Abstract
Perhaps more than any other policy area today, environmental sustainability and climate mitigation are in the focus of European Union politics and policy. Significant efforts are being made to achieve progress toward an economy based on resource-saving and environmentally sound practices rather than the use of ever more resources and pollution. Populism is among those factors that counteract this high-level political project of ecological modernization. While the phenomenon of populism tends to escape a clear definition, many observers have ascertained the importance of climate policy in populist discourse. In that regard, populism is usually assumed to cover a spectrum of positions roughly between the outright denial of climate change, and skepticism toward the technological changes involved with the pursuit of climate protection and higher levels of environmental sustainability. On different levels, populist political forces have access to EU-level politics and decision-making procedures. There is, hence, a certain risk for the implementation of the EU’s policies. While EU sustainability policy is entering a new round, the influence of populism appears to be growing. If the EU’s climate goals are to be realized, its institutions and those member states that support them therefore will require a strategy to meet the populist challenge. This chapter evaluates the (potential) threat of populism for EU sustainability and climate policy and discusses to what extent populists can influence the outcomes of EU-level politics on the mentioned subject. Additionally, the chapter pursues the question of whether the EU’s science programs can be part of a legitimate and viable answer to the populist challenge to the project of a sustainable Europe.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For example all 17 Sustainable Development Goals (https://sdgs.un.org/goals).
- 2.
Interestingly, research has shown a negative relationship between politics and sustainability: where policies are successful, and the performance of a given country in terms of sustainable development increases, support for populist forces decreases (Kroll & Zipperer, 2020, p. 5).
- 3.
The Gilets Jaunes movement in France is often used to exemplify the potential of populism to mobilize significant parts of the population and to affect the societal climate negatively against climate mitigation policies.
- 4.
The EU is currently implementing new initiatives towards the 2030 goals (European Commission, 2021a).
- 5.
This stands in contrast to a more pro-science attitude of the new climate movement.
- 6.
One could add mistrust in EU-level experts (von Homeyer et al., 2021, p. 965).
- 7.
The European Union devotes more than eight percent of its seven-year budget on science and innovation. This makes this area one of the largest Europeanized policy areas.
References
Abbott, A., & Schiermeier, Q. (2019). EU Science. The next €100 billion. Nature, 569, 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01566-z
Abromeit, J. (2017). A critical review of recent literature on populism. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1146
Atlantic Council. (2021). The global energy agenda. Report, Washington, DC. Retrieved from: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Global-Energy-Agenda-2021.pdf. Accessed 06 Dec 2021.
Auer, S. (2010). ‘New Europe’: Between cosmopolitan dreams and nationalist nightmares. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1163–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02108.x
Banchoff, T. (2002). Institutions, inertia and European Union research policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00341
Batel, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2015). Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representation Theory. Public Understanding of Science, 24(3), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513514165
BBC. (2021). Shell: Netherlands court orders oil giant to cut emissions. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57257982. Accessed 06 Dec 2021.
Bergmann, J., Hackenesch, C., & Stockemer, D. (2021). Populist radical right parties in Europe: What impact do they have on development policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 59, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13143
Best, E. (2019). Policy-making in the European Union. In M. Cini & N. Pérez-Solórzano Borragán (Eds.), European union politics (6th ed., pp. 235–252). Oxford University Press.
Biard, B., Bernhard, L., & Betz, H.-G. (2021). Do they make a difference? The policy influence of radical right populist parties in Western Europe. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers/ECPR Press.
Böhmelt, T. (2021). Populism and environmental performance. Global Environmental Politics, 21(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00606
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2020). Identity politics, core state powers and regional integration: Europe and beyond. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12982
Bosworth, K. (2020). The people’s climate March: Environmental populism as political genre. Political Geography, 83, 102281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102281
Buti, M., & Pichelmann, K. (2017). European integration and populism: Addressing Dahrendorf’s quandary. Policy Brief, LUISS School of European Political Economy, Rome. Online: http://sep.luiss.it/sites/sep.luiss.it/files/Buti_PB_01302017.pdf. Accessed 08 June 2021.
Buzogány, A., & Ćetković, S. (2021). Fractionalized but ambitious? Voting on energy and climate policy in the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 1038–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918220
Buzogány, A., & Mohamad-Klotzbach, C. (2021). Populism and nature – The nature of populism: New perspectives on the relationship between populism, climate change, and nature protection. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 15, 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00492-7
Caldwell, C. (2019, August 2). The problem with Greta Thunberg’s climate activism. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/02/opinion/climate-change-greta-thunberg.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2021.
Calvo-Gallardo, E., Arranz, N., & de Arroyabe, J. C. F. (2021). Analysis of the European energy innovation system: Contribution of the Framework Programmes to the EU policy objectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126690
Carvalho, A. (2020). Green populism: A new phenomenon (Dissertation). Retrieved from: http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1461333/FULLTEXT02.pdf. Accessed 13 Aug 2021.
Checkel, J. T., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2009). The politicization of European identities. In J. T. Checkel & P. J. Katzenstein (Eds.), European identity (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press.
Christiansen, T. (2020). The EU’s new normal: Consolidating European integration in an era of populism and geo-economics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13106
Cossarini, P., Ruzza, C., & Berti, C. (2021). The impact of populism on the European Union: ‘The people’ and the Brussels bubble. In C. Ruzza, C. Berti, & P. Cossarini (Eds.), The impact of populism on European institutions and civil society. Discourses, practices, and policies. Springer Nature.
Counterpoint. (2021). Green Wedge? Mapping dissent against climate policy in Europe. Retrieved from: https://counterpoint.uk.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Green_Wedge_Counterpoint_OSEPI.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2021.
Eikeland, P. O., & Skjaerseth, J. B. (2021). The politics of low-carbon innovation: Implementing the European Union’s strategic energy technology plan. Energy Research & Social Science, 76, 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102043
Escartin, A. R. (2020). Populist challenges to EU foreign policy in the Southern Neighbourhood: An informal and illiberal Europeanisation? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(8), 1195–1214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712459
European Commission. (2018). Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee, The Committee of The Regions, and the European Investment Bank. A Clean Planet for all. A European strategic long term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. COM(2018) 773 final, 28 November 2018.
European Commission. (2019). Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee, The Committee of The Regions. The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final, 11 December 2019.
European Commission. (2021a). Communication from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee, and The Committee of The Regions. ‘Fit for 55’: delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality. COM(2021) 550 final, 14 July 2021.
European Commission. (2021b, July 5). Press release. Eurobarometer Survey: Europeans consider climate change to be the most serious problem facing the world. Brussels. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_21_3156/IP_21_3156_EN.pdf
European Commission. (n.d.). Responsible research & innovation. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
European Parliament. (2019). Closer to the citizen, closer to the ballot. Spring Eurobarometer 2019. Eurobarometer Survey 91.1 of the European Parliament. A Public Opinion Monitoring Study. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/files/be-heard/eurobarometer/2019/closer-to-the-citizens-closer-to-the-ballot/report/en-eurobarometer-2019.pdf
European Union. (2018a). Directive (EU) 2018/410 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2018 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reduction and low-carbon investments, and Decision (EU) 2015/1814. Official Journal of the European Union, L 76/3, 19.03.2018.
European Union. (2018b). Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action. Official Journal of the European Union, L 328/1, 21.12.2018.
European Union. (2019a). European Union presents its progress towards sustainable development. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_4250. Accessed 08 Aug 2021.
European Union. (2019b). Special Eurobarometer 490. Report. Climate Change. Survey requested by the European Commission, Directorate General for Climate Action and co-ordinated by the Directorate-General for Communication, April 2019.
European Union. (2021). Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013. Official Journal of the European Union. L170/1, 12.5.2021.
European Union. (n.d.). European battery alliance. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/strategy/industrial-alliances/european-battery-alliance_en. Accessed 15 Nov 2021.
Falkner, G., & Plattner, G. (2020). EU policies and populist radical right parties’ programmatic claims: Foreign policy, anti-discrimination and the single market. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58, 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12963
Farstad, F. M. (2018). What explains variation in parties’ climate change salience? Party Politics, 24(6), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817693473
Fitch-Roy, O., Benson, D., & Mitchell, C. (2018). Wipeout? Entrepreneurship, policy interaction and the EU’s 2030 renewable energy target. Journal of European Integration, 40(7), 983–999. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1487961
Fraune, C., & Knodt, M. (2018). Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Research & Social Science, 43, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.029
Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, A. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy, 44, 1080–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.001
Halikiopoulou, D. (2018). A right-wing populist momentum? A review of 2017 elections across Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12769
Henke, M., & Maher, R. (2021). The populist challenge to European defense. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(3), 389–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1881587
Huber, R. A., Maltby, T., Szulecki, K., & Ćetković, S. (2021). Is populism a challenge to European energy and climate policy? Empirical evidence across varieties of populism. Journal of European Integration, 28(7), 998–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918214
IDEA. (2020). Populist government and democracy: An impact assessment using the Global State of Democracy Indices. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, Report. Online: https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/populist-government-and-democracy-impact-assessement-using-gsod-indices.pdf. Accessed 03 Aug 2021.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel, & J. C. Minx (Eds.)]. Cambridge University Press.
Jahn, D. (2021). Quick and dirty: How populist parties in government affect greenhouse gas emissions in EU member states. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 980–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918215
Kastrinos, N., & Weber, K. M. (2020). Sustainable development goals in the research and innovation policy of the European Union. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120056
Khrushcheva, O., & Maltby, T. (2016). The future of EU-Russia energy relations in the context of decarbonisation. Geopolitics, 21(4), 799–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1188081
Kroll, C., & Zipperer, V. (2020). Sustainable development and populism. Ecological Economics, 176, 106723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106723
Lanzone, M. E., & Morini, M. (2017). Populists in power: From municiplaities to (European) parliament, the case of the Italian five star movement. Chinese Political Science Review, 2, 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0065-z
Leonhard, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Shapiro, J., & Tagliapietra, S. (2021). The geopolitics of the European Green Deal. Policy Brief, European Council on Foreign Relations, Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia, Warsaw. Retrieved from: https://ecfr.eu/publication/the-geopolitics-of-the-european-green-deal/. Accessed 30 Aug 2021.
Lindberg, L., & Scheingold, S. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. Prentice-Hall.
Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
Lopatka, R. (2019). Subsidiary: Bridging the gap between the ideal and reality. European View, 18(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685819838449
March, L. (2017). Left and right populism compared: The British case. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), 282–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117701753
Markou, G. (2017). Book review: Benjamin Moffitt, the global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Political Studies Review, 15(3), 434–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929917710170
Marschall, P., & Klingebiel, S. (2019). Populism: Consequences for Global Sustainable Development. Briefing Paper, German Development Institute, Bonn. Retrieved from: https://www.die-gdi.de/uploads/media/BP_8.2019.pdf. Accessed 08 Sept 2021.
Mede, N. G., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520924259
Meyer, B. (2021). Populists in power: Perils and prospects in 2021. Tony Blair Institute, London. Retrieved from: https://institute.global/sites/default/files/articles/Populists-in-Power-Perils-and-Prospects-in-2021.pdf. Accessed 03 Aug 2021.
Mouffe, C. (2020). Why a populist Left should rally around a green democratic transformation. openDemocracy, London. Retrieved from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/rethinking-populism/left-populist-strategy-post-covid-19/. Accessed 27 Oct 2021.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C. (2019). The 2019 EU elections: Moving the center. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0066
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Exclusionary vs. inclusionary populism: Comparing contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics, 48(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2012.11
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019). Populisme. Dreyers Forlag.
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? University of Philadelphia Press.
Novitzky, P., Bernstein, M., Blok, V., Braun, R., Chan, T. T., Lamers, W., Loeber, A., Meijer, I., Lindner, R., & Griessler, E. (2020). Improve alignment of research policy and societal values. Science, 369(6499), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3415
Oberthür, S., & Dupont, C. (2021). The European Union’s international climate leadership: Towards a grand climate strategy? Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918218
OECD. (2019). Regions in industrial transition: Policies for people and places. OECD Publishing.
Ostiguy, P., Panizza, F., & Moffitt, B. (2021). Populism in a global perspective. A performative and discursive approach. Routledge.
Pappas, T. S. (2019). Populists in power. Journal of Democracy, 30(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0026
Petri, F., & Biedenkopf, K. (2021). Weathering growing polarization? The European Parliament and EU foreign climate policy ambitions. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 1057–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918216
Politico. (2021, May 21). EU court orders a Polish coal mine to pause operations. Online: https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-court-orders-polish-coal-mine-to-pause-operations-lawsuit/. Accessed 15 Aug 2021.
Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. L., & van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065
Sattich, T., & Jackson Inderberg, T. H. (2019). EU geoeconomics: A framework for analyzing bilateral relations in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 502–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12830
Schmidt, V. A. (2019). Politicization in the EU: Between national politics and EU political dynamics. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 1018–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1619189
Schreurs, M., & Wurster, S. (2019). The governance of big transformations. TATuP – Zeitschrift fürTechnikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis/Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 28(2), 69–70. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.28.2.s69
Skjaerseth, J. B. (2018). Implementing EU climate and energy policies in Poland: Policy feedback and reform. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1429046
Skjaerseth, J. B. (2021). Towards a European Green Deal: The evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes. International Environmental Agreements, 21, 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09529-4
Stockemer, D., & Amengay, A. (2020). The 2019 elections to the European Parliament: The continuation of a populist wave but not a populist tsunami. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13077
Surel, Y. (2011). The European Union and the challenge of populism. Policy Brief, Notre Europe, Paris. Retrieved from: https://institutdelors.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/bref27_ysurel_en-1.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2021.
Theodore, J. (2019). Survival of the European (Dis) Union: Responses to populism, nativism and globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Timbro. (2019). Timbro authoritarian populism index. Timbro, Stockholm. Online: https://populismindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/TAP2019C.pdf. Accessed 03 Aug 2021.
United Nations. (2015). The Paris Agreement. Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Accessed 14 Nov 2021.
United Nations. (2021, November 13). COP26 reaches consensus on key actions to address climate change. UN Climate Press Release. Retrieved from: https://unfccc.int/news/cop26-reaches-consensus-on-key-actions-to-address-climate-change. Accessed 15 Nov 2021.
Varga, M., & Buzogány, A. (2020). The foreign policy of populists in power: Contesting liberalism in Poland and Hungary. Geopolitics, 26(5), 1442–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1734564
Vittori, D. (2021). Threat or corrective? Assessing the impact of populist parties in government on the qualities of democracy: A 19-country comparison. Government and Opposition, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2021.21
von Homeyer, I., Oberthür, S., & Jordan, A. (2021). EU climate and energy governance in times of crisis: Towards a new agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 959–979. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918221
Wanvik, T. I., & Haarstad, H. (2021). Populism, instability, and rupture in sustainability transformations. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1866486
WEF. (2020). Shaping a multiconceptual world 2020. Special report, World Economic Forum, Geneva. Retrieved from: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_a_Multiconceptual_World_2020.pdf. Accessed 06 Dec 2021.
Ydersbond, I. M. (2018). Power through collaboration: Stakeholder influence in EU climate and energy negotiations. International Negotiation, 23, 478–514. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-23031161
Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F., & Laffan, B. (2019). Introduction: The European Union beyond the polycrisis? Integration and politicization in an age of shifting cleavages. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 963–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1619803
Żuk, P., & Szulecki, K. (2020). Unpacking the right-populist threat to climate action: Poland’s pro-governmental media on energy transition and climate change. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101485
Zulianello, M. (2020). Varieties of populist parties and party systems in Europe: From state-of-the art to the application of a novel classification scheme to 66 parties in 33 countries. Government and Opposition, 55, 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.21
Zulianello, M., & Gahner Larsen, E. (2021). Populist parties in European Parliament elections: A new dataset on left, right and valence populism from 1979 to 2019. Electoral Studies, 71, 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102312
Zürn, M. (2019). Politicization compared: At national, European, and global levels. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 977–995. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1619188
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sattich, T. (2022). The Populist Challenge to the EU’s Sustainability Policy: Is “More Science” a Legitimate and Viable Response?. In: Eslen–Ziya, H., Giorgi, A. (eds) Populism and Science in Europe . Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97535-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97535-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97534-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97535-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)