Abstract
Thyroid nodules are common and commonly benign. The challenge for the clinician is to reliably identify and treat those malignant. Advances in thyroid in nodule diagnosis have facilitated its management, including sensitive TSH assays, widely available and sensitive US, FNA biopsy, and a revised, new cytologic classification. Thyroid cancer is the commonest endocrine malignancy, the majority with excellent outcome. Data show that the incidence of thyroid cancer has increased three- to fourfold in the last four decades, with mostly small papillary cancers. Approximately 80% of papillary thyroid carcinomas are low to moderate risk with favorable prognosis. The first step is thyroidectomy with the primary aim to remove all tumor and involved nodes. In moderate- or high-risk cases, radioiodine remnant ablation is carried out post-operatively. All patients maintained on thyroxine therapy; serum TSH is kept <0.1 mIU/L for higher-risk disease. Follow-up includes TSH and Tg measurements with periodic US exams. Serum Tg measurements are crucial in follow-up.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Thyroid nodule
- Ultrasound
- Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy
- Papillary thyroid carcinoma
- Radioiodine
- Thyroidectomy
- Thyroglobulin
- Thyroxine
Introduction and Clinical Importance
Thyroid nodules are very common in clinical practice with a prevalence ranging from 2% to 6% by palpation [1] and up to 19–68% by ultrasound [2,3,4]. Most patients with a palpable thyroid nodule on physical examination have additional nodules on US investigation [5, 6]. The main clinical importance of these nodules is to rule out malignancy.
The majority of nodules are benign; approximately 6% are malignant [1, 3]. The incidence of thyroid cancer has been increasing due to the use of neck ultrasonography and other imaging leading to early diagnosis of occult and incidental cancer with unclear clinical significance [7]. The incidence of thyroid cancer has tripled from 4.9 per 100,000 in 1975 to 14.3 per 100,000 in 2009 [8, 9]. The estimated annual incidence of thyroid nodules is 0.1% per year, suggesting that approximately 350,000 new nodules will be detected this year, conferring a 10% lifetime probability for developing a thyroid nodule [3, 10]. Thyroid nodules are more common in elderly persons, in women, and in areas with iodine deficiency and with a history of childhood radiation exposure [6, 11]. The prevalence of nodular thyroid disease is high so the main purpose of thyroid nodule evaluation is to determine which nodules are malignant or require surgical intervention.
History and Physical Examination
Clinical evaluation begins with a complete medical history and thyroid palpation. Both benign and malignant disorders can cause thyroid nodules (Table 3.1). Attention should be directed to information on prior history of radiation treatment of the head and neck, rate of growth of the mass (location, size, and consistency), associated cervical lymphadenopathy, local symptoms (pain, dysphonia, dyspnea, or dysphagia), and other associated symptoms of hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism. Most patients will have no symptoms during evaluation as the majority of thyroid nodules will be discovered incidentally. Malignancy rate in younger and older patients is increased three- to four-fold when compared to adults [12, 13].
Family history should be obtained, paying special attention to a history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), papillary thyroid carcinoma, multiple endocrine neoplasia types 2A and 2B, familial polyposis disease, Cowden disease, Carney complex, Gardner syndrome, and other rare diseases [14,15,16,17]. Table 3.2 shows findings suggestive of increased risk of malignancy potential.
Diagnostic Evaluation
Serum Markers
Besides a complete history and physical exam, all patients should have a serum TSH measurement [8, 18]. If the TSH is low, a thyroid scintigraphy should be performed to determine the functional status of the nodule as low TSH suggests overt or subclinical hyperthyroidism, hyperfunctioning (“hot”), and autonomous functioning adenoma. If indeed the nodule is found to be “hot,” it is unlikely to be malignant, and FNA should be deferred [19].
TSH levels are independent predictors of malignancy in patients with thyroid nodules: the risk of malignancy increases as the TSH levels also increase [20, 21]. Routine measurement of serum thyroglobulin (Tg) for initial evaluation of thyroid nodules is not recommended [8].
Calcitonin is a marker for detection of C-cell hyperplasia and MTC, and levels >10 pg/mL have high sensitivity for the detection of MTC. Calcitonin should be measured in high-risk patients, such as in those with a family history of MTC, with high clinical suspicion of MTC by US or cytology, or with MEN 2 syndromes. Overall, the prevalence of MTC is low enough in the United States that both the recent ATA and AACE Guidelines recommend “neither for or against routine calcitonin measurement” [8, 22].
Thyroid Ultrasound and Indication for Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA)
Ultrasonography, more sensitive than palpation, is the imaging of choice to detect a thyroid nodule. Thyroid ultrasound (US) with survey of the cervical lymph nodes should be performed in all patients with a suspected thyroid nodule, a goiter, or after an incidentally found nodule by other imaging modalities [8]. Thyroid US is noninvasive and inexpensive, has a sensitivity of 95%, and can identify nodules usually not palpated on the physical exam. Ultrasound provides a very good evaluation of nodule size, dimensions, structure, and any possible suspicious features. It can also differentiate solid from cystic nodules [8, 22, 23].
Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is the procedure of choice (gold standard) in the evaluation of thyroid nodules and is the most accurate test for determining malignancy [8, 22]. It is safe, cost-effective, and preferred over palpation-guided leading to much lower rates of non-diagnostic and false-negative cytology results [24]. When performed by experienced physicians, adequate sample can be obtained from solid nodules in 90–97% of aspirations [24]. There is no single ultrasound characteristic of malignancy but instead a combination of features that need to be evaluated as predictors of malignancy [10].
The most recent American Thyroid Association guidelines classify nodules into five risk groups based on a constellation of sonographic pattern [8], while the current AACE guidelines offer a more practical, three-tier risk analysis, including low (<1%), intermediate (5–15%), and high risk (50–90%) [22]. Per ATA guidelines, the recommendations for diagnostic FNA are the following:
-
Nodules ≥1 cm in greatest dimension with high suspicious sonographic pattern.
-
Nodules ≥1 cm in greatest dimension with intermediate suspicion sonographic pattern.
-
Nodules ≥1.5 cm in greatest dimension with low suspicion sonographic pattern.
-
FNA may be considered in nodules ≥2 cm in greatest dimension with very low suspicion sonographic pattern (spongiform). Observation is an option.
-
Cystic nodules are considered to have very low suspicion sonographic pattern and don’t require FNA.
The nodular characteristics mostly associated with being predictive of malignancy include shape that is taller than wide in the transverse dimension, hypoechogenicity, irregular margins, microcalcifications, and absent halo. These characteristics have high specificity, but the positive predictive value is lowered by their relatively low sensitivity. None of these features alone is enough to differentiate a benign from malignant lesion [25,26,27,28]. Findings such as isoechogenicity and spongiform appearance are features of benignity [29]. Complex nodules with solid and cystic components often with a dominant cystic part are frequently benign.
Numbers of nodules and size are not predictive of malignancy. In a gland with multiple nodules, the selection for FNA should be based on the US features rather than size alone. Cancer is not less frequent in small nodules so diameter cutoff alone to evaluate cancer risk is not recommended [30, 31]. Ultrasound should only be performed in patients with known or suspected thyroid nodules or the presence of risk factors [8]. Advances in diagnostic imaging have improved the management of thyroid nodules, but it also increased the discovery of incidentalomas (small thyroid nodules with <1 cm in diameter).
Other Imaging
Other techniques like MRI and CT scan are not recommended as routine tests as they are expensive and rarely diagnostic. CT scan and MRI have more value to assess goiter size, substernal extension, or extension to surround structures. Iodine contrast should be avoided as it decreases subsequent iodine 131 uptake [22]. Thyroid scintigraphy should be performed when there is suspicion of autonomy of the nodule (low TSH) suggesting overt subclinical hyperthyroidism.
Cytology
Thyroid FNA slides should be reviewed by a cytopathologist with experience in thyroid. FNA has reduced the number of surgical procedures in patients with nodules by more than 50% and substantially increased the malignancy yield at thyroidectomy [32]. An adequate sample is highly accurate for diagnosing thyroid cancer. Biopsy results may be classified as satisfactory or unsatisfactory (non-diagnostic). To be considered diagnostic or satisfactory, the aspirate needs to contain no less than six groups of well-preserved thyroid epithelial cells consisting of at least ten cells in each group [33].
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology is the most commonly used. Currently there are six diagnostic categories: benign; malignant; suspicious for malignancy; follicular neoplasm or suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN); follicular lesion or atypia of undetermined significance (FLUS or AUS); non-diagnostic (Table 3.3) [33] [34]. The expertise of the cytopathologist is crucial in correct and clear interpretation of FNA slides and classification of the cytology [35].
Overall, 6–11% of the FNAs will be unsatisfactory (non-diagnostic), usually because of sampling error, bloody smears, or poor technique [36,37,38]. Biopsy should be repeated, but ultimately, about 5% of nodules will still be unsatisfactory [8, 39,40,41,42]. The false-negative rates range from 1 to 11% but usually will be less than 5% in most clinics with enough FNA experience [41, 43].
Management, Therapy, and Follow-Up
Benign Thyroid Nodule
The most common benign lesions include colloid nodule, macrofollicular adenoma, benign cyst, and lymphocytic thyroiditis. The majority of these nodules do not need specific treatment once malignancy and abnormal thyroid function are excluded [1, 8, 22]. If patient reports local symptoms including dysphagia, choking, dysphonia, dyspnea, or pain, surgical treatment may be warranted. The clinician should make sure that the symptoms are caused by the thyroid mass or enlargement, and not due to other processes such as pulmonary, cardiac, or esophageal disorders [10]. Patients with a single toxic nodule or a toxic multinodular goiter may be treated with surgery or radioiodine. Treatment with 131 I for large toxic nodules is not preferred as these nodules usually require high doses and are associated with more side effects [18].
Routine use of T4 suppressive therapy has no role in the management of benign thyroid nodules [8, 22]. Therapy with levothyroxine may be associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation, other cardiac abnormalities, and reduced bone density, so therapy should be avoided in patients with large nodules, long-standing goiters, low TSH levels, post-menopausal women, and men older than 60 years [44,45,46].
The chance of a false-negative FNA (malignancy rate) is reported around 1–2% only [47, 48], and an initial benign FNA has negligible mortality risk in long-term follow-up [49]. Some studies report an increased risk of malignancy in nodules greater than 4 cm due to decreased FNA accuracy and recommend surgery [50,51,52], but based on current evidence, it is still unclear if patients with nodules with greater than 4 cm and benign cytology carry higher risk of malignancy [8].
The follow-up of thyroid nodules with benign cytology should be determined by risk stratification according to ultrasonography pattern [8]. The current guidelines of the American Thyroid Association published recommend that nodules with high suspicion US pattern should undergo repeat US and US-guided FNA within 12 months. Nodules with low to intermediate suspicion US pattern should have repeat US at 12–24 months; in nodules with very low suspicion US pattern, the utility of surveillance US and assessment of nodule growth as an indication to consider repetition of FNA are limited. If US is considered, it should be done at >24 months. If the nodule has undergone repeat US-guided FNA with a second benign cytology results, US surveillance for evaluation of malignancy is no longer warranted [8].
Malignant Thyroid Nodule
If cytologic results are positive for thyroid malignancy, surgery is almost always indicated [8] [22]. Consultation with an experienced endocrine surgeon is preferred and should be done as soon as possible. This category includes papillary cancer, follicular carcinoma, Hurthle cell (oncocytic) carcinoma, medullary cancer, thyroid lymphoma, anaplastic cancer, and metastatic cancer to the thyroid. Metastatic disease to the thyroid is rare [53] and usually precludes immediate surgery until further investigation for the primary site is completed. Full workup should also be performed for anaplastic carcinoma and lymphoma [18].
An active surveillance approach may be considered in a small subgroup of patients including those with a very low-risk tumors (papillary thyroid microcarcinoma without evident metastasis or local invasion), high surgical risk patients due to comorbid conditions, and patients with short remaining life spans [8]. Most patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma have an indolent course, and a few prospective studies have reported very good outcomes with very low rate of loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis, and this approach may be considered in thyroid micro-carcinoma (tumors <1 cm in diameter) [54].
Suspicious for Malignancy
This category represents the cytologic results with strong suspicious for malignancy but lacking clear diagnostic criteria, with an estimated cancer risk of 60–75% [34]. Usually surgical management is similar to a malignant cytology, depending on clinical risk factors, sonographic features, patient preference, and possible mutation testing. As more data become available from the molecular testing field, management of this category may change in the future. Mutation testing could improve risk stratification prior to surgery, including possibly BRAF mutations and seven-gene panel of mutations (including BRAF, RAS< RET/PTC, with or without PAX9/PPARy) [55, 56].
Indeterminate Thyroid Nodule (AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN)
This group carries the most challenging diagnostic dilemma. In this category a clear cytologic diagnosis cannot be made, and examples include follicular neoplasms, Hurthle cell neoplasm, atypical PTC, or lymphoma. Indeterminate cytology also includes AUS/FLUS (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance) and FN/SFN (follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm).
According to the Bethesda system, AUS/FLUS compromises specimens that contain cells with architectural and/or nuclear atypia that is more pronounced than expected for benign changes but not sufficient to be placed on the higher-risk categories [57]. Frequency range is around 7% of reports, and the risk of cancer is between 6 and 48%, with a mean risk of 16% [58].
Treatment options for AUS/FLUS include a repeat FNA, molecular testing, observation, and surgical intervention. Providers should take into consideration clinical and ultrasound risk factors and patient preferences when making management decisions. Of repeated FNAs 10–30% yield again AUS/FLUS [59,60,61]. Thyroid core needle biopsy could also be considered [62]. Molecular testing is another option commonly used in this subset of patients. Mutation testing for BRAF has a high specificity but low sensitivity [63, 64], while a panel of mutations (BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, KRAS, RET/PTC1, RET/PTC3, PAX8/PPARy) has a higher sensitivity [55] [65]. Recent studies are also using sonographic features to estimate risk of malignancy [66].
FN/SFN cytology compromises follicular cells arranged in an altered architectural pattern characterized by cell crowding and/or microfollicle formation and lacking nuclear features of papillary carcinoma or compromised almost exclusively of oncocytic (Hurthle) cells [33]. This category carries a 14–33% risk of malignancy (mean 26%), with a frequency of 1–25% (mean 10%) of all thyroid FNA samples [58].
For this category usually surgical excision for diagnosis had been an established practice. Again, with the introduction and availability of molecular testing, this can be used to supplement malignancy risk assessment after considering the clinical and ultrasound risk factors and patient preferences [8]. Risk stratification with molecular testing including seven-gene panel shows a sensitivity of 57–75% and specificity of 97–100%, PPV of 87–100%, and NMPV of 79–86% [55, 65].
Non-diagnostic
Patients with non-diagnostic biopsies are those that do not meet specified criteria (the presence of at least six follicular cell groups, each containing 10–15 cells derived from at least two aspirates of a nodule) [33]. If initial FNA biopsy is non-diagnostic, it should be repeated with possible onsite cytological assessment [8, 22, 67]. If the results are again non-diagnostic, core needle biopsy, close observation, or surgery should be considered, the latter especially if there are suspicious pattern on ultrasound, clinical risk factors, and growth of the nodule. A repeat FNA after initial non-diagnostic cytology may yield a 75% diagnostic cytology in solid nodules and 50% in cystic nodules [68].
Figure 3.1 shows an algorithm with a summary for the diagnosis and management of palpable thyroid nodules.
Special Situations
Thyroid Nodule During Pregnancy
The majority of the thyroid nodules during pregnancy are pre-existing, but in some cases they can be initially diagnosed. Overall they should be managed exactly the same way in non-pregnant women except that radioactive agents should be avoided [22] [69]. If the clinical and imaging features are suspicious for malignancy, patient will require a FNA biopsy, regardless of the gestational age [70]. Some studies showed that the cancer behavior during pregnancy is the same when compared to the general population, without any differences in survival rates or recurrence. Suppressive therapy with levothyroxine for thyroid nodules is not recommended.
Patient’s preferences should always be considered, and a multi-disciplinary approach including an endocrinologist, pathologist, obstetrician, surgeon, and anesthesiologist is recommended. Women with no evidence of aggressive thyroid cancer may be reassured, and surgical treatment can be performed after delivery [71]. The cytologic suspicious nodule is the most challenging situation during pregnancy. The malignancy rate is similar between pregnant women and non-pregnant women, so deferring surgical treatment to the postpartum is reasonable [72]. Some may recommend postponing FNA until delivery unless worrisome features are seen in the ultrasound as this may lead to possible thyroidectomy during pregnancy depending of the FNA results. If the outcome of the results will be unchanged, meaning that surgical treatment will be postponed, this will just expose the patient to anxiety regarding diagnosis and except management [73].
Thyroid Nodules in Children
The prevalence of thyroid nodules in children is up to 1.8%, and some cohort studies showed higher malignancy rates [74, 75]. These findings suggest that the surgical approach for thyroid nodules in children is more common than that in adults. The evaluation of nodular disease in children is similar to adults. Overall the prognosis of thyroid cancer in children remains good despite the increase prevalence of local metastatic disease [76]. As in adults, the most common thyroid cancer is the papillary.
Thyroid Cancer
The most common histologic types of thyroid cancers are follicular cell-derived and medullary thyroid cancers. Follicular cell-derived cancer includes all variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma (85% of all thyroid cancers) and follicular thyroid carcinoma (10–15% lesions, including Hürthle cell cancer). The other follicular cell-derived cancer is anaplastic carcinoma that accounts for less than 5% of thyroid tumors [77].
Medullary thyroid cancer originates in C cells and accounts for less than 5% of thyroid malignancies. While the majority has sporadic MTC, around 25% of patients may have a hereditary form as part of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes (MEN 2). They will also require thyroidectomy and are followed with tumor markers like calcitonin. Even though the majority of medullary thyroid cancer is sporadic, genetic testing is recommended to all patients for evaluation including RET proto-oncogene mutation. If a mutation is found, all family members should undergo screening for the same mutation as early as possible.
The recently published recommendations of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) for differentiated thyroid cancer will be reviewed briefly in the following [8].
Goals of thyroidectomy include removing the tumor, improving overall disease-specific survival, and decreasing the rate of recurrence and morbidity. All patients should undergo pre-operative neck ultrasound for evaluation of lymphadenopathy. Risk stratification after surgery is paramount to outline a strategy for radioiodine treatment, follow-up plan, and TSH suppression.
For tumors <1 cm, without extra-thyroidal extension or regional lymph node metastasis, a thyroid lobectomy may be sufficient . For tumors 1–4 cm, without extra-thyroidal extension or lymph nodes, total thyroidectomy or, in selected patients, a lobectomy may be considered. Tumors greater or equal to 4 cm, with extra-thyroidal extension or metastases, should always undergo total thyroidectomy.
American Thyroid Association Risk Stratification System
ATA Low Risk
Patients with papillary thyroid cancer with no local or distant metastasis; all macroscopic tumor has been resected, no tumor invasion of loco-regional tissues or structures, no aggressive histology (tall cell, hobnail variant, columnar cell carcinoma); if I131 is given, no RAI avid metastatic foci outside the thyroid bed on the first post-treatment whole body RAI scan, no vascular invasion, clinical N0 or <5 pathologic N1 micro metastases (<0.2 cm in the largest dimension); intrathyroidal, encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer; intrathyroidal, well-differentiated follicular thyroid cancer with capsular invasion and no or minimal (<4 foci) vascular invasion; intrathyroidal, papillary microcarcinoma, unifocal or multifocal, including V600E BRAF mutated.
For this group of patients, especially in tumors <1 cm (unifocal or multifocal), there is no evidence suggesting that radioactive iodine (RAI) improves disease-specific and disease-free survival. Overall post-surgical RAI is not indicated. In patients with tumor size 1–4 cm, there are conflicting data that RAI improves disease-free survival and post-surgical RAI is not routinely indicated.
In patients that undergo total thyroidectomy, initial TSH goal is 0.5–2 mU/L if non-stimulated TG <0.2 ng/mL, and TSH goal is 0.1–0.5 mU/L if non-stimulated Tg >0.2 ng/mL. Evaluation of response to therapy includes at least annual thyroglobulin testing and neck ultrasound. Diagnostic whole body scan is not routinely recommended. Follow-up is usually annually for the first 5 years. If serum TG level is rising or neck ultrasound is abnormal, patient may require further diagnostic tests.
In patients undergoing lobectomy, post-op serum TG may be considered as well as neck ultrasound. Although after partial thyroidectomy serum TG will be undetectable, an increase in stable TG levels should give rise to suspicion of recurrent disease warranting further evaluation. RAI remnant ablation is not recommended and initial TSH goal should be 0.5–2 mU/L. Evaluation for response to therapy includes annual ultrasound and consideration for thyroglobulin testing.
ATA Intermediate Risk
Patients with microscopic invasion of tumor into the peri-thyroidal soft tissues, RAI avid metastatic foci in the neck on the first post-treatment whole body RAI scan, aggressive histology, papillary thyroid cancer with vascular invasion, clinical N1 or ≥5 pathologic N1 with all involved lymph nodes <3 cm in largest dimension, intrathyroid, papillary thyroid cancer, primary tumor 1–4 cm, V600E BRAF mutated, multifocal papillary micro-carcinoma with extra-thyroidal extension and V600E BRAF mutated.
In patients with tumor size >4 cm, post-surgical RAI may be considered, especially in patients with adverse features. In patients with microscopic extra-thyroidal extension (any size tumors), post-surgical RAI is usually favored based on risk of recurrence of disease.
In patients with central compartment neck lymph node metastasis, post-surgical RAI is usually favored, mainly due to higher risk of persistent and recurrent disease, especially in larger tumors (>2 cm) or clinical evidence of lymph nodes or extra-nodal extension.
Initial therapy for these patients includes total thyroidectomy, neck dissection for clinical N1 disease, and possible prophylactic central neck dissection. Diagnostic RAI scanning may be considered. Surveillance includes serum thyroglobulin and ultrasound of the neck.
RAI scanning should be considered in patients with intermediate risk. For remnant ablation 30 mCI may be considered. For adjuvant therapy, usually up to 150 mCi is given. Initial TSH goal is 0.1–0.5 mU/L, and evaluation for response to therapy includes thyroglobulin testing, neck ultrasound, and consideration for diagnostic whole body scan. Again, periodic (annual) evaluation with thyroglobulin (non-stimulated) and ultrasound of the neck are recommended.
ATA High Risk
This group of patients includes macroscopic invasion of tumor into the peri-thyroidal soft tissues (gross extra-thyroidal extension), incomplete tumor resection, distant metastases, and post-operative serum thyroglobulin suggestive of distant metastases.
In patients with ATA high risk, the body of evidence suggests that RAI improves disease-specific survival and disease-free survival; therefore routine RAI use is recommended. Initial therapy includes total thyroidectomy, therapeutic neck dissection, and possible prophylactic central neck dissection. Post-operatively, monitoring with thyroglobulin, ultrasound, and RAI scanning are recommended.
RAI therapy is routinely recommended with up to 150 mCI as adjuvant therapy. For known structural disease, empiric 100–200 mCI or dosimetry-guided dosing is recommended. Initial TSH goal is <0.1 mU/L. This group of patients is at increased risk for recurrence, and follow-up should include thyroglobulin testing, neck ultrasound, whole body scan, and CT/MRI or FDG/PET scanning.
Summary
Thyroid nodules are very common and are usually benign; only around 5% carry the risk of malignancy. The challenge in the management of thyroid nodules is to reliably identify benign nodules and diagnose malignant thyroid disease as early as possible. Thyroid evaluation starts with a careful history and physical exam followed by thyroid function tests and ultrasound exam. An initial low TSH requires additional tests for evaluation of hyperthyroidism. When TSH is normal and US shows an indeterminate or suspicious nodule, an US-FNA should follow as it remains the single most important procedure for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules. When cytology is suspicious for malignancy, surgery is usually recommended. Benign thyroid nodules can be followed clinically and with serial ultrasound images. An indeterminate nodule poses a clinical challenge; treatment may include observation, molecular markers, or surgery. The most common type of thyroid cancer is papillary thyroid cancer. Treatment usually entails total thyroidectomy with or without lymph node dissection. Depending on risk stratification, some patients may benefit from radioactive iodine therapy. Long-term follow-up includes ultrasound of the neck, TSH, and thyroglobulin. The overall prognosis of thyroid cancer remains good.
References
Hegedus L. Clinical practice. The thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1764–71.
Dean DS, Gharib H. Epidemiology of thyroid nodules. Best practice & research. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22(6):901–11.
Tan GH, Gharib H. Thyroid incidentalomas: management approaches to nonpalpable nodules discovered incidentally on thyroid imaging. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126(3):226–31.
Guth S, Theune U, Aberle J, Galach A, Bamberger CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. Eur J Clin Investig. 2009;39(8):699–706.
Ezzat S, Sarti DA, Cain DR, Braunstein GD. Thyroid incidentalomas. Prevalence by palpation and ultrasonography. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(16):1838–40.
Mazzaferri EL. Management of a solitary thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(8):553–9.
Brito JP, Al Nofal A, Montori VM, Hay ID, Morris JC. The impact of subclinical disease and mechanism of detection on the rise in thyroid cancer incidence: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota during 1935 through 2012. Thyroid. 2015;25(9):999–1007.
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov YE, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association guidelines task force on thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26(1):1–133.
Davies L, Welch HG. Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(4):317–22.
Gharib H, Papini E. Thyroid nodules: clinical importance, assessment, and treatment. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2007;36(3):707–35. vi
Volzke H, Ludemann J, Robinson DM, Spieker KW, Schwahn C, Kramer A, et al. The prevalence of undiagnosed thyroid disorders in a previously iodine-deficient area. Thyroid. 2003;13(8):803–10.
Corrias A, Einaudi S, Chiorboli E, Weber G, Crino A, Andreo M, et al. Accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules in detecting malignancy in childhood: comparison with conventional clinical, laboratory, and imaging approaches. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(10):4644–8.
Rosai J, Carcangiu ML. Pathology of thyroid tumors: some recent and old questions. Hum Pathol. 1984;15(11):1008–12.
Heshmati HM, Gharib H, van Heerden JA, Sizemore GW. Advances and controversies in the diagnosis and management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Med. 1997;103(1):60–9.
Loh KC. Familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinoma: a meta-review of case series. Thyroid. 1997;7(1):107–13.
Punales MK, da Rocha AP, Meotti C, Gross JL, Maia AL. Clinical and oncological features of children and young adults with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Thyroid. 2008;18(12):1261–8.
Farooq A, Walker LJ, Bowling J, Audisio RA. Cowden syndrome. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36(8):577–83.
Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R, Duick DS, Valcavi R, Hegedus L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 2010;16(Suppl 1):1–43.
Fiore E, Rago T, Provenzale MA, Scutari M, Ugolini C, Basolo F, et al. Lower levels of TSH are associated with a lower risk of papillary thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodular disease: thyroid autonomy may play a protective role. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2009;16(4):1251–60.
Boelaert K, Horacek J, Holder RL, Watkinson JC, Sheppard MC, Franklyn JA. Serum thyrotropin concentration as a novel predictor of malignancy in thyroid nodules investigated by fine-needle aspiration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4295–301.
Haymart MR, Repplinger DJ, Leverson GE, Elson DF, Sippel RS, Jaume JC, et al. Higher serum thyroid stimulating hormone level in thyroid nodule patients is associated with greater risks of differentiated thyroid cancer and advanced tumor stage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(3):809–14.
Gharib H, Papini E, Garber JR, Duick DS, Harrell RM, Hegedus L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules--2016 update. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(5):622–39.
Solbiati L, Osti V, Cova L, Tonolini M. Ultrasound of thyroid, parathyroid glands and neck lymph nodes. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(12):2411–24.
Danese D, Sciacchitano S, Farsetti A, Andreoli M, Pontecorvi A. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional versus sonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 1998;8(1):15–21.
Leenhardt L, Erdogan MF, Hegedus L, Mandel SJ, Paschke R, Rago T, et al. 2013 European thyroid association guidelines for cervical ultrasound scan and ultrasound-guided techniques in the postoperative management of patients with thyroid cancer. Eur Thyroid J. 2013;2(3):147–59.
Cappelli C, Castellano M, Pirola I, Cumetti D, Agosti B, Gandossi E, et al. The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules. QJM. 2007;100(1):29–35.
Remonti LR, Kramer CK, Leitao CB, Pinto LC, Gross JL. Thyroid ultrasound features and risk of carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Thyroid. 2015;25(5):538–50.
Papini E. The dilemma of non-palpable thyroid nodules. J Endocrinol Investig. 2003;26(1):3–4.
Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH, Na DG, Baek JH, Lee YH, et al. Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation--multicenter retrospective study. Radiology. 2008;247(3):762–70.
Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, Oh KK, Kim DI, Lee JT, et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178(3):687–91.
Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Taccogna S, Nardi F, et al. Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(5):1941–6.
Werk EE Jr, Vernon BM, Gonzalez JJ, Ungaro PC, McCoy RC. Cancer in thyroid nodules. A community hospital survey. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144(3):474–6.
Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, Rosai J, Merino MJ, Randolph G, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36(6):425–37.
Cibas ES, Ali SZ. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1159–65.
Cibas ES, Baloch ZW, Fellegara G, LiVolsi VA, Raab SS, Rosai J, et al. A prospective assessment defining the limitations of thyroid nodule pathologic evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(5):325–32.
Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol. 2012;56(4):333–9.
Theoharis CG, Schofield KM, Hammers L, Udelsman R, Chhieng DC. The Bethesda thyroid fine-needle aspiration classification system: year 1 at an academic institution. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1215–23.
Bohacek L, Milas M, Mitchell J, Siperstein A, Berber E. Diagnostic accuracy of surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(1):45–51.
Gharib H. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: advantages, limitations, and effect. Mayo Clinic Proc Mayo Clinic. 1994;69(1):44–9.
Gharib H, Goellner JR. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 1995;1(6):410–7.
Gharib H, Goellner JR, Zinsmeister AR, Grant CS, Van Heerden JA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid. The problem of suspicious cytologic findings. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101(1):25–8.
Yeh MW, Demircan O, Ituarte P, Clark OH. False-negative fine-needle aspiration cytology results delay treatment and adversely affect outcome in patients with thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2004;14(3):207–15.
Castro MR, Gharib H. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: progress, practice, and pitfalls. Endocr Pract. 2003;9(2):128–36.
Uzzan B, Campos J, Cucherat M, Nony P, Boissel JP, Perret GY. Effects on bone mass of long term treatment with thyroid hormones: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(12):4278–89.
Sawin CT, Geller A, Wolf PA, Belanger AJ, Baker E, Bacharach P, et al. Low serum thyrotropin concentrations as a risk factor for atrial fibrillation in older persons. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(19):1249–52.
Parle JV, Maisonneuve P, Sheppard MC, Boyle P, Franklyn JA. Prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in elderly people from one low serum thyrotropin result: a 10-year cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9285):861–5.
Tee YY, Lowe AJ, Brand CA, Judson RT. Fine-needle aspiration may miss a third of all malignancy in palpable thyroid nodules: a comprehensive literature review. Ann Surg. 2007;246(5):714–20.
Orlandi A, Puscar A, Capriata E, Fideleff H. Repeated fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid in benign nodular thyroid disease: critical evaluation of long-term follow-up. Thyroid. 2005;15(3):274–8.
Nou E, Kwong N, Alexander LK, Cibas ES, Marqusee E, Alexander EK. Determination of the optimal time interval for repeat evaluation after a benign thyroid nodule aspiration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(2):510–6.
Pinchot SN, Al-Wagih H, Schaefer S, Sippel R, Chen H. Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for predicting neoplasm or carcinoma in thyroid nodules 4 cm or larger. Arch Surg. 2009;144(7):649–55.
Kuru B, Gulcelik NE, Gulcelik MA, Dincer H. The false-negative rate of fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosing thyroid carcinoma in thyroid nodules. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2010;395(2):127–32.
Wharry LI, McCoy KL, Stang MT, Armstrong MJ, LeBeau SO, Tublin ME, et al. Thyroid nodules (>/=4 cm): can ultrasound and cytology reliably exclude cancer? World J Surg. 2014;38(3):614–21.
Hegerova L, Griebeler ML, Reynolds JP, Henry MR, Gharib H. Metastasis to the thyroid gland: report of a large series from the Mayo Clinic. Am J Clin Oncol. 2015;38(4):338–42.
Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, Kobayashi K, Miya A. Patient age is significantly related to the progression of papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid under observation. Thyroid. 2014;24(1):27–34.
Nikiforov YE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, Carty SE, LeBeau SO, Ferris RL, et al. Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):3390–7.
Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK, Choi JR, Hong SW, Kim MJ, et al. The role of BRAFV600E mutation and ultrasonography for the surgical management of a thyroid nodule suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma on cytology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(11):3125–31.
Krane JF, Vanderlaan PA, Faquin WC, Renshaw AA. The atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: malignant ratio: a proposed performance measure for reporting in the Bethesda System for thyroid cytopathology. Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120(2):111–6.
Bongiovanni M, Crippa S, Baloch Z, Piana S, Spitale A, Pagni F, et al. Comparison of 5-tiered and 6-tiered diagnostic systems for the reporting of thyroid cytopathology: a multi-institutional study. Cancer Cytopathol. 2012;120(2):117–25.
Nayar R, Ivanovic M. The indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration: experience from an academic center using terminology similar to that proposed in the 2007 National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Cancer. 2009;117(3):195–202.
Baloch Z, LiVolsi VA, Jain P, Jain R, Aljada I, Mandel S, et al. Role of repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the management of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;29(4):203–6.
Yang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, Wasserman PG. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer. 2007;111(5):306–15.
Na DG, Baek JH, Jung SL, Kim JH, Sung JY, Kim KS, et al. Core needle biopsy of the thyroid: 2016 consensus statement and recommendations from Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(1):217–37.
Kim SK, Hwang TS, Yoo YB, Han HS, Kim DL, Song KH, et al. Surgical results of thyroid nodules according to a management guideline based on the BRAF(V600E) mutation status. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):658–64.
Adeniran AJ, Hui P, Chhieng DC, Prasad ML, Schofield K, Theoharis C. BRAF mutation testing of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens enhances the predictability of malignancy in thyroid follicular lesions of undetermined significance. Acta Cytol. 2011;55(6):570–5.
Nikiforov YE, Steward DL, Robinson-Smith TM, Haugen BR, Klopper JP, Zhu Z, et al. Molecular testing for mutations in improving the fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(6):2092–8.
Yoo WS, Choi HS, Cho SW, Moon JH, Kim KW, Park HJ, et al. The role of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules with atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2014;80(5):735–42.
Orija IB, Pineyro M, Biscotti C, Reddy SS, Hamrahian AH. Value of repeating a nondiagnostic thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Endocr Pract. 2007;13(7):735–42.
Alexander EK, Heering JP, Benson CB, Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Cibas ES, et al. Assessment of nondiagnostic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirations of thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(11):4924–7.
Meier DA, Brill DR, Becker DV, Clarke SE, Silberstein EB, Royal HD, et al. Procedure guideline for therapy of thyroid disease with (131)iodine. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(6):856–61.
Abalovich M, Amino N, Barbour LA, Cobin RH, De Groot LJ, Glinoer D, et al. Management of thyroid dysfunction during pregnancy and postpartum: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8 Suppl):S1–47.
Moosa M, Mazzaferri EL. Outcome of differentiated thyroid cancer diagnosed in pregnant women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(9):2862–6.
Marley EF, Oertel YC. Fine-needle aspiration of thyroid lesions in 57 pregnant and postpartum women. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;16(2):122–5.
Popoveniuc G, Jonklaas J. Thyroid nodules. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96(2):329–49.
Rallison ML, Dobyns BM, Keating FR Jr, Rall JE, Tyler FH. Thyroid nodularity in children. JAMA. 1975;233(10):1069–72.
Raab SS, Silverman JF, Elsheikh TM, Thomas PA, Wakely PE. Pediatric thyroid nodules: disease demographics and clinical management as determined by fine needle aspiration biopsy. Pediatrics. 1995;95(1):46–9.
Feinmesser R, Lubin E, Segal K, Noyek A. Carcinoma of the thyroid in children--a review. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1997;10(6):561–8.
Hundahl SA, Fleming ID, Fremgen AM, Menck HR. A National Cancer Data Base report on 53,856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S., 1985-1995 [see comments]. Cancer. 1998;83(12):2638–48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Griebeler, M.L., Gharib, H. (2022). Thyroid Nodules and Cancer. In: Bandeira, F., Gharib, H., Griz, L., Faria, M. (eds) Endocrinology and Diabetes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90684-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90684-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90683-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90684-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)