Abstract
Though met with tepid commercial success and critical acclaim, Tanuja Chandra’s directorial journey in Hindi language cinema is in fact quite significant. The cinematic significance lies in Chandra’s initial resistance to make the text-book women-centric films of the 1990s, where melodrama is the default mode of storytelling. Instead, Chandra is interested to narrate stories of women and narratives of their agency through film genres that are overtly masculine: thriller and action. Using Rick Altman’s conception of film genres as being inextricably associated with deeply rooted semantic codes and conventions that allows filmmakers to rework “formulas” and reconfigure the expectations of consumers, this essay proposes to unpack Chandra’s two early films Dushman (1998) and Sangharsh (1999). Both films use the genre of the psychological thriller by making the women in them the pivot on which the plot revolves. Interestingly, the men (played by male Bollywood stars of the time) are relegated not only to secondary roles but also to an extent mere witnesses to the action (physical and narrative) that the women are engaged in.
The essay also proposes to juxtapose the two above-mentioned films with Chandra’s latest directorial exercises, Silvat (2016) and Qarib Qarib Singlle (2017). Silvat marks Chandra’s foray into a decidedly feminist tradition of filmmaking, exploring the inner world and sexuality of the female protagonist. The other film is more of a proverbial romantic comedy starring Irrfan and Parvathy Thiruvothu. Chandra seems to highlight how “women makers create out of generic resources new combinations and outcomes.” Chandra’s critique of the conventional romantic comedy and its deeply problematic cultural and social mores is unmistakable.
The chapter argues that Chandra is an important pit stop in charting the emergence of the female director in Bollywood because of her continued improvisations and reappropriations with genres that have traditionally been the stronghold of male directors. Chandra’s career underscores Steve Neale’s theorizations on genre as a process that is marked by sameness and difference, where every difference can be read as an act of transgression and resistance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, R. (2019). Film/Genre. Bloomsbury, London.
Anwer, M. & Arora, A. (2021). Bollywood’s New Woman: Liberalization, Liberation and Contested Bodies. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
Basu, A. (2012). Bollywood in the Age of New Media. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Bigelow, K. (2008). The Hurt Locker. Voltage Pictures.
Chandra, T. (1998). Dushman. Vishesh Films.
———. (1999). Sangharsh. Vishesh Films.
———. (2001). Yeh Zindagi ka Safar. Vishesh Films.
———. (2002). Sur – The Melody of Life. Pritish Nandy Communications.
———. (2006). Zindaggi Rocks. Anuradha Prasad.
———. (2016). Silvat. Zee5.
———. (2017). Qarib Qarib Singlle. Zee Studios & Jar Pictures.
———. (2019). Aunty Sudha Aunty Radha. Anupama Mandloi.
Chopra, Y. (1997). Dil to Pagal Hai. Yash Raj Films.
Harrod, M. & Paskiewicz, K. (2019). Women Do Genre in Film and Television. Routledge, London.
Heller-Nicholas, A. (2021). Rape-Revenge Films: A Critical Study. McFarland & Company Inc., Jefferson.
Hollinger, K. (2008). ‘Afterword: Once I got passed the name chick flick’. In: Ferriss, S., Young, M. (eds.). Chick Flicks: Contemporary Women at the Movies. Routledge, Oxon, pp. 221–236.
Interview with Tanuja Chandra. (2017). The Telegraph, T2, Screen. November 1. Kolkata, p. 5.
Iordanova, D. (2003). Cinema of the Other Europe: The Industry and Artistry of East Central European Film. Wallflower, London and New York.
Jermyn, D. & Abbott, S. (2009). Falling in Love Again: Romantic Comedy in Contemporary Cinema. Bloomsbury Academic, London.
Kord, S., & Krimmer, E. (2011). Contemporary Hollywood Masculinities: Gender, Genre, and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
Kuhn, A. (1990). ‘Textual Politics’. In P. Erens (ed). Issues in Feminist Film Criticism. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, pp. 250–261.
Neale, S. (2002). Genre and Contemporary Hollywood. Bloomsbury, London.
Paszkiewicz, K. (2018). Genre, Authorship and Contemporary Women Filmmakers. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Sarkar, B. (2013). ‘Metafiguring Bollywood: Brecht after Om Shanti Om’. In: Sen, M., Basu, A. (eds). Figurations in Indian Film. Palgrave Macmillan, Edinburgh, pp. 205–235.
Singh, N. (2021). ‘The Popular “Dexter”: Its Heirs and Impact on Indian Media’. In: Srivastava, P.K., Singh, M. (eds). Indian Popular Fiction: New Genres, Novel Spaces. Routledge, Oxon, pp. 152–179.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mukherjee, S. (2023). Women (Not) Telling Women’s Stories: Tanuja Chandra’s Directorial Journey from Action-Thriller to Romance and Beyond. In: Iqbal Viswamohan, A. (eds) Women Filmmakers in Contemporary Hindi Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10232-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10232-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10231-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10232-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)