Skip to main content

Fake News Detection Methods: A Survey and New Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2020) (AI2SD 2020)

Abstract

The world today is witnessing a tremendous evolution in the field of information dissemination, where millions of people can publish and receive free information and news instantly. However, detecting and reducing the spread of misinformation on online social media is a challenging problem. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review of fake news detection methods and introduce two methods that we implemented using word embedding techniques in order to come up with a text representation which is intended to capture the pertinent information characterizing fake news. More concretely, we first discuss the feature engineering used when working with fake news extraction, then we provide a comprehensive summary of the unsupervised and the supervised methods for fake news detection. Finally, we discuss open-ended questions and future research directions relating to fake news detection paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., Liu, H.: Fake news detection on social media, a data mining perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 19, 2–3 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/11823285_121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Özgöbek, Ö., Gulla, J.A.: Towards an understanding of fake news. In: 3rd Norwegian Big Data Symposium in conjunction with NxtMedia Conference, pp. 35–42 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, S., Shah, N.: False information on web and social media, a survey (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fallis, D.: A functional analysis of disinformation. In: iConference 2014 Proceedings, pp. 621–627 (2014). https://doi.org/10.9776/14278

  5. Hernon, P.: Disinformation and misinformation through the internet, findings of an exploratory study. Gov. Inf. Q. 12, 133–139 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-624X(95)90052-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas, J.E.: Statements of fact, statements of opinion, and the first amendment. Cal. L. Rev. 74, 1001–1056 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/3480402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jin, Z., Cao, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., Tian, Q.: Novel visual and statistical image features for microblogs news verification. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 19, 598–608 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016.2617078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Castillo, C., Mendosa, M., Poblete, B.: Information credibility on twitter. In; Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, ser. WWW 2011, pp. 675–684. ACM, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1963405.1963500

  9. Kwon, S., Cha, M., Jung, K., Chen, W., Wang, Y.: Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media. In: 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, Dallas, pp. 1103–1108. IEEE (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2013.61

  10. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59, 96–104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chu, Z., Gianvecchio, S., Wang, H., Jajodia, S.: Detecting automation of twitter accounts: are you a human, bot, or cyborg? IEEE Trans. Dependable Secure Comput. 9, 811–824 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2012.75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng, J., Bernstein, M., Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Leskovec, J.: Anyone can become a troll, causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW 2017, vol. 2017, pp. 1217–1230. ACM, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998213

  13. Hosseinimotlagh, S., Papalexakis, E.: Unsupervised content-based identification of fake news articles with tensor decomposition ensembles. In: Proceedings of the MIS2 Workshop held in conjuction with 11th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. MIS2, Marina Del Rey (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang, S., Shu, K., Wang, S., Gu, R., Wu, F., Liu, H.: Unsupervised fake news detection on social media, a generative approach. In: The Thirty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, California USA, vol. 33, pp. 5644–5651. AAAI Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33015644

  15. Geman, S., Geman, D.: Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6, 721–741 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Cresci, S., Di Pietro, R., Petrocchi, M., Spognardi, A., Tesconi, M.: A fake follower story, improving fake accounts detection on Twitter. Technical report, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Italy (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jin, Z., Cao, J., Jiang, Y.G., Zhang, Y.: News credibility evaluation on microblog with a hierarchical propagation model. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Shenzhen, China, pp. 230–239. IEEE (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2014.91

  18. Ma, J., Gao, W., Wei, Z., Lu, Y., Wong, K.-F.: Detect rumors using time series of social context information on microblogging websites. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1751–1754. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2806416.2806607

  19. Ciampaglia, G.L., Shiralkar, P., Rocha, L.M., Bollen, J., Menczer, F., Flammini, A.: Computational fact checking from knowledge networks. PLoS ONE 10(6), e0128193 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lendvai, P., Reichel, U.: Contradiction detection for rumorous claims. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics (ExProM), Osaka, Japan, pp. 31–40. The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hardalov, M., Koychev, I., Nakov, P.: In search of credible news. In: Dichev, C., Agre, G. (eds.) AIMSA 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9883, pp. 172–180. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44748-3_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferreira, W., Vlachos, A.: Emergent, a novel data-set for stance classification. In: Proceedings of the conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies, San Diego, California, pp. 1163–1168. Association for Computational Linguistics (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N16-1138

  23. Silverman, C.: Lies, Damn Lies and Viral Content. Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University (2015). https://doi.org/10.7916/D8Q81RHH

  24. Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Mikolov, T.: Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Valencia, Spain, vol. 2, pp. 427–431. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/E17-2068

  25. Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Douze, M., Jegou, H., Mikolov, T.: Fasttext. zip: compressing text classification models. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2017). arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.03651 (2017)

  26. Chollet, F.: Keras: Theano-based deep learning library (2015). https://keras.io/

  27. Wang, W.Y.: “liar, liar pants on fire”, a new benchmark data-set for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, vol. 2, pp. 422–426. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-2067

  28. Wang, W.Y.: LIAR. https://www.cs.ucsb.edu/william/data/liardata-set.zip

  29. Ruchansky, N., Seo, S., Liu, Y.: CSI: a hybrid deep model for fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 797–806. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3132847.3132877

  30. Long, Y., Lu, Q., Xiang, R., Li, M., Huang, C.R.: Fake news detection through multi-perspective speaker profiles. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Taipei, Taiwan, vol. 2, pp. 252–256. Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Volkova, S., Shaffer, K., Jang, J.Y., Hodas, N.: Separating facts from fiction, linguistic models to classify suspicious and trusted news posts on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, vol. 2, pp. 647–653. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-2102

  32. Bronstein, M.M., Bruna, J., Lecun, Y., Szlam, A., Vandergheynst, P.: Geometric deep learning, going beyond euclidean data. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34, 18–42 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2693418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, Y., et al.: EANN: event adversarial neural networks for multi-modal fake news detection. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2018 - London, United Kingdom, pp. 849–857 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219903

  34. Liu, Y., Wu, Y.-F.B.: Early detection of fake news on social media through propagation path classification with recurrent and convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, Louisiana, (AAAI 2018). AAAI Press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shrestha, M.: Detecting Fake News with Sentiment Analysis and Network Metadata. Earlham College, Fall 2018, Richmond, IN (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qian, F., Gong, C., Sharma, K., Liu, Y.: Neural user response generator, fake news detection with collective user intelligence. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 3834–3840. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, Stockholm, Sweden (2018). https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/533

  37. Tschiatschek, S., Singla, A., Rodriguez, M.G., Merchant, A., Krause, A.: Fake news detection in social networks via crowd signals. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2018, pp. 517–524. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3188722

  38. Shu, K., Mahudeswaran, D., Wang, S., Liu, H.: Hierarchical propagation networks for fake news detection, investigation and exploitation. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Palo Alto, California, USA, vol. 14, pp. 626–637. AAAI Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  39. FakeNewsNet. https://github.com/KaiDMML/FakeNewsNet

  40. Monti, F., Frasca, F., Eynard, D., Mannion, D., Bronstein, M.M.: Fake News Detection on Social Media using Geometric Deep Learning (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Drif, A., Ferhat, Z.H., Giordano, S.: Fake news detection method based on text-features. In: The Ninth International Conference on Advances in Information Mining and Management, Nice, France, pp. 26–31. IARIA XPS Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.D.: Glove, global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Doha, Qatar, vol. 14, pp. 1532–1543. EMNLP (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/D14-1162

  43. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Ide, H., Kurita, T.: Improvement of learning for CNN with ReLU activation by sparse regularization. In: IJCNN: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Anchorage, AK, USA, pp. 2684–2691. IEEE Conference Proceedings (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966185

  45. Ciregan, D., Meier, U., Schmidhuber, J.: Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Providence, RI, USA, pp. 3642–3649. IEEE (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248110

  46. Fake-news. https://www.kaggle.com/c/fake-news/data

  47. Drif, A., Belhakimi, M.A., Giordano, S.: Merging deep learning models for fake news detection. In: 2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering, Algeria, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAEE47123.2019.9015097

  48. Mikolov, T., Corrado, G.S., Chen, K., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Learning Representations, Arizona, USA, pp. 1–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Lee, K., Caverlee, J., Webb, S.: Uncovering social spammers: social honeypots + machine learning. In: Proceeding of the 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval - SIGIR 2010, pp. 435–442. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1835449.1835522

  50. Morstatter, F., Dani, H., Sampson, J., Liu, H.: Can one tamper with the sample API? In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide, WWW 2016 Companion, pp. 81–82. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2872518.2889372

  51. Morstatter, F., Wu, L., Nazer, T.H., Carely, K.M., Liu, H.: A new approach to bot detection: striking the balance between precision and recall. In: 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), San Francisco, pp. 533–540. IEEE (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM.2016.7752287

  52. Bessi, A., Ferrara, E.: Social bots distort the 2016 U.S. Presidential election online discussion. First Monday J. 21 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.7090

  53. Luceri, L., Deb, A., Giordano, S., Ferrara, E.: Evolution of bot and human behavior during elections. First Monday J. 24 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v24i9.10213

  54. Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, B.: Sentiment lexicon expansion based on neural PU learning, double dictionary lookup, and polarity association. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 553–563. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D17-1059

  55. Zhang, L., Ghosh, R., Dekhil, M., Hsu, M., Liu, B.: Combining Lexicon-based and Learning-based Methods for Twitter Sentiment Analysis. Technical report HPL, HP Laboratories (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ferrara, E., Yang, Z.: Quantifying the effect of sentiment on information diffusion in social media. PeerJ Comput. Sci. J. 1, e26 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P., Welpe, L.: Election forecasts with twitter, how 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 29, 402–418 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439310386557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bollen, J., Pepe, A., Mao, H.: Modeling public mood and emotion, twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 450–453. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  59. O’Connor, B., Balasubbramanyan, R., Routledge, B.R., Smith, N.A.: from tweets to polls, linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, vol. 11, pp. 122–129. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kosmajac, D., Keselj, V.: Twitter bot detection using diversity measures. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Natural Language and Speech Processing, Trento, Italy, pp. 1–8. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Yang, K., Varol, O., Hui, P.-M., Menczer, F.: Scalable and generalizable social bot detection through data selection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, vol. 34, pp. 1096–1103. AAAI Press (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Fang, Y., Gao, J., Huang, C., Peng, H., Wu, R.: Self multi-head attention-based convolutional neural networks for fake news detection. PLoS ONE 14, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Lu, Y.-J., Li, C.-T.: GCAN: graph-aware co-attention networks for explainable fake news detection on social media. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 505–514. Association for Computational Linguistics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zineb Ferhat Hamida .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferhat Hamida, Z., Refoufi, A., Drif, A. (2022). Fake News Detection Methods: A Survey and New Perspectives. In: Kacprzyk, J., Balas, V.E., Ezziyyani, M. (eds) Advanced Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development (AI2SD’2020). AI2SD 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1418. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90639-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics