Skip to main content

Taiwan, South Korea, and the Philippines: Asian Values, Political Parties and Democratic Support

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy under Pressure

Part of the book series: Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century ((CDC))

  • 322 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines three democracies that adhere to traditional Asian culture and have experienced similar political transitions from authoritarianism under their respective ruling parties at approximately the same time. The study focuses on the mutual accommodation mechanism between Asian cuture and political parties as a factor influencing support for democratic regimes. The study first examines the problem Asian parties encouter when applying democratic ideas to non-Western polities, and then assesses to what extent and in what manner Asian culture influences the function of political parties in these three young democracies. Following a review of political parties and party system in the three democracies, this chapter then focuses on core features of Asian culture, chiefly family values and their relationship with political parties. The emprical section looks at factors associated with support for democratic regimes and explainins the mutual accommodation mechanism between culture and political parties in the three cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allern, E. H., Heidar, K., & Karlsen, R. (2015). After the mass party: Continuity and change in political parties and representation in Norway. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). An approach to political culture. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondel, J. (2006). Parties and party systems in East and Southeast Asia. In Democratisation, governance and regionalism in East and Southeast Asia (pp. 63–100). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T. J. (1989). Democratizing the quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41(4), 471–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, T. J. (2003). Political institutions and the malaise of East Asian new democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J., & Ong, N. N. T. (2005). Authority orientations and democratic attitudes: A test of the ‘Asian values’ hypothesis. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bary, W. T. (1983). The liberal tradition in China. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F., Chu, Y. H., & Tien, H. M. (Eds.). 1997. Consolidating the third wave democracies (Vol. 1). JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L., 1999. Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. JHU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, R. H. (1992). Democratization and the institutionalization of Latin American political parties. Comparative Political Studies, 24(4), 488–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1963). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. Wiley (Original work published 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., & Whitefield, S. (1995). The politics and economics of democratic commitment: Support for democracy in transition societies. British Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 485–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Confucianism and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 6(2), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giebler, H., Lacewell, O. P., Regel, S., & Werner, A. (2018). Decline or change? Party types and the crisis of representative democracy. In Democracy and crisis (pp. 145–175). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2005). Cultural and economic prerequisites of democracy: Reassessing recent evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(4), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1984). Will more countries become democratic?. Political Science Quarterly, 99(2), 193–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave. Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., 1999. Postmodernization erodes respect for authority, but increases support for democracy. In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 236–256). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. M. (1997). “Asian-style democracy”: A critique from East Asia. Asian Survey, 37(12), 1119–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Choi, J. Y., & Cho, J. (2008). Changing cleavage structure in new democracies: An empirical analysis of political cleavages in Korea. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 136–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, O. (1966). The transformation of the Western European party systems. In Political parties and political development (pp. 177–200). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H. D. (1999). Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis. In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 31–56). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larry, D. (2008). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. B. (2001). The political process in Korea. In S. H. Kil, & Chung-in Moon (Eds.), Understanding Korean politics: An introduction (pp. 141–74). State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lien, P. T., Margaret Conway, M., & Wong, J. (2003). The contours and sources of ethnic identity choices among Asian Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 461–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political man (expanded ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (Eds.). (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America (p. 1). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. Handbook of Party Politics, 11(6), 204–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, M. L., & Scully, P. L. (2002). Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National Civic Review, 91(2), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L. (2004). What is a ‘good’ democracy? Democratization, 11(5), 10–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, L., Berg-Schlosser, D., & Badie, B. (2017). Political science: A global perspective. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munck, G. L. (1994). Democratic transitions in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 26(3), 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neher, C. D. (1994). Asian style democracy. Asian Survey, 34(11), 949–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, S., & Barghoorn, F. C. (1956). Modern political parties: Approaches to comparative politics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power (Vol. 6). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. W. (2002). Elections in democratizing Korea, In J. F. S. Hsieh, & D. Newman (Eds.), How Asia votes (pp. 118–46). Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, N., & Garcia, J. A. (2009). Asian-Pacific-American partisanship: Dynamics of partisan and nonpartisan identities. Social Science Quarterly, 90(4), 886–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. B. (1982). Contemporary democracies. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rappa, A., & Tan, S. H. (2003). Political implications of Confucian familism. Asian Philosophy, 13(2–3), 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocamora, J. (2004). Formal democracy and its alternatives in the Philippines: Parties, elections and social movements. In Democracy and civil society in Asia: Volume 2 (pp. 196–221). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalapino, R. A. (1997). The East Asian prospect: Tale of three systems. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 150–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian (p. 286). Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sin, T. C., Sin, T. C., & Shin, D. C. (1999). Mass politics and culture in democratizing Korea. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tien, H. M. (1996). Taiwan in 1995: Electoral politics and cross-Strait relations. Asian Survey, 36(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomsa, D., & Ufen, A. (Eds.). (2013). Party politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and electoral competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (2019). Temporal models of political development: In general and of democratization in particular. In Democracy under threat (pp. 23–44). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. S. (2000). The effects of age and political exposure on the development of party identification among Asian American and Latino immigrants in the United States. Political Behavior, 22(4), 341–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis L. C. Weng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weng, D.L.C. (2022). Taiwan, South Korea, and the Philippines: Asian Values, Political Parties and Democratic Support . In: van Beek, U. (eds) Democracy under Pressure. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09123-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics