Skip to main content

On the Difficulty of Speaking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Inquiries after Wittgenstein

Part of the book series: Nordic Wittgenstein Studies ((volume 8))

Abstract

One of the things most important in the tradition of Wittgenstein-inspired moral philosophy is its emphasis on working with examples. This essay is an attempt to do just that. The example will be two scenes from Rainer Werner Fassbinder’s film Martha (1974). The task is to listen to the people talking in the scenes and to try to understand what they mean. This requires listening also to what they do not say, to what they struggle to say but do not succeed in expressing. Above all, it involves trying to understand where the difficulties lie. Against the background of such a discussion, questions about the possibility and nature of moral philosophy are raised, with reference to some of the central points made by Wittgenstein in his later philosophy. The basic phenomenon is not words meaning this and that but people meaning this and that, and meaning it to one another. For what is hard is not to utter certain words or sentences, but to utter them meaning what you are saying, and understanding what someone is saying is then not a fundamentally different thing from understanding her.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For ways in which this can be done, see Holland 1980, e.g. ch. 8, Winch 1987, e.g. ch. 11, Levi 1987, 1989, Wolgast 1992, Cook 1999, e.g. ch. 9, Gaita 2000, e.g. pp. 17–55, Hertzberg 2002a, Strandberg 2020. For a general discussion, see Beran 2021, ch. 3.

  2. 2.

    My translation. I have tried to retain all “unnecessary” words, cases of unusual word order, etc., which means that the translation is not very elegant. But for the purpose of the philosophical discussion I would like to pursue here, these features are not inessential.

  3. 3.

    This is something I will come back to in the last section of the essay.

  4. 4.

    Cf. Buber 1953, 330–331.

  5. 5.

    Cf. McElhaney 2012, 212, 215–216.

  6. 6.

    For this section, cf. Strandberg 2020, 2021, ch. 1.

  7. 7.

    See Augustine 1992, 1.8.13.

  8. 8.

    See, however, Augustine 1992, 1.6.8.

  9. 9.

    Augustine might make a similar point by saying that every human word depends on, and is a response to, the Word of God.

  10. 10.

    Here one could add that the very identification of something as a sign already points to the possibility of its being alive. Cf. Conant 2020.

  11. 11.

    This question sounds more natural in German than it does in English, but I have opted for a literal translation rather than a smooth one.

  12. 12.

    My line of thought here is partly inspired by Hertzberg 2002b, 2010, 2017, Cockburn 2014.

  13. 13.

    This interpretation can be strengthened by reference to the previous scenes in the film in which Marianne takes part.

  14. 14.

    It is however significant that Martha goes to see Mr. Kaiser in a later scene in the film.

  15. 15.

    One could even claim that with the attitude that the future is just more of the same, no conversation would be possible at all, for there would then be no point in listening to the other, as I am able to predict what she will tell me.

  16. 16.

    An example perhaps closer to home: think of how quickly students, after the initial shock, often get used to and adopt the spiteful tone of seminar discussions, having now learnt what it means to be a philosopher.

  17. 17.

    Cf. Adorno 2003a, 461, 2003b, 85.

  18. 18.

    This publication was supported within the project of Operational Programme Research, Development and Education (OP VVV/OP RDE), “Centre for Ethics as Study in Human Value”, registration No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000425, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic.

    Thanks to Salla Aldrin Salskov, Christopher Cordner and Lars Hertzberg for comments on a previous version of this essay. I have also presented a previous version of it at the research seminar at the Centre for Ethics, University of Pardubice; thanks to those who participated in the discussion.

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 2003a. Ästhetische Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003b. Philosophie der neuen Musik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine. 1992. Confessions. Ed. James J. O’Donnell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beran, Ondřej. 2021. Examples and their role in our thinking. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, Martin. 1953. Hinweise. Zürich: Manesse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn, David. 2014. Trust in conversation. Nordic Wittgenstein Review 3 (1): 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, James. 2020. Wittgenstein and the relation of sign to symbol. In The logical alien: Conant and his critics, ed. Sofia Miguens, 863–947. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, John W. 1999. Morality and cultural differences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaita, Raimond. 2000. A common humanity: Thinking about love and truth and justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg, Lars. 2002a. Moral escapism and applied ethics. Philosophical Papers 31: 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. On the need for a listener and community standards. In The practice of language, ed. Martin Gustafsson and Lars Hertzberg, 247–259. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Attending to the actual saying of things. In Language and world: Part one, essays on the philosophy of Wittgenstein, ed. Volker Munz, Klaus Puhl, and Joseph Wang, 125–133. Heusenstamm: Ontos.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Giving hostages to irrationality? Winch on the philosopher as judge of human thought. Nordic Wittgenstein Review 6 (2): 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R.F. 1980. Against empiricism: On education, epistemology and value. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Don S. 1987. Hypothetical cases and abortion. Social Theory and Practice 13: 17–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. What’s luck got to do with it? Philosophical Investigations 12: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhaney, Joe. 2012. A nagging physical discomfort: Fassbinder and Martha. In A companion to Rainer Werner Fassbinder, ed. Brigitte Peuker, 204–225. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandberg, Hugo. 2020. In search of the context of a question. Sats 21: 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. Forgiveness and moral understanding. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter. 1987. Trying to make sense. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. The blue and brown books. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolgast, Elizabeth. 1992. Ethics of an artificial person. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hugo Strandberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strandberg, H. (2022). On the Difficulty of Speaking. In: Aldrin Salskov, S., Beran, O., Hämäläinen, N. (eds) Ethical Inquiries after Wittgenstein. Nordic Wittgenstein Studies, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98084-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics