Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recording and Transcription

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Methodology in Politeness Research

Part of the book series: Advances in (Im)politeness Studies ((AIMS))

  • 217 Accesses

Abstract

Naturally occurring data derive from natural and spontaneous interactions, they are real life data. They exist potentially without research or a researcher: undoubtedly spontaneous interaction in a real shop will be more natural than roleplay, and in the latter case, the interaction would not even take place if there were no research. Even if the interlocutors of the roleplay had not been informed about the research, their exchange would not have taken place without it. So this is not a natural event, although speakers may use natural language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainciburu, M. C., & Ramajo Cuesta, A. (2017). Some courtesy formulas used by Syrian-Lebanese immigrants in Argentina. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(3), 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, A. (2010). Rapport management in Thai and Japanese social talk during group discussions. Pragmatics, 20(3), 289–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargiela-Chiappini, F. (2013). Embodies discursivity: Introducing sensory pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., & Winter, B. (2018). Multimodal indexicality in Korean: “doing deference” and “performing intimacy” through nonverbal behavior. Journal of Politeness Research, 15(1): 25–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchara, A. (2015). The role of religion in shaping politeness in Moroccan Arabic: The case of the speech act of greeting and its place in intercultural understanding and misunderstanding. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(1), 71–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Franch, P., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2019). Introduction to analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse. New insights and future directions (pp. 3–22). Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bou-Franch, P., & Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2008). Natural versus elicited data in cross-cultural speech act realisation: The case of requests in Peninsular Spanish and British English. Spanish in Context, 5(2), 246–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briz Gómez, A. (1998). El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brumme, J. (2012). Traducir la voz ficticia. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burdelski, M. (2010). Socializing politeness routines: Action, other-orientation, and embodiment in a Japanese preschool. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1606–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calsamiglia Blancafort, H., & Tusón Valls, A. (1999). Las cosas del decir. Manual de análisis del discurso. Ariel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. (2017). Children’s early awareness of the effect of interpersonal status on politeness. Journal of Politeness Research, 13(1), 121–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devís Herrais, E., & Cantero Serena F. J. (2014). The intonation of mitigating politeness in Catalan. Journal of Politeness Research, 10(1), 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiehler, R. (2002). How to do emotions with words: Emotionality in conversations. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions. Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 79–106). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd, S., Rossi, G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Dingemanse, M., Kendrick, K. H., Zinken, J., & Enfield, N. J. (2018). Ethics Universals and cultural diversity in the expresion of gratitude. Royal Society, 5, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgakopoulou, A. (2013). Small stories and identities analysis as a framework for the study of (im)politenss in interaction. Journal of Politenss Research, 9(1), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment responses: A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occuring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 90–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning, S. (2012). Un análisis contrastivo de la realización del acuerdo y el desacuerdo en conversaciones entre españoles y conversaciones entre suecos. In J. Escamilla Morales, & G. Henry Vega (Eds.), Miradas multidisciplinares a los fenómenos de cortesía y descortesía en el mundo hispánico (pp. 290–324). Universidad del Atlántico-Programa EDICE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, S. (2019). The coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse analysis. In P. Bou-Franch & P. Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse. New insights and future directions (pp. 25–68). Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo Navarro, A. (2006). La expresión de cortesía en español hablado: marcas y recursos prosódicos para su reconocimiento en la conversación colloquial. In M. Villayandre Llamazares (Ed.), Actas del XXXV Simposio internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (pp. 957–979). Universidad de León.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo Navarro, A. (2011). En torno a la (des)cortesía verbal y al papel modalizador de la entonación en español. In C. Fuentes Rodríguez, E. Alcaide Lara, & E. Brenes Peña (Eds.), Aproximaciones a la (des)cortesía verbal en español (pp. 75–100). Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo Navarro, A. (2013). La fono(des)cortesía: marcas prosódicas (des)corteses en español hablado. Su estudio a través de corpus orales. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada, 51(2), 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo Navarro, A., & Martínez Hernández, D. (2017). Hacia una propuesta metodológica para el estudio de la atenuación fónica en Es.Var.Atenuación. Sociocultural Pragmatics, 5(1), 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idemaru, K., Winter, B., & Brown, L. (2019). Cross-cultural multimodal politeness: The phonetics of Japanese deferential speech in comparison to Korean. Intercultural Pragmatics, 16(5), 517–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narbona Jiménez, A. (2001). Diálogo literario y escritura(lidad)-oralidad. In R. Eberenz (Ed.), Diálogo y oralidad en la narrativa hispánica moderna (pp. 189–208). Verbum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jucker, A. (2018). Data in pragmatic research. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 3–36). Mouton De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 316–341). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keisanen, T., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2014). A multimodal analysis of compliment sequences in everyday English interactions. Pragmatics, 24(3), 649–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuz, R., & Riordan, M. (2018). The art of transcription: Systems and methodological issues. In A. H. Jucker, K. P. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Ed.), Methods in pragmatics (pp. 95–120). Mouton De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landone, E. (2019). Los marcadores del discurso. ¿Guías inferenciales de la comunicación emotiva? Spanish in Context, 16(2), 272–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlotz, A., & Locher, M. (2013). The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlotz, A., & Locher, M. (2017). (Im)politeness and emotion. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 287–322). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Locher, M. (2004). Power and politeness in action. Disagreements in oral communication. Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Serena, A. (2007). Oralidad y escrituralidad en la recreación literaria del español coloquial. Gredos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, A. (2016). Multimodality. In Z. Hua (Ed.), Research methods in intercultural communication (pp. 268–280). Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2012). “Was that a compliment?” Implicit compliments in English and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 980–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez Reiter, R. (2008). Intra-cultural variation: Explanations in service calls to two Montevidean service providers. Journal of Politeness Research, 4, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morady Moghaddam, M. (2019). Appraising and reappraising of compliments and the provision of responses: Automatic and non-automatic reactions. Pragmatics, 29(3), 410–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2019). Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1996). Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Ed.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 407–437). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterreicher, W. (1996). Lo hablado en lo escrito. Reflexiones metodológicas y aproximación a una tipología. In T. Kotschi, W. Oesterreicher, & K. Zimmermann (Eds.), El español hablado y la cultural oral en Esapña e Hispanoamerica (pp. 317–340). Veuvert/Iberoamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallotti, G. (1999). Metodologie di ricerca. In R. Galatolo & G. Pallotti (Ed.), La conversazione. Un'introduzione allo studio dell'interazione verbale (pp. 365–407). Cortina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock-Speck, B., & del Saz-Rubio, M. (2013). A multimodal analysis of facework strategies in a corpus of charity ads on British television. Journal of Pragmatics, 49, 38–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, M., & André, E. (2007). More than just a friendly phrase: Multimodal aspects of polite behavior in agents. In T. Nishida (Ed.), Conversational informatics: An engineering approach (pp. 69–84). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rühlemann, C. (2019). Corpus Linguistics for Pragmatics. A guide for research. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakel, J., & Everett, D. L. (2012). Linguistic field work. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnurr, S., & Zayts, O. (2013). “I can’t remember them ever not doing what I tell them!”: Negotiating face and power relations in ‘upward’ refusals in multicultural workplaces in Hong Kong. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(4), 593–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, U. (2018). Face as an interactional construct in the context of connectedness and separateness. An empirical approach to culture-specific interpretations of face. Pragmatics, 28(4), 547–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seco, M. (1983). Lengua coloquial y literatura. Boletín Informativo de la Fundación Juan March, 129, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J., & Malcom, C. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H., & Xing, J. (2000). A problematic Chinese business visit to Britain: Issues of face. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally speaking: Managing rapport through talk across cultures (pp. 272–288). Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, M. (1987). Análisis del discurso. Análisis sociolingüístico del lenguaje natural. Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data anaysis for cross-cultural research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Bom, I., & Mills, S. (2015). A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(2), 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, D., & Lan, C. (2019). (Im)politeness at a Chinese dinner table: A discursive approach to (im)politeness in multi-party communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 15(2), 223–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, C. (2008). (Im)politeness. Towards an evaluative and embodied approach. Pragmatics and Cognition, 16(1), 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Lingue, Letterature, Culture e Mediazioni, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Elena Landone

Authors
  1. Elena Landone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Landone .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Landone, E. (2022). Recording and Transcription. In: Methodology in Politeness Research. Advances in (Im)politeness Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09161-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09161-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09160-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09161-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation