Abstract
This study examined how parental mental health impacts children’s psychosocial functioning, accounting for military deployment and moderating effects of gender of the service member (SM) and spouse (SP). Survey data from the Millennium Cohort Family Study were used to examine family demographic characteristics, deployment, parental mental health, social functioning, and family satisfaction as predictors of emotional and behavioral difficulties among children in the family. Analytic techniques ranged from descriptive statistics to hierarchical regression models. SP mental health was most influential on the behavioral and emotional outcomes of children in comparisons where neither, one of the, or both parents had mental health problems. Gender of the SP was a moderator of child outcomes. Male SPs with mental health problems were associated with an elevated risk for negative child outcomes, especially among families of female SMs. Contrary to expectations, parental deployment history was largely unrelated to children’s outcomes. Both parental social functioning and family satisfaction served as protective factors, buffering children from negative outcomes, even when parental mental health problems were present. Authors conclude that providing military families access to prevention and treatment services is warranted, especially for families with female SMs and male SPs serving in the role of primary caregiver.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Children’s mental health
- Deployment
- Parental mental health
- Family functioning
- Millennium Cohort
- Child mental health
- Children’s psychosocial
- Military families
The growing recognition of the toll that military service can have on the more than two million children (U.S. Department of Defense [DoD], 2015) of service members (SMs) has prompted researchers to explore different facets of military life (e.g., deployment , parental mental health) that may impact child and family functioning (Fairbank et al., 2018; Lester et al., 2010; Lincoln et al., 2008). Two recent national studies—the Millennium Cohort Family Study (Family Study; Briggs et al., 2020; Fairbank et al., 2018; Steenkamp et al., 2018) and the RAND Corporation Deployment Life Study (Tanielian et al., 2014)—have helped to broaden the focus of deployment health research beyond outcomes for SMs to include the mental health of military-involved spouses (SPs) and children. For instance, in the Family Study, over a third (35.9%) of military SPs screened positive for one or more psychiatric conditions (e.g., depression, 6.7%; post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], 9.2%; anxiety, 6.1%; alcohol misuse, 8.2%; Steenkamp et al., 2018). In the Deployment Life Study, multiple conditions, including anxiety (2.1%) and binge drinking (13.8%), were found among military SPs; 16% of SPs and 14% of SMs reported the need for mental health counseling services due to recent emotional problems (Tanielian et al., 2014).
With respect to children, the Family Study found that older youth in military families with combat-deployed parents were more likely to have received a diagnosis of attention-deficit disorder/attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD) than youth in families whose SM parents were not deployed (Fairbank et al., 2018). In addition, any parental military deployment (combat deployed or noncombat deployed) was associated with increased rates of depression among youth in military families (Fairbank et al., 2018). The RAND Deployment Life Study further documented moderate-to-high levels of emotional difficulties in 28% of the children in their sample (Tanielian et al., 2014). Taken together, these findings highlight the need to better understand and respond to the mental health needs of military SPs and children, particularly as they relate to unique military experiences such as deployment .
There is an extensive civilian literature on family systems and dynamics that suggests that children’s mental health and behavior are interconnected with parental mental health and family functioning. Notable is the robust literature on maternal mental health (e.g., anxiety, depression) and links to child emotional and behavioral problems (e.g., Gao et al., 2007; Goelman et al., 2014; Koutra et al., 2013). Family Systems Theory describes how the components of a system individually, collectively, and dynamically interact, such that, for example, maternal depression may impact children’s behavior by affecting parenting strategies, regulation and expression, or quality of the marital relationship. Far fewer studies have examined paternal mental health and its connection to child functioning, but similar patterns of paternal mental health and emotional and behavioral problems in children have been observed (e.g., Kvalevaag et al., 2013; Pettit et al., 2008). Additionally, evidence suggests that the risk for child mental health problems is further heightened when both parents have a mental health condition (Weitzman et al., 2011).
Similar findings have been documented for military and veteran populations; that is, children of parents with a mental illness are often found to be at high risk for behavioral and psychological difficulties themselves (e.g., Jordan et al., 1992; Lester et al., 2010). Further, the literature on family functioning suggests that the potential protective nature of adaptive family processes (e.g., cohesiveness, communication, support, and satisfaction) tends to be negatively correlated with child behavioral problems (e.g., Wang & Zhou, 2015). The robustness of the connection between family functioning and child outcomes has not been firmly established, however, because there has not been consensus on the confluence of risk and protective factors.
The framework proposed by Palmer (2008) for military families may help researchers understand how to integrate findings on parental and family functioning from civilian populations while simultaneously considering how the military context may yield different child outcomes. Palmer’s framework suggests that psychosocial outcomes associated with military life for children are impacted by parental stress and psychopathology. Thus, the impact of military-specific stressors, such as frequent moves, changes in schools and friends/peer groups, parental SM deployments, family reunion and reintegration, and other factors that promote and/or undermine resilience and well-being among military children, is strongly influenced by parental mental health (e.g., anxiety, depression) and functioning. For example, each reported family-related military stressor increased the odds of a child being diagnosed with depression or anxiety by 23%, while deployment- and injury-related stressors were also associated with an increased risk for a range of maladaptive child psychosocial outcomes (Briggs et al., 2020).
To date, relatively few studies have gone beyond deployment to explore the influence of parental and familial factors on child well-being in military families. Specifically, there is much to learn about whether parental mental health and family functioning convey risk for negative child outcomes in the context of military life and key differences between each parent’s link with the child’s adjustment. For example, is the heightened risk of child emotional and behavioral problems associated more with the mental health status of the SM or that of the SP who is often the primary caregiver? Is the risk of child mental health problems further amplified when both parents have a mental health condition? To what extent does family functioning influence outcomes over and above parental mental health?
To this end, the primary objectives of the analyses conducted for this chapter were to address the following three study questions:
-
1.
To what extent do children’s psychosocial functioning and mental health vary at the family level when the SM, SP, or both parents have a history of problematic mental health?
-
SP mental health was expected to be more influential than SM mental health on children’s outcomes.
-
More problematic children’s outcomes were expected when both parents have mental health difficulties.
-
-
2.
What are the effects of deployment on children’s outcomes, accounting for parental mental health and family functioning?
-
Type of deployment experienced was expected to have differential effects on children’s outcomes.
-
-
3.
Are there differences in children’s psychosocial and mental health outcomes for military households with female SMs and male SPs?
Method
The Family Study (Crum-Cianflone et al., 2014) is a prospective cohort study designed to evaluate the interrelated health and well-being effects of military service on families, including the SM, SP, and children. The Family Study is a component of the Millennium Cohort Study, a longitudinal, prospective examination of long-term health outcomes among active-duty and National Guard/Reserve personnel and their families across US military branches (Ryan et al., 2007). To be eligible for the Family Study, SMs and their SPs had to be married at the time of enrollment (2011–2013) and service affiliated for 2–5 years. Female SMs were oversampled in the Millennium Cohort study to ensure that male SPs had adequate representation in the Family Study. To maximize response rates, the survey methods for the Family Study included both online and paper mail survey response options (Dillman et al., 2009; McMaster et al., 2017).
The study described herein uses survey data collected between 2014 and 2016, which were the first follow-up data collected and the most recent data available for analysis. Only married couples with at least one child 3–17 years of age were eligible for inclusion in the analyses. The data are structured with children nested within families (n = 3849 weighted) as the primary sampling unit for paired SM and SP dyads (n = 2336 weighted). Responses were weighted at the family level to account for the probability of original selection of the SM, as well as SM and SP nonresponse, using a combination of response propensity modeling and raking-ratio estimates to known population totals.
Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) reviewed and approved the research protocol (NHRC.2015.0019) and provided ongoing oversight. Exemptions for secondary data analysis were approved by the Duke University Health System IRB (Pro00064951). More details about the Millennium Cohort and the Family Study methods are described elsewhere (Corry et al., 2017; Crum-Cianflone, 2013; Crum-Cianflone et al., 2014; Gray et al., 2002).
Millennium Cohort and Family Study Surveys
The SM survey assessed a variety of topics, including medical conditions, psychosocial well-being, substance use, and military-specific and occupational exposures. The military SP survey contained questions based on a conceptual model with four main domains: (1) SP physical health, (2) SP mental health and adjustment, (3) SP reports of their children’s mental/physical health and functioning, and (4) family functioning and protective and vulnerability factors (Crum-Cianflone et al., 2014). The present study focused on the latter three domains and included the following specific variables to address the study aims and hypotheses:
Demographic Characteristics
Demographic variables included gender of the SP and SM, age, race/ethnicity, marital duration, number of children in the household, as well as age of the oldest child in the family. Administrative data were used to assess SM military branch (Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy), component (active duty, Reserve/National Guard), pay grade (officer, enlisted), and deployment history. Deployment status was determined using a computed variable based on administrative records from the Contingency Tracking System documenting deployments in support of military operations (e.g., Operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn) since September 11, 2001. Combat exposure during deployment was further determined based on SM self-reports on the DoD Post-Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA; Hoge et al., 2006; Milliken et al., 2007) screening and 18 items on the Millennium Cohort survey. A combat experience designation was assigned if the SM endorsed any of the 3 combat exposure items on the PDHA (i.e., encountering dead bodies or seeing people killed or wounded; engaging in direct combat and discharging weapon; and feeling in great danger of being killed) or any of the 18 items included on the Millennium Cohort survey (e.g., being attacked or ambushed; receiving small arms fire; having a member of unit be seriously injured or killed; personally witnessing a person’s death due to war, disaster, or tragic event; witnessing instances of physical abuse; and seeing dead or decomposing bodies, maimed soldiers or civilians, or prisoners of war or refugees). SM deployment history was then categorized as lifetime history of no deployment , deployment without combat exposure, or deployment with combat exposure.
Parental Mental Health Indicators
SMs and military SPs responded to the Veterans RAND 36-Item Health Survey (VR-36; Kazis et al., 2004), wherein lower scores on the mental component summary (MCS) reflect worse mental health functioning and more functional impairment. Respondents were also asked to report whether they had ever received a mental health diagnosis by a clinical provider (i.e., depression, schizophrenia or psychosis, bipolar disorder, and/or PTSD). We combined the two mental health indicators into a problematic mental health composite (PMHC) for endorsement of either a history of mental health disorder(s) or a low MCS score for SMs (M ≤ 33.99) and SPs (M ≤ 35.34), which represents one standard deviation below the mean sample MCS score for SMs and SPs, respectively (LeardMann et al., 2009). We then categorized each family into one of the four mutually exclusive dyad groups to characterize parental mental health status: neither parent with a PMHC (NP), SM only with a PMHC, military SP only with a PMHC, and both parents with a PMHC (BP).
Global Indicator of Parental Social Functioning
Parental social functioning had a numeric range from 0 to 100 based on transformed scores of two questions in the VR-36: “During the past 4 weeks, to what extent has your physical health or emotional problems interfered with your normal social activities with family, friends, neighbors, or groups?” “During the past 4 weeks, how much of the time has your physical health or emotional problems interfered with your social activities (like visiting with friends, relatives)?” Higher scores represent better social functioning.
Family Satisfaction
The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale IV (FACES IV) assesses the cohesion and flexibility dimensions of the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems (Olson, 2000). Family satisfaction is a sum score ranging from 10 to 50 based on SP ratings of the 10-item FACES-IV. Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction.
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
An adaptation of the parent report version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1997), a brief emotional and behavioral screening measure of children and adolescents aged 3 through 17 years, was administered to SPs. The present study included four of the five original subscales (conduct problems, emotional symptoms, hyperactivity/inattention, and peer problems) with 20 respective items rated dichotomously (yes/no). Values were computed for the subscales and a total SDQ score per the SDQ developer’s coding protocols (sdqscore.org). For family-level SDQ analyses, we selected the most severe child score for each scale as the outcome of interest.
Children’s Mental Health Conditions
Military SPs were asked about common mental health conditions and developmental concerns for their children based on the National Survey of Children’s Health (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2007) survey question: “Has a doctor or health professional ever told you that your child has (1) behavioral or conduct problems, (2) depression, (3) anxiety problems or other emotional problems, or (4) ADD/ADHD?” As required by the NHRC IRB to enhance protection of the identity and privacy of individual children in the family, SPs indicated if any child in the home had received these diagnoses. For analysis, endorsements of depression, anxiety, and other emotional problems were collapsed into one construct given the likelihood of co-occurrence.
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics of frequencies and means were calculated for parent demographics, mental health, and family characteristics. Child SDQ means and diagnosis/disorder frequencies were compared across the four parental mental health dyads for PMHC. Unadjusted regressions for each outcome compared the marginal means of the NP, SM only, SP only, and BP dyad groups to determine if there were statistical differences. Adjustments for multiple tests were not applied given the hypothesis-driven study aims and preference to minimize type II errors (false negatives) that could result by imposing overly conservative thresholds for significance. Hierarchical regression models estimated unstandardized and standardized effects of PMHC dyads on child outcomes by introducing groups of variables in four stages: (1) demographic variables, (2) deployment and other military variables, (3) parental mental health dyad groupings, and (4) family dynamic variables. We also tested models with deployment after parental mental health to assess suppression effects. Then, moderation tests were run to evaluate interaction effects on PMHC dyads and gender of parent. Lastly, we conducted a sensitivity analysis by rerunning unstandardized and standardized hierarchical regression models among female SMs (N = 368). Analyses were conducted at the family level using SAS software, version 9.3, and Stata software, version 15.1 (StataCorp, 2017), survey commands. Statistically significant differences were defined a priori at p < 0.05 and relaxed to p < 0.10 for interaction tests.
Results
Parental Demographic and Mental Health Characteristics
The analytical sample consisted of 3849 observations comprising 2336 parental dyads of paired SMs and SPs. The descriptive statistics in Table 8.1 show sample demographics, family characteristics, and indicators of parental mental health. Percentages, means, and number of observations (n) are weighted at the family level. Military couples mainly consisted of male SMs married to female SPs (87%), with both approximately 32 years of age on average. SMs and SPs, respectively, were predominately non-Hispanic White, 66% and 69%; non-Hispanic Black, 17% and 11%; and Hispanic, 10% and 12%. Social functioning was high—in the top 25th percentile on a 100-point scale: M = 76.1 for SMs and M = 82.2 for SPs. Conversely, less than a quarter of SMs (22%) and SPs (21%) endorsed ever having had one or more mental health disorders or diagnoses. Overall, the average score for the MCS was similar for SMs and SPs at approximately M = 47 on a scale ranging from 3.5 to 71.8.
Military and Family Characteristics
As shown in Table 8.2, all branches of military service were represented in the sample, and slightly over half were affiliated with the Army (56%). Most SMs (72%) were previously deployed, with more than half (58%) reporting combat exposures while deployed. Nearly three-quarters (74%) of parents had been married for more than 5 years, the majority of whom had two or more children (83%). The average age of the oldest child in each family was 8.4 years (SE = 0.18). Mean family satisfaction was slightly above average (M = 36.80, SE = 0.42), in the top 50th percentile for the scale.
Indicators of Children’s Mental Health
Less than half (48.9%) of the families with data for both SMs and SPs on parental mental health indicators had a positive PMHC value for either a history of mental health diagnosis/disorder or a low MCS score. The child SDQ mean scores increased in rank order when NP had a PMHC, only the SM had a PMHC, only the SP had a PMHC, and BP had a PMHC. Figure 8.1 shows that the upward trend across the four PMHC dyads was consistent for SDQ conduct problems, emotional problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, and SDQ total scores. Likewise, unadjusted regression models of pairwise comparisons revealed that BP had statistically greater effects than NP on SDQ outcomes. However, we found no significant differences in effects between SMs and SPs for emotional problems, hyperactivity, and peer problems.
Figure 8.2 shows that child diagnosis percentages increased consistently in rank order from SM to SP, but not consecutively across all four dyad groups from NP to BP. Differences in help-seeking behaviors for clinical care may explain why NP was higher than expected and BP was lower than expected. Statistically, however, the odds of depression/anxiety and behavioral disorders were greater for BP than NP in unadjusted regressions with multinominal pairwise comparisons.
Table 8.3 shows significant associations between various factors (SP age, child age, years of marital duration, service branch, deployment , PMHC dyad, SM and SP social functioning, and family satisfaction) and children’s mental health outcomes in the four stages of the hierarchical regression models. In Stage 1, oldest child age is noteworthy because it is a significant risk factor for all five SDQ subscales and all three disorders. In Stage 2, we observed increased odds for select child disorders for Marine Corps (behavioral disorders), Air Force (behavioral disorders and ADD/ADHD), and Coast Guard (depression/anxiety) SMs compared with Army SMs. Deployment without combat compared with no deployment history is also significant (behavioral disorders) when added before or after Stage 3. In Stage 3, SP dyads’ PMHC increases SDQ conduct problems, SDQ emotional problems, SDQ total scores, and odds of depression/anxiety disorders more than NP dyads’ PMHC. Also, BP dyads, compared with NP dyads, have a greater effect on SDQ emotional problems and SDQ total scores. Among the family dynamics variables in Stage 4, family satisfaction stands out as a protective factor against most of the negative outcomes assessed, including all five SDQ subscales and ADD/ADHD. In fact, family satisfaction is one of the most influential significant factors in the standardized hierarchical models; second only to SP-only PMHC dyads.
The interactions of PMHC dyads by parental gender (Fig. 8.3) suggest that men pose an elevated risk for negative child outcomes compared with women, especially in their role as the caregiving SP if they are the one parent with the problematic mental health composite. Given the small cell sizes for SP-only PMHC dyad*male (n = 51) in the three-way interaction, a sensitivity analysis of the hierarchical regressions was run only in the subsample of SMs (n = 368) to ensure sufficient numbers to detect signals for gender differences. In support of the moderation test, there was a significant association between male SP-only PMHC dyad and SDQ conduct problems, SDQ emotional problems, SDQ peer problems, SDQ total score, and odds for depression/anxiety and behavioral disorders (See Table 8.4).
Discussion
Consistent with findings from earlier Family Study analyses (Briggs et al., 2020; Fairbank et al., 2018), most children were found to be functioning well, with an important but modest subset presenting with emotional and behavioral symptoms or a mental health diagnosis. Likewise, a minority of SM and SP parents reported mental health problems (~20%). Although different metrics were used, the rates of mental health problems endorsed by SMs and SPs in the Family Study cohort were comparable, on average, to those found in the RAND Deployment Life Study (Tanielian et al., 2014).
The finding that children’s SDQ means increased in rank order by PMHC scores from NP, SM, and SP to BP groupings for all SDQ factors is consistent with the broad scientific literature that delineates heightened risk for children associated with a range of parental mental health problems, including parental depression, serious mental illness, and PTSD (Gao et al., 2007; Goelman et al., 2014; Koutra et al., 2013; Monson et al., 2012; Van Loon et al., 2014). Interestingly, the strength of the association with child SDQ problems was consistently higher for SP than SM mental health and amplified further when BP had a mental health condition. Percentages of children’s mental health diagnoses also increased in rank order from SMs to SPs, with SPs demonstrating the most consistent association with these outcomes. These findings underscore the crucial role of parental mental health on both parenting and children’s mental health and psychosocial functioning, as emphasized in family systems theory and clinical practice (e.g., Swick & Williams, 2006), and they are consistent with literature on military and civilian families that have explored aspects of the links between parents’ and children’s mental health.
In our study, we found gender of the SM and SP to be a moderator for children’s psychosocial functioning and mental health. Overall, fathers with a problematic mental health composite in the role of an SM or SP posed a higher risk than mothers for impacting children’s psychosocial functioning and mental health. The adverse consequences were substantially increased for fathers in the role of SPs compared with SMs. A number of factors may contribute to this pattern, including fewer male SPs of female SMs in the military, social isolation of male SP parents from their male SP peers given their minority status among military-connected families, and assumptions and expectations regarding gender roles and challenges associated with perceptions of role reversal (e.g., stigma associated with seeking support). Future studies should consider examining parenting practices, support systems, and family dynamics, among other factors, that may contribute to female gender being a protective factor—and male SP role a potential risk factor—for military children’s psychosocial functioning and mental health (see Segal, 1995; Segal & Lane, 2016; Tepe et al., 2016).
Thus, an unanticipated new finding was how the confluence of gender and role (SM or SP) as a significant moderator impacted children’s psychosocial and mental health outcomes. Our findings suggest that when fathers served as the primary caregiver (male SP) and had problems with mental health, social, and/or family functioning, their children were more likely to have impairments in emotional and behavioral functioning and to have a mental health diagnosis. This finding underscores a need to learn more about psychosocial variables that may affect the relationship between male SP mental health and psychosocial mental health outcomes for children in military families. For example, findings from a recent study of male SMs (Zhang et al., 2020) suggest that paternal emotion regulation and coercive interactions with children increase the risk for child psychopathology. Similar studies on the association between male SP mental health and psychosocial functioning of children in the family are needed.
Male SPs may also perceive fewer opportunities for services and treatments within military mental health-care systems. To improve the psychosocial health of children in military families, future studies could attempt to better understand the experiences of male SPs within military and civilian communities and the availability and accessibility of mental health resources, services, and care specifically designed to address the needs of male SPs and their children. The construct of resilience, for example, is valued and emphasized within military culture and is often viewed as a potential protective mechanism. For some male SPs with mental health treatment needs, however, an emphasis on resilience may also have the unintended consequence of fostering stigma that could act as a barrier to reaching out for support when needed. From a policy perspective, male SPs could be targeted as a group for prevention strategies. Families OverComing Under Stress (FOCUS) Resilience Training for military families (Lester et al., 2013) is one such family-based program that promotes resilience training as a prevention strategy (https://focusproject.org/). The program is described as a resilience-enhancement program for couples, families, and children that builds on strengths and teaches new skills, such as effective emotion regulation, communication strategies, problem-solving, goal setting, and management of trauma and stress reminders (Lester et al., 2011). It would be useful to learn more about male SP experiences with FOCUS as well as with other evidence-based programs for military parents, such as the After Deployment : Adaptive Parenting Tools (ADAPT) program described in this volume (Gewirtz & Simenec, Chap. 9).
A noteworthy finding was that parental mental health was generally not associated with deployment history in this analysis. Results did not suggest a mediating role for the sequential effects of deployment , given a lack of unadjusted association and minimal adjusted association. These findings could, in part, be due to how deployment was constructed in our analysis. Including a numerical measure of combat exposure (e.g., total months) instead of the lifetime categorical variable could have offered greater variability and thereby a more powerful predictor. However, the well-known healthy warrior effect may also mitigate some of the potentially negative implications of deployment . In this conception, SMs who are healthier or functioning better in their military roles are more likely to be deployed, while some of the nondeployed may have been ineligible because of a range of health or functional concerns. Further research would be warranted to investigate what contributing and contextual factors promote deployment as a positive experience for military families.
Both family satisfaction and parental social functioning served as robust protective factors, buffering children from negative outcomes even when parental mental health problems were present. In fact, family satisfaction was the strongest resilience factor associated with better child functioning. The malleability of family satisfaction suggests a target for intervention that could improve the function of those children experiencing mental health problems. For example, prevention programs that are geared toward strengthening family resiliency could, in turn, improve SM readiness (Lester et al., 2011) and provide the family with the skills necessary to act as a conduit to other positive sequelae, such as improved mental health functioning for both children and parents.
These findings highlight the complex array of factors that contribute to the mental health and well-being of children in military families. The observations herein raise additional questions about how these vulnerabilities and protective factors lead to differential outcomes for military-connected children. For example, does a parent with greater social functioning also parent or interact with their child differently? Are caregivers with fewer mental health concerns more consistent in their parenting? Do they exhibit higher levels of parental attachment and warmth, or regulate their affect or communicate more effectively? Future studies should examine these potential pathways to better understand how we can more effectively support military families and mitigate the risks associated with parental mental health problems and poor family functioning.
The study presented in this chapter has several methodological limitations. This study was cross-sectional in nature and relied on a single respondent (i.e., the SP) to report on children’s psychosocial functioning. Consequently, there is potential response bias from the SP because we were not able to examine the reliability of reports across respondents on child functioning (e.g., SMs, mental health professionals, teachers, child self-reports). Unlike symptomatology, children’s psychiatric diagnoses were based on SP reports of a mental health provider’s diagnosis rather than the actual medical records from the diagnosing provider. Psychosocial functioning and diagnoses were assessed on the family level, that is, across all children in the home rather than a randomly identified child. Symptom measurement also relied on an abbreviated and modified version of the SDQ that used dichotomous rather than Likert-type response options, which has not been validated relative to response options available in the full measure. Lastly, some cell sizes were relatively small, limiting power to detect differences. Although the findings are consistent with the literature on parental mental health and the heightened risk for child mental health diagnoses and difficulties, low base rates of child mental health impairments and diagnoses and modest effects restricted our ability to infer clinical significance and the extent to which findings may guide the development, selection, and application of mental health treatment or relevant services.
Despite these limitations, an important strength of the Family Study that differentiates it from much of the earlier research on the mental health of children in military families is that it is composed of a large, DoD-wide cohort that includes female and male SMs and SPs. Family Study respondents represent all branches and components of the US military. This study also improves on the design and methods of earlier military family research by recruiting a probability-based sample of junior military personnel SPs; thus, the findings will be applicable to a broad population of military families over time. This strategy will also allow researchers to better understand the etiology and progression of risk and protective factors over time. Continued exploration of the relationships between parental, family, and child well-being longitudinally will be an integral part of responding to calls for improving our understanding and addressing the needs of military families.
Conclusion
This study sought to explore how military parents’ mental health and family functioning are associated with children’s mental health conditions and impairments in psychosocial functioning. The results highlight the need to understand child functioning in the context of SP functioning, especially when the SP is male because SPs are often the primary caregiver. Findings also highlight that SM mental health functioning is not inconsequential, given that better mental health and social functioning, especially among female SMs, were found to be associated with fewer child mental health problems. Moreover, the results also suggest that there may be added risk for children’s mental health associated with having both the SP and the SM with one or more mental health conditions, underscoring the need to destigmatize and increase access to mental health services and interventions for the entire family, including the SM, SP, and children. Further still, programs, interventions, and support services that foster healthy parental social and family functioning and children’s psychological growth and resilience are critical to minimizing the impact of mental health difficulties and conditions on all members of the military family.
Future prospective investigations focused on parental and child mental health would be beneficial, including an investigation of mechanisms that promote child and family well-being. Second, understanding other developmental and contextual factors that impact child and family mental health outcomes is key to a full understanding of who may be at particular risk. The findings of this study can inform military force readiness and strategies for its enhancement by mitigating risk factors and potentiating protective factors related to parenting, parental mental health, and child mental health, all of which can affect SM effectiveness. As well, the findings of this study are relevant to many military family support programs. Relevant information can be disseminated through educational materials, webinars, and newsletters, and used to support the development of new services, interventions, and policies to address some of the unmet needs of military families as reported in this research.
Change history
29 January 2022
This book was inadvertently published with the wrong affiliation of Dr. John A. Fairbank.
References
Briggs, E. C., Fairbank, J. A., Tunno, A. M., Lee, R. C., Corry, N. H., Pflieger, J. C., Stander, V. A., & Murphy, R. A. (2020). Military life stressors, family communication, and satisfaction: Associations with children’s psychosocial outcomes. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 13, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-019-00259-z
Corry, N. H., Williams, C. S., Battaglia, M., McMaster, H. S., & Stander, V. A. (2017). Assessing and adjusting for non-response in the Millennium Cohort Family Study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(16), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0294-8
Crum-Cianflone, N. F. (2013). The millennium cohort study: Answering long-term health concerns of U.S. military service members by integrating longitudinal survey data with military health system records (NHRC Tech. Doc. No. 11-51). Naval Health Research Center. ADA620647.pdf (dtic.mil).
Crum-Cianflone, N. F., Fairbank, J. A., Marmar, C. R., & Schlenger, W. (2014). The Millennium Cohort Family Study: A prospective evaluation of the health and well-being of military service members and their families. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 23(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1446
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Fairbank, J. A., Briggs, E. C., Lee, R. C., Corry, N. H., Pflieger, J. C., Gerrity, E. T., Amaya-Jackson, L. M., Stander, V. A., & Murphy, R. A. (2018). Mental health of children of deployed and nondeployed US military service members: The Millennium Cohort Family Study. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 39(9), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000606
Gao, W., Paterson, J., Abbott, M., Carter, S., & Iusitini, L. (2007). Maternal mental health and child behaviour problems at 2 years: Findings from the Pacific Islands Families Study. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41(11), 885–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670701634929
Goelman, H., Zdaniuk, B., Boyce, W., Armstrong, J. M., & Essex, M. J. (2014). Maternal mental health, child care quality, and children’s behavior. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(4), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.05.003
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
Gray, G. C., Chesbrough, K. B., Ryan, M. A., Amoroso, P., Boyko, E. J., Gackstetter, G. D., Hooper, T. I., Riddle, J. R., & Millennium Cohort Study Group. (2002). The Millennium Cohort Study: A 21-year prospective cohort study of 140,000 military personnel. Military Medicine, 167(6), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/167.6.483
Hoge, C. W., Auchterlonie, J. L., & Milliken, C. S. (2006). Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(9), 1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.9.1023
Jordan, B. K., Marmar, C. R., Fairbank, J. A., Schlenger, W. E., Kulka, R. A., Hough, R. L., & Weiss, D. S. (1992). Problems in the families of male Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.60.6.916
Kazis, L. E., Miller, D. R., Skinner, K. M., Lee, A., Ren, X. S., Clark, J. A., Rogers, W. H., Spiro, A., III, A., Selim, A., Linzer, M., Payne, S. M., Mansell, D., & Fincke, G. (2004). Patient reported measures of health: The Veterans Health Study. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 27(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004479-200401000-00012
Koutra, K., Chatzi, L., Bagkeris, M., Vassilaki, M., Bitsios, P., & Kogevinas, M. (2013). Antenatal and postnatal maternal mental health as determinants of infant neurodevelopment at 18 months of age in a mother–child cohort (Rhea Study) in Crete, Greece. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48(8), 1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0636-0
Kvalevaag, A. L., Ramchandani, P. G., Hove, O., Assmus, J., Eberhard-Gran, M., & Biringer, E. (2013). Paternal mental health and socioemotional and behavioral development in their children. Pediatrics, 131(2), e463–e469. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0804
LeardMann, C. A., Smith, T. C., Smith, B., Wells, T. S., Ryan, M. A. K., & for the Millennium Cohort Study Team. (2009). Baseline self-reported functional health and vulnerability to post-traumatic stress disorder after combat deployment: Prospective US military cohort study. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Edition), 338, b1273. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1273
Lester, P., Leskin, G., Woodward, K., Saltzman, W., Nash, W., Mogil, C., & Beardslee, W. (2011). Wartime deployment and military children: Applying prevention science to enhance family resilience. In S. M. Wadsworth & D. Riggs (Eds.), Risk and resilience in U.S. military families (pp. 149–173). Springer.
Lester, P., Peterson, K., Reeves, J., Knauss, L., Glover, D., Mogil, C., Duan, N., Saltzman, W., Pynoos, R., Wilt, K., & Beardslee, W. (2010). The long war and parental combat deployment: Effects on military children and at-home spouses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(4), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.01.003
Lester, P., Stein, J. A., Saltzman, W., Woodward, K., Wadsworth, S. M., Milburn, N., Mogil, C., & Beardslee, W. (2013). Psychological health of military children: Longitudinal evaluation of a family centered prevention program to enhance family resilience. Military Medicine, 178(8), 838–845. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-12-00502
Lincoln, A., Swift, E., & Shorteno-Fraser, M. (2008). Psychological adjustment and treatment of children and families with parents deployed in military combat. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(8), 984–992. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20520
McMaster, H. S., LeardMann, C. A., Speigle, S., Dillman, D. A., & for the Millennium Cohort Family Study Team. (2017). An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17, 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0337-1
Milliken, C. S., Auchterlonie, J. L., & Hoge, C. W. (2007). Longitudinal assessment of mental health problems among active and reserve component soldiers returning from the Iraq War. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(18), 2141–2148. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.18.2141
Monson, C. M., Fredman, S. J., Dekel, R., & Macdonald, A. (2012). Family models of posttraumatic stress disorder. In J. G. Beck & D. M. Sloan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of traumatic stress disorders (pp. 219–234). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399066.013.0015
Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.00144
Palmer, C. (2008). A theory of risk and resilience factors in military families. Military Psychology, 20(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600802118858
Pettit, J. W., Olino, T. M., Roberts, R. E., Seeley, J. R., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (2008). Intergenerational transmission of internalizing problems: Effects of parental and grandparental major depressive disorder on child behavior. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37(3), 640–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410802148129
Ryan, M. A., Smith, T. C., Smith, B., Amoroso, P., Boyko, E. J., Gray, G. C., Gackstetter, G. D., Riddle, J. R., Wells, T. S., Gumbs, G., Corbeil, T. E., & Hooper, T. I. (2007). Millennium cohort: Enrollment begins a 21-year contribution to understanding the impact of military service. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.05.009
Segal, M. W. (1995). Women’s military roles cross-nationally: Past, present, and future. Gender & Society, 9(6), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124395009006008
Segal, M. W., & Lane, M. D. (2016). Conceptual model of military women’s life events and well-being. Military Medicine, 181(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00345
StataCorp. (2017). Stata 15 [Statistical software]. StataCorp LLC.
Steenkamp, M. M., Corry, N. H., Qian, M., Li, M., McMaster, H. S., Fairbank, J. A., Stander, V. A., Hollahan, L., & Marmar, C. R. (2018). Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in United States military spouses: The Millennium Cohort Family Study. Depression and Anxiety, 35(9), 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22768
Swick, K. J., & Williams, R. D. (2006). An analysis of Bronfenbrenner’s bio-ecological perspective for early childhood educators: Implications for working with families experiencing stress. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(5), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0078-y
Tanielian, T., Karney, B. R., Chandra, A., Meadows, S. O., & the Deployment Life Study Team. (2014). The Deployment Life Study: Methodological overview and baseline sample description. Rand Corporation. The Deployment Life Study: Methodological Overview and Baseline Sample Description | RAND
Tepe, V., Yarnell, A., Nindl, B. C., Van Arsdale, S., & Deuster, P. A. (2016). Women in combat: Summary of findings and a way ahead. Military Medicine, 181(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00409
U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). (2015). 2014 demographics: Profile of the military community. Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Military Community and Family Policy). Retrieved from http://download.militaryonesource.mil/12038/MOS/Reports/2014-Demographics-Report.pdf
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). (2007). National Survey of Children’s Health 2007 (ICPSR 28121). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/RCMD/studies/28121
Van Loon, L. M. A., Van de Ven, M. O. M., Van Doesum, K. T. M., Witteman, C. L. M., & Hosman, C. M. H. (2014). The relation between parental mental illness and adolescent mental health: The role of family factors. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1201–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9781-7
Wang, Q., & Zhou, T. (2015). The impact of family functioning and mental health condition on the child’s behavioral problems. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(7), 1135–1146. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.7.1135
Weitzman, M., Rosenthal, D. G., & Liu, Y. (2011). Paternal depressive symptoms and child behavioral and emotional problems in the United States. Pediatrics, 128(6), 1126–1134. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3034
Zhang, J., Palmer, A., Zhang, N., & Gewirtz, A. H. (2020). Coercive parenting mediates the relationship between military fathers’ emotion regulation and children’s adjustment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 48(5), 633–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00625-8
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Courtney Smith, Robert Lee, H. Ryan Wagner, Alison Cooke, and Kelly Woodall for their contributions to various iterations of this chapter. We would also like to thank all those who valiantly serve our country and who have made this research possible.
Disclaimer: I am a military service member or employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of my official duties. Title 17, U.S.C. §105, provides that copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the US Government. Title 17, U.S.C. §101, defines a US Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. Report No. 20–98 was supported by the US Department of Defense, Defense Health Agency, under work unit no. N1240. The views expressed in this chapter are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the US Government. The study protocol was approved by the Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. Research data were derived from an approved Naval Health Research Center Institutional Review Board protocol number NHRC.2015.0019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Briggs, E.C. et al. (2022). Children’s Mental Health, Deployment , Parental Mental Health, and Family Dynamics: Findings from the Millennium Cohort Family Study. In: Glick, J.E., King, V., McHale, S.M. (eds) Parent-Child Separation. National Symposium on Family Issues, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87759-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87759-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87758-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87759-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)