Keywords

1 Introduction

The smelt is an anadromous species that is very susceptible to environmental effects (Repečka and Gerulaitis 1994). Numerous studies of Russian and foreign researchers have been devoted to the smelt biology as an important commercial species (Gaigalas 1980; Manyukas 1959; Shibaev et al. 2012). Despite the more or less studied biology of the species, the problem of accurately predicting the allowable volume of catches still exists (Ryabchun et al. 2020), i.e. it can be concluded that the smelt fishery is affected rather not by the population size, but by hydrometeorological factors that can affect the spawning migration of smelt, and, accordingly, its yield. This issue was considered only in the work of the Lithuanian researcher in regard to the catches in the Curonian Lagoon (Svagždys 2009).

Table 17.1. Both smelt (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus L.) which lives in the Baltic Sea, and its resident freshwater form (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus morpha spirinchus L.) play an import role in commercial fisheries; they together belong to the family Osmeridae and in the fishery statics, their total catches are usually reported. Fishery is conducted on spawning routes, namely in the Curonian Lagoon and in the Curonian Lagoon-Neman River transit zone, which includes the lower course of the Neman River (the Skirvite arm, the Vitine and Atmata rivers) and the Matrosovka River. The fishery in the transit zone was not sufficiently developed until 2011 for several reasons. First, the fisheries regulation based on the system of the total allowable catch did not allow a large number of commercial enterprises and fishermen to perform fishing, since the quota was distributed among four fishing collective farms according to the historical principle. This approach often led to an underutilization of the quota, especially in years when the ice breakup in the lagoon occurs later, and it was impossible to use set gillnets in the lagoon for the quota utilization, and therefore smelt migrated to rivers where commercial fishermen were ready to fish, but their quotas were insufficient for large volumes of catches. Second, the lack of a sufficient number of fishing sites on the rivers, since after the collapse of the USSR, the main fishing sites on the rivers of the Curonian Lagoon basin became part the Lithuanian territory. Russian fishermen were traditionally fishing in the lower reaches of the river, mainly in the Skirvite arm. But in 2012, the possible recommended catch (RC/PC) became an alternative to the system of fishery regulation based on total allowable catch (TAC) which made it possible to develop fisheries in rivers (Anuryeva et al. 2015; Burbakh et al. 2019; Burbach 2021).

Table 17.1 Temperature regime during the spawning migration of smelt, 2012–2020 (prepared by the authors)

The aim of the work is to identify the main hydrometeorological factors that affect the dynamics of the spawning migration and smelt fisheries in the Curonian Lagoon-the Neman River transit system.

2 Materials and Methods

This work is based on the data of monitoring surveys at fishing sites in the period from 2012 to 2020. Fish sampling was conducted in different sections of the Curonian Lagoon-Neman River transit system, depending on the tasks: in the lower reaches of the Neman River, in the Matrosovka River outflowing the Neman River downstream of the city of Sovetsk, and in the Deyma River (2020) near the fishing sites of fishing brigades in the current year (see Fig. 17.1).

Fig. 17.1
A map of the fishing brigades and their ways of smelt spawning migration starts from Vytine and Skirvit rivers and joins to Atmata river, and Neman river. Here, the Lithuanian fishermen are on the left side of the Vytine and Neman rivers. The Russian fishermen are on the right side of the Vytine and Neman rivers.

Map of the fishing brigades locations and smelt migration ways (compiled by the authors)

All data on temperature and water level fluctuations in the transit system were obtained directly by the authors.

3 Results

The maximum historical catch of smelt was 8.8 thousand tons in 1935 (Osadchiy 2000), in the modern period such a value has never been achieved. The Russian catches after the collapse of the USSR range from 24 to 541 tons, averaging 188 tons.

The year of 2010 is a turning point in the history of smelt fishery. That year, the winter was very cold and prolonged, the lagoon was covered with ice for a long time, therefore, fishing with set gillnets was impossible. As a result, the total catch in 2010 amounted to 23 tons; it is the minimum value for the last 30 years.

Since 2011, there was a tendency in Russia to relocate fisheries to the rivers of the Curonian Lagoon basin, which has become possible for several reasons. First, in some years the ice breakup starts late in the lagoon. Second, the fishing regulations changed. Thus, in 2012, smelt was transferred to the category of aquatic biological resources, for which the total allowable catch (TAC) was not established, but the recommended (possible) catch (RC/PC) was defined. As a result of the transition to the system of the recommended catch (RC/PC), all interested fishing enterprises and fishermen receive fishing permits for the use of aquatic biological resources, and fishing is carried out according to the “Olympic system”. The new regulatory system has made it possible to increase the efficiency of fishing. The allowable volume of catches increased from 38 to 81% (Fig. 17.2).

Fig. 17.2
A graph of catch in lagoon versus a year is evaluated. From 1990 to 1995, the catch in the lagoon is a peak at 540. From 1995 to 2000, the catch in the lagoon is a peak at 180. From 2015 to 2020, the catch in the lagoon is a peak at 300. The catch in revers is high in 2015 at 550. Developing TAC/RC is peak from 1990 to 1995.

Long-term dynamics of commercial catches of smelt and developing of the allowed volume of production

In some years, the catch volume exceeds the recommended one, but this fact does not have a negative impact on the smelt stock.

We paid attention to the main hydrological factors that can affect the dynamics of the spawning migration and catches such as water temperature during different periods of spawning migration, rate of water warming, the day fish enter the rivers (the length of daylight), wind regime.

During the research period, smelt enters the Curonian Lagoon-Neman River transit zone in different periods, usually at the end of February or early March, less often at the end of March or mid-April, usually at a temperature of 1.0–1.5 °C, only in 2016 it was recorded at a temperature of 2 °C. The spawning migration ends at a water temperature of about 4–6 °C, i.e. at spawning temperatures, the period of intensive migration is observed at a temperature of 3–4 °C (see Table 17.1, Fig. 17.3).

Fig. 17.3
A graph of water temperature versus year is evaluated. The beginning of spawning migration starts in 2012 with a temperature of 0.5 and ends in 2020 with a temperature of 2. The end of spawning starts with a temperature of 0.5 and ends with a temperature of 2. The peak of spawning starts with a temperature of 0.5 and ends with a temperature of 2.

Temperature regime during spawning migration of smelt to the rivers of the Curonian Lagoon basin (compiled by the authors)

When comparing the data on catches in the rivers with the average water temperature during the period of intensive migration, when the maximum catches are recorded, it is found that the temperature affects rather not the amount of total catch and the duration of migration, but the time of entry and termination of migration, this in turn determines the results of fishing. Thus, in 2012, when the average temperature was 3.5 °C during the period of intensive migration, the yield in the rivers was 252 tons, and in 2014, at the same temperature, the yield was 54 tons. At an average temperature of 3 °C during the intensive migration, the catches differ, amounting to 275 and 50 tons in 2016 and 2017, respectively (see Fig. 17.4).

Fig. 17.4
A graph of catch versus year is evaluated. In 2011, the catch in rivers is 40. In 2015, the catch in rivers is 260. In 2016, the catch in rivers is 290. In 2020, the catch in rivers is 90. In 2012, the temperature is 4, and get falls in 2015 to a temperature of 2. It increases in 2016, the temperature is 3. In 2020, its temperature is 4.5.

Temperature regime during spawning migration and its impact on smelt catches in rivers (compiled by the authors)

Another important factor determining spawning migration is the rate of water warming. At slow water warming, the spawning migration is gradual and long. Accordingly, the catches per effort are low, but the total catch is higher than in years when warming period is short. The most durable migrations were recorded in 2015 and 2016 (23 and 30 days, respectively); at that time the catches in the rivers were maximal and amounted to 257 (2015) and 286 tons (2016) (see Fig. 17.5).

Fig. 17.5
A graph of catch versus year is evaluated. In 2011, the catch in rivers is 100. In 2015, the catch in rivers is 260. In 2016, the catch in rivers is 290. In 2020, the catch in rivers is 90. In 2012, the duration of migration is 8, and increased in 2016, the duration of migration is 28. In 2020, the duration of migration is 28.

Relationship between smelt catches in rivers and duration of spawning migration (compiled by the authors)

At the same time, the rate of warming has an impact in combination with other hydrometeorological factors, which does not allow conducting the direct correlation analysis. Thus, in 2018, the duration of the spawning migration was 22 days, and the yield was low (100 tons).

The study of the temporal dynamics of the spawning migration showed that the date of its beginning is not always correlated with the water temperature, but has its own deterministic period. It was found that at an earlier migration into rivers, the yield is higher (the correlation coefficient is 0.7, which indicates a strong dependence). Conversely, the later the water temperature reaches the optimum for the beginning of the spawning migration, the smaller the catch value is (see Figs. 17.6 and 17.7).

Fig. 17.6
A graph of catch in tons versus date of the migration beginning in rivers. In 2015, the date of migration begins on 01.05.03. In 2014, the date of migration begins on 11.15.03. In 2020 and 2012, the date of migration begins on 16.20.03. In 2011,18, the date of migration begins on 26.31.03. In 2013, the date of migration begins on 06.10.04.

Relationship between smelt catch in the rivers and the day of entry into the rivers of the Curonian Lagoon basin by years (compiled by the authors)

Fig. 17.7
A graph of Catch, tons versus Day of entry of smelt into the rivers relative to February 27. An equation of a line is y equals minus 8, 0433 x plus 391, 4. R equals 0, 7.

Relationship between the catch of smelt in the rivers of the Curonian Lagoon basin and the day of entry into the rivers relative to the date of the earliest start of spawning migration (compiled by the authors) (x-day of entry of smelt into the rivers relative to February 27, y-catch)

The water level during the spawning migration varied between 1.9 and 3.4 m. The average fluctuation of the level during the spawning migration of smelt in the Skirvite River is 10–15 cm. The dependence of the water level on the daily dynamics of catches was not found (see Fig. 17.8). The effect of the water level on the total catch in the rivers was not also found (see Fig. 17.9).

Fig. 17.8
A graph of Catch, tons versus months is evaluated. On 25 Feb, the catch is 5 tons. On 02 Mar, the catch is 10 tons. On 07 Mar, the catch is 60 tons. On 12 Mar, the catch is 245 tons. On 17 Mar, the catch is 180 tons. On 22 Mar, the catch is 50 tons. On 27 Mar, the catch is 15 tons. The water level is 2 on 25 Feb, 2.2 on 12 Mar, and 2 on 27 Mar.

Level regime during the spawning migration period and its impact on the smelt catch by the dates of fishing (compiled by the authors)

Fig. 17.9
A graph of Catch, tons versus months is evaluated. In 2011, the catch is 30 tons. In 2013, the catch is 140 tons. In 2015, the catch is 255 tons. In 2016, the catch is 280 tons. In 2018, the catch is 100 tons. In 2020, the catch is 90 tons. The water level is 2 in 2015, 2.75 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 3.5 in 2018, 2.5 in 2019, and 2.75 in 2020.

Level regime during spawning migration and its impact on smelt catches in rivers (compiled by the authors)

The wind regime is an important factor during the spawning migration. It should be mentioned that, an important condition for smelt to enter the Neman River is “silence”, i.e. when the ice breaks or the wind is strong, the fish cannot enter the rivers because they are deterrent factors. The depth of the Skirvite River in the mouth part during this period is no more than 0.5 m, which makes it impossible for the smelt to descend to avoid the action of the wind. Provided that strong winds blow during the fishing season, the efficiency of fishing also decreases, due to the fact that the “shoal breaks” and the fish move separately.

4 Conclusion

In modern conditions, there has been a redistribution of smelt catches between the Curonian Lagoon and the rivers of its basin. In some years, the share of smelt catches in the rivers reaches 90% (2013), on average over the past 10 years, the share of catches in the rivers has been 40–50%. The period of smelt spawning migration in the rivers is at the end of February-beginning of April, and depends on hydrological factors. The beginning of migration is usually timed to water warming to a water temperature of 1.0–1.5 °C, the peak of the migration is observed at a temperature of 3–4 °C, at a higher temperature, solitary specimens are found in catches. The slow water warming and the early beginning of the migration determine the maximum catches of smelt, so in 2014 the spawning migration lasted 15 days and the total catch was 58 tons, whereas in 2016, the catch was 5 times higher for 28 days.

Due to the different fishing modes, set gillnets are used in the lagoon, and beach seine in the rivers, a separate system of fisheries regulation is necessary. The transition from the regulation of smelt fisheries according to the system of the total allowable catch, which is distributed by quotas among fishing enterprises to fisheries according to the “Olympic system”, the utilization of the total quota by all fishing enterprises, ensured self-regulation of fishing depending on the intensity of the spawning migration in each particular year.

Due to the fact that intensive spawning migration and smelt fishery lasts 5–7 days, and then stops, the by-catch of related species, with the exception of ruff, corresponds to the concept of an ecosystem approach.