Skip to main content

On Revolutionary Situations, Stages of Revolution, and Some Other Aspects of the Theory of Revolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Societies and Political Orders in Transition ((SOCPOT))

Abstract

Leonid Grinin analyzes several theoretical aspects of important revolutionary phenomena. In particular, he analyzes some of the ways in which international relations and the World System as a whole can influence the emergence of a revolution and its outcome and vice versa—how revolutions and their waves can affect the World System and the balance of power within the world order. The author also examines the ways in which revolutions can affect the current international role of revolutions, and their use as a geopolitical weapon. It is very important since, according to George Lawson, there is something amiss with how revolutionary theory approaches the international. The chapter also considers the concept of “revolutionary situation” and proposes its clarification and the introduction of new precise concepts. A special section is dedicated to “great revolutions”. It shows the differences between them and ordinary revolutions. The following section concerns the problem of the stages of revolution and the details of the revolutionary cycle, including the so-called Thermidor phase. The last section is devoted to analyzing elite behavior in those situations when, supporting the revolution, certain elites lose their sense of self-preservation in the pre-revolutionary period and in the beginning of a revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    When attempting to treat revolutions only as a sociological phenomenon as well as to create a non-temporal theory of revolutions one can encounter difficulties with defining common features: the early revolutions may lack certain later common features due to the fact that there was not enough experience and material prerequisites for them, while the subsequent revolutions appear different since a number of social problems had been already solved, and some revolutionary incidents were already disapproved so the revolutionaries could avoid them. The support base of revolutions and many other characteristics also changed (the neglect of these methodological approaches and related drawbacks could be found, e.g., in Eduard Shults’s Theory of Revolution (2016) which in other respects is quite an informative book).

  2. 2.

    In particular, revolutions can be considered as a result of rapid and abrupt changes, including sharp demographic changes with increasing share of young people in the population (see Chapter “Revolution and Modernization Traps” [Grinin, 2022c]; see also Goldstone 1991; Grinin, 2012d).

  3. 3.

    It is generally accepted that the military defeat or even overstretch of the forces of society in war often becomes the starting point for mass discontent and revolution. But we do not consider this aspect in this chapter (but see Chapters “The Phenomenon and Theories of Revolutions” [Goldstone et al., 2022c] and “Revolutionary Waves and Lines of the Twentieth Century” [Grinin and Grinin 2022, in this volume]).

  4. 4.

    See about its influence Chapter “On Revolutionary Waves Since the Sixteenth Century” (Grinin, 2022b, in this volume).

  5. 5.

    About the revolutionary waves and their influence on the World System see Chapter “Introduction. Changing Yet Persistent: Revolutions and Revolutionary Events” (Goldstone et al., 2022b), Chapter “Typology and Principles of Dynamics of Revolutionary Waves in World History” (Rozov, 2022), Chapter “Revolutionary Waves of the Early Modern period. Types and Phases” (Tsygankov, 2022), Chapter “The European Revolutions and Revolutionary Waves of the Nineteenth Century: Their Causes and Consequences” (Grinin, 2022f), “Revolutionary Waves and Lines of the Twentieth Century” (Grinin & Grinin, 2022), Chapter “On Revolutionary Waves Since the Sixteenth Century” (Grinin, 2022b), Chapter “The Arab Spring: Causes, Conditions, and Driving Forces” (Grinin & Korotayev 2022b), Chapter “Revolutions of the Twenty-First Century as a Factor in the World System Reconfiguration” (Grinin, 2022e), and Chapter “Conclusion. How Many Revolutions Will We See in the Twenty-First Century?” (Goldstone et al , 2022a) in this volume.

  6. 6.

    For more details on the third effect see Chapter “Revolutionary Waves and Lines of the Twentieth Century” (Grinin & Grinin, 2022) and Chapter “On Revolutionary Waves Since the Sixteenth Century” (Grinin, 2022b, in this volume).

  7. 7.

    The Color Revolutions produced chronic instability, as their democratic advances were followed by backsliding to illiberal and corrupt regimes, which led to further protests and political upheavals (see Chapter “The ‘Color’ Revolutions. Successes and Limitations of Non-violent Protest” [Mitchell, 2022, in this volume]).

  8. 8.

    Some researchers speak about a great number of revolutionary situations in the Modern Period. Thus, Tilly alone counted 707 revolutionary situations in Europe for a period of about five hundred years, from 1492 till 1991 (Tilly, 1996: 243).

  9. 9.

    See also Tilly (1978), Skocpol (1979), Kileff and Robinson (1986), Arjomand (1988), Higley and Burton (1989), Wickham-Crowley (1989), Bunce (1989), Paige (1989), Goldstone (1991), Goldstone et al., (1991), Bearman (1993), Haggard and Kaufman (1995), DeFronzo (1996), Hough (1997), Lachmann (1997), Dogan and Higley (1998), Snyder (1998), Parsa (2000).

  10. 10.

    About the importance of agreement on the value issues for consolidation of a society and the danger of its split in the context of existence of opposing ideologies see Pettee (1938: 42–45), Heberle (1951), Gurr (1970).

  11. 11.

    Fiscal strain often becomes a trigger for the revolutionary outbreak as pointed by many researchers (e.g., Foran, 2005; Goldstone, 1982, 1991, 2001a; Paige, 1975; Skocpol, 1979; Walton, 1984; see also Beck, 2011; Sanderson, 2010; Tilly, 1978).

  12. 12.

    As Jack A. Goldstone notes, ‘Revolutions do not arise simply from mounting discontent over poverty, inequality, or other changes. Rather, revolution is a complex process that emerges from the social order becoming frayed in many areas at once’ (Goldstone, 2014: 15). One can both agree and disagree with this. It is true that revolution is a very complicated process that happens due to the crises of social systems, but, firstly, one can hardly agree that the system always has to decay in many spheres at once. For example, the political regime or economy may be prosperous, but discontent with its evils, the weakness of the government, its mistakes, ‘lack of talent’, etc., may provoke violent protests.

  13. 13.

    Additionally, if the government that lost its authority shows weakness or compliance at the wrong time, this leads to increasing demands on the part of its opposition.

  14. 14.

    She was the head of power in Petrograd at this moment since Nicholas II was in the Russian Supreme High Command General Headquarters.

  15. 15.

    As we already mentioned in Chapter “The Phenomenon and Theories of Revolutions” (Goldstone et al., 2022c, in this volume), there are two types of revolutions according to the starting point and further spreading of revolutionary events (a central collapse or an advance from the periphery [Goldstone, 2014; Huntington, 1968]).

  16. 16.

    It is not surprising that fundamental social changes during the great revolutions lead to a very intense social struggle. Therefore, one can hardly disagree with the idea of Armitage (2015) which is expressed in his article’s title “Every Great Revolution is a Civil War.”.

  17. 17.

    Prior to that time the republics existed only in small states.

  18. 18.

    In this respect it is interesting to note that great revolutions or something that substituted them occurred with the interval of about half a century after the beginning of the Great French Revolution. In 1848−1849 the European revolutions occurred, and then in 1905 a revolutionary epoch emerged in Russia. The revolution of 1949 succeeded in China but in fact it continued for twenty years.

  19. 19.

    The regular character of revolutionary stages was pointed out by François-Auguste Mignet, Thomas Carlyle, Wilhelm Josef Blos and others (Blos, 1906; Carlyle, 1903 [1837]; Mignet, 1824). When comparing the English and the French revolutions, Joseph-Marie de Maistre predicted restoration of monarchy after the French revolutions (Maistre, 1841 [1796]).

  20. 20.

    Contributions were made also by Marx (e.g. 2000 [1852]) and Engels (e.g. 1955 [1887]).

  21. 21.

    However, both during this period and later, there may be attempts to carry out even more radical transformations, but they usually do not receive support or end in failure. With respect to the English Revolution, there was the radical egalitarian movement of the ‘Levellers.’ With respect to the French Revolution we should mention the so-called ‘The Enrage’ and Gracchus Babeuf’s ‘Conspiracy of Equals’ (1796), whose participants set a goal to equalize property. In Soviet Russia on the eve of the introduction of NEP there were many hotheads who wanted to march to Europe in order to approach the coming of the world revolution.

  22. 22.

    As is known on 9 Thermidor, according to the French Republican Calendar (27/28 July) 1794 there took place a coup that ended the Jacobean dictatorship. Maximilien Robespierre, Louis Antoine de Saint-Just, Georges Couthon and other revolutionaries were executed, whereas Joseph Fouché and Paul Barras and others, who united the opponents of Robespierre, came to power.

  23. 23.

    For example, Hobsbawm (1996) speaks about the phase of split among moderate revolutionaries drifting towards the camp of order and counterrevolution.

  24. 24.

    ‘Every revolutionary period inevitably splits into two interrelated stages. “Reaction” is not a phenomenon beyond revolution but its immanent part—the second stage’ (Sorokin, 1992a: 268; 1925: 7). According to Berdyaev, ‘Every revolution ends in reaction. It is inevitable, it is a law’ (Berdyaev, 1990 [1923]: 29). About Berdyaev’s law see Chapter “Revolutions, Counterrevolutions, and Democracy” (Grinin & Korotayev, 2022a, in this volume); also Grinin and Korotayev (2014, 2016b, 2016c). Huntington reduces to the first two large stages of revolution, probably, because he delineates the Western and the Eastern types of revolutions, noting that the Western revolutions have a more evident sequence of stages compared to the Eastern revolutions (Huntington, 1968).

  25. 25.

    Its predecessor, the collection Vekhi [Landmarks] will be described below.

  26. 26.

    However, Trotsky himself did not claim to be the first and pointed out in one of his anti-Stalinist articles that it is not easy to determine who was the first to appeal to historical analogy with the Thermidor. Already in 1926, the members of a group who valued ‘democratic centralism’ claimed, ‘The Thermidor is an accomplished fact!’ (Trotsky, 1935).

  27. 27.

    Yet, there were some efforts in this direction, since Oliver Cromwell assigned his son Richard as his successor in the office of Lord Protector.

  28. 28.

    The renewal of the mandate for ten years was enshrined by the referendum on December 21, 1851; the transformation of the presidency into a monarchy—by the referendum on November 21, 1852. The actions of Louis Bonaparte were approved by an overwhelming majority of votes in both referenda. For more details about the referenda of Napoleon III see Chapter “Revolutions, Counterrevolutions, and Democracy” [Grinin & Korotayev, 2022a, in this volume].

  29. 29.

    In particular, Veblen (1973 [1899]) argued that sometimes a leisure class may lose the instinct for self-preservation. For example, that was the case with the Romans during the barbarian invasions in the late Roman Empire. Yet, in a book analysing sociological theories the authors tried to correct Veblen arguing that the leisure class loses not the sense for self-preservation but the ability of self-defence, that is, that the Romans probably forgot how to protect themselves, that is forgot how to do it since the barbarians had replaced them everywhere (Adams & Sydie, 2002: 253).

  30. 30.

    Perhaps in February 1917 the Russian supreme generalship supported the czar's demise, having a strange belief that the beginning of the revolution would strengthen the mood to continue the war (at least such an explanation was given by Admiral Alexander V. Kolchak, which can be found in the records of his interrogations [Starikov, 2014]). The awareness of the mistake came some time later when the defensism policy was substituted with defeatist moods and immediate peace-making.

  31. 31.

    Huntington (1968) also notes that on the eve of revolution the former elite “loses will to power.”.

  32. 32.

    It is remarkable that Louis XVI, the king, still ordered the Life Guards to disperse the disobedient deputies, but when the guards tried to enter the Hall of Minor Pleasures where they gathered, Marquis de La Fayette and some remaining noblemen blocked their route with swords in their hands. About the elite's strange behavior on the eve and during the French Revolution see, e.g., Furet and Richet (1970), Furet (1981, 1996).

  33. 33.

    For an interesting analysis of this miscellany see Eidelman (n.d.).

  34. 34.

    In 1922, a great number of philosophers and publicists were sent abroad by the Soviet government on the so-called Philosophers’ ship.

  35. 35.

    In Chapter “Revolutionary Waves and Lines of the Twentieth Century” (Grinin & Grinin, 2022, in this volume) we discuss the pressure from the American president James Carter who under influence of democratic ideology demanded from Iranian shah and the Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza to weaken repressions against opposition. They both did this and in result in the both countries in 1979 revolutions began.

  36. 36.

    Television could be used as a means to evoke sympathy for revolutions in the periphery (or vice versa). Also, the rise of terrorism was not least connected with the spread of television. Rather, the role of the latter was important only in a series of anti-communist revolutions in Europe, when opposition representatives had many supporters on television and actively prepared countries for changes employing the idea of freedom of speech and information.

References

  • Adams, B., & Sydie, R. A. (2002). Classical sociological theory. Pine Forge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Akhmedov, V. (2022). The Syrian revolution. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 707–723). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-978-3-030-86468-2_27

  • Arendt, H. (2006[1963]). On revolution. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjomand, S. A. (1988). The Turban for the crown: The Islamic revolution in Iran. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, D. (2015). Every great revolution is a civil war. In K. M. Baker & D. Edelstein (Eds.), Scripting revolution (pp. 57–68). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baczko, B. (1989). Comment sortir de la terreur? Thermidor et la révolution. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmin, Y. (2022). Revolution in Libya. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 725–738). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_28

  • Bearman, P. S. (1993). Relations into rhetorics: Local elite social structure in Norfolk, England 1540–1640. Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, C. J. (2011). The world-cultural origins of revolutionary waves: Five centuries of European contention. Social Science History, 35(2), 167–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdyaev, N. (1990 [1923]). Filosofiya neravenstva. YMCA-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdyaev, N. (1994 [1909]). Philosophical Verity and Intelligentsia Truth. In M. S. Shatz & J. E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Vekhi [Landmarks] (pp. 1–16). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blos, V. (1906). Frantsuzskaya revolyutsiya. Altshulera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, C. (1965 [1938]). The anatomy of revolution. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, V. (1989). The Polish crisis of 1980–1981 and theories of revolution. In T. Boswell (Ed.), Revolution in the world-system (pp. 167–188). Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T. (1903 [1837]). The French revolution. A history. Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFronzo, J. (1996). Revolutions and revolutionary movements (2nd ed.). Westview .

    Google Scholar 

  • de Maistre, J. M. (1841 [1796]). Considérations sur la France: principe générateur des constitutions politiques, etc. délais de la justice divine. Du pape. De l’église Gallicane. Imprimerie catholique de Migne, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, M., & Higley, J. (1998). Elites, crises, and the origins of regimes. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, J. (1978). Cuba: Order and revolution. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, S. (1986). The impact of the Cuban revolution: A comparative perspective. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 28, 503–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500014031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eidelman, T. (n.d.). “Vekhi” and vekhovtsi. http://files.school-collection.edu.ru/dlrstore/bd86951e-1bd7-ba23-a172-ab89a5ae46d6/1010911A.htm

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (1978). Revolution and the transformation of societies. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1955 [1887]). The condition of the working-class in England. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filin, N. (2022). The green movement in Iran: 2009–2010. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 571–592). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_22

  • Filin, N., Khodunov, A., & Koklikov, V. (2022). Serbian “Otpor” and the color revolutions’ diffusion. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 465–482). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_17

  • Foran, J. (2005). Taking power: On the origins of third world revolutions. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Furet, F. (1981). Interpreting the French revolution. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, F. (1996). The French revolution 1770–1814. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furet, F., & Richet, D. (1970). The French revolution. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon, M. (1994 [1909]). Creative self-consciousness. In M. S. Shatz & J. E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Vekhi [Landmarks] (pp. 51–70). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (1982). The comparative and historical study of revolutions. Annual Review of Sociology, 8(1), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.001155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (1991). Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (2001a). An analytical framework. In M. N. Katz (Ed.), Revolutions: International dimensions (pp. 9–29). CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (2001b). Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 139–187. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A. (2014). Revolutions: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone, J. A., Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. (2022a). Conclusion. How many revolutions will we see in the 21st century? In J. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 1035–1059). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_41

  • Goldstone, J. A., Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. (2022b). Introduction. Changing yet Persistent: Revolutions and Revolutionary Events. In J. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 1–33). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_1

  • Goldstone, J. A., Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. (2022c). The phenomenon and theories of revolutions. In J. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 37–68). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_2

  • Goldstone, J. A., Gurr, T. R., & Moshiri, F. (Eds.). (1991). Revolutions of the late twentieth century. Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (1997). Formatsii i tsivilizatsii. Ch. 2. Filosofiya i Obshchestvo, 2, 5–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2007). Filosofiya, teoriya i sotsiologiya istorii (4th ed.). KomKniga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2010). The role of the individual in history: A reconsideration. Social Evolution & History, 9(2), 95–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2012a). Arabskaya vesna i rekonfiguratsiya Mir-Sistemy. In A. Korotayev, J. Zinkina, & A. Khodunov (Eds.), Sistemnyy monitoring globalnykh i regionalnykh riskov (pp. 188–223). Librokom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2012b). Macrohistory and globalization. Uchitel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2012c). Ot Konfutsiya do Konta. Stanovleniye teorii, metodologii i filosofii istorii. LIBROKOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2012d). State and socio-political crises in the process of modernization. Cliodynamics: The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History, 3(1), 124–157. https://doi.org/10.21237/C7clio3112323

  • Grinin, L. (2013). State and socio-political crises in the process of modernization. Social Evolution & History, 12(2), 35–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2014). Ukrainskoye gosudarstvo kak nezavershenniy politicheskiy proekt: Fragmentarnoe proshloe, krizisnoe nastoyashchee, neyasnoe budushchee. Istoricheskaya Psikhologiya i Sotsiologiya Istorii, 7(1), 5–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2016). Evolution of world order. In L. Grinin & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Evolution and big history: dimensions, trends, and forecasts (pp. 75–95). Uchitel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2017a). Rossiyskaya revolyutsiya v svete teorii modernizatsii. Istoriya i Sovremennost’, 2, 22–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2017b). Revolyutsii i istoricheskiy protsess. Filosofiya i Obshchestvo, 3, 5–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2017c). Revolyutsiya v Rossii i transformatsiya Mir-Sistemy. Vek Globalizatsii, 3, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2017d). Revolutsii. Vzglyad na pyatisotletniy trend. Istoricheskaya Psikhologia i Sotsiologia Istorii, 2, 5–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2018a). Revolutions: An insight into a five centuries’ trend. Social Evolution & History, 17(2), 171–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2018b). Revolutions and historical process. Journal of Globalization Studies, 9(2), 126–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2019). Revolutions in the light of historical process. Social Evolution & History, 18(2), 260–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L. (2020). Slozhilas’ li v Amerike revolyutsionnaya situatsiya. Vek globalizatsii, 3, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.30884/vglob/2020.03.03

  • Grinin, L. (2022a). Evolution and typology of revolutions. In J. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 173–200). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_6

  • Grinin, L. (2022b). On revolutionary waves since the 16th century. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 389–411). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_13

  • Grinin, L. (2022c). Revolution and modernization traps. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 219–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_8

  • Grinin, L. (2022d). Revolutions and historical process. In J. A.Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 139–171). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_5

  • Grinin, L. (2022e). Revolutions of the 21st century as a factor in the World System reconfiguration. In J. A.Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 975–998). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_38

  • Grinin, L. (2022f). The European revolutions and revolutionary waves of the 19th century: Their causes and consequences. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 281–313). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_11

  • Grinin, L., & Grinin, A. (2020). Revolutions of the 20th century: A theoretical-quantitative analysis. Polis (Russian Federation), 5, 130–147. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.05.10

  • Grinin, L., & Grinin, A. (2022). Revolutionary waves and lines of the 20th century. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 315–388). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_12

  • Grinin, L., Ilyin, I., & Andreev, A. (2016a). World order in the past, present, and future. Social Evolution & History, 15(1), 58–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L., Issaev, L. M., & Korotayev, A. (2016b). Revolyutsii i nestabil’nost’ na Blizhnem Vostoke (2nd ed.). Uchitel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2012). Does “Arab Spring” mean the beginning of world system reconfiguration? World Futures: THe Journal of Global Education, 68(7), 471–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2012.697836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2014). Revolyutsiya vs demokratiya (revolyutsiya i kontrrevolyutsiya v Egipte). Polis. Politicheskiye Issledovaniya, 3, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2016a). MENA region and the possible beginning of world system reconfiguration. In M. Mustafa Erdoğdu & B. Christiansen (Eds.), Comparative political and economic perspectives on the MENA region(pp. 28–58). Information Science Reference, An Imprint of IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2016b). Revolution and democracy: Socio-political systems in the context of modernization. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 10(3), 118–139. http://www.cejiss.org/issue-detail/revolution-and-democracy-socio-political-systems-in-the-context-of-modernisation

  • Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. (2016c). Revolyutsii kak osobaya stadiya razvitiya obshchestva i Arabskaya vesna. In L. Grinin, A. Korotayev, L. Issayev, & K. Meshcherina (Eds.), Sistemniy monitoring global’nykh i regional’nykh riskov: Arabskaya vesna v global’nom kontekste (pp. 157–190). Uchitel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2022a). Revolutions, counterrevolutions, and democracy. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 105–136). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_4

  • Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. (2022b). The Arab Spring: Causes, conditions, and driving forces. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 595–624). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_23

  • Grinin, L., Korotayev, A., Issaev, L. M., & Shishkina, A. R. (2015). Vvedenie. Rekonfiguratsiya Mir-Sistemy i usileniye kreditnykh soglasheniy nestabil'nosti. In L. Grinin, A. Korotayev, L. M. Issayev, & A. R. Shishkina (Eds.), Sistemniy monitoring global’nykh i svyazannykh riskov: Ukrainskiy razlom (pp. 4–19). Uchitel’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinin, L., Korotayev, A., & Tausch, A. (2019). Islamism, Arab Spring, and the future of democracy. World System and world values perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91077-2

  • Gurr, T. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. R. (1995). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, M. N. (1975). The phenomenon of revolution. Dodd Mead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberle, R. (1951). Social movements: An introduction to political sociology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higley, J., & Burton, M. (1989). The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns. American Sociological Review, 54, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1996). The age of revolution: Europe, 1789–1848. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, J. (1997). Democratization and revolution in the USSR 1985–1991. Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1986). Revolution and political order. In J. A. Goldstone (Ed.), Revolutions: Theoretical, comparative, and historical studies (pp. 39–47). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. (1991). The third wave. Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibn-Khaldun. (1980). Prolegomeny k “Knige pouchitel'nykh primerov …” In A. A. Ignatenko, Ibn-Khal’dun (pp. 121–155). Mysl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kara-Murza, S., Telegin, S., Aleksandrov, A., & Murashkin, M. (2005). Eksport revolyutsii. Saakashvili, Yushchenko … Algoritm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. N. (2001). The international dimensions of revolution: An introduction. In M. N. Katz (Ed.), Revolutions: International dimensions. CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khawaja, M. (1993). Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the West Bank. Sociological Forum, 8, 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kileff, C., & Robinson, L. W. (1986). The elitist thesis and the Rhodesian revolution: Implications for South Africa. In M. I. Midlarsky (Ed.), Inequality and contemporary revolutions (pp. 111–123). University Denver Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A. (1986). The Mexican revolution, 2 vols. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korotayev, A., Shishkina, A., & Khokhlova, A. (2022). Global echo of the Arab Spring. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 813–849). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_31

  • Krejci, J. (1995). Great revolutions compared: The outline of a theory. Harvester and Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropotkin, P. (2009 [1909]). The great French revolution 1789–1793. Cosimo Classics. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/petr-kropotkin-the-great-french-revolution-1789-1793

  • Kurzman, C. (1996). Structural opportunity and perceived opportunity in social-movement theory. American Sociological Review, 61, 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, R. (1997). Agents of revolution: Elite conflicts and mass mobilization from the Medici to Yeltsin. In O. Foran (Ed.), Theorizing revolutions (pp. 73–101). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, G. (2015). Revolutions and the international. Theory and Society, 44, 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9251-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, G. (2016). Within and beyond the “fourth generation” of revolutionary theory. Sociological Theory, 34(2), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275116649221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. (1970 [1920]) ‘Left-wing’ communism, an infantile disorder. Foreign Languages Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. (1974 [1915]). The collapse of the second international. In V. Lenin (auth) Collected works (Vol. 21, pp. 205–259). Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, M. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 266–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfred, A. Z. (1974). Frantsuzskaya burzhuaznaya revolyutsiya kontsa XVIII veka. In E. M. Zhukov (Ed.), Sovetskaya istoricheskaya entsiklopediya: in 16 vols (Vol. 15, pp. 370–383). Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2000 [1852]). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In D. McLellan (Ed.), Selected writings (pp. 329–355). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, V., & Starodubrovskaya, I. (2001). The challenge of revolution: Contemporary Russia in historical perspective. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mignet, F.-A. (1824). Histoire de la Révolution française. Firmin Didot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, L. A. (2022). The “color” revolutions. Successes and limitations of non-violent protest. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 435–445). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_15

  • Moore, W. H. (1998). Repression and dissent: Substitution, context, and timing. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 851–873. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, J. (1991). State repression and collective action in South Africa, 1970–1984. South African Journal of Sociology, 22, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J. M. (1975). Agrarian revolution. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J. M. (1989). Revolution and the agrarian bourgeoisie in Nicaragua. In T. Boswell (Ed.), Revolution in the world-system (pp. 99–128). Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panah, M. (2002). Social revolution: The elusive emergence of an agenda in international relations. Review of International Studies, 28(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210502002711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsa, M. (2000). States, ideologies, and social revolutions. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pettee, G. (1938). The process of revolution. Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettee, G. (1966). Revolution—Typology and process. In C. J. Friedrich (Ed.), Revolution: Yearbook of the American society for political and legal philosophy (pp. 10–33). Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polyakova, N. V. (2014). “Zakon Termidora”: Traditsii i novatsii. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya, 3, 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasler, K. (1996). Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review, 61, 132–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozov, N. (2022). Typology and principles of dynamics of revolutionary waves in world history. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 241–264). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_9

  • Sanderson, S. K. (2010). Revolutions. A Worldwide introduction to social and political contention (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevsky, D. (2022). Euromaidan revolution in Ukraine. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 851–863). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_32

  • Shults, E. E. (2016). Teoriya revolyutsii. Revolyutsii i sovremennye tsivilizatsii. LENAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T., & Trimberger, E. K. (1994). Revolutions and the world-historical development of capitalism. In T. Skocpol (Ed.), Social revolution in the modern world. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, R. (1998). Paths out of Sultanistic regimes: Combining structural and voluntarist perspectives. In H. E. Chehabi & J. J. Linz (Eds.), Sultanistic Regimes (pp. 49–81). Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. (1925). The sociology of revolution. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. A. (1992a). Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obshchestvo. Politizdat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin, P. A. (1992b). Sotsiologiya revolyutsii. In P. A. Sorokin (Ed.), Chelovek. Tsivilizatsii. Obschestvo (pp. 266–294)

    Google Scholar 

  • Starikov, N. (2014). Admiral Kolchak. Protokoly doprosa. Piter, Saint Petersburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Diaries … (1991). Dnevniki imperatora Nikolaya II. ORBITA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1986). Does modernization breed revolution? In J. A.Goldstone (Ed.), Revolutions: Theoretical, comparative, and historical studies (pp. 47–57). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1996). European revolutions, 1492–1992. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tkachuk, M., Romanchuk, A., Timotin, I. (2022). ‘Moldovan Spring’ 2009. The atypical ‘revolution’ of April 7 and the days that followed. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 549–569). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_21

  • Trotskiy, L. D. (1935). Rabochee gosudarstvo, termidor i bonapartizm. Byulleten’ oppozitsii (bol’shevikov-lenintsev) 43. In L. D. Trotskiy (Ed.), Protiv Stalina: dvenadtsat’ let oppozitsii (Stat’i, rechi i pis’ma L. Trotskogo iz “Byulletenya oppozitsii”, iyul’ 1929—avgust 1941). http://magister.msk.ru/library/trotsky/trotm235.htm

  • Tsygankov, V. (2022) Revolutionary waves of the Early Modern period. Types and phases. In J. A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Eds.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 265–279). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_10

  • Ustryalov, N. (1921). Patriotica. Smena vekh: sb. Praga. http://lib.ru/POLITOLOG/USTRYALOV/patriotica.txt

  • Veblen, T. (1973 [1899]). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vekhi. (1909). Sbornik statey o russkoy intelligentsii. http://imwerden.de/pdf/vehi_1909.pdf

  • Walton, J. (1984). Reluctant rebels: Comparative studies of revolution and underdevelopment. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weede, E. (1987). Some new evidence on correlates of political violence: Income inequality, regime repressiveness, and economic development. European Sociological Review, 3, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham-Crowley, T. (1989). Winners, losers, and also-rans: Toward a comparative sociology of Latin American guerrilla movements. In S. Eckstein (Ed.), Power and popular protest: Latin American social movements (pp. 132–181). Univ. Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. (1968). Zapata and the Mexican revolution. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This chapter is an output of a research project implemented as part of the Basic Research Program at the HSE University in 2022 with support by the Russian Science Foundation (Project No. 18-18-00254).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grinin, L. (2022). On Revolutionary Situations, Stages of Revolution, and Some Other Aspects of the Theory of Revolution. In: Goldstone, J.A., Grinin, L., Korotayev, A. (eds) Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics