Abstract
A corpus is a reasoned and pondered collection of texts of any nature that can be analysed on paper or in audio–video or digital form. It becomes data when it is accessed with a research objective. A digital corpus offers an empirical basis with automated access, but as Clark (Methods in Pragmatics. Mouton De Gruyter, 2018) points out, this does not exempt the analyst from the use of intuition. This chapter focuses on corpora, and outlines examples of recent studies in politeness research. These show how a corpus is a tool for sharpening intuitions, that is, an adjuvant which does not exempt the analyst from keeping a clear position with respect to the data she is going to analyse. The corpus analysis is somehow an evolution of the philological method, which is a method of data collection with ancient origins that consists of sifting through many texts to scour for occurrences of the linguistic structures under analysis. Nowadays, this time-consuming process is digitally supported by storage of texts, data retrieval and statistical analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adolphs, S. (2008). Corpus and context. Investigating pragmatic functions in spoken discourse. John Benjamins.
Aijmer, K. (2015). “Will you fuck off please”. The use of please by London teenagers. Sociocultural Pragmatics, 3(2), 127–149.
Aijmer, K. (2018). Corpus pragmatics: From form to function. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 555–585). Mouton De Gruyter.
Albelda Marco, M., Briz Gómez, A., Cestero, A. M., Kotwica, D., & Villalba, C. (2014). Ficha metodológica para el análisis pragmático de la atenuación en corpus discursivos del español. ES.POR.ATENUACIÓN. Oralia, 17, 1–44.
Andersen, G. (2018). Corpus construction. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 467–494). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Archer, D., & Culpeper, J. (2003). Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 37–58). Peter Lang.
Archer, D. (2014). Exploring verbal aggression in English historical texts using USAS: the possibilities, the problems and potential solutions. In I. Taavitsainen, A. Jucker, & J. Tuominen (Eds.), Diachronic corpus pragmatics (pp. 277–302). John Benjamins.
Archer, D., & Culpeper, J. (2018). Corpus annotation. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 495–525). Mouton De Gruyter.
Archer, D., & Bethan, M. (2017). Tracing facework over time using semi-automated methods. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(1), 27–56.
Briz Gómez, A. (2012). La (no)atenuación y la (des)cortesía, lo lingüístico y lo social: ¿son pareja? In J. Escamilla Morales, G. Henry Vega (Eds.), Miradas multidisciplinares a los fenómenos de cortesía y descortesía en el mundo hispánico (pp. 33–75). Universidad del Atlántico-Programa EDICE.
Briz Gómez, A. (1996). El español coloquial. Situación y uso. Arco/Libros.
Briz Gómez, A. (1998). El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Ariel.
Briz Gómez, A., & Grupo Val.Es.Co. (2004). Cortesía codificada y cortesía interpretada en la conversación. In D. Bravo & A. Briz Gómez (Eds.), Pragmática sociocultural: estudios sobre el discurso de cortesía en español (pp. 67–93). Ariel.
Clark, B. (2018). Cognitive pragmatics: Relevance-theoretic methodology. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 185–215). Mouton De Gruyter.
Culpeper, J. (2009). The metalanguage of impoliteness: Eexplorations in the Oxford English Corpus. In P. Baker (Ed.), Contemporary corpus linguistics (pp. 64–86). Continuum.
Culpeper, J., O’Driscoll, J., & Hardaker, C. (2019). Notions of politeness in Britain and North America. In E. Ogiermann & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), From speech acts to lay understandings of politeness (pp. 177–200). Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. (2012). (Im)politeness: Three issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1128–1133.
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Sudhof, M., Jurafsk, D., Leskovec, J., & Potts, C. (2013). Computational approach to politeness with application to social factors. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 250–259). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Davies, B. L. (2018). Evaluating evaluations: What different types of metapragmatic behaviour can tell us about participants’ understandings of the moral order. Journal of Politeness Research, 14(1), 121–151.
De Beaugrande, R. (1996). The ‘pragmatics’ of doing language science: The ‘warrant’ for large-corpus linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 503–535.
de Pablos-Ortega, C. (2015). Thank you for a lovely day! Contrastive thanking in textbooks for teaching English and Spanish as Foreign Languages. Sociocultural Pragmatics, 3(2), 150–173.
Diani, G. (2015). Politeness. In K. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics. A handbook (pp. 169–191). Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, S., Soler Bonafont, M. A., & Vuoto, J. (2018). La atenuación en conversaciones coloquiales argentinas y españolas: un estudio contrastivo. RILCE, 34(3), 1280–1312.
Estellés Arguedas, M., & Albelda Marco, M. (2014). Evidentials, politeness and prosody in Spanish: A corpus analysis. Journal of Politeness Research, 10(1), 29–62.
Flöck, I., & Geluykens, R. (2015). Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: A quantitative contrastive study of directives in spontaneous and elicited discourse. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics (pp. 7–38). Springer.
Garretson, G., & O’Connor, M. C. (2007). Between the humanist and the modernist: Semi-automated analysis of linguistic corpora. In E. Fitzpatrick (Ed.), Corpus linguistics beyond the word: Corpus research from phrase to discourse (pp. 87–106). Rodopi.
Goethals, P., & Blancke, B. (2013). Un estudio exploratorio de las convenciones discursivas en el Parlamento Europeo: Los agradecimientos en español, francés y neerlandés. Revista De Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 8, 93–102.
Ide, S. (2005). How and why honorifics can signify dignity and elegance. The indexicality and reflexivity of linguistic rituals. In R. Lakoff & S. Ide (Eds.), Broadening the horizon of linguistic politeness (pp. 45–64). John Benjamins.
Jiménez Martin, E., & Garrote, E. M. (2017). Aproximación al uso del halago en el español de Monterrey. Normas, 7(1), 169–187.
Jucker, A. (2013). Corpus pragmatics. In J.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–17). John Benjamins.
Jucker, A. (2018). Data in pragmatic research. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 3–36). Mouton De Gruyter.
Kádár, D., & House, J. (2020) ‘Politeness markers’ revisited—A contrastive pragmatic perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, forthcoming.
Kádár, D., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Karl de Marlangeon, S. (2012). Actividades de imagen de rol, de autocortesía y de (des)cortesía en reseñas de publicaciones científicas. Sociocultural Pragmatics, 1(1), 74–99.
King, J. (2011). Power and indirectness in business correspondence: Petitions in Colonial Louisiana Spanish. Journal of Politeness Research, 7, 259–283.
Klaus, S., & Barron, A. (Eds.). (2014). Pragmatics of discourse. Mouton de Gruyter.
Muñoz Arruda, M. P., & Godoi, E. (2012). La demanda en el proceso judicial civil: ¿petición o exigencia? Un análisis contrastivo español-portugués en textos escritos. In J. Escamilla Morales, & G. Henry Vega (Eds.), Miradas multidisciplinares a los fenómenos de cortesía y descortesía en el mundo hispánico (pp. 344–368). Universidad del Atlántico-Programa EDICE.
Molina Martos, I. (2015). Estrategias de atenuación en el barrio de Salamanca de Madrid. In A. M. Cestero Mancera, I. Molina Martos, & F. Paredes García (Eds.), Patrones sociolingüísticos de Madrid (pp. 349–364). Peter Lang.
Meléndez Quero, C. (2019). Hacia una pragmalingüística integral: el caso de por fin como recurso de (des)cortesía en el discurso digital y político. Pragmalingüística, 27, 212–232.
Murphy, M. L., & De Felice, R. (2018). Routine politeness in American and British English requests: Use and non-use of please. Journal of Politeness Research, 15(1), 77–100.
O’Keeffe, A. (2018). Corpus-based function-to-form approaches. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 587–618). Mouton De Gruyter.
Pallotti, G. (1999). Metodologie di ricerca. In R. Galatolo & G. Pallotti (Eds.), La conversazione. Un’introduzione allo studio dell'interazione verbale (pp. 365–407). Cortina.
Cervera Rodríguez, Á., Torres Álvarez, J. (2015). Análisis conversacional del discurso procesal penal. Pragmalingüística, 23, 8–21.
Rühlemann, C. (2019). Corpus linguistics for pragmatics. A guide for research. London.
Savy, R., & Solís García, I. (2008). Strategie pragmatiche in italiano e spagnolo a confront: una prima analisi su corpus. Testi e Linguaggi, 2, 214–239.
Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K. (2009). EXMARaLDA—Creating, analysing and sharing spoken language corpora for pragmatic research. Pragmatics, 19(4), 565–582.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2011). Conceptualising ‘the relational’ in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im)politeness comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 3565–3578.
Teubert, W. (2001). Corpus linguistics and lexicography. In W. Teubert (Ed.), Text, corpora and multilingual lexicography (pp. 109–133). John Benjamins.
Watts, R. (2008). Rudeness, conceptual blending theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(2), 289–317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Landone, E. (2022). Corpus Analysis. In: Methodology in Politeness Research. Advances in (Im)politeness Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09161-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09161-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09160-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09161-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)