Skip to main content

How Does the Mind Frame?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methodology in Politeness Research

Part of the book series: Advances in (Im)politeness Studies ((AIMS))

  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

The last chapter in Part I of this volume rounds up the discussion of the relevant methodological consequences emerging from the theoretical state of the art. As in the previous chapter, the following pages deal with how speakers reach a mutual understanding of politeness in spite of the great diversity of their perspectives and evaluations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adornetti, I. (2012). Why philosophical pragmatics needs clinical pragmatics. Humana. Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 5(23), 159–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez, S.B. (2007). El concepto de «cooperación conversacional» revisado desde el punto de vista de la teoría de los juegos. Oralia 10, 25–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2001). Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics. In R. Kenneth & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 13–32). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, M. (2018). Teaching sociopragmatics: Face-work, politeness and impoliteness in L2 Spanish colloquilal conversations. In D. Dumitrescu, & P.L. Andeuza (Eds.) Spanish pragmatics. From research to teaching (pp. 131–150). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettoni, C. (2006). Usare un’altra lingua. Guida alla pragmatica intercultural. Editori Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolívar, A. (2008). Perceptions of (im)politenss in Venezuelan Spanish: The role of evaluation in interaction. Pragmatics, 18(4), 605–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charaudeau, P. (2012). Problemas teóricos y metodológicos en los estudios de la oralidad aplicados a la cortesía: aspectos lingüísticos, pragmáticos y discursivos. In J. Escamilla Morales, & G. Henry Vega (Eds.) Miradas multidisciplinares a los fenómenos de cortesía y descortesía en el mundo hispánico (pp. 13–32). Universidad del Atlántico—Universidad de Estocolmo; CADIS—Programa EDICE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, H. M. (2001). Why can’t learners of JFL distinguish polite from impolite speech styles? In R. Kenneth & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 80–102). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Culpeper, J., & Terkourafi, M. (2017). Pragmatic approaches (Im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 11–39). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Duranti, A. (2007). Etnopragmatica. La forza del parlare. Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenchlas, S. (2011). On-line interactions as a resource to raise pragmatic awareness. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escandell-Vidal, M.V. (1996). Towards a cognitive approach to politeness. In K. Jaszczolt, & K. Turner (Eds.) Contrastive semantics and pragmatics. Volume II. Discourse Strategies (pp. 629–650). Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escandell-Vidal, M.V. (2009). Social cognition and second language learning. In M. Reyes Gómez et al. (Eds.) Pragmatics applied to language teaching and learning (pp. 2–41). Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escandell-Vidal, M. V. (1998a). Politeness: A relevant issue for relevance theory. Revista Alicantina De Estudios Ingleses, 11, 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escandell-Vidal, M. V. (1998b). Cortesía y relevancia. Diálogos Hispánicos, 22, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., & Mugford, G. (2017). (Im)politeness: Learning and teaching. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 489–516). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1990b). The concept of politeness. Paper presented at the 1985 NWAVF Meeting, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics, 4(4), 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B., & Nolen, W. (1981). The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2004). Cultural scripts: What are they and what are they good for? Intercultural Pragmatics, 1–2, 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, A. (2013). Development of politeness strategies in participatory online environments: A case study. In N. Taguchi & J. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 101–120). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, W. (2001). Categoria/Category. In A. Duranti (Ed.) Culture e discorso. Un lessico per le scienze umane (pp. 34–39). Meltemi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, M. (2012). Conversational interaction. In K. Jaszczolt, & K. Allan (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 253–273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, M., & Chang, W.-L. (2019). The apology seemed (in)sincere: Variability in perceptions of (im)politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, M., & Jaszczolt, K. (2012). Speaker intentions and intentionality. In K. Jaszczolt & K. Allan (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 87–112). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kádár, D., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G. (2001). Classroom research on interlanguage pragmatics”. In R. Kenneth & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 33–60). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics: An introduction. In G. Kasper, & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.) Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 3–17). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kecskes, I. (2012). Sociopragmatics and cross-cultural and intercultural studies. In K. Jaszczolt & K. Allan (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 599–616). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, S. (1990). Lip Service: The contribution of the visual modality to speech perception and its relevance to the teaching testing of foreign language listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics and language teachers. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landone, E. (2004). El aprendizaje cooperativo del E/LE: propuestas para integrar las funciones de la lengua y las destrezas colaborativas. RedELE 0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landone, E. (2009). Reflexiones sobre la cortesía verbal en la enseñanza/aprendizaje del E/LE. Marcoele, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landone, E. (2019). Los marcadores del discurso. ¿Guías inferenciales de la comunicación emotiva? Spanish in Context 16(2), 272–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1992). Primer for the field investigation of spatial description and conception. Pragmatics, 2(1), 5–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. (2009). Perception and language. In S. Dominiek, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Cognition and pragmatics (pp. 272–287). John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mesquita, B., Frijda, N., & Scherer, K. (1997). Culture and emotion. In J. Berry et al. (Eds.) Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Basic processes and human development (pp. 255–297). Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, N., & Haugh, M. (2015). Agency, accountability and evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 207–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno Fernández, F. (2012). Sociolingüistica cognitiva. Proposiciones, escolios y debates. Vervuert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, G. (1996). Toward a theory of Cultural Linguistics. University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizziconi, B., & Locher, M. (2015). Introducing the ‘teaching’ and ‘learning’ of (im)politeness. In B. Pizziconi, & M. Locher (Eds.), Teaching and learning (Im)politeness (pp. 1–19). Mouton de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclavi, M. (2003). Arte di ascoltare e mondi possibili. Come si esce dalle cornici di cui siamo parte. Bruno Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclavi, M. (2005). A una spanna da terra. Paravia Bruno Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharwood Smith, M. (1986). Comprehension versus acquisition: Two ways of processing input. Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1987). Análisis del discurso. Análisis sociolingüístico del lenguaje natural. Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi, N., & Carsten, R. (2017). Second language pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkourafi, M., & Kádár, D.Z. (2017). Convention and ritual (im)politenss. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D.Z. Kádár (Eds.) The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 171–195). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terkourafi, M. (2012). Politeness and pragmatics. In K. Jaszczolt & K. Allan (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 617–637). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Verschueren, J. (2002). Para entender la pragmática. Gredos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, A. (1985). Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, 145–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. (2015). Elements of hermeneutic pragmatics. Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Žegarac V., & Pennington M. C. (2000). Pragmatic transfer in intercultural communication. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 165–190). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Landone .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Landone, E. (2022). How Does the Mind Frame?. In: Methodology in Politeness Research. Advances in (Im)politeness Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09161-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09161-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09160-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09161-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics