Abstract
This introduction discusses the historical and current blindness of social scientific research in and on the Arctic and underscores the potential of critical research to open up new perspectives. The way in which the Arctic social world becomes “known” is partial and in many ways still influenced by its legacy of expeditions. Despite the increasing volume of Arctic social sciences, many gaps remain. Through discussing critical research—forays into problematization and critique—the chapter elaborates on the relevance of critical approaches for bringing to light Arctic issues and questions that we are currently blind to. To this end, the chapter groups the contributions of the book into three thematic strands: novel angles on questions of order, explorations of heretofore unacknowledged sites of power, and perspectives on studying Arctic pluralities. The introduction, and the volume as a whole, invites the reader to problematize that which appears self-evident in the Arctic and to explore alternative approaches.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bröckling, U., Krasmann, S., & Lemke, T. (2011). From Foucault’s lectures at the Collège de France to studies of governmentality: An introduction. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges (pp. 1–33). Routledge.
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2020). Intersectionality. Polity Press.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Sage.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault (pp. 87–104). The University of Chicago Press.
Furniss, E. (2000). The burden of history: Colonialism and the frontier myth in a rural Canadian community. UBC Press.
Graham, L. (2011). The product of text and ‘other’ statements: Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 43(6), 663–674.
Guerrieri, V. (2019). The spatiality of hope: Mapping Canada’s northwest energy frontier. Globalizations, 16(5), 678–694.
Hanrahan, M. (2017). Enduring polar explorers’ Arctic imaginaries and the promotion of neoliberalism and colonialism in modern Greenland. Polar Geography, 40(2), 102–120.
Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2012). Feminist research: Exploring, interrogating and transforming the interconnections of epistemology, methodology and method. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and praxis (pp. 2–26). Sage.
Joseph, J. (2010). The limits of governmentality: Social theory and the international. European Journal of International Relations, 16(2), 223–246.
Keskitalo, E., & Carina, H. (2002). Constructing ‘the Arctic’: Discourses of international region-building. University of Lapland.
Koopman, C. (2013). Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Indiana University Press.
Körber, L.-A., McKenzie, S., & Stenport, A. W. (Eds.). (2017). Arctic environmental modernities: From the age of polar exploration to the era of the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan.
Lemke, T., with Baele, S. (2008). An interview with Thomas Lemke: Foucault today. On the theoretical relevance of Foucauldian concepts of ‘governmentality’ and ‘biopolitics’. Emulations, 2(4), 46–51.
Longino, H. E. (1993). Subjects, power, and knowledge: Description and prescription in feminist philosophies of science. In L. Alcoff & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 101–120). Routledge.
McCorristine, S. (2018). Spectral Arctic: A history of dreams and ghosts in polar exploration. UCL Press.
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2016). Introduction: Locations of engagement in the First World. In A. Moreton-Robinson (Ed.), Critical indigenous studies: Engagements in first world locations (pp. 3–16). The University of Arizona Press.
Neumann, I. B., & Sending, O. J. (2010). Governing the global polity: Practice, mentality, rationality. The University of Michigan Press.
Nuttall, M. (2012). Imagining and governing the Greenlandic resource frontier. The Polar Journal, 2(1), 113–124.
Povinelli, E. A. (2011). Economies of abandonment: Social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Duke University Press.
Ray, S. J., & Maier, K. (2017a). Introduction: Approaching critical Northern issues critically. In S. J. Ray & K. Maier (Eds.), Critical Norths: Space, nature, theory (pp. 1–12). University of Alaska Press.
Ray, S. J., & Maier, K. (Eds.). (2017b). Critical Norths: Space, nature, theory. University of Alaska Press.
Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.
Rosner, V. (2009). Gender and polar studies: Mapping the terrain. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(3), 489–494.
Scott, J. W. (2008). Introduction: Feminism’s critical edge. In J. W. Scott (Ed.), Women’s studies on the edge (pp. 1–13). Duke University Press.
Sellheim, N., Zaika, Y. V., & Kelman, I. (Eds.). (2019). Arctic triumph: Northern innovation and persistence. Springer.
Shadian, J. M., & Tennberg, M. (eds.). (2009). Legacies and change in polar sciences: Historical, legal and political reflections on the International Polar Year. Ashgate.
Simpson, A., & Smith, A. (2014). Introduction. In A. Simpson & A. Smith (Eds.), Theorizing native studies (pp. 1–30). Duke University Press.
Sinevaara-Niskanen, H. (2020). When gender matters: Equality as a source of Arctic sustainability? In M. Tennberg, H. Lempinen, & S. Pirnes (Eds.), Resources, social and cultural sustainabilities in the Arctic (pp. 131–143). Routledge.
Sokhi-Bulley, B. (2016). Governing (through) rights. Hart.
Stern, P., & Stevenson, L. (Eds.). (2006). Critical Inuit Studies: An anthology of contemporary Arctic ethnography. University of Nebraska Press.
Stevenson, L. (2006). Introduction. In P. Stern & L. Stevenson (Eds.), Critical Inuit Studies: An anthology of contemporary Arctic ethnography (pp. 1–22). University of Nebraska Press.
Tennberg, M., Lempinen, H., & Pirnes, S. (Eds.). (2020). Resources, social and cultural sustainabilities in the Arctic. Routledge.
Vola, J. (2022). Homunculus: Bearing incorporeal articulations. University of Lapland.
Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality: Critical encounters. Routledge.
Wright, J. (1939). Survey on polar expeditions. Polar Record, 3(18), 144–168.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lindroth, M., Sinevaara-Niskanen, H., Tennberg, M. (2022). Introduction: Alternative Lenses on the Arctic. In: Lindroth, M., Sinevaara-Niskanen, H., Tennberg, M. (eds) Critical Studies of the Arctic. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11120-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11120-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11119-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11120-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)