Skip to main content

Characteristics of Team Dynamics Influencing Success in Engineering Student Teams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Mobility for Smart Cities and Regional Development - Challenges for Higher Education (ICL 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 389))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Introducing team projects into the engineering curriculum and teaching good teaming skills is one of the challenges for today’s engineering instructors. One of the challenging tasks is to form project team that can be successful. The question becomes: what information can be used to avoid bad teams. This article uses the experience of introducing real-world projects into the curriculum of the Department of Innovation in Chemical Technology of Kazan National Research Technological University to explore two key questions that might influence team success: 1) whether culture is a large factor in determining team success and 2) whether the diversity of styles of managing conflict influences success. In Kazan, there are two distinct cultures: Tatar which is predominantly Muslim and European Russian which is predominantly Orthodox. This situation offers an excellent opportunity to study these questions.

Student teams were formed around projects according to their area of interest. During the project students were given three surveys from www.itpmetrics.com: on their personality and on their individual style of conflict management and a final survey on assessing the health and performance of the team.

The approach in this article to analyze the results of these surveys to explore what factors had the most influence. All the students regardless of sex or culture showed a very high degree of integrative decision making. However, there are distinct differences in conflict management styles between the men and women of Tatar and Russian cultures. Having a high integrative style in the team leaders correlated to high team satisfaction. Surprisingly, the lack of contribution equity or the presence of personal conflict in the team had no to minimal influence on success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schneider, M.: Google Spent 2 Years Studying 180 Teams. The Most Successful Ones Shared These 5 Traits (2017). https://www.inc.com/michael-schneider/google-thought-they-knew-how-to-create-the-perfect.html

  2. Sultanova, D., Maliashova, A.: Development of the direction at the Kazan National Research Technological University. Innovation 12(254), 2–5 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sultanova, D., Sanger, P.A., Maliashova, A.: Introducing real-world projects into a chemical technology curricula. In: Auer, M.E., Rüütmann, T. (eds.) ICL 2020. AISC, vol. 1328, pp. 362–370. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68198-2_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Neill, T.A., McLarnon, M.J.W., Hoffart, G.C., Woodley, H.J.R., Allen, N.J.: The structure and function of team conflict state profiles. J. Manag. 44(2), 811–836 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315581662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahim, A., Bonoma, T.V.: Managing organizational conflict: a model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychol. Rep. 44(3), 1323–1344 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanger, P.: Integrating project management, product design with industry sponsored projects provides stimulating senior capstone experiences. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 1(2), 13 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yarullin R.A.: Petrochemistry of Tatarstan Will Grow in Siberia, Time and Money, no. 2 (2012). https://www.e-vid.ru/index-m-192-p-63-article-39381.htm

  8. Galloway, P.D.: The 21st-Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform. ASCE, Reston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barron, B.: Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. J. Learn. Sci. 7, 271–311 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A Regional Summit: Meeting Western North Carolina’s Needs Through Higher Education. Western Carolina University (2003). http://www.wcu.edu/chancellor/presentations/regionalsummit_Feb2003.html. Accessed 21 Feb 2003

  11. McVey, M.A., Luchies, C.W., Villicana, A.J.: Impact of high-performing teams on student learning. In: 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio (2017). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28465

  12. Heinricher, A.C., Quinn, P., Vaz, R.F., Rissmiller, K.J.: Long-term impacts of project-based learning in science and engineering. In: 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia (2013). https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--1988

  13. Allen, N.J., O’Neill, T.A.: Team composition and performance: considering the project team challenge. In: Kelloway, E.K., Hobbs, B., Chiocchio, F. (Eds.) The Psychology and Management of Project Teams: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 301–328. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sheridan, P.: Student Development of Team-Effectiveness Behaviours in Engineering Teams. Doctoral Dissertation University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haslam, S.A., McGarty, C., Brown, P.M., Eggins, R.A., Morrison, B.E., Reynolds, K.J.: Inspecting the emperor’s clothes: evidence that random selection of leaders can enhance group performance. Group Dyn. 2, 168–184 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ho, K., Tang, D.: Personality traits, teamwork competencies and academic performance among first-year engineering students. High. Educ. Skills Work-Based Learn. 11(2), 367–385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-11-2019-0153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Neill, T., et al.: Introducing a scalable peer feedback system for learning teams. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 44(6), 848–862 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tasa, K., Sears, G.J., Schat, A.C.: Personality and teamwork behavior in context: the cross level moderating role of collective efficacy. J. Organ. Behav. 32(1), 65–85 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Neill, T.A., et al.: Constructive controversy and reflexivity training promotes effective conflict profiles and team functioning in student learning teams. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 16(2), 257–276 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rahim, M.A.: A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Acad. Manag. J. 26(2), 368–376 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip A. Sanger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maliashova, A., Sultanova, D., Sanger, P.A. (2022). Characteristics of Team Dynamics Influencing Success in Engineering Student Teams. In: Auer, M.E., Hortsch, H., Michler, O., Köhler, T. (eds) Mobility for Smart Cities and Regional Development - Challenges for Higher Education. ICL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 389. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93904-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics