Skip to main content

Abstract

Peace studies have long ignored social theories about spatiality and have considered space as an abstract container that does not contribute anything to understanding peacebuilding. This article shows how spatiality has been treated in peace studies and how peace has been treated in spatiality studies to discuss possible and fruitful dialogues between the two fields of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is enormous literature that has built a relational and critical notion of social space to show that social space is composed of society-nature relations, the spatial logics of modes of production, and the appropriations and daily and existential constructions of space-time. In addition to Henri Lefebvre (Lefebvre 1991), Milton Santos (Santos 2002), David Harvey (Harvey 1997), it is key to mention authors such as (a) Thrift, Nigel (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. Routledge; (b) Whatmore, Sarah (2002). Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces. SAGE. (c) Massey, Doreen (2005). For space. Sage; (d) Porto-Gonçalves, Carlos Walter (2009). Territorialities and struggle for territory in Latin America: geography of social movements in Latin America. Ediciones IVIC; (e) Werlen, Benno (1993). Society action and space: an alternative human geography. Routledge.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Pena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pena, L. (2022). The Spatiality of the Peace. In: AlDajani, I.M., Leiner, M. (eds) Reconciliation, Heritage and Social Inclusion in the Middle East and North Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08713-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08713-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08712-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08713-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics