213–232.
Swyngedouw, E., & Wilson, J. (Eds.). (2014). The post-political and its discontents: Spaces of depoliticisation, spectres of radical politics. Edinburgh University.
Taylor, M. (2015). The political ecology of climate change adaptation: Livelihoods, agrarian change and the conflicts of development. Routledge.
UNEP. (2019). Emissions gap report 2019. UNEP.
UNEP. (2021a). Cut global emissions by 7.6 percent every year for next decade to meet 1.5°C Paris target—UN report. http://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/press-release/cut-global-emissions-76-percent-every-year-next-decade-meet-15degc. Accessed May 13.
UNEP. (2021b). Adaptation Gap Report 2020. Nairobi.
UNFCCC. (2015). Paris agreement to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. In UNFCCC (Ed.).
UNFCCC. (2021). Issuance certified emission reductions. https://cdm.unfccc.int/Issuance/cers_iss.html. Accessed July 16.
West, T. A. P., et al. (2020). Overstated carbon emission reductions from voluntary REDD+ projects in the Brazilian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(39), 24188–24194.
World Bank. (2021). Financial intermediary funds—Adaptation Fund. https://fiftrustee.worldbank.org/en/about/unit/dfi/fiftrustee/fund-detail/adapt#1. Accessed July 16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ervine, K. (2022). Delivering Adaptation Finance Through the Market? The Trouble with Using Carbon Offsets to Finance Climate Adaptation in the Global South. In: Cash, C., Swatuk, L.A. (eds) The Political Economy of Climate Finance: Lessons from International Development. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12619-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12619-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-12618-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-12619-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)