Abstract
This chapter describes and reviews a set of contributions that have explored the consequences of the social and armed conflict on victims of human rights violations. The context of the social and armed conflict in Colombia has been a scenario that has exponentially triggered repeated human rights violations. This chapter proposes a research and intervention model with a multidimensional analysis perspective that allows us to demonstrate the role of psychosocial processes such as forgiveness, reconciliation, transitional justice mechanisms (such as truth commissions or JEP in Colombia—Special Justice for Peace) in the restoration of human rights at the individual, community, and social levels. The work of psychology is key to promoting human rights and seeking ways to contribute to sustainable peace.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
The human rights (HR) proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of the United Nations (1948) are the international instrument that has set the global objective of respecting and guaranteeing human dignity based on the principles of equality and justice (Valdivieso, 2012).
In the Colombian democracy, HR are conceived as guiding and binding principles that shape the government’s actions (López, 2012). However, the complex social and state structures have hindered the formulation and implementation of HR policies in Colombia (Herrera & Taylor, 2014). This context is evident in the existing sociopolitical violence, internal armed conflict, and the rationale of state neglect and exclusion (Sikkink, 2009).
Armed Conflict in Colombia
Human rights violations in Colombia’s recent history have left cultural, political, economic, social, and psychological scars throughout the country (Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica [CNMH], 2013). The armed conflict has directly affected more than eight million people (Unidad para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Víctimas, 2020) through violence against the civilian population such as threats, forced recruitment, disappearances, massacres, killings, and selective executions by multiple actors (e.g., guerrillas, paramilitary groups, state forces, drug trafficking organizations) (CNMH, 2013). Violence has been used systematically to sustain control over the territory in a way that allows land concentration, arms and drug trafficking, and, ultimately, the management of political and economic power both regionally and nationally by a set of elites (Ibáñez & Vélez, 2008).
Since the late twentieth century, peace negotiations were held with some former combatants but with mixed results. Although the demobilization and political participation of some illegal groups were achieved, the lack of institutional and regional support, the resurgence of violent practices, and the political and armed persecution of these new political organizations called into question the State’s role as guarantor of human rights of the civilian population and opposing political groups (CNMH, 2018; Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, 2017).
The many negotiation processes have included multiple transitional justice mechanisms that have had implications for how memory, truth, and reparations for victims have become imperatives. For instance, the Justice and Peace Law 975, that was approved in 2005, established the main formal proceedings of transitional justice (Congreso de la República de Colombia, 2005). Among its goals, this law aimed to disarm the paramilitary groups, reintegrate their members into society, and guarantee the rights of truth, justice, and reparation to the victims. This initiative promoted massive demobilization and created a legal framework to prosecute crimes committed by paramilitary groups. However, this law was decried internationally, warning that it would ensure impunity to those responsible for atrocious crimes while failing to offer guarantees to victims (CNMH, 2013; Villa, 2012).
Subsequently, the Victims Law (Law 1448) was passed in 2011, recognizing the damage caused by armed conflict and seeking mechanisms for attention, assistance, and comprehensive reparation to victims. This scenario fostered the negotiations with the FARC-EP guerrilla in 2016 when a historic peace agreement was reached with this group, achieving demobilization processes and political participation for reintegrating members. The peace accords created one of the boldest transitional justice mechanisms that encompassed a new truth commission, a special justice system for peace, and the missing people’s search unit. This mechanism put legal and non-legal reparations measures for the conflict’s victims at the forefront of the process. Amid a long and complex armed conflict such as the Colombian one, These measures are a hopeful sign of strengthening the commitment to respect human rights in a context of a long and complex armed conflict such as the Colombian one (United Nations, 2018).
Nonetheless, the agreement was forged in a climate of social polarization, with the government of President Iván Duque (2018–2022) and his party repeatedly speaking out against the peace accord and its implementation. Consequently, the annual reports on the first three years of implementation of the peace agreement documented systematic attacks on HR defenders, social and community leaders. The reports also note difficulty in moving forward with the comprehensive reparation to victims in areas affected in the past by the conflict, due to the lack of coverage, monitoring and guarantees in reintegration and restitution services (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2019).
Likewise, as of 2019, combat with other illegal groups (ELN guerrillas, paramilitary, and drug trafficking groups) intensified, reactivating terrorist attacks and forcing new displacements. Paramilitary groups have taken center stage with a subsequent increase in victimization statistics related to the control of illicit economies such as drug trafficking, illegal mining, arms trafficking, and commercial extortion which once again impairs the guarantee of human rights (United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2019).
It is important to emphasize that the victims continue to be mainly civilians in rural areas (e.g., farmers, indigenous people, Afro-descendants) and community social leaders. During 2020, there were 76 massacres, the highest figure since 2014. There were also 73 homicides of former FARC-EP members and 133 murders of HR defenders (United Nations, 2021).
The prolongation of the armed conflict and the multiplicity of actors involved led to deep societal divisions and have weakened the Colombian state’s capacity to respond as a guarantor of HR (Amnistía Internacional, 2018). Promoting the non-repetition of these events and the HR protection, generating policies and measures for the reparation of victims at different levels are indispensable conditions for peace construction.
Psychosocial Consequences of Human Rights Violations During the Armed Conflict
Economic, political, legal, environmental, security, and psychosocial factors must be taken into account when analyzing human rights violations in Colombia (Sikkink, 2009; United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2019). The context of exclusion, poverty, misery, inequality, the failure to ensure basic security needs, lack of access to health services, and inadequate education resources represent the constant violation of human rights by the Colombian state (Rodríguez, 2004). Moreover, rural inhabitants are the most affected because the war happened in their territory, where there are high levels of poverty and socioeconomic inequality (Naucke, 2017).
Psychology in Colombia has had long participation in community work to mitigate the multiple consequences upon communities and individuals of the armed conflict and the sustained violation of human rights. Psychologists in non-governmental organizations, various initiatives of universities as well as governmental entities have accompanied these challenging processes. The community-based psychology was shaped by the legacy of psychologists such as Maritza Montero, Ignacio Martín-Baró, and by the inspiring work of Elizabeth Lira. Unfortunately, many of these initiatives have not been reported or have been noted only as part of reports that overshadow their actions and impact. However, their contributions are visible in the community practices and the lives of the people who have participated in such programs. In recent years, several new areas of research have emerged regarding the consequences of the conflict and the processes involved in the long and complex peace process.
The field of psychology has sought to understand, specifically, the consequences of the internal armed conflict and the violation of human rights on individual, interpersonal, intra-, and inter-group dynamics (López-López, 2017, 2020). Research has focused on analyzing (a) the consequences on psychological well-being from exposure to traumatic events; (b) the impact on the coexistence of directly and indirectly affected communities; (c) the dynamics of the persistence of violence by analyzing the role of social agents in the legitimization of violent or peaceful practices; (d) the processes of disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration into civilian life of former combatants; (e) the processes of recognition of harm, justice, and comprehensive reparation to victims; and (f) the disposition towards social reconciliation to achieve a shared future of peaceful coexistence.
Some studies on psychological well-being report that people exposed to traumatic events in the context of armed conflict are more likely to suffer mental health disorders as compared to the general population (Cuartas et al., 2019). Post-traumatic stress, depression, and anxiety are frequently encountered (Cudris-Torres & Barrios Núñez, 2018; Gaviria et al., 2016; Hewitt et al., 2016). Research has found that minors directly exposed to a conflict are more likely to have aggressive behaviors, externalizing disorders (e.g., oppositional defiant disorder) (Brook et al., 2007; Cuevas & Castro, 2009), or post-traumatic stress disorder (Pérez-Olmos et al., 2005). Moreover, some studies with children suggest that exposure to violence at an early age or during the gestation period can affect physical and brain development, generating negative consequences in intellectual and interpersonal processes (Cuevas & Castro, 2009; Duque, 2017).
In group and community dynamics, some studies report that the armed conflict generates a decrease in the quality of life and a rupture of the family and social fabric (Castañeda et al., 2019; Hewitt et al., 2016). There is evidence that the relocation and displacement experiences generate new vulnerabilities and ongoing instability in family structures (Mootz et al., 2019).
In territories threatened by different armed conflicts, cohesion, support among community members, and participation in collective decision-making processes make communities less likely to be displaced (Krakowski, 2017). There is even evidence of communities that have mitigated violence against them through peaceful resistance measures such as remaining neutral, avoiding threats, and implementing self-reliance mechanisms to refrain from cooperating with former combatants (Wegner, 2017).
These findings demonstrate that social resources such as trust, cohesion, and solidarity are crucial for the recovery of communities (Krakowski, 2017; Taylor, 2016). There is also evidence of high levels of community resilience, often related to spirituality and religious practices, which have enabled victims to cope and restructure their lives (Hewitt et al., 2016), despite severe conditions of violence.
Regarding the dynamics of persistent violence, broad empirical evidence points to a socio-psychological repertoire shaped by collective beliefs, attitudes, and emotions towards the armed conflict and its actors, which is functional to the members of society to cope with the human and material losses. At the same time, this fosters the continuation of the armed confrontation (López-López et al., 2018).
Likewise, the government discourse concerning the armed conflict has been characterized by a delegitimization of the adversary and legitimization of the use of force (Barreto et al., 2009; Borja-Orozco et al., 2008; López-López et al., 2018). However, some studies also show the transformation of this socio-psychological repertoire in the course of seeking a peaceful resolution to the conflict in recent years. Concretely, impact can be seen in calling for hope for peace, the recognition of victims’ rights and the structural causes of the conflict, as well as in the absence or reduction of strategies to delegitimize the adversary (López-López et al., 2018; Rincón-Unigarro et al., 2020).
As for the processes of disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration into civilian life by former combatants, some studies report that the civilian population has little trust or willingness to coexist and work with former combatants of demobilized armed groups (López-López et al., 2016a, b, 2018). In territories where reintegration processes occurred, Kaplan and Nussio (2018) found that former combatants are more likely to participate in community activities when there is high participation of the civilian community members themselves. These are spaces where former combatants also feel useful in the settlement communities. When people are not involved, former organize in isolation, separated from the community, seeking to protect their families and themselves from the effects of the deeply rooted stigmatization of being identified as former combatants (McFee, 2016).
The processes of recognition of harm, justice, and comprehensive reparation for victims present many challenges to overcome. Many initiatives have emerged to repair the damage caused in the conflict by HR groups, state institutions, and the victims themselves to achieve a stable and lasting peace (Arias, 2018). However, the transitional justice mechanisms to achieve comprehensive reparation by providing guarantees to the victims to overcome social helplessness depend on (a) a national budget, which is often insufficient; (b) operational public institutions, often with limited response capacity; and (c) social and political will, sometimes at odds with these objectives (Arias, 2018; Villa & Insuasty, 2016).
Within this context, it is therefore understandable that some studies find that the victim populations do not believe the promised reparations or trials of the perpetrators will ever come about. They simply mistrust state mechanisms (Castrillón-Guerrero et al., 2018).
Lastly (Bloomfield et al., 2003), several studies confirm that structural challenges must be overcome to foster the disposition towards reconciliation and move forward from a divided past to a shared future of peaceful coexistence in Colombia.
In different countries empirical evidence points to the benefits for the psychological well-being of victims derived from reconciliation scenarios such as improved interpersonal relationships, creation of new social networks, strengthening of social capital, overcoming negative emotions, and feelings towards the perpetrator (Cilliers et al., 2016). However, political reconciliation can also increase depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder, affecting the psychological well-being of victims (Cilliers et al., 2016). Similarly, although forgiveness is personal and does not condition reconciliation, clearly, it can facilitate participation in the construction of a collective future.
The willingness to forgive and reconcile was studied in Colombia in both the victim and the general population. The research has identified a low disposition to forgive and reconcile—in personal terms—although higher among victims, regardless of the existence of remorse among the perpetrators. Studies also found that during 2016, the year of the peace agreement referendum, the willingness to forgive increased when former combatants participated in peace talks with the state or when there are guarantees of non-repetition (López-López et al., 2013, 2016a, b).
Research on the conceptualizations of forgiveness found that both victims and the general population associated the process with a religious context linked to the idea of divine justice and forgetting offenses, partly because there is no credibility in the forms of justice provided by the State (Castrillón-Guerrero et al., 2018; Cortés et al., 2016). Reconciliation, however, is a process usually associated with acceptance and resumption of interactions in which the victim and the victimizer may participate (Castrillón-Guerrero et al., 2018; Cortés et al., 2016; López-López et al., 2016a, b).
In peace processes throughout the world different actors have generated transitional mechanisms associated with justice. This underscores the importance of forgiveness and reconciliation processes in truth commissions and the transitional justice mechanisms. However, it is difficult to achieve effectiveness without conditions of non-repetition and reparation, which is the case in many Colombian local contexts (López-López et al., 2016a, b).
Psychosocial Intervention for the Restoration of Human Rights in the Context of the Colombian Armed Conflict: A Case Study
Thanks to their activism through collective mobilization, the armed conflict victims achieved visibility in the social and political arena, both nationally and internationally. One of the main demands was effective psychosocial care policies from the State (Villa, 2012). Due to this pressure, and with the support of international organizations, the State created a national program focused on psychosocial intervention for armed conflict victims through the Law 1448 of 2011 (Congreso de la República de Colombia, 2011).
Among the different measures contemplated in Law 1448 was the implementation of the Psychosocial Care and Comprehensive Health Program for Victims of the Conflict (PAPSIVI-acronym in Spanish), as part of the health care and physical, mental, and psychosocial rehabilitation measure (Congreso de la República de Colombia, 2011).
The PAPSIVI program has a psychosocial approach, with an ethical commitment, proposing that entities and professionals should recognize the integrality of those who have been victims (Moreno & Díaz, 2016). The aim is to develop comprehensive care services that contribute to the recovery or mitigation of “psychosocial damage, emotional suffering and impacts on the psychological and moral integrity and life project of victims, their families, and communities, as a result of serious human rights violations and breaches of IHL [International Humanitarian Law]” (Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social [MinSalud], 2017a, p. 23, 2017b).
This program intends to address the impacts of violence on the victim population throughout the national territory, at the individual, family, and community levels, taking into account a differential approach, the effective participation of different national institutions, and, above all, highlighting the obligation of the Colombian State to guarantee the victims’ human rights (MinSalud, 2017a).
Another psychosocial intervention tool developed as a result of Law 1448 was the Emotional Recovery Strategy at Group Level (ERE-G) promoted by the UARIV (2014), which aims to respond to the psychosocial needs of victims through group work, the construction of meanings, emotional self-regulation, and the representation-symbolization of people’s suffering.
According to MinSalud (2019), between 2012 and 2018, the government provided psychosocial care to 692,999 conflict victims. Of this number, 490,708 received care through the psychosocial component of PAPSIVI and 202,291 through the UARIV (within the ERE-G framework). However, the number of psychosocial services provided to date is very low for the proposed target under Law 1448 (24%).
Although the rate of perception of improvement and rehabilitation by the beneficiaries of the PAPSIVI and ERE-G initiatives is suggested to be high (MinSalud, 2019), empirical evidence indicates that not all processes are proving to be restorative for the victims and that these initiatives probably require greater caution and investment.
The criticisms of the psychosocial interventions generated from Law 1448 for conflict victims who have had their HR violated, as shown in Fig. 18.1, are due to structural and professional factors that cause adverse effects in the communities (Aranguren-Romero & Rubio-Castro, 2018; Cuartas et al., 2019; Villa, 2016). For instance, the health system does not prioritize psychosocial care and uses hiring schemes that are often outsourced and precarious. Besides, there is a lack of expertise and training in the multiple interventions in communities and individuals carried out by psychologists and social science and health professionals. Figure 18.1 describes some of the challenges faced at the structural and professional levels.
A Multidimensional Perspective for the Promotion of Human Rights in Colombia
To meet the challenge of building peace in Colombia, as we have previously stated, requires prioritizing the appropriation of human rights in the social and political agenda of the country. In other words, systematic efforts must be focused on prevention, promotion, and protection of human rights, as well as monitoring and denouncing human rights violations. Moreover, we must assume a multidimensional and interdisciplinary perspective of research and intervention to understand the various dimensions of actors, violence, consequences, and processes involved in the pursuit of peace and the defense of human rights. In this sense, López-López (2016, 2017, 2020) proposes in his works to consider a multidimensional research and intervention perspective (see Fig. 18.1).
This perspective contemplates eight dimensions in which agendas should be built, as shown in Fig. 18.2. The transformations proposed for each dimension are:
-
1.
Socioeconomic : Reduce inequality in the distribution of wealth.
-
2.
Sociopolitical : Promote policies aimed at the inclusion of vulnerable groups and social reconciliation scenarios and implement management mechanisms based on dialogue and consensus.
-
3.
Socio-legal : Advance towards the respect for human rights and the reduction of impunity through the application of restorative actions.
-
4.
Safety : Establish actions and mechanisms aimed at protecting integrity, privacy, and intimacy.
-
5.
Sociocultural : Promote practices that encourage tolerance, gender equality, and child-rearing practices and that reject the use of violence and exclusion.
-
6.
Socio-environmental : Recognize and transform the environmental crises, the deterioration of natural resources, and violence and move towards economic policies based on sustainable sources and change extractive strategies.
-
7.
Socio-historical : Address the communities’ experience from a micro- and macro-perspective, taking into account how the socio-historical processes are remembered by the civilian population in the present and the future perspective, thus strengthening collective memory processes.
-
8.
Psychosocial : Progress in emotional education processes, reduce asymmetries in interpersonal and inter-group interactions to move towards group cohesion, developing empathy, and giving voice to the communities to advance in the empowerment processes.
Regarding the psychosocial dimension, Fig. 18.3 illustrates an approach based on the identification of a set of actors, violence, consequences, and psychosocial processes. It is an approach that intertwines (a) the ethnic, gender, and developmental differences; (b) experiences of care and community and personal intervention; as well as (c) community and institutional biographies and mediums (López-López, 2020).
This proposed approach understands the psychosocial dimension as a spiral or fabric in which the personal is woven with the relational, the intra- and inter-group, and the societal aspects. Within this fabric, biographies and community and social histories are constructed (López-López, 2020). The evidence of the continuous work of psychologists and other professionals with the communities shows the interaction of the psychosocial dimension with the others (political, economic, environmental, legal) and the importance of transitional justice mechanisms, such as clarifying the truth and achieving social reconciliation. It also suggests that only by articulating this whole set of interactions can sustainable peace processes be built (López-López, 2020).
Proposal for the Future to Advance in the Guarantee of Human Rights from Psychology in Colombia
Peacebuilding in Colombia is a highly complex process that requires, as we have previously stated, a dynamic, multidimensional, interdisciplinary perspective that prioritizes human rights over any other process involved in the reconstruction that seeks to lessen the impact of the social and armed conflict. Thus, protecting the rights and the lives of the most vulnerable communities and those who defend and promote them is an urgent matter. The rise in murders of social leaders and human rights defenders and the lack of government commitment to protect them and clarify, capture, and prosecute those responsible, unfortunately, lead to sustained and escalated conflict.
Furthermore, in a context of permanent transition in which the armed confrontation has not stopped, and the State shows that it cannot respond to the constant violations of human rights, psychology professionals have no alternative but to continue working even in adverse conditions, to contribute to strengthening psychological well-being and the community fabric in the country (Molina, 2017). Therefore, as argued by the multidimensional model of peace proposed by López-López (2016, 2017, 2020), efforts aimed at peacebuilding cannot be limited to a single aspect due to the complexity of the conflict.
The sustained commitment is needed from different social actors, including psychologists, to build, accompany, and install long-term cultural practices of peaceful resistance and care for human rights with communities (López-López et al., 2018). Furthermore, it is necessary to sustain the development of knowledge that allows for understanding and acting in processes associated with the defense of human rights, peacebuilding, and social reconciliation (Velez et al., 2020).
It seems evident that due to the multiple factors that maintain the armed conflict in the Colombian context, there are many challenges that must be addressed to create a setting that guarantees human rights. Therefore, psychology must have a continuous and long-term agenda committed to human rights advocacy that involves psychology as professionals as well as in training and academic research.
References
Amnistía Internacional. (2018). Informe 2017/2018. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/es/countries/americas/colombia/report-colombia/
Aranguren-Romero, N., & Rubio-Castro, N. (2018). Formación en herramientas terapéuticas a sobrevivientes del conflicto armado en el Pacífico colombiano. Revista de estudios sociales, 66, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.7440/res66.2018.03
Arias, J. D. (2018). Administrative repair to the victims of the armed conflict in Colombia: A fundamental right without warranties. International Journal of Cultural Heritage, 3, 91–101. Retrieved from https://www.iaras.org/iaras/filedownloads/ijch/2018/017-0009(2018).pdf
Barreto, I., Borja, H., Serrano, Y., & López-López, W. (2009). La legitimación como proceso en la violencia política, medios de comunicación y construcción de culturas de paz. Universitas Psychologica, 8(3), 737–748. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77952029175&partnerID=tZOtx3y1
Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T., & Huyse, L. (2003). Reconciliation after violent conflict a handbook. IDEA. Retrieved from https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/reconciliation-after-violent-conflict-handbook.pdf
Borja-Orozco, H., Barreto, I., Sabucedo, J. M., & López-López, W. (2008). Construcción del discurso deslegitimador del adversario: Gobierno y paramilitarismo en Colombia. Universitas Psychologica, 7(2), 571–583. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=64770220
Brook, J. S., Brook, D. W., & Whiteman, M. (2007). Growing up in a violent society: Longitudinal predictors of violence in Colombian adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40(1–2), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9126-z
Castañeda, J. G., López-López, W., & Barrero, J. A. (2019). Calidad de Vida en Salud en Población Victima del Conflicto Armado en Colombia. Psicología Desde El Caribe, 36(2), 133–148. Retrieved from http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/10305
Castrillón-Guerrero, L., Riveros, V., Knudsen, M., López-López, W., Correa-Chica, A., & Castañeda Polanco, J. G. (2018). Comprensiones de perdón, reconciliación y justicia en víctimas de desplazamiento forzado en Colombia. Revista de Estudios Sociales, 63, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.7440/res63.2018.07
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2013). ¡Basta ya! Colombia: Memorias de guerra y dignidad. Retrieved from http://www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/micrositios/informeGeneral/descargas.html
Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. (2018). Todo pasó frente a nuestros ojos. Genocidio de la Unión Patriótica 1984-2002. Retrieved from http://centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/todo-paso-frente-a-nuestros-ojos-genocidio-de-la-union-patriotica-1984-2002/
Cilliers, J., Dube, O., & Siddiqi, B. (2016). Reconciling after civil conflict increases social capital but decreases individual well-being. Science, 352(6287), 787–794. Retrieved from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/352/6287/787
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH). (2017). Informe No 170/17 Caso 11227. Informe de fondo: Integrantes y militantes de la Unión patriótica. Retrieved from https://www.oas.org/es/cidh/decisiones/corte/2018/11227FondoEs.pdf
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2005). Ley de Justicia y Paz 975 de 2005. Pub. L. No. 975. Retrieved from https://www.fiscalia.gov.co/colombia/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Ley-975-del-25-de-julio-de-2005-concordada-con-decretos-y-sentencias-de-constitucionalidad.pdf
Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2011). Ley 1448 de 2011 Por la cual se dictan medidas de atención, asistencia y reparación integral a las víctimas del conflicto armado interno y se dictan otras disposiciones. Pub. L. No. 1448. Retrieved from https://www.centrodememoriahistorica.gov.co/micrositios/caminosParaLaMemoria/descargables/ley1448.pdf
Cortés, Á., Torres, A., López-López, W., Pérez, C., & Pineda-Marín, C. (2016). Comprensiones sobre el perdón y la reconciliación en el contexto del conflicto armado colombiano. Psychosocial Intervention, 25(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psi.2015.09.004
Cuartas, J., Karim, L. L., Martínez, M. A., & Hessel, P. (2019). The invisible wounds of five decades of armed conflict: Inequalities in mental health and their determinants in Colombia. International Journal of Public Health, 64(5), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01248-7
Cudris-Torres, L., & Barrios-Núñez, Á. (2018). Malestar psicológico en víctimas del conflicto armado. Revista CS, 26, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i25.2654
Cuevas, M. C., & Castro, L. (2009). Efectos emocionales y conductuales de la exposición a violencia en niños y adolescentes en Colombia. Revista Internacional de Psicología Clínica y de La Salud, 17(2), 277–298. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2998347
Duque, V. (2017). Early-life conditions and child development: Evidence from a violent conflict. SSM - Population Health, 3, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.012
Gaviria, S. L., Alarcón, R. D., Espinola, M., Restrepo, D., Lotero, J., Berbesi, D. Y., Sierra, G. M., Chaskel, R., Espinel, Z., & Shultz, J. M. (2016). Socio-demographic patterns of posttraumatic stress disorder in Medellin, Colombia and the context of lifetime trauma exposure. Disaster Health, 3(4), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665044.2016.1263086
Herrera, P., & Taylor, S. (2014). El Sistema Nacional De Derechos Humanos Y Derecho Internacional Humanitario: ¿Una Nueva Etapa En La Actuación En Materia De Derechos Humanos En Colombia? Opera, 12. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2388181
Hewitt, N., Juárez, F., Parada, A. J., Guerrero, J., Romero, Y. M., Salgado, A. M., & Vargas Amaya, M. V. (2016). Afectaciones Psicológicas, Estrategias de Afrontamiento y Niveles de Resiliencia de Adultos Expuestos al Conflicto Armado en Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 25(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v25n1.49966
Ibáñez, A. M., & Vélez, C. E. (2008). Civil conflict and forced migration: The micro determinants and welfare losses of displacement in Colombia. World Development, 36(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.04.013
Kaplan, O., & Nussio, E. (2018). Community counts: The social reintegration of ex-combatants in Colombia. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 35(2), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894215614506
Krakowski, K. (2017). Resisting displacement amid armed conflict: Community-level conditions that make people more likely to stay. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 12, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2017.1370387
López, J. A. (2012). Las organizaciones no gubernamentales de derechos humanos en la democracia. Aproximaciones para el estudio de la politización de los derechos humanos en Colombia. Estudios Políticos, 41, 103–123. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-51672012000200006
López-López, W. (2016). La reconstrucción psicológica y social: una prioridad de corto, mediano y largo plazo para el futuro de la paz en Colombia. In G. Niño, J. Escobar, & L. Muñoz (Eds.), La paz el derecho de la democracia. Elementos de análisis frente a los desafíos del legislador en la implementación del acuerdo final de paz en Colombia (pp. 149–157). Centro de Investigaciones de Altos Estudios Legislativos – CAEL.
López-López, W. (2017). Contribuciones de Psicología de la Paz: Una Perspectiva Multidimensional. Innovación y Ciencia, 24(1), 100–108. Retrieved from https://innovacionyciencia.com/revista/91
López-López, W. (2020). A multidimensional and dynamic perspective of research and intervention in peace psychology. Peace Psychologist, 29, 39–41.
López-López, W., Andrade, A. F., & Correa-Chica, A. (2016a). El Proceso de Pedir Perdón como Condición Necesaria para la Construcción de Paz en Medio del Conflicto Armado en Colombia. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 25(2), 187–194. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2819/281946990009.pdf
López-López, W., Pineda, C., Murcia, M. C., Perilla, D. C., & Mullet, E. (2013). Forgiving perpetrators of violence: Colombian people’s positions. Social Indicators Research, 114, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/24720248
López-López, W., Rincón-Unigarro, C., Correa-Chica, A., & García-Revelo, D. A. (2018). Repertorio socio-psicológico del conflicto colombiano en el discurso presidencial de Juan Manuel Santos. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 236–248. Retrieved from https://journal.sipsych.org/index.php/IJP/article/view/491
López-López, W., Silva, L. M., Castro, P., & Caicedo, A. (2016b). Actitudes implícitas de estudiantes universitarios frente al perdón en el marco del conflicto armado colombiano. Pensamiento Psicológico, 14(2), 49–62. Retrieved from https://revistas.javerianacali.edu.co/index.php/pensamientopsicologico/article/view/1404
McFee, E. (2016). The double bind of “playing double”: Passing and identity among ex-combatants in Colombia. Peace and Conflict, 22(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000146
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2017a). Programa de atención psicosocial y salud integral a víctimas - PAPSIVI. Retrieved from https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/PS/Documento-Marco-papsivi-2017.pdf
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. (2017b). Protocolo de atención integral en salud con enfoque psicosocial a víctimas del conflicto armado. Retrieved from https://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/DE/PS/Protocolo-de-atencion-integral-en-salud-papsivi.pdf
Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social, & Social. (2019). Informe al Congreso de la República 2018-2019. Retrieved from https://www.minsalud.gov.co/Ministerio/RCuentas/Paginas/informes-gestion.aspx
Molina, N. (2017). Retos de la psicología en la construcción de paz en Colombia: ¿fatalismo o ingenuidad? Pensamiento Psicológico, 15(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI15-1.RPCP
Mootz, J. J., Stark, L., Meyer, E., Asghar, K., Roa, A. H., Potts, A., Poulton, C., Marsh, M., Ritterbusc, A., & Bennouna, C. (2019). Examining intersections between violence against women and violence against children: Perspectives of adolescents and adults in displaced Colombian communities. Conflict and Health, 13, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-019-0200-6
Moreno, M. A., & Díaz, M. E. (2016). Posturas en la atención psicosocial a víctimas del conflicto armado. El Ágora USB, 16(1), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.21500/16578031.2172
Naucke, P. (2017). The memory of resistance: Historicity and remembrance in a Colombian peace community. The Latin Americanist, 61(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/tla.12127
Pérez-Olmos, I., Fernández-Piñeres, P. E., & Rodado-Fuentes, S. (2005). Prevalencia del trastorno por estrés postraumático por la guerra, en niños de Cundinamarca, Colombia. Revista de Salud Pública, 7(3), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0124-00642005000300003
Rincón-Unigarro, C., Correa-Chica, A., López-López, W., del Pilar Morales-Sierra, M., & Rivera-Escobar, S. (2020). Media framings of forgiveness and reconciliation in the context of the Colombian armed conflict. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 29(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.15446/.v29n1.81505
Rodríguez, F. (2004). La pobreza como un proceso de violencia estructural. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (RCS ), 1, 42–50. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/280/28010104.pdf
Sikkink, K. (2009). Comments on the Colombia chapters from the perspective of human rights theories. In E. F. Babbitt & E. L. Lutz (Eds.), Human rights and conflict resolution in context (pp. 70–88). S/E. Retrieved from https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=qmTLqCYfoWIC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Human+Rights+and+Conflict+Resolution+in+Context&ots=t2PJBRUlH7&sig=LpAo_nqOCdpug7m9jjSy2XS8AmE#v=onepage&q&f=false
Taylor, L. K. (2016). Impact of political violence, social trust, and depression on civic participation in Colombia. Peace and Conflict, 22(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000139
Unidad para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Victimas (UARIV). (2014). Estrategia de Recuperación Emocional a Nivel Grupal. Retrieved from https://www.unidadvictimas.gov.co/sites/default/files/documentosbiblioteca/3912-estrategia-de-recuperacion-emocional-nivel-grupal-con-adultos-ereg-v1.pdf
Unidad para la Atención y Reparación Integral a las Victimas (UARIV). (2020). Registro Único de Víctimas (RUV) RNI - Red Nacional de Información. Retrieved from https://www.unidadvictimas.gov.co/es/registro-unico-de-victimas-ruv/37394
United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/es/universal-declaration-human-rights/
United Nations. (2018). National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to human rights council resolution 16/21 Colombia. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/COIndex.aspx
United Nations. (2021). Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.hchr.org.co/documentoseinformes/informes/altocomisionado/A_HRC_46_76_AdvanceUneditedVersion.pdf
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2019). Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/G1902543.pdf
Valdivieso, M. A. (2012). La justicia transicional en Colombia. Los estándares internacionales de derechos humanos y derecho internacional humanitario en la política de Santos. Papel Político, 17(2), 621–653. Retrieved from https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/papelpol/article/view/6545
Velez, G., Twose, G., & López-López, W. (2020). Human rights and reconciliation: Theoretical and empirical connections. In N. S. Rubin & R. L. Flores (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of psychology and human rights (pp. 537–552). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108348607.037
Villa, J. D. (2012). La acción y el enfoque psicosocial de la intervención en contextos sociales: ¿podemos pasar de la moda a la precisión teórica, epistemológica y metodológica? El Ágora USB, 12(2), 349–365. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4550239
Villa, J. D. (2016). Intervenciones psicosociales en el marco de acciones de reparación a víctimas del conflicto armado colombiano. ECA: Estudios Centroamericanos, 71(744), 81–104. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5793225
Villa, J. D., & Insuasty, A. (2016). Entre la participación y la resistencia: reconstrucción del tejido social desde abajo en el municipio de san carlos Más allá de la lógica de reparación estatal. Agora U.S.B., 16(2), 453. https://doi.org/10.21500/16578031.2442
Wegner, D. (2017). Rethinking civilian protection: How residents of the Colombian peace community in San José de Apartadó resist violence. Student Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 4(1), 18–29. Retrieved from http://www.paxetbellum.org
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
López-López, W., Correa-Chica, A., Caicedo-Moreno, A., Castro-Abril, P., Buitrago-Panader, C.F. (2022). Psychology and Human Rights in Colombia: Contributions to Peacebuilding. In: Lira, E., Cornejo, M., Morales, G. (eds) Human Rights Violations in Latin America. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97542-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97542-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97541-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97542-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)