Abstract
Medulloepithelioma (MEP) arises from the primitive neuroepithelium of the ciliary body of the eye, occurs in the first decade of life, and may be a manifestation of the DICER1 syndrome. It is often misdiagnosed with glaucoma or uveitis and became symptomatic with pain and visual loss when it is large enough to be seen through the pupil. MRI shows a mass composed by both a solid and a cystic component that histologically are represented by poorly differentiated neuroepithelium and cysts full of hyaluronic acid. Prognosis is excellent after enucleation (up to 95% 5-year survival), but remains poor when there is extraocular extension. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy may be used in selected cases.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Medulloepithelioma (MEP) is a rare tumor derived from the primitive neuroepithelium that forms the ciliary body of the eye, iris, retina, or optic nerve head. It usually arises from the non-pigmented ciliary body of the eye; however, tumors arising from the optic nerve, retina, or central nervous system have also been described (Vajaranant et al. 2005; Molloy et al. 1996).
It represents the second most common intraocular tumor in childhood after retinoblastoma, with 75–90% of cases occurring in children aged less than 10 years (Tadepalli et al. 2019). Very rarely, these tumors can affect adults, in some cases as a late malignant transformation of a benign asymptomatic MEP arisen in childhood (Husain et al. 1998).
MEP is a locally aggressive tumor that may extend anteriorly into the iris or posteriorly into the vitreous cavity, involving the retina, with the entire globe filled with tumor similar to retinoblastoma. In advanced cases, it may present with extraocular extension and involve the regional lymph nodes. Distant metastasis to the lungs and parotid gland has been rarely described (Broughton and Zimmerman 1978; Viswanathan et al. 2008). There is no racial or gender predilection, and both eyes are equally affected, but it is commonly unilateral (Tadepalli et al. 2019).
MEP can be associated with central nervous system malignancies (i.e., pinealoblastoma) or malformations (i.e., corpus callosum agenesis, schizencephaly) (Vajaranant et al. 2005). In addition, MEP has been found associated with pleuropulmonary blastoma (Priest et al. 2011) as part of the DICER1 familiar tumor predisposition syndrome. It has been reported that 5% of patients with MEP have a history of pleuropulmonary blastoma but the risk for MEP in pleuropulmonary blastoma patients is low (<1%) (Kaliki et al. 2013). Recently, somatic mutations of the KMT2D gene have been found, but their role in MEP needs to be further elucidated (Sahm et al. 2016).
1 Clinical Presentation
MEP is characterized by a slow growth, and it is often asymptomatic until it is large enough to be seen through the pupil. The most common presenting symptoms are pain and poor vision, related to secondary lens subluxation, glaucoma, or cataract formation. Leukocoria, strabismus, and the evidence of a mass in the iris or ciliary body are also part of the initial signs (Chung et al. 2007; Tadepalli et al. 2019).
On fundoscopic examination, the tumor presents an irregular surface with characteristic cystic lesions (Fig. 32.3 1a). In up to 60% of patients, cysts break off the surface and float freely in aqueous or vitreous humor. Retinal detachment is seen in many cases (Chung et al. 2007). On ultrasound, MEP appears as an echogenic irregular mass with a cystic structure and calcifications in some cases. Ultrasound biomicroscopy is more precise to define tumor dimensions and internal characteristics (Bianciotto et al. 2011). CT scan shows a dense irregular mass in the region of the ciliary body with marked to moderate enhancement after contrast, but MRI is preferred to investigate MEP. On MRI, the mass shows both solid and cystic components and appears moderately hyperintense compared to vitreous on T1-weighted images and hypointense on T2-weighted images with marked enhancement after gadolinium administration (Fig. 42.3.1b). Invasion of the sclera or optic nerve can also be identifiable (Sansgiri et al. 2013).
2 Diagnosis
The diagnosis requires a histopathologic examination. MEP is characterized by proliferating folded and multilayered sheets and cords of poorly differentiated neuroepithelium, resembling the primitive medullary plate and neural tube. Cystic spaces full of hyaluronic acid are present. MEP has been classified as nonteratoid (approximately two-thirds of cases) and teratoid type, and both types can be benign or malignant. The nonteratoid MEP is a pure proliferation of cells of the medullary epithelium, and it is typically positive for vimentin and neuron-specific enolase. The teratoid subtype includes also heteroplastic elements, such as cartilage, skeletal muscle, and brain-like tissue, and accounts for 30–50% of cases.
The histopathological criteria for malignancy are the presence of frequent mitotic figures or nuclear pleomorphism, poor cellular differentiation with or without rosettes, sarcomatous changes, and invasion of surrounding ocular tissues with or without extrascleral extension (Broughton and Zimmerman 1978).
When MEP is very extended and includes calcification, it may be difficult to distinguish it from an anteriorly located retinoblastoma. Differential diagnosis should also include benign conditions such xanthogranuloma, a cyst of the ciliary body, or the persistence and hyperplasia of the primary vitreous (Vajaranant et al. 2005; Chung et al. 2007).
A recent study investigating for MEP biomarkers found that EZH2, an epigenetic enzyme that regulates tumor suppressor genes or oncogene expression, is strongly positive in moderate to poorly differentiated primitive/neuroblastic MEP cells and negative in the surrounding non-neoplastic tissues. EZH2 positivity has been observed in other forms of cancer including retinoblastoma, and this limits its diagnostic utility (Avedschmidt et al. 2016). More interesting may be the role of LIN28A, a miRNA binding protein, able to downregulate tumor suppressing microRNAs of the let-7 family. LIN28A is positive in all tumors showing the tendency to form rosettes and tubules, but it is negative in retinoblastoma, showing a potential role to differentiate MEP from retinoblastoma and representing a possible therapeutic target (Stagner and Jakobiec 2016).
3 Treatment and Prognosis
MEP treatment is usually based on the surgical removal of the tumor. Enucleation may be necessary in larger lesions and exenteration when there is evidence of extraocular extension. Limited local resection has been used in small tumors, but the risk of recurrence is high. The successful use of brachytherapy after conservative surgery has also been reported, and cryotherapy has been used in recurrent tumors (Tadepalli et al. 2019; Cassoux et al. 2010). The prognosis is less favorable for tumor with extraocular extension. In these cases, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been adopted. Recent reports have showed tumor response after chemotherapy including vincristine, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide underlining the possible use of preoperative chemotherapy to limit the aggressiveness of surgery (Meel et al. 2010) or for metastatic tumors (Hellman et al. 2018).
Prognosis is excellent (5-year survival of 90–95%) for patients with MEP without extraocular extension treated with enucleation (Vajaranant et al. 2005). When extraocular extension is evident, the prognosis is poor (Broughton and Zimmerman 1978) although a report exists of a metastatic MEP long-term survivor after multimodality treatment (Hellman et al. 2018).
References
Avedschmidt SE, Stagner AM, Eagle RC, Harocopos GJ, Dou Y, Rao RC (2016) The targetable epigenetic tumor protein EZH2 is enriched in intraocular medulloepithelioma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:6242–6246
Bianciotto C, Shields CL, Guzman JM, Romanelli-Gobbi M, Mazzuca D Jr, Green WR et al (2011) Assessment of anterior segment tumors with ultrasound biomicroscopy versus anterior segment optical coherence tomography in 200 cases. Ophthalmology 118:1297–1302
Broughton WL, Zimmerman LE (1978) A clinicopathologic study of 56 cases of intraocular medulloepitheliomas. Am J Ophthalmol 85(3):407–418
Cassoux N, Charlotte F, Sastre X, Orbach D, Lehoang P, Desjardins L (2010) Conservative surgical treatment of medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body. Arch Ophthalmol 128(3):380–381
Chung EM, Specht CS, Schroeder JW (2007) From the archives of the AFIP: pediatric orbit tumors and tumorlike lesions: neuroepithelial lesions of the ocular globe and optic nerve. Radiographics 27(4):1159–1186
Hellman JB, Harocopos GJ, Lin LK (2018) Successful treatment of metastatic congenital intraocular medulloepithelioma with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, enucleation and superficial parotidectomy. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 11:124–127
Husain SE, Husain N, Boniuk M, Font RL (1998) Malignant nonteratoid medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body in an adult. Ophthalmology 105:596–599
Kaliki S, Shields CL, Eagle RC Jr, Vemuganti GK, Almeida A, Manjandavida FP, Mulay K, Honavar SG, Shields JA (2013) Ciliary body medulloepithelioma: analysis of 41 cases. Ophthalmology 120(12):2552–2559
Meel R, Chawla B, Mohanti BK, Kashyap S, Bakhshi S (2010) Ocular medulloepithelioma chemosensitivity. Ophthalmology 117(12):2440.e1–2440.e2
Molloy PT, Yachnis AT, Rorke LB et al (1996) Central nervous system medulloepithelioma: a series of eight cases including two arising in the pons. J Neurosurg 84:430–436
Priest JR, Williams GM, Manera R, Jenkinson H, Bründler MA, Davis S, Murray TG, Galliani CA, Dehner LP (2011) Ciliary body medulloepithelioma: four cases associated with pleuropulmonary blastoma—a report from the International Pleuropulmonary Blastoma Registry. Br J Ophthalmol 95(7):1001–1005
Sahm F, Jakobiec FA, Meyer J, Schrimpf D, Eberhart CG, Hovestadt V et al (2016) Somatic mutations of DICER1 and KMT2D are frequent in intraocular medulloepitheliomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 55:418–427
Sansgiri RK, Wilson M, McCarville MB, Helton KJ (2013) Imaging features of medulloepithelioma: report of four cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol 43:1344–1356
Stagner AM, Jakobiec FA (2016) Updates on the molecular pathology of selected ocular and ocular adnexal tumors: potential targets for future therapy. Semin Ophthalmol 31(1–2):188–196
Tadepalli SH, Shields CL, Shields JA, Honavar SG (2019) Intraocular medulloepithelioma—a review of clinical features, DICER 1 mutation, and management. Indian J Ophthalmol 67(6):755–762
Vajaranant TS, Mafee MF, Kapur R, Rapoport M, Edward DP (2005) Medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body and optic nerve: clinicopathologic, CT, and MR imaging features. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 15(1):69–83
Viswanathan S, Mukul S, Qureshi S, Ramadwara M, Arora B, Kane SV (2008) Orbital medulloepitheliomas—with extensive local invasion and metastasis: a series of three cases with review of literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72:971–975
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bisogno, G. (2022). Medulloepithelioma. In: Schneider, D.T., Brecht, I.B., Olson, T.A., Ferrari, A. (eds) Rare Tumors in Children and Adolescents. Pediatric Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92071-5_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92071-5_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92070-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92071-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)