Abstract
This chapter examines three democracies that adhere to traditional Asian culture and have experienced similar political transitions from authoritarianism under their respective ruling parties at approximately the same time. The study focuses on the mutual accommodation mechanism between Asian cuture and political parties as a factor influencing support for democratic regimes. The study first examines the problem Asian parties encouter when applying democratic ideas to non-Western polities, and then assesses to what extent and in what manner Asian culture influences the function of political parties in these three young democracies. Following a review of political parties and party system in the three democracies, this chapter then focuses on core features of Asian culture, chiefly family values and their relationship with political parties. The emprical section looks at factors associated with support for democratic regimes and explainins the mutual accommodation mechanism between culture and political parties in the three cases.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allern, E. H., Heidar, K., & Karlsen, R. (2015). After the mass party: Continuity and change in political parties and representation in Norway. Lexington Books.
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). An approach to political culture. Princeton University Press.
Blondel, J. (2006). Parties and party systems in East and Southeast Asia. In Democratisation, governance and regionalism in East and Southeast Asia (pp. 63–100). Routledge.
Cheng, T. J. (1989). Democratizing the quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41(4), 471–499.
Cheng, T. J. (2003). Political institutions and the malaise of East Asian new democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(1), 1–41.
Dalton, R. J., & Ong, N. N. T. (2005). Authority orientations and democratic attitudes: A test of the ‘Asian values’ hypothesis. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 6(2), 211–231.
De Bary, W. T. (1983). The liberal tradition in China. Columbia University Press.
Diamond, L., Plattner, M. F., Chu, Y. H., & Tien, H. M. (Eds.). 1997. Consolidating the third wave democracies (Vol. 1). JHU Press.
Diamond, L., 1999. Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. JHU Press.
Dix, R. H. (1992). Democratization and the institutionalization of Latin American political parties. Comparative Political Studies, 24(4), 488–511.
Duverger, M. (1963). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. Wiley (Original work published 1954).
Evans, G., & Whitefield, S. (1995). The politics and economics of democratic commitment: Support for democracy in transition societies. British Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 485–514.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Confucianism and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 6(2), 20–33.
Fukuyama, F. (2006). The end of history and the last man. Simon and Schuster.
Giebler, H., Lacewell, O. P., Regel, S., & Werner, A. (2018). Decline or change? Party types and the crisis of representative democracy. In Democracy and crisis (pp. 145–175). Springer.
Hadenius, A., & Teorell, J. (2005). Cultural and economic prerequisites of democracy: Reassessing recent evidence. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(4), 87–106.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
Huntington, S. P. (1984). Will more countries become democratic?. Political Science Quarterly, 99(2), 193–218.
Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave. Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
Inglehart, R., 1999. Postmodernization erodes respect for authority, but increases support for democracy. In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 236–256). Oxford University Press.
Kim, Y. M. (1997). “Asian-style democracy”: A critique from East Asia. Asian Survey, 37(12), 1119–1134.
Kim, H., Choi, J. Y., & Cho, J. (2008). Changing cleavage structure in new democracies: An empirical analysis of political cleavages in Korea. Electoral Studies, 27(1), 136–150.
Kirchheimer, O. (1966). The transformation of the Western European party systems. In Political parties and political development (pp. 177–200). Princeton University Press.
Klingemann, H. D. (1999). Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis. In Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 31–56). Oxford University Press.
Larry, D. (2008). The spirit of democracy: The struggle to build free societies throughout the world. Macmillan.
Lee, J. B. (2001). The political process in Korea. In S. H. Kil, & Chung-in Moon (Eds.), Understanding Korean politics: An introduction (pp. 141–74). State University of New York Press.
Lien, P. T., Margaret Conway, M., & Wong, J. (2003). The contours and sources of ethnic identity choices among Asian Americans. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 461–481.
Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. Yale University Press.
Lipset, S. M. (1981). Political man (expanded ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Mainwaring, S., & Scully, T. (Eds.). (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America (p. 1). Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring, S., & Torcal, M. (2006). Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. Handbook of Party Politics, 11(6), 204–227.
McCoy, M. L., & Scully, P. L. (2002). Deliberative dialogue to expand civic engagement: What kind of talk does democracy need? National Civic Review, 91(2), 117–135.
Morlino, L. (2004). What is a ‘good’ democracy? Democratization, 11(5), 10–32.
Morlino, L., Berg-Schlosser, D., & Badie, B. (2017). Political science: A global perspective. Sage.
Munck, G. L. (1994). Democratic transitions in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 26(3), 355.
Neher, C. D. (1994). Asian style democracy. Asian Survey, 34(11), 949–961.
Neumann, S., & Barghoorn, F. C. (1956). Modern political parties: Approaches to comparative politics. University of Chicago Press.
Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford University Press.
Panebianco, A. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power (Vol. 6). Cambridge University Press.
Park, C. W. (2002). Elections in democratizing Korea, In J. F. S. Hsieh, & D. Newman (Eds.), How Asia votes (pp. 118–46). Chatham House.
Phan, N., & Garcia, J. A. (2009). Asian-Pacific-American partisanship: Dynamics of partisan and nonpartisan identities. Social Science Quarterly, 90(4), 886–910.
Powell, G. B. (1982). Contemporary democracies. Harvard University Press.
Rappa, A., & Tan, S. H. (2003). Political implications of Confucian familism. Asian Philosophy, 13(2–3), 87–102.
Rocamora, J. (2004). Formal democracy and its alternatives in the Philippines: Parties, elections and social movements. In Democracy and civil society in Asia: Volume 2 (pp. 196–221). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham House.
Scalapino, R. A. (1997). The East Asian prospect: Tale of three systems. Journal of Democracy, 8(3), 150–155.
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Review, 66(1), 91–113.
Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian (p. 286). Penguin.
Sin, T. C., Sin, T. C., & Shin, D. C. (1999). Mass politics and culture in democratizing Korea. Cambridge University Press.
Tien, H. M. (1996). Taiwan in 1995: Electoral politics and cross-Strait relations. Asian Survey, 36(1), 33–40.
Tomsa, D., & Ufen, A. (Eds.). (2013). Party politics in Southeast Asia: Clientelism and electoral competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. Routledge.
Whitehead, L. (2019). Temporal models of political development: In general and of democratization in particular. In Democracy under threat (pp. 23–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wong, J. S. (2000). The effects of age and political exposure on the development of party identification among Asian American and Latino immigrants in the United States. Political Behavior, 22(4), 341–371.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weng, D.L.C. (2022). Taiwan, South Korea, and the Philippines: Asian Values, Political Parties and Democratic Support . In: van Beek, U. (eds) Democracy under Pressure. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09123-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09123-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09122-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09123-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)