Abstract
The chapter is devoted to various aspects of philosophical anthropology in the views of Latin authors of the Later Middle Ages. The boundaries of the period are set by two important historical occurrences: the translation of Aristotelian natural philosophy treatises into Latin at the turn of the thirteenth century and the early signs of crisis in scholastic philosophy precipitating the rejection of the pre-modern vision of human being as a psychosomatic unity by early modern science. It presents, in a chronological order, the changes and developments in the understanding of mutual relations between the soul and the body. It takes into account not only the areas of interest (reproduction, nutrition, growth, motion, perception, cognition, etc.) but also the forms of the analyzed works (literal commentaries, paraphrases, questions, treatises). Moreover, it pays attention to the way in which those works formed an interlocking chain through two and a half centuries of history with several recurrently crossing trails, some of which were frequented throughout the period, while others were of a more ephemeral character.
This work was supported by the Polish National Science Centre (NCN) grant n. UMO-2016/23/B/HS1/00430.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
See Hasse (2000).
- 2.
See Burnett (1996, 37).
- 3.
See McVaugh (2019, 384).
- 4.
See Esteban-Segura (2012, 18–19).
- 5.
See Kurdziałek (1950).
- 6.
See McVaugh (2010).
- 7.
See Galle (2008, 9–11).
- 8.
See De Leemans (2010, 917–918).
- 9.
See Callus (1943, 4).
- 10.
- 11.
There might have been some earlier attempts to comment on at least some of the treatises from the Parva naturalia set. According to an entry from a seventeenth-century catalogue of the Cathedral Library in Beauvais, there was a manuscript containing, among others, glosses on De somno et vigilia and De morte et vita (again, presumably De longitudine et brevitate vitae) by Alfred of Sareshel. This copy, however, did not survive and, if there are some others still extant, they have not been discovered yet. See Omont (1916, 48, n. 143); Callus (1943, 10–11).
- 12.
See De Leemans (2000, 272–360, esp. 275–276).
- 13.
See Wöllmer (2013, 250–251).
- 14.
See Canguilhem (1991).
- 15.
See Freidson (1970).
- 16.
See Daniels (2000, 318).
- 17.
See Engelhardt (1996).
- 18.
- 19.
See Tellkamp (2016).
- 20.
See Dunne (2003, 320–336).
- 21.
See Ebbesen (2014, 257–341).
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
Callus (1943, 38–39 and 45–47).
- 25.
See Marone (1983, 196).
- 26.
See Flint and Rea (2009).
- 27.
See Del Soldato (2020).
- 28.
See McCord Adams and Trifogli (2012).
- 29.
Solère (2018).
- 30.
See O’Boyle (1998, 5–7).
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
See Miteva (2018).
- 34.
See Hoenen (2011).
- 35.
- 36.
See Levinas (1961).
References
Beneduce, Chiara. 2019. La fisiologia del tatto nel XIV secolo. Il caso di Giovanni Buridano. In Rappresentazioni della natura nel Medioevo, ed. Onorato Grassi and Giovanni Catapano, 207–220. Firenze: Sismel Edizioni del Galluzzo.
Black, Deborah. 1991. Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna: The Logical and Psychological Dimensions. Dialogue 32 (02): 219–258.
———. 1996. Memory, Individuals, and the Past in Averroes’ Psychology. Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5: 161–187.
———. 2000. Imagination and Estimation: Arabic Paradigms and Western Transformation. Topoi 19: 59–75.
Burnett, Charles. 1996. The Introduction of Aristotle’s Natural Philosophy into Great Britain: A Preliminary Survey on the Manuscript Evidence. In Aristotle in Britain during the Middle Ages, ed. John Marenbon, 21–50. Turnhout: Brepols.
Callus, Daniel Angelo. 1943. Introduction of Aristotelian Learning to Oxford. In Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 29, 3–55. London: Humphrey Milford.
Canguilhem, Georges. 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.
Christensen, Michael Stenskjær. 2015. Simon of Faversham “Quaestiones super De motu animalium”. A Partial Edition and Doctrinal Study. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 84: 93–128.
Daniels, Norman. 2000. Normal Functioning and the Treatment Enhancement Distinction. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 9: 309–322.
De Asúa, Miguel. 1997. Pedro de Abano y la controversia entre médicos y filósofos. Patristica et Mediaevalia 18: 49–66.
De Leemans, Pieter. 2010. Parva naturalia, Commentaries on Aristotle’s. In Encyclopaedia of Medieval Philosophy between 500 and 1500, ed. Henrik Lagerlund, 917–918. Dordrecht/New York: Springer.
———. 2000. Medieval Latin Commentaries on Aristotle’s “De motu animalium”. Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales 67 (2): 272–360.
Del Soldato, Eva. 2020. Early Modern Aristotle. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Dunne, Michael. 2003. Thirteenth and Fourteenth-Century Commentaries on the “De Longitudine et Brevitate Vitae”. Early Science and Medicine 8 (4): 320–336.
Ebbesen, Sten. 2013. Simon of Faversham Quaestiones super librum De somno et vigilia: An Edition. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 82: 90–145.
———. 2014. Geoffrey of Aspall Quaestiones super librum De somno et vigilia: An Edition. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 83: 257–341.
———. 2015. Anonymous Orielensis 33 on De memoria: An Edition. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 85: 128–161.
Ebbesen, Sten, Christina Thomsen Thörnqvist, and Véronique Decaix. 2015. Questions on “De sensu et sensato”, “De memoria et reminiscentia” and “De somno et vigilia”. A Catalogue. Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 57: 59–115.
Engelhardt, Tristram H., Jr. 1996. The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esteban-Segura, Laura. 2012. System of Physics (GUL MS Hunter 509, ff. 1r–167v). In A Compendium of Mediaeval Medicine Including the Middle English Gilbertus Anglicus. Bern–Berlin–Bruxelles–Frankfurt–New York–Oxford–Wien: Peter Lang.
Flint, Thomas, and Michael Rea. 2009. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freidson, Eliot. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.
Galle, Griet. 2008. The Dating and Earliest Reception of the Translatio vetus of Aristotle’s “De sensu”. Medioevo 33: 7–96.
Hasse, Dag Nicolaus. 2000. Avicenna’s “De anima” in the Latin West. The Formation of a Peripatetic Philosophy of the Soul 1160–1300. London/Turin: The Warburg Institute.
Hoenen, Maarten J.F.M. 2011. Nominalism in Cologne: The Student Notebook of the Dominican Servatius Fanckel. In Crossing Boundaries at Medieval Universities, ed. Spencer E. Young, 85–144. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Kitchel, Mary Joan. 1977. Walter Burley’s Doctrine of the Soul: Another View. Mediaeval Studies 39: 387–401.
———. 1971. The “De potentiis animae” of Walter Burley. Mediaeval Studies 33: 85–113.
Kurdziałek, Marian. 1950. Gilbert Anglik i dygresje psychologiczne w jego “Compendium medicinae”. Dissertation. Lublin: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski.
Lawn, Brian. 1993. The Rise and Decline of the Scholastic “Quaestio disputata”. With Special Emphasis on its Use in the Teaching of Medicine and Science. Leiden/New York/Köln: Brill.
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1961. Totalité et infini: essais sur l’extériorité. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Lohr, Charles H. 2013. Latin Aristotle Commenaries I.1. Medieval Authors A–L. Firenze: Sismel Edizioni del Galluzzo.
Marone, Stephen P. 1983. William of Auvergne and Robert Grosseteste: New Ideas of Truth in Early Thirteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McCord Adams, Marilyn, and Cecilia Trifogli. 2012. Whose Thought Is It? The Soul and the Subject of Action in Some Thirteen and Fourteenth Century Aristotelians. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3): 624–647.
McVaugh, Michael. 2010. Who was Gilbert the Englishman? In The Study of Medieval Manuscripts of England: Festschrift in Honor of Richard W. Pfaff, ed. George Hardin Brown and Linda Ehrsam Voigts, 295–324. Turnhout: Brepols.
———. 2019. Galen in the Medieval Universities, 1200–1400. In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Galen, ed. Petros Bouras-Vallianatos and Barbara Zipser, 381–392. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Miteva, Evelina. 2018. “Iam ergo patet veritas eius quod dixit Aristoteles, et causa deceptionis Galieni”. Philosophers vs. Medics in Albertus Magnus’ Account on Conception. In Irrtum. Error. Erreur, ed. Andreas Speer and Maxime Mauriège, 107–122. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
O’Boyle, Cornelius. 1998. The Art of Medicine: Medical Teaching at the University of Paris, 1250–1400. Leiden/Boston/Köln: Brill.
Omont, Henri. 1916. Recherches sur la Bibliothèque de l’Église cathédrale de Beauvais. Mémoires de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 40: 1–93.
Pavlíček, Ota. 2018. Parisian and Prague “Quodlibeta” Compared: The Transfer of the Quodlibetal Disputation between the Faculties and Jerome of Prague’s Struggle against the Thematic Limitations Imposed on the Faculty of Arts. In What is New in the New Universities? Learning in Central Europe in the Late Middle Ages (1348–1500), ed. Elżbieta Jung, 325–356. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
Shields, Aemilia Ledyard, and Henricus Blumberg. 1949. Praefatio. In Averrois Cordubensis Compendia librorum qui Parva naturalia vocantur, ed. Aemilia Ledyard Shields and Henricus Blumberg, vii–viii. Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy of America.
Solère, Jean-Luc. 2018. James of Viterbo’s Innatist Theory of Cognition. In A Companion to James of Viterbo, ed. Antoine Côté and Martin Pickavé, 168–217. Leiden: Brill.
Tellkamp, Jörg A. 2016. Aping the Logic? Albert the Great on Animal Mind and Action. In Subjectivity and Selfhood in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind, ed. Jari Kaukua and Tomas Ekenberg, vol. 16, 109–123. Cham: Springer.
Wöllmer, Gilla. 2013. Albert the Great and His Botany. In A Companion to Albert the Great. Theology, Philosophy, and the Sciences, ed. Irven M. Resnick, 221–268. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gensler, M., Mansfeld, M., Michałowska, M. (2022). The Development of Aristotelian Psychology and Physiology in Medieval Europe Between 1200 and 1420: Introduction. In: Gensler, M., Mansfeld, M., Michałowska, M. (eds) The Embodied Soul. Historical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99453-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99453-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99452-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99453-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)