Abstract
The chapter explores science populism from a left-wing perspective to understand how populism relates to popular and democratic citizenship. The literature often conceptualises science populism as anti-democratic, however a left-wing perspective on populism allows us to explore the democratic and progressive potential when citizens engage in articulating alternative knowledge positions online that challenges hegemonic discourses in science and environmental conflict. This chapter therefore focuses on how the Danish Vegan Party draws on popular, digital citizenship to articulate alternative knowledge positions online that contribute to populist discourses on food, science, and the environment. The analysis of how the Vegan Party reformulate digital rights-claims allows the chapter to argue that three central and interconnected populist antagonistic logics are present in the vegan discourse: (1) conflicts regarding mainstream versus alternative knowledge, (2) the people versus the citizen, and (3) humans versus non-humans.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The Vegan Party website: https://vgpt.dk/politisk-fundament/ (accessed 20/5 2021).
- 2.
https://www.facebook.com/109622273936015/posts/302362511328656/?d=n (accessed 14/6 2021).
- 3.
https://www.facebook.com/veganerpartiet (accessed 14/6 2021).
- 4.
https://www.facebook.com/ditbt/posts/4879828348711011 (accessed 14/6 2021).
- 5.
- 6.
https://twitter.com/VeganWithDaniel (accessed 20/5 2021).
- 7.
- 8.
https://www.facebook.com/ditbt/posts/4879828348711011 (accessed 14/6 2021).
- 9.
https://www.facebook.com/veganerpartiet (accessed 15/6 2021).
- 10.
https://twitter.com/AnimalRightsDK/status/1399793685605330951 (accessed 15/6 2021).
- 11.
Original emphasis. The Vegan Party website: https://vgpt.dk/politisk-fundament/ (accessed 20/5 2021).
- 12.
https://twitter.com/AnimalRightsDK/status/1399793685605330951 (accessed 15/6 2021).
- 13.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=335wCOgkGVY (accessed 15/6 2021).
References
Baker, M., & Blaagaard, B. B. (2016). Reconceptualizing citizen media: A preliminary charting of a complex domain. In M. Baker & B. B. Blaagaard (Eds.), Citizen media and public spaces. Diverse expressions of citizenship and dissent (pp. 1–22). Routledge.
Beeson, M. (2019). Environmental populism. The politics of survival in the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bessi, A. (2016). On the statistical properties of viral misinformation in online social media. Elsevier.
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds. A handbook of method. Princeton University Press.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
Davies, W. (2020). Green populism? Action and mortality in the Anthropocene. Environmental Values, 29(6), 647–668.
Eslen-Ziya, H. (2020). Right-wing populism in New Turkey: Leading to all new grounds for troll science in gender theory. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 76(3), a6005.
Eslen-Ziya, H. (2022). Knowledge, counter-knowledge, pseudo-science in populism. In H. Eslen-Ziya & A. Giorgi (Eds.), Populism and science in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Eslen-Ziya, H., et al. (2019). From anger to solidarity: The emotional echo-chamber of Gezi park protests. Emotion, Space and Society, 33, 100632.
Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost. The Public, 25(3), 298–314.
Fernandez-Torres, M. J., et al. (2021). Infodemic and fake news in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 1781. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041781
Flyvbjerg, B. (1991). Rationalitet og Magt. Det Konkretes Videnskab. Bind 1. Akademisk Forlag.
Hørkilde, M. (2021, March 7). Partileder: Vil redde klimaet ved at rationere bøffer og benzin. Politiken.
Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge University Press.
Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Introduction. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 1–12). Zed Books.
Isin, E. F., & Ruppert, E. (2015). Being digital citizens. Rowman & Littlefield.
Jasanoff, S. (2004). The idiom of co-production. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge (pp. 1–12). Routledge.
Korkut, U., et al. (2021). Looking for truth in absurdity: Humour as community-building and dissidence against authoritarianism. International Political Science Review. Advance online publication 4 January. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120971151
Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography. Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. Verso.
Laclau, E. (2005a). Populism. What’s in a name? In D. Howarth (Ed.), Ernesto Laclau. Post-marxism, populism and critique (pp. 152–164). Routledge.
Laclau, E. (2005b). On populist reason. Verso.
Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732.
Lundqvist, Å., & Petersen, K. (2010). In experts we trust: Knowledge, politics and bureaucracy in Nordic welfare states. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Mede, N. G., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands towards science. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 473–491.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. Verso.
Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An ideational approach. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 27–47). Oxford University Press.
Neimanis, A., & Hedrén, J. (2015). Four problems, four directions for Environmental Humanities: Toward critical posthumanities for the Anthropocene. Ethics and the Environment, 20(1), 67–97.
Raffini, L., & Penalva-Verdú, C. (2022). The problematic relationship between science, politics and public opinion in late modernity. The case of the anti-vax movement in Spain and Italy. In H. Eslen-Ziya & A. Giorgi (Eds.), Populism and science in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Roslyng, M. M. (2011). Challenging the hegemonic food discourse: The British media debate on risk and salmonella in eggs. Science as Culture, 20(2), 157–182.
Roslyng, M. M., & Larsen, G. (2021). The struggle between the power of language and the language of power. Pro- and anti-vaccination memes and the discursive construction of knowledge. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(6), 894–912.
Saresma, T., & Palonen, E. (2022). On the emergence of alt-science counterhegemony: The case of the Finns Party. In H. Eslen-Ziya & A. Giorgi (Eds.), Populism and science in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sørensen, P. B. (2020). Environment, energy, and climate policy from energy supply to climate gases. In P. M. Christiensen, J. Elklit, & P. Nedergaard (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Danish politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198833598.013.37
Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-wing populism in the European periphery: The case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142.
Tomasi, M. (2020). Populism, science and the Italian democracy. In G. Delledonne, G. Marticico, M. Monti, & F. Pacini (Eds.), Italian populism and constitutional law. Challenges to democracy in the 21st century (pp. 223–240). Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Zoonen, L. (2012). I-pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political culture. European Journal of Communication, 27(1), 56–67.
Wodak, R. (2013). “Anything Goes!” – The Haiderization of Europe. In R. Wodak, M. KhosraviNik, & B. Mral (Eds.), Right wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse (pp. 23–38). Bloomsbury Academic.
Ylä-Anttila, T. (2018). Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authorities. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5(4), 356–388.
Zuk, P., & Zuk, P. (2020). Right-wing populism in Poland and anti-vaccination myths on YouTube: Political and cultural threats to public health. Global Public Health, 15(6), 790–804.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roslyng, M.M. (2022). Between Populism and Popular Citizenship in Science Conflicts. In: Eslen–Ziya, H., Giorgi, A. (eds) Populism and Science in Europe . Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97535-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97535-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97534-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97535-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)