Skip to main content

Abstract

Defining the concepts of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘vulnerable groups’ is challenging, since vulnerability is a multi-dimensional concept used with both universal and particular meanings in a variety of disciplines, and can moreover be examined from different perspectives. In this chapter, we seek to define the concepts of ‘vulnerability’ and ‘vulnerable groups’ from sociological and legal perspectives in order to build a theoretical background for the subject analysed in this book. The approach taken in this chapter is based on the idea that to be human is to be vulnerable; nevertheless, although all humans are vulnerable, some groups are more vulnerable than others.

The chapter begins with the sociological approach to vulnerability. It could be argued that contemporary societies consist of fragmented and often antagonistic communities with only a small number having access to adequate social welfare and services. The remaining individuals have little hope of realising their human potential. They are often called vulnerable or marginalised groups or groups at risk of social exclusion. In different spheres of life, vulnerable groups experience deep exclusion that negatively affects their quality of life, well-being and future life opportunities. Moreover, there exists a dominant discursive tradition that imposes a burden of guilt, shame and even greater vulnerability on socially afflicted and vulnerable groups. Rather than accepting this discursive tradition, sociologists have turned their attention to researching social exclusion, social suffering, and daily hardship, thereby turning vulnerable people’s experiences of injustice, harm and damage into crucial sociological issues.

After a brief sociological analysis of vulnerable groups, the chapter continues by presenting the international legal framework. The authors identify and discuss the main universal and regional human rights instruments that provide for the protection of vulnerable groups and their individual members and note the relevant practice of the UN treaty monitoring bodies and UN Committees. In this way, the chapter sketches the framework of international legal regulation linking the international, regional and national levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a more extensive analysis of the historical background of the Declaration and links of its articles to historical events, see Nifosi-Sutton (2017), p. 21.

  2. 2.

    See, as an example, Recommendation CM/Rec(2011)5 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on reducing the risk of vulnerability of elderly migrants and improving their welfare; PACE Resolution 2048 (2015) Discrimination against transgender people in Europe; 2011 Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention), adopted on 11 May 2011.

  3. 3.

    A search was made in Eur-Lex with key words ‘vulnerable groups such as’. Documents of 2020 and 2021 which appeared as a result of the search mentioned Roma, children, migrant minors, persons with disabilities and other groups already noted above.

  4. 4.

    Domestic violence is classified as gender-based violence and the majority of victims are women.

  5. 5.

    This list of criteria is based on the criteria suggested by Morawa (2003) and is further supplemented.

  6. 6.

    For example, the UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules) (2010) in its preamble states that “women prisoners belong to one of the vulnerable groups that have specific needs and requirements”.

  7. 7.

    Among soft-law instruments, we should mention CEDAW Committee General Recommendation No. 19 on violence against women (1992) and CEDAW Committee General Recommendation No. 35 on gender-based violence against women (2017).

  8. 8.

    Due to its gender definition, the Istanbul Convention is struggling to gain acceptance in Lithuania, Poland and Latvia. In Latvia, a constitutional case before the Latvian Constitutional Court has been initiated in this regard in August 2020. Among the countries on which this research focuses, only Estonia has ratified the Convention.

  9. 9.

    For a more extensive discussion on the positive obligation of states with respect to children see Ippolito (2015), pp. 23–47.

  10. 10.

    Several other disability-specific non-binding international instruments have been adopted at the international level. To mention just a few examples: UN Declaration of the Rights of Mentally-Retarded Persons (1971), UN Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons (1975), UN Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care (1991), etc.

References

Books and Articles

  • Ahmed S (2004) The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed T (2015) The many vulnerabilities of the Roma and the European legal framework. In: Ippolito F, Iglesias Sanchez S (eds) Protecting vulnerable groups. The European Human Rights Framework. Hart Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge J (2015) Participatory research. Working with vulnerable groups in research and practice. Policy Press, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib S (1992) Situating the self: gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresnevičiūtė V, Leončikas T (2009) Diskriminacijos suvokimas Lietuvos visuomenėje. Filosofija. Sociologija 4:336–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant L (2011) Cruel optimism. Duke University Press, Durham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P et al (1999) The weight of the world: social suffering in the contemporary society (trans: Parkhurst Ferguson P). Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJD (1992) An invitation to reflexive sociology. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazienė R, Guščinskienė J (2004) Socialinės atskirties modeliai Lietuvoje. Filosofija. Sociologija 4:50–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown W (1995) States of injury: power and freedom in late modernity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2004) Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. Verso, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2009) Frames of war: when is life grievable? Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (2011) For and against precarity. Tidal: Occupy Theory 1. http://www.e-flux.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/TIDAL_occupytheory.pdf?b8c429. Accessed 2 Apr 2021

  • Butler J (2012) Can one lead a good life in a bad life? Adorno Prize Lecture. In: Radical Philosophy. Nov/Dec 2012, pp 9–18. https://www.radicalphilosophyarchive.com/issue-files/rp176_article1_judith_butler_adorno_prize_lecture.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  • Butler J, Athanasiou A (2013) Dispossession: the performative in the political. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth SJ (2000) A phenomenology of working class experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Das V, Kleinman A, Lock MM, Ramphele M, Reynolds P (eds) (2001) Remaking a world: violence, social suffering, and recovery. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Fines F (2015) European protection for women. In: Ippolito F, Iglesias Sanchez S (eds) Protecting vulnerable groups. The European Human Rights Framework. Hart Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggett P, Mayo M, Miller C (2008) The dilemmas of development work. Policy Press, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito F (2015) (De)Constructing children’s vulnerability under European law. In: Ippolito F, Iglesias Sanchez S (eds) Protecting vulnerable groups. The European Human Rights Framework. Hart Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Ippolito F, Iglesias Sanchez S (eds) (2015) Protecting vulnerable groups. The European Human Rights Framework. Hart Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Iusmen I (2018) ‘Non multa, sed multum’: EU Roma policy and the challenges of Roma inclusion. J Eur Integr 40(4):427–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1462803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jehoel-Gijsbers G, Vrooman C (2007) Explaining social exclusion: a theoretical model tested in the Netherlands. The Netherlands Institute for Social Research, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas R, Pantazis C, Fahmy E, Gordon D, Lloyd E, Patsios D (2007) The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. University of Bristol Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Misztal BA (2011) The challenges of vulnerability. In search of strategies for a less vulnerable social life. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Mjöll Arnardóttir O, Quinn G (eds) (2009) The UN Convention on The Rights of Persons with Disabilities. European and Scandinavian Perspectives. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawa AHE (2003) Vulnerability as a concept in international human rights law. J Int Relat Dev 10:139–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Nifosi-Sutton I (2017) The protection of vulnerable groups under international human rights law. Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okunevičiūtė Neverauskienė L, Moskvina J (2014) Pažeidžiamos gyventojų grupės: iššūkiai užimtumui. Socialinė teorija, politika ir praktika 9:114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesada L (2015) Protection of refugees and other vulnerable persons under the European Social Charter. Protección de refugiados y otras personas vulnerables en la Carta Social Europea. Revista de Derecho Político 1:245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranci C (2011) Social vulnerability in Europe. In: Ranci C (ed) Social vulnerability in Europe. The new configuration of social risks. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs B (2001) The toilet paper: femininity, class and mis-recognition. Women’s Stud Int Forum 24(3/4):295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taket A, Crisp BR, Nevill A, Lamaro G, Graham M, Barter-Godfrey S (2009) Theorising social exclusion. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Benzon N, van Blerk L (2017) Research relationships and responsibilities: ‘doing’ research with ‘vulnerable’ participants: introduction to the special edition. Soc Cult Geogr 18(7):895–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil SW, Wildemeersch D, Percy-Smith B (2005) Unemployed youth and social exclusion in Europe: learning for inclusion? Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesbrock A (2015) Disability as a form of vulnerability under EU and CoE law: embracing the ‘social model’? In: Ippolito F, Iglesias Sanchez S (eds) Protecting vulnerable groups. The European Human Rights Framework. Hart Publishing

    Google Scholar 

Legal Acts

  • CESCR General Comment No. 14 (2000) on the right to the highest attainable standard of health (Art. 12). 11 August 2000 (E/C.12/2000/4).

    Google Scholar 

  • CESCR. Statement on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and economic, social and cultural rights (2020), 17 April 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination General Recommendation 27 on Discrimination Against Roma (2000), adopted on 16 August 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women established under the CEDAW (CEDAW Committee) General Recommendation No. 19 on violence against women (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women established under the CEDAW (CEDAW Committee) General Recommendation No. 35 on gender-based violence against women, updating general recommendation No. 19 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (Istanbul Convention) (2011), 11 May 2011, ETS 210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)11 on the European Rules for juvenile offenders subject to sanctions or measures (2008), adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 5 November 2008 at the 1040th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec(2009)10 on integrated national strategies for the protection of children from violence, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 November 2009 at the 1070bis meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Recommendation Rec(2002)5 on the protection of women against violence, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 April 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe Strategy on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2017-2023 (2016), https://rm.coe.int/16806fe7d4. Accessed 7 April 2021.

  • Declaration of the Council of Europe’s First Summit (‘Vienna Declaration, 1993), 9 October 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration on Race and Racial Prejudice (1978), adopted by the General Conference of UNESCO, on 27 November 1978

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities (1992), adopted by General Assembly resolution 47/135 of 18 December 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2012/29/EU of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime (Victims’ Rights Directive) (2012). OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECRI General Policy Recommendation (No. 3) on ‘Combating Racism and Intolerance against Roma/Gypsies’ (1998), 6 March 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • ECRI General Policy Recommendation (No.11) on combating racism and racial discrimination in policing (2007), 29 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • ECRI General Policy Recommendation (No.13) revised on combating antigypsyism and discrimination against Roma (2011, 2020), adopted on 24 June 2011 and amended on 1 December 2020

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000). OJ C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 391–407

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An EU Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies up to 2020 (2011). COM/2011/0173 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions EU strategy on the rights of the child (2021). COM/2021/142 final

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (EU Racial Equality Directive) (2000). OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p. 22-26

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA of 28 November 2008 on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (2008). OJ L 328, 6.12.2008, p. 55-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation. OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p. 16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030 (2021), https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8376&furtherPubs=yes. Accessed 7 April 2021.

  • European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages (1992), ETS No. 148, 5 November 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee of Social Rights (2003). Conclusions 2003, Statement of interpretation of Article 17

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee of Social Rights (2005). Conclusions 2005, Statement of Interpretation of Article 14§1.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) (1950), adopted by the Council of Europe on 4 November 1950

    Google Scholar 

  • European Convention on the Exercise of Children’s Rights (1996), Strasbourg, 25 January 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (1995), ETS No.157, 1 February 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965), adopted by the General Assembly in resolution 2106A (XX) of 21 December 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966), adopted by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), adopted by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966

    Google Scholar 

  • Recommendation Rec(2006)2-rev on the European Prison Rules (European Prison Rules) (2006), adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 January 2006, and revised and amended by the Committee of Ministers on 1 July 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revised European Social Charter (1996), ETS No.163, adopted on 18 October 1961 revised on 3 May 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Revised European Social Charter (1996), Strasbourg, 3 May 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)(1979) adopted by the UN General Assembly on 18 December 1979

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 20 November 1989

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Declaration of the Rights of Mentally Retarded Persons (1971), proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 2856 (XXVI) of 20 December 1971

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women (“DEVAW”) (1993), proclaimed by the UN General Assembly resolution 48/104 of 20 December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons (1975), proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 3447 (XXX) of 9 December 1975

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Principles and Guidelines on Access to Legal Aid in Criminal Justice Systems (2012). General Assembly resolution 67/187.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and the Improvement of Mental Health Care (1991), adopted by General Assembly resolution 46/119 of 17 Dec. 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules) (2010), adopted by the General Assembly on 21 December 2010 in A/RES/65/229

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules)(2010), adopted by resolution 2010/16 of 22 July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 13 December 2006 (A/RES/61/106)

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

    Google Scholar 

Other Resources

  • European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), Glossary & Thesaurus. https://eige.europa.eu/thesaurus/terms/1429. Accessed 7 April 2021.

  • Explanatory Report to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (2011), ETS 210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnė Limantė .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Limantė, A., Теrеškinas, A. (2022). Definition of Vulnerable Groups. In: Limantė, A., Pūraitė-Andrikienė, D. (eds) Legal Protection of Vulnerable Groups in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland. European Union and its Neighbours in a Globalized World, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06998-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06998-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06997-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06998-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics