Abstract
In this chapter, we engage with the concept “global civil society.” The concept played an important role in the symbolic construction of social reality after the end of the Cold War. It represented a critique of conventional state-centric perceptions of politics by focusing on the significance of nonparty politics and activism across borders; the study of global civil society was viewed as a way to supplant the study of international relations that refers to relations between states. It intervened into the discussion of the relationship between the state, society, individual, and market, and it represented a contribution to the globalization discourse by arguing that globalization is more than economic integration and also more than a structural process that has come over us. Despite all its discursive achievements, we argue that the concept failed in one respect: it did not manage to push knowledge production beyond methodological nationalism. What used to constitute the concept’s disruptive potential, namely, its conceptual enmeshment with the idea globalization, captured in the adjective global, eventually tamed it. Our chapter aims to revive the spirit of the concept “global civil society” by introducing a concept that takes up and pushes forward this unachieved goal: “planetary politics.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrow, M., & Seckinelgin, H. (Eds.). (2011). Global civil society 2011: Globality and the absence of justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Albrow, M., Anheier, H., Glasius, M., Price, M., & Kaldor, M. (Eds.). (2007). Global civil society 2007/8: Communicative power and democracy. Sage.
Anheier, H., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (2001). Introducing global civil society. In H. Anheier, M. Glasius, & M. Kaldor (Eds.), Global civil society 2001. Oxford University Press.
Anheier, H., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (Eds.). (2004). Global civil society 2004/5. Sage.
Bach, O. (2013). Die Erfindung der Globalisierung: Entstehung und Wandel eines zeitgeschichtlichen Grundbegriffs. Campus.
Beck, U. (2012) Living in and coping with world risk society: 42nd St Gallen Symposium, video lecture. Retrieved from www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeKiD5JLGIE.
Beck, U. (1988). Gegengifte: die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit. Suhrkamp.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.
Beck, U. (2004). Cosmopolitical realism: On the distinction between cosmopolitanism in philosophy and the social sciences. Global Networks, 4(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2004.00084.x
Beck, U. (2006). The cosmopolitan vision. Polity.
Beck, U., & Sznaider, N. (2006). Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda. British Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x
Bush, G. W. (2002). The national security strategy of the United States of America. Retrieved August 1, 2019, from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/national/nss-020920.pdf
Cohen, J., & Arato, A. (1992). Political theory and civil society. MIT Press.
Falk, R. (1997). Resisting ‘globalisation-from-above’ through ‘globalisation-from-below’. New Political Economy, 2(1), 17–24.
Fioramonti, L. (2013). Gross domestic problem: The politics behind the world’s most powerful number. Zed Books.
Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 48–78). Routledge.
Friedman, S. S. (2015). Planetary modernisms: Provocations on modernity across time. Columbia University Press.
Glasius, M., Kaldor, M., & Anheier, H. (Eds.). (2006). Global civil society 2006/7. Sage.
Herod, A. (2009). Geographies of globalization: A critical introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Jackson, T. (2016). Prosperity without growth. Routledge.
Kaldor, M. (2003). Global civil society: An answer to war. Polity Press.
Lees, L., Shin, H. B., & Lopez-Morales, E. (2016). Planetary gentrification. Polity Press.
Lessenich, S. (2016). Neben uns die Sintflut: Die Externalisierungsgesellschaft und ihr Preis. Hanser.
Mason, A. (2008). Explaining political disagreement. Cambridge University Press.
McHale, J. (1969). The future of the future. George Braziller.
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Green Publishing.
Rosenau, J. N. (1990). Turbulence in world politics: A theory of change and continuity. Princeton University Press.
Selchow, S. (2021). Planetary disasters: Moving the UN disaster risk reduction framework into cosmopolitised reality. Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1868819
Selchow, S. (2013). An interplay of traditions: The ‘return of uncertainty’ and its taming in post-9/11 US security thinking. In M. Bevir, O. Daddow, & I. Hall (Eds.), Interpreting global security (pp. 35–52). Routledge.
Selchow, S. (2016). The paths not (yet) taken: Ulrich Beck, the ‘Cosmopolitized world’ and security studies. Security Dialogue, 47(5), 369–385.
Selchow, S. (2017). Negotiations of the ‘New World’: The omnipresence of global as a political phenomenon. Transcript.
Sen, A. (2001, July 17). A world of extremes: Ten theses on globalization. Los Angeles Times.
Spivak, G. C. (2015). Planetarity. Paragraph, 38(2), 290–292.
Whitmee, S., et al. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet, 386, 1973–2028.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaldor, M., Selchow, S. (2022). Planetary Politics: Reviving the Spirit of the Concept “Global Civil Society”. In: Hoelscher, M., List, R.A., Ruser, A., Toepler, S. (eds) Civil Society: Concepts, Challenges, Contexts. Nonprofit and Civil Society Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98008-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98008-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98007-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98008-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)