Skip to main content

Quantitative Assessment of Fetal Wellbeing Through CTG Recordings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Connected e-Health

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 1021))

  • 592 Accesses

Abstract

Cardiotocogram (CTG), one of the methods for the overall evaluation of fetus condition. It is entails two significant recordings, the Contractions in Uterus (UC) and Heart Rate of Fetus (FHR). Multiple methods are already used to interpret the CTG. Maximum use either a binary classification method or a multiclass method to make a judgement about the class with which the finding belongs to! This current work takes two datasets available today that contains different features. Dataset-1 and 2 contain the recording of fetus movement. Dataset-1 has observations that are taken internally by placing electrode on the scalp of fetus. Other maternal factors are also mentioned. Dataset-2 contains the CTG readings taken externally by placing probe on the abdomen on the pregnant ladies. Sometimes the readings taken externally might not be much accurate because of the very placement of probe and mother’s physical state. And readings those are recorded internally may cause infection to mother and fetus. The use of three-class (1, 2 or 3) approach to the evaluate cardiotocograms and proposing a model for the healthy data. The results indicate that the features of dataset-1 are more significant for predicting the state of fetus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sampath V (2018) Computational intelligence methods for predicting fetal outcomes from heart rate patterns. Theses, Spring

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alnuaimi S, Jimaa S, Khandoker A (2017) Fetal cardiac doppler signal processing techniques: challenges and future research directions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 5(82):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Comert Z, Kocamaz A (2017) A novel software for comprehensive analysis of cardiotocography signals “CTG-OAS”. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saleem S, Naqvi SS, Manzoor T, Saeed A, Rehman N, Mirza J (2019) A strategy for classification of “vaginal vs. cesarean section” delivery: bivariate empirical mode decomposition of cardiotocographic recordings. Front Physiol 246(10):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rishika Reddy A, Suresh Kumar P (2016) Predictive big data analytics in healthcare. In: 2016 second international conference on computational intelligence and communication technology, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICT.2016.129

  6. Mishra S, Sahoo S, Mishra BK (2019) Addressing security issues and standards in Internet of things. In: Emerging trends and applications in cognitive computing. IGI Global, pp 224–257

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hoodbhoy Z, Noman M, Shafique A, Nasim A, Chowdhury D, Hasan B (2019) Use of machine learning algorithm for prediction of fetal risk using cardiotocographic data. Int J Appl Basic Med Res 9(4):226–230

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu L, Georgieva A, Redman C, Payne S (2013) Feature selection for computerized fetal heart analysis using genetic algorithm. In: 35th annual international IEEE conference, July 3–7, pp 445–448

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang Y, Zhao Z (2017) Fetal state assessment based on cardiotocography parameters using PCA and AdaBoost. In: 10th international congress on image and signal processing, biomedical engineering and informatics, IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen C, Chen J, Yu C, Lin C (2009) A comparative study of a new cardiotocography analysis program. In: 31st annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS, Sep. 2-6, pp 2567–2570

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zakaria N, Numan P, Malarvili MB (2018) Fetal movements recording system using accelerometer sensor. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 13(3):1022–1032

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Deng Y (2018) Article, A comprehensive feature analysis of the fetal heart rate signal for the intelligent assessment of fetal state. J Clinical Med 7:223. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7080223

  13. Yilmaz E, Kilikcier C (2013) Research article, “determination of fetal state from cardiotocogram using LS-SVM with particle swarm optimization and binary decision tree. Hindawi Publication Corporation, vol. 487179, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao Z, Deng Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Shao L (2019) Deep FHR: intelligent prediction of fetal Acidemia using fetal heart rate signals based on convolutional neural network

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arif M (2015) Classification of cardiotocograms using random forest classifier and selection of important features from cardiotocogram signal. Biomater Biomech Bioeng 2(3):173–183

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaur H, Khullar V, Singh H, Bala M (2019) Perinatal hypoxia diagnostic system by using scalable machine learning algorithms. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng 8(12):1954–1959. ISSN: 2278–3075

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vovsha I, Rajan A, Salleb-Aouissi A, Raja A, Radeva A, DIab H, Tomar A, Wapner R (2021) Predicting preterm birth is not elusive: machine learning paves the way to individual wellness. In: AAAI spring symposium, pp 82–89

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao X, Zeng X, Koehl L, Tartare G, Jonckheere J, Song K (2019) An IoT-based wearable system using accelerometers and machine learning for fetal movement monitoring. IEEE 299–304

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spilka J et al (2014) Analysis of obstetricians’ decision making on CTG recordings. J Biomed Inform 51:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2014.04.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fuentealba P, Illanes A, Ortmeier F (2017) Analysis of the foetal heart rate in cardiotocographic recordings through a progressive characterization of decelerations. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 3(2):423–427. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pilarczyk R, Strózik M, Hirnle L (2020) Diagnostic equivalency of mobile CTG devices and remote analysis to conventional on-site nonstress test. Adv Clin Exp Med 29(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/111812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ, Smith V, Smyth RMD (2015) Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004909.pub3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fanelli A, Magenes G, Campanile M, Signorini MG (2013) Quantitative assessment of fetal well-being through ctg recordings: a new parameter based on phase-rectified signal average. IEEE J Biomed Heal Inform 17(5):959–966. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2013.2268423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tan KH, Sabapathy A, Wei X (2013) Fetal manipulation for facilitating tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003396.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan KH, Smyth RMD, Wei X (2013) Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002963.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Georgoulas G, Karvelis P, Spilka J, Chudáček V, Stylios CD, Lhotská L (2017) Investigating pH based evaluation of fetal heart rate (FHR) recordings. Health Technol (Berl) 7(2–3):241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-017-0201-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ali Kadhim NJ, Kadhim Abed J (2020) Enhancing the prediction accuracy for cardiotocography (CTG) using firefly algorithm and naive bayesian classifier. In: IOP conference series material science engineering, vol 745(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012101

  28. Al-yousif S et al (2021) A systematic review of automated preprocessing, feature extraction and classification of cardiotocography. PeerJ Comput Sci 7:1–37. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khandoker A, Ibrahim E, Oshio S, Kimura Y (2018) Validation of beat by beat fetal heart signals acquired from four-channel fetal phonocardiogram with fetal electrocardiogram in healthy late pregnancy. Sci Rep 8(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31898-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Garcia-Canadilla P, Sanchez-Martinez S, Crispi F, Bijnens B (2020) Machine learning in fetal cardiology: what to expect. Fetal Diagn Ther 47(5):363–372. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alyousif S, Mohd M, Bilal B, Sheikh M, Algunaidi M (2017) Rule-based algorithm for intrapartum cardiotocograph pattern features extraction and classification. Heal. Sci. J. 10(6):1–13. https://doi.org/10.21767/1791-809x.1000468

  32. Romano M, Ponsiglione AM (2014) Computerized cardiotocography: a software to generate synthetic signals. J Heal Med Inform 05(04). https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7420.1000162

  33. Blix E et al (2019) Intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring during labour: A systematic scoping review to identify methods, effects, and accuracy. PLoS ONE 14(7):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Chudcek V, Spilka J, Bursa M, Janku P, Hruban L, Huptych M, Lhotska L (2014) Database, “Open access intrapartum CTG database,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumya Ranjan Nayak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sharma, S., Ashu, Gupta, A., Nayak, S.R. (2022). Quantitative Assessment of Fetal Wellbeing Through CTG Recordings. In: Mishra, S., González-Briones, A., Bhoi, A.K., Mallick, P.K., Corchado, J.M. (eds) Connected e-Health. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97929-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics