Skip to main content

De-Provincializing Liolà: Pirandello, Futurism, and the Dialectics of Revision in Gramsci’s Cultural Writings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking Place through Literary Form

Part of the book series: Geocriticism and Spatial Literary Studies ((GSLS))

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

This essay demonstrates how, in his Sicilian play Liolà, Luigi Pirandello reaches beyond the geographical and dialectal provenance of his chosen literary form. Pirandello’s de-provincializing intent unfolds against the cultural milieu of Italy’s bourgeois theater, with its standard morality stories and cosmopolitan ideas ungrounded in a national or regional identity. Antonio Gramsci read Pirandello as contributing to the de-provincialization of Italian culture, a description that Gramsci also applied positively to early Futurism as well as in anticipation of the national-popular culture. Pirandello’s thinking joins in with such progressive undertakings by illuminating provincialism as a national problem despite its being displaced onto the rural—especially the Southern—regions. Within Pirandello’s dialectic of the regional and the national (and even beyond), the paganism of Magna Grecia in Liolà emerges as a key example of how the play sublates, as opposed to merely negates, its Sicilianness. As a tradition that predates—and thus supersedes—the Roman Empire, this Southern tradition doubly serves as counterpoint to the long-standing cosmopolitan hegemony of Italy, giving voice once again to how the play gains its broader appeal through its situatedness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    In line with the international standard for citing Gramsci’s work, references to his notes written in prison are provided by the number of Notebook (Q) and the note (§). Other citations are accompanied by the corresponding page number in one of the following three sources: Selections from Cultural Writings (henceforth CW), Volume 1 of Prison Notebooks, or Selections from Prison Notebooks (henceforth SPN). Citations of Gramsci’s essays about Pirandello’s dialect plays, including Liolà (both the Avanti ! columns and his notes on Pirandello from 1930–1935), are from CW, except for one occasion where I rely on Tony Mitchell’s translation (see footnote 2).

  2. 2.

    For this particular quotation, I rely on Tony Mitchell’s translation, due to its apt introduction of the word “provincialism,” which captures the complexity of what Gramsci meant by vita regionale (Q14 §15). William Boelhower translates it into “regional life” which, while literally correct, does not reflect its complicity with the dominant hegemony in generating cultural consensus and conditioning the public taste.

  3. 3.

    As the name suggests, Pirandellism (Pirandellismo) primarily refers to Pirandello’s body of work, with a particular focus on his later work where his “play within the play” technique and philosophical themes become more pronounced. After the publication of Adriano Tilgher’s 1923 study of Pirandello in his Studi sul teatro contemporaneo (Studies in Contemporary Theatre), these features came to be known in Italian literary circles as “Pirandellism” and were adopted even beyond Italy between the twenties and the sixties. Some of the themes that appear repeatedly in his plays, “the relativity of truth, the multiplicity of personality, the art-life opposition, and the overwhelming absurdity of life,” are especially notable (Bishop 146). As Pirandellism gained popularity, especially among the French and German playwrights, cases were present where writers were declarably Pirandellians without even being familiar with his work.

  4. 4.

    Named after Antonio Bresciani (1798–1862), a reactionary Jesuit writer, Brescianism is a term coined by Gramsci to highlight the reactionary tendencies of many post-war intellectuals, most of whom were affiliated with Jesuitism to varying degrees and supported the repressive measures of the fascist regime, which sought to use the Concordat to tighten ideological control over the people. After his imprisonment, Gramsci examined the phenomenon of Brescianism as an important part of many ideological coalitions that were taking place in literary culture, religion, and the dominant class at this time.

Works Cited

  • Bassanese, Fiora A. Understanding Luigi Pirandello. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Thomas. Pirandello and the French Theater. New York: New York University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bru, Sascha. “The Untameables: Language and Politics in Gramsci and Marinetti.” Back to the Futurists: The Avant-Garde and Its Legacy. Ed. Elza Adamowicz and Simona Storchi. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013. 243–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Francisci, Enza. “Translating sicilianità in Pirandello’s dialect play Liolà.” Adapting Translation for the Stage. Ed. Geraldine Brodie and Emma Cole. New York: Routledge, 2017. 223–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombroski, Robert S. “On Gramsci’s Theater Criticism.” The Legacy of Antonio Gramsci, special issue of Boundary 2, vol. 14, no. 3, Spring 1986: 91–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elden, Stuart. The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013. 53–97.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, Benedetto. “Intellectuals and Masses: Agency and Knowledge in Gramsci.” Antonio Gramsci. Ed. Mark McNally. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. “Questions on Geography.” Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon, 1977. 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. “Gramsci on Theatre.” Ed. and trans. Tony Mitchell. New Theatre Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 47, 1996: 259–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Letters from Prison. Ed. Frank Rosengarten. Trans. Raymond Rosenthal. New York: Columbia University Press, 1994a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Prison Notebooks. Ed. Joseph A. Buttgieg. Vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Selections from Cultural Writings. Ed. David Forgacs and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. Trans. William Boelhower. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Some Aspects of the Southern Question.” Antonio Gramsci: Pre-Prison Writings. Ed. Richard Bellamy. Trans. Virginia Cox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994b. 313–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, Peter. Gramsci’s Politics of Language: Engaging the Bakhtin Circle and the Frankfurt School. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mariani, Umberto. “Liolà: Beyond Naturalism.” Living Masks: The Achievement of Pirandello. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinetti, F. T. et al. “The Futurist Synthetic Theatre.” Futurism: An Anthology. Ed. Lawrence Rainey et al. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009. 204–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, Mark. “Gramsci’s Internationalism, the National-Popular and the Alternative Globalisation Movement.” Gramsci and Global Politics: Hegemony and Resistance. Ed. Mark McNally and John Schwarzmantel. New York: Routledge, 2009. 58–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Catherine E. Fascist Directive: Ezra Pound and Italian Cultural Nationalism. Clemson, SC: Clemson University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirandello, Luigi. The Late Mattia Pascal. 1904. Trans. William Weaver. New York: New York Review Books, 1964a.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Liolà. 1916. Pirandello’s Theatre of Living Masks: New Translations of Six Major Plays. Trans. Umberto Mariani and Alice Gladstone Mariani. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011. 27–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Sicilian Theatre?” 1909. Luigi Pirandello in the Theatre: A Documentary Record. Ed. Susan Bassnett and Jennifer Lorch. Philadelphia: Harwood, 1993. 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “A Warning on the Scruples of the Imagination.” The Late Mattia Pascal. Trans. William Weaver. New York: New York Review Books, 1964b. 245–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Province.” The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989. OED Online. https://www-oed-com.ezp1.lib.umn.edu/oed2/00191085. Accessed 14 June 2019.

  • San Juan, E., Jr. “Antonio Gramsci on Surrealism and the Avantgarde.” Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 37, no. 2, 2013: 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilgher, Adriano. Studi sul teatro contemporaneo. Rome: Libreria di Scienze e lettere, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Somie Kang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kang, J.S. (2022). De-Provincializing Liolà: Pirandello, Futurism, and the Dialectics of Revision in Gramsci’s Cultural Writings. In: Banerjee, R., Cadle, N. (eds) Rethinking Place through Literary Form. Geocriticism and Spatial Literary Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96494-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics