Skip to main content

Mapping Postmodern Patterns of Political Agency and Rhetoric: Established Politics Facing Bricolage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rhetoric and Bricolage in European Politics and Beyond

Part of the book series: Rhetoric, Politics and Society ((RPS))

  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

The basic structures and functions of democracy are continuously challenged by the surging political role of digital disruption coupled with new divisions of social, economic and technological forces cross-cutting the public domains of democracy. There are several key dimensions of politics that have been affected by the accelerating pace of technological change such as political participation, communication, decision-making, policy-making, legitimacy, agency and rhetoric. The chapter is focused on mapping the conceptual underpinnings of this dialogue between social and technological change in terms of the main theoretical concepts used to catch the essence of the political aspects of these transformative dynamics. One of the main conceptual frameworks explored in the chapter constitutes the dynamic relationships between different modes of societies as in the modern and postmodern, which rather than replacing each other are interacting with one another to alter the grids of political life. The clarifying of these properties of politics are used to define bricolage politics as a conceptual tool to cast a light on emerging dilemmas of sync between public preferences and policy on pressing issues such as Covid-19 with respect to, e.g. political agency and rhetoric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an elaborate account of the weaknesses of Inglehart’s postmaterialist theory, see e.g. Flanagan (1982, 99–128, 1987, 1289–1319); Flanagan & Lee (2003); van Deth (1983, 63–79); Duch & Taylor (1993, 747–779); Brym (2016); Abramson (2011).

  2. 2.

    It must be noted, though, that the goals of the old left are not totally incompatible with those of the new left (Inglehart 1977, 243). There are of course broad mutual goals such as social equality and peace, and even if the motives of the old and new left differ, the political implications are in some areas similar. For instance, the goals of individualism and participatory orientation are highly likely to imply increasing co-determination at the workplace. The old emphasis on economic redistribution and the new demand on an ecologically motivated restructuring of the economy, both require relatively extensive mechanisms of control over the economy (Poguntke 1989, 181).

  3. 3.

    The libertarian elements of the personal computer pioneers are described quite vividly by the following review comment on Freiberger and Swaine’s (1999) story of this ‘… ragtag group of college dropouts, hippies, and.

  4. 4.

    Cf. Huntington’s description of the shift from the traditional to modern society: ‘Social science analysis of the transition from agrarian to industrial society began with a clear-cut dichotomy between the modern and the traditional. It soon became clear, however, that the process of modernization did not involve the displacement of the latter by the former, but rather the addition of modern elements to a society which still retained many of its components…. The society of the future, in any event, will be a mixture of industrial and postindustrial components’ (Huntington 1973, 191).

References

  • Abramson, P. R. (2011). Critiques and counter-critiques of the post-materialism thesis: Thirty-four years of debate. Centre for the Study of Democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ampuja, M., & Koivisto, J. (2014). From “post-industrial” to “network society” and beyond: The political conjunctures and current crisis of information society theory. Triple C, 12(2), 447–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, K. L., Dalton, R. J., & Hildebrandt, K. (1981). Germany transformed: Political culture and the new politics. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1983). Simulations. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (2001). Selected writings (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G., & Stehr, N. (1986). Knowledge society. D. Reidel Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, V. (2002). ’Style, rhetoric, and postmodern culture’. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 35(3), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brants, K. & Voltmer, K. (2011). Political communication in postmodern democracy: Challenging the primacy of politics. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brym, R. (2016). ‘After postmaterialism: An essay on China, Russia and the United States’. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 42(2), 195–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzezinski, Z. (1970). Between two ages. America’s role in the technetronic era. The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. (Director). (1999). Pirates of the silicon valley (Film). Turner Network Television.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bürklin, W. P. (1984). Grüne Politik: Ideologische Zyklen. Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bürklin, W. P. (1985). The German greens: The post-industrial non-established and the party system. International Political Science Review, 6(4), 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. 2nd edition. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2004). The network society: A cross-cultural perspective. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, W. M., & Siaroff, A. (1985). Postindustrial politics in Germany and the origins of the Greens. Comparative Politics, 18(1), 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, S., Pakulski, J., & Waters, M. (1992). Postmodernization: Change in advanced society. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. J. (2019). Citizen politics. Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. 7th edition. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J. W. (1983). The persistence of materialist and post-materialist value orientations. European Journal of Political Research, 11, 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow. Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duch, R. M., & Taylor, M. A. (1993). Postmaterialism and the economic condition. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 747–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. (1991). Postmodern sociology. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, S. C., & Lee, A.-R. (2003). The new politics, culture wars, and the authoritarian-libertarian value change in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 36(3), 235–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, S. C. (1982). Measuring value change in advanced industrial societies: A rejoinder to Inglehart. Comparative Political Studies, 15(1), 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, S. C. (1987). Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 81(4), 1289–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiberger, P., & Swaine, M. (1999). Fire in the valley: The making of the personal computer. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissen, P. H. A. (1999). Politics, governance and technology. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins, J. R., & Reimer, B. (1995). ‘Postmodernism’. In van Deth, J. & Scarbrough, E. (Eds), The impact of values. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbins, J. R. (Ed.) (1989). Contemporary political culture. Politics in a postmodern age. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Haute, E. (2016). Green parties in Europe. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, K-G. (1979). ‘The new industrial structure—The Scandinavian experience’. In Gustafsson, B. (Ed.), Post-industrial society. St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1973). Post-industrial politics: How benign will it be? Comparative Politics, 6(1), 163–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. American Political Science Review, 65(4), 991–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization. Cultural, economic, and political Change in 43 societies. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1999). ‘Postmodernization Erodes respect for authority, but increases support for democracy’. In Norris, P. (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (2018). Cultural evolution: People’s motivations are changing, and reshaping the world. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. & Rabier, J.-R. (1986). 'Political realignment in advanced industrial society: From class-based politics to quality-of-life politics'. Government & Opposition, 21(4), 457–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innerarity, D. (2012). Power and knowledge: The politics of the knowledge society. European Journal of Social Theory, 16(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve jobs: A bibliography. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaase, M., & Newton, K. (1995). Beliefs in government. Beliefs in Government Volume 5. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. (2011). The facebook effect: The inside story of the company that is connecting the world. Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingemann, H. D., & Pappi, F.U. (1972). Politischer Radikalismus. Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., & Wüest, B. (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (1966). The decline of politics and ideology in a knowledgeable society. American Sociological Review, 31(5), 649–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1972). ‘Toward a theory of post-industrial society’. In Hancock, D. M. & Sjöberg, G. (Eds.), Politics in the post-welfare state. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (1990). Sociology of postmodernism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962). La pensée sauvage. Plon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A.K. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, Y. (1968). Jouhou Shakai Nyumon [Introduction to the study of information society]. Perikan-sha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda, Y. (1980). The information society and post-industrial society. World Future Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, D. (2001). Review of Freiberger & Swaine (1999). Amazon.com. https://www.amazon.com/Fire-Valley-Making-Personal-Computer/dp/0071358927

  • Müller-Rommel, F. (Ed.) (1989). New politics in Western Europe: The rise and success of Green parties and alternative lists. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, F., Yu, C.-Y., Hameed, T., & El Akhdary, M. A. (2017). The knowledge society’s origins and current trajectory. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 1, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, T. (1989). ‘The “new politics dimension” in European Green parties’. In Müller-Rommel, F. (Ed.), New politics in Western Europe: The rise and success of Green parties and alternative lists. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulkkinen, T. (2000). The postmodern and political agency. University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B. (1988). ‘No values—new values? Youth and postmaterialism’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11(4), 347–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, B. (1989). ‘Postmodern structures of feeling: Values and life-styles in the postmodern age’. In Gibbins, J. R. (Ed.), Contemporary political culture: Politics in a postmodern age. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repo, P., Timonen, P., & Zilliacus, K. (2009). Alternative regulatory cases challenging consumer policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siisiäinen, M. (1985). ‘Interest, voluntary associations and the stability of the political system’. Acta Sociologica, 28(4), 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, N. (2016). Knowledge politics: Governing the consequences of science and technology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr N. & Ruser, A. (2017). ‘Knowledge society, knowledge economy and knowledge democracy’. In Carayannis E., Campbell D., Efthymiopoulos M. (Eds.), Handbook of cyber-development, cyber-democracy, and cyber-defense. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. & Esser, F. (2014). ‘Mediatization of politics: Transforming democracies and reshaping politics’. In Lundby, K. (Ed.), Mediatization of communication. Handbooks of communication science, vol. 21. De Gruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildawsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M., Grendstad, G., & Selle, P. (1999). Cultural theory as political science. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Umesao, T. (1963). ‘Information industry theory: Dawn of the coming era of the ectodermal industry’. Hoso Asahi, January, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1970). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yujiro, H. (1969). Jouhouka Shakai (Informatized society): Hado na Shakai kara Sofuto na Shakai e. Koudanhsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilliacus, K. & Puohiniemi, M. (2019). ‘Postmodern patterns of values and (dis)beliefs. Setting up an index of postmodern thinking to explore the political challenges of technological change’. Paper presented at the 5th TRACE Symposium, 22–23 August, University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilliacus, K. (2001a). The Greens and the left wing of the 1990s—Profiles of ‘new politics’ in Finland. West European Politics, 24(1), 27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilliacus, K. (2001b). Modern vs postmodern politics: Theoretical perspectives. SSKH Reports and Discussion Papers 3. Research Institute. Swedish School of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim Zilliacus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zilliacus, K. (2022). Mapping Postmodern Patterns of Political Agency and Rhetoric: Established Politics Facing Bricolage. In: Kauppi, N., Palonen, K. (eds) Rhetoric and Bricolage in European Politics and Beyond. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98632-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics