Skip to main content

System Analysis of Deep Trends in the Evolution of Science: From Fixed Concepts to Moving Artistic Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
System Analysis in Engineering and Control (SAEC 2021)

Abstract

A systematic analysis of modern science shows that it is currently in a stage of a deep crisis caused by a number of factors (loss of integrity of the scientific worldview, no link between tens of thousands of research disciplines, highly complex concepts, impossibility to verify many hypotheses, extremely long mathematical proofs, etc.). The purpose of the paper is to define the causes of the crisis and suggest methods of overcoming it. The study employs the following methods: abstraction, generalization, induction, deduction, analysis, synthesis, analogy, interpretation, system-structural method. The following findings have been substantiated: the main cause of the crisis is thinking in permanent concepts. This method of thinking was ingrained in philosophy and science through the paradigm of Parmenides (“being is essentially motionless”) and Aristotle’s Logic, in particular, the law of identity (A = A); 2) The paradigm of Heraclitus (“everything flows”) and Hegel’s ontology present a possibility to create a new rationalism based on “dynamic” concepts; 3) The suggested “generalized identity law” can form the foundation of rationalism as “motion-based thinking”; 4) The prerequisite of the new rationalism is the paradigm of evolution (the object is an evolving human-dimensional system), i. e. concepts and methods assume the “mobility” of images-concepts in the process of reasoning (in topology, intuitionism, fuzzy logic, and other non-classical logics); 5) Arts is a cultural area where images, concepts, and forms evolve as an artwork unfolds. Contemporary science and art converge in terms of style, methods, and techniques of using variable concepts and images, 6) A currently reanimated ancient Greek understanding of time as the unity of Chronos, Cyclos, and Kairos (i.e. human, natural, and spiritual time) is a contributing condition for synthesis of science and art; 7) Science-Art is a promising area of development of cognition and culture. The significance of the suggested ideas lies in the fact that adoption of thinking in “dynamic” concepts and images by the scientific community will make it possible for science and civilization to ascend to new promising paradigms, methods, and paths of evolution.

Science progresses from Parmenides to Heraclitus

I. Prigogine

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Voitsekhovich, V.E.: K metodologii postneklassicheskoi nauki. [Methodology of postnonclassical science.] In: Proceedings of the 19th All-Russian Research to Practice Conference “Science Days – 2019”. Tribute to 150-year anniversary of D.I. Mendeleev’s law. 17–20.04.2019, pp. 165–168. Ozyorsk (2019). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Volnov, I. N.: Science-art: edinstvo nauki i iskusstva [Science Art: The Unity of Science and Art]. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Filosofiya [People’s Frienship University of Russia Review. Series: Philosophy], vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 557–564 (2017). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malinetskiy, G.G., Voitsekhovich, V.E., Volnov, I.N., Kolesnikov, A.V., Skiba, I.R., Soroko, E.M.: Krasota i garmoniya v tsifrovuyu epokhu: Matematika – iskusstvo – Iskusstvennyi intellekt. Budushchee i gumanitarno-tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya. [Beauty and Harmony in the Digital Age: Mathematics – Art – Artificial Intelligence. The future and the humanities technological revolution]. LENAND Publ., Moscow (2021). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hofkirchner, W.: A paradigm shift for the Great Bifurcation. Biosystems (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2020.104193.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.Reference:BIO104193,lastaccessed2021/22/08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zafirovsky, M.: Classical and neoclassical conceptions of rationality — Findings of an exploratory survey. The Journal of Socio-Economics 37(2), April 2008, 789–820 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.053

  6. Sagasti, F.: Rethinking development at the twilight of Bacon’s age. Futures, vol. 114, December 2019, 102470 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102470

  7. Egmond, N.D. van Vries, H.J.M.de.: Sustainability: The search for the integral worldview. Futures 43(8), October 2011, 853–867 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.027

  8. Katz, B., Katz, M.G., Sanders, S.: A footnote to the crisis in contemporary mathematics. Hist. Math. 45(2), 176–181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2018.03.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Miranker, W.L., Zuckerman, G.J.: Mathematical foundations of consciousness. J. Appl. Log. 7(4), 421–440 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2008.05.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Caniato, F., Harland, C., Johnsen, T., Moretto, F., Ronchi, S.: The Art and Science of Procurement: Revisiting Leonardo da Vinci: Editorial of the 2019 IPSERA Conference Special Issue. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 26(4), October 2020, 100650 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100650

  11. Shan, B., Werger, M., Huang, W., Giddon, D.B.: Quantitating the art and science of esthetic clinical success. J. World Federation of Ortho. 10(2), 49–58 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rezvani, S., Wang, Z.: Class imbalance learning using fuzzy ART and intuitionistic fuzzy twin support vector machines. Inf. Sci. 578, 659–682 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.07.010

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Setchi, R., Spasić, I., Morgan, J., Corken, R.: Artificial intelligence for patent prior art searching. World Patent Information 64, March 2021, 102021 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2021.102021

  14. Noh, S., Tolbert, P.S.: Organizational identities of U.S. art museums and audience reactions. Poetics 72, 94–107 (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2018.10.002

  15. Gromov, M.: Kol’tso tain: vselennaya, matematika, mysl’. [Ring of Mystery: Universe, Mathematics, Thinking.] MTsNMO Publ. (electronic publication), Moscow (2017). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moiseev, V. I.: Logika otkrytogo sinteza: V 2 tomakh. T.1 Struktura, Priroda i Dusha. [Logic of Open Synthesis, 2 volumes. Vol.1 Structure, Nature and Soul.] Book 1. “Mir” Publ., St. Petersburg (2010). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freier, M.R.: Kairos (2021). http://web.archive.org/web/20110728095413/http://www.whatifenterprises.com/whatif/whatiskairos.pdf, last accessed 2021/22/08

  18. Bergson, H.: L'Évolution créatrice. Édition électronique (ePub, PDF) v.: 1,0 : Les Échos du Maquis, Avril 2013 (2013), https://philosophie.cegeptr.qc.ca/wp-content/documents/Lévolution-créatrice.pdf, last accessed 2021/22/08. (In French)

  19. Florensky, P.A.: Ikonostas. [Iconostasis.] Azbuka-klassika Publ., St. Petersburg (2010). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nalimov, V.V.: Spontannost’ soznaniya. Veroyatnostnaya teoriya smyslov i smyslovaya arkhitektonika lichnosti. [Spontaneity of consciousness: Probabilistic theory of meanings and semantic architectonics of personality.] Academic Project, Moscow (2011). (In Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lidov, A.M.: Ierotopiya. Sozdanie sakral'nykh prostranstv kak vid khudozhestvennogo tvorchestva. [Hierotopy. Creation of sacral spaces as a kind of creativity and a subject of a historical research.] (electronic publication) (2007), http://www.polit.ru/article/2007/06/14/ierotop, last accessed 2021/22/08. (In Russian)

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research received a special grant No. 20-511-00003 from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viacheslav E. Voitsekhovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Voitsekhovich, V.E., Volnov, I.N., Malinetskiy, G.G. (2022). System Analysis of Deep Trends in the Evolution of Science: From Fixed Concepts to Moving Artistic Images. In: Vasiliev, Y.S., Pankratova, N.D., Volkova, V.N., Shipunova, O.D., Lyabakh, N.N. (eds) System Analysis in Engineering and Control. SAEC 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98832-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics