Abstract
Plant pathogens represent one of the prime threats to sustainable crop production. Till date, synthetic agrochemicals are considered as effective tools for the management of various biotic stresses such as pathogenic microorganisms and insects in plants. Unfortunately, their injudicious and intensive usages in agriculture pose a serious threat to the environment and all living beings dwelling on the earth. Under such circumstances, the application of beneficial Bacillus-mediated management of plant pathogens has emerged as one of the most benevolent and sustainable options. A large number of Bacillus species has been identified as promising candidates for managing a number of plant pathogens through induction of systemic resistance in plants. Significant research progress has been attained in the characterisation and understanding of the role of Bacillus-induced systemic resistance (ISR) against a wide range of pathogens of crop plants. In this chapter, we aim to provide an overview of the mechanisms of Bacillus-induced ISR for instance, elicitors, phytoalexins, lipopeptides, antibiotics, hormones and enzymes to protect plants from various pests. Additionally, glimpses of the research progress in the identification of different Bacillus strains and their evaluation as a potential biocontrol agent have also been presented.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
6.1 Introduction
Steady increase in crop yield to feed the ever-increasing population is the greatest challenge faced by the agriculturists worldwide. Apart from factors such as nutrient supply, soil conditions, moisture, degrading cultivable land, and cultivar quality, biotic stresses pose a huge threat to the food security of the ever-increasing global population (Wulff et al. 2011; Islam et al. 2016a, b, 2019a, 2020). Although practices like crop rotation, use of chemical pesticides, and development of better cultivar have been utilised for the management of emerging diseases, these approaches are no longer ecologically and economically sustainable. Thus, application of beneficial microorganisms have emerged as a suitable alternative to the pre-existing traditional approaches (Hardoim et al. 2015). Coordination between microbiota and root endodermis supports plant mineral nutrient homeostasis (Salas-González et al. 2020). Among the beneficial microorganisms studied so far, Bacillus spp. have been observed to perform especially well not only in managing diseases but also in increasing nutrient availability, enhancing plant growth, improving beneficial microbial community in the rhizosphere, and inducing sustained defence reactions in the plant (Islam et al. 2016a, b, 2019b).
Bacillus is a genus of Gram-positive and endospore-forming bacteria, which is cosmopolitan in nature and widely spread across a diverse range of environments. They occur naturally in crop fields and aid in crop productivity both directly and indirectly. Inherent traits like durable cell wall, formation of endospores, peptide and antibiotic secretion, and production of antimicrobial enzymes play a significant role in the survival of these ubiquitous organisms even in a highly adverse situation.
A large body of research on the Bacillus species has attributed its success in the production of antibiotics and lipopeptides, quorum quenching, lysis of pathogen hyphae, competition for space and nutrients, and induced systemic resistance (Li et al. 2013; Islam et al. 2016a, b, 2019a, b; Surovy et al. 2019; Rayanoothala et al. 2020). Furthermore, Bacillus spp. increase nutrient uptake, siderophore production, and promote plant growth. For example, B. subtilis increases N uptake, phosphate solubilisation, and siderophore and phytohormone production, and promotes plant growth. Bacillus species has also been observed to alter the microbial community in the rhizosphere which facilitated disease suppression (You et al. 2016; Mahapatra et al. 2020).
This chapter aims to review the current understanding of the induction of resistance mechanism in host plant by Bacillus species. It deals with the various mechanisms employed by Bacillus species to suppress the phytopathogens in the plant rhizosphere and phyllosphere. It also discusses the genomic and molecular bases of disease resistance in plants imparted by the Bacillus species. Finally, it summarises the field application of Bacillus-based formulation, its prospects and challenges. This report also tries to bridge the knowledge gap and help to develop Bacillus species as a reliable and effective strategy for the management of emerging pests and diseases.
6.2 Bacillus Diversity and Antagonism
The type of soil plays a crucial role in the management of phytopathogens. Suppressive soils contain a large number of beneficial microbes that are able to inhibit the growth of bacterial and fungal pathogens. Among the biocontrol agents, the Pseudomonas genus has been most extensively studied for its anti-fungal metabolites (AFMs) such as pyrrolnitrin, phenazines, pyoluteorin, 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (DAPG), and viscosinamide (Nielsen et al. 1999; Nielsen et al. 2000). However, Bacillus species has gained popularity in the recent years due to its production of a wide array of antimicrobial substances and the ability of certain strains to promote plant growth (Choudhary and Johri, 2008). A large number of cultivable strains of B. cereus and B. subtilis have been identified in different studies (Vargas-Ayala et al. 2000), while cultivation-independent studies have demonstrated the existence of a much more number of uncultivable strains of Bacillus spp. (McSpadden Gardener 2004).
Some studies have found B. megatarium to be the most abundantly available species, while some researchers observed Paenibacillus, previously known as Bacillus polymyxa, to dominate a variety of soils. Paenibacillus has the ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen and thus are helpful in meeting the N requirement of a large number of crop plants like Canadian wheat (Priest 1993). Brevibacillus, previously known as Bacillus brevis, is terrestrial and aquatic in nature (Panda et al. 2014). A member of the Bacillus species, B. sphaericus is a notable entomopathogen and thus thrives in the habitats of insect larvae like pools, ditches, and lakes (El-Bendary 2006).
Spatiotemporal analysis of the microbial communities in soil, rhizoplane, and rhizosphere revealed that soil type had greater effect than plant type in determining the microbial population diversity (Wieland et al. 2001). Arias et al. (1999) studied the distribution and diversity of Bacillus spp. in the soybean phylloplane. Their study revealed that B. pumilus is the most widely distributed species in the soybean phylloplane. Although other bacterial strains like B. brevis, B. subtilis , B. circulans, and B. firmus were also observed in the phylloplane, their population continued to decline with the growth of the crop and became completely undetectable at 85 days of the cropping season. As mentioned earlier, Paenibacillus genus contains many nitrogen fixing bacterial species, like P. azotofixans, P. polymyxa, and P. macerans (Ash et al. 1993). But amongst all the reported species, P. azotofixans has been found to be the most efficient, and hence, is abundant in the rhizosphere of wheat, maize, sorghum, banana, sugarcane, and some forage crops (Seldin 1992). P. azotofixans is more abundant in bulk soil than the rhizosphere, while its population varied largely with the soil type in the same crop rhizosphere (Rosado et al. 1998, Seldin et al. 1998).
The distribution and diversity of the Bacillus species is largely dependent on the interaction between the soil and the plant. The exudates from the plant roots, which play a significant role in determining the microbial distribution, are specific to the plant and are also correlated to a particular soil habitat (Crowley and Rengel 1999; Duineveld et al. 2001). The exudates vary with the stage of the crop as well, which is reflected in the findings of Jaegar and co-workers. The growth stage of the crop could be a crucial factor in determining the rhizobacterial community, as observed by Van Overbreek and van Elsas (2008) in potato. It has been observed that plants encourage the growth of specific microorganisms, from the indefinite microdiversity based on the chemical influences in the rhizosphere. Thus the manipulation of the chemical constituents of the rhizosphere could be done to encourage the growth of promising Bacillus strains among the rhizospheric community of microorganisms.
6.3 Mechanism of Induction of Resistance Against Plant Disease by Bacillus spp.
When Bacillus is introduced in the host-pathogen-environment system, it interacts with all the components in a number of complex mechanisms that affect the growth of the phytopathogen directly or indirectly. These interactions may lead to plant growth promotion, biofilm formation, induced systemic resistance (ISR), competition for nutrients, production of antibiotics, and cell lysis (Fig. 6.1). Strains of Bacillus spp. have been recorded to exhibit one or more of these traits that work synergistically with the plant and the environment in suppressing the phytopathogens. Furthermore, these interactions may lead to increased plant growth, vigour, and a shift in the rhizospheric microbial community, which would indirectly reduce the impact of the plant pathogens on the host plant.
6.3.1 Competition for Nutrients
Nutrients are always limiting factors for the growth and development of microorganisms and plants in the any crop fields. Biological control aims at utilizing this competition for nutrient and space to reduce the growth and productiveness of the pathogen by the non-pathogenic organisms. Generally, soil-borne pathogens like Fusarium and Pythium infect through mycelial contact, which makes them more vulnerable to competition from the non-pathogenic organisms. Micronutrients, such as iron, are extremely essential but its availability is limited and largely dependent on the soil conditions. In such situations, microbes produce siderophores, which are capable of attracting iron from the rhizosphere, thus meeting the iron requirement of the microorganism (Chakraborty et al. 2020a, b). In many instances, Bacillus has been found to compete with pathogenic microbes, such as Erwinia carotovora, by a similar mechanism, hence, restricting the growth and the development of the pathogen (Kloepper et al. 2004a, b). Studies also revealed that the inoculation of Bacillus sp. in the rhizosphere resulted in a shift of the pathogenic microflora from the site of infection. Bacillus species was reported to cause rapid colonisation in the tissues of tomato plant, which reduced the disease severity and wilting index of Fusarium sp. in the host plant (Jangir et al. 2018). Similar results were obtained by Zhang and co-workers (2011) when working with Fusarium wilt of banana. They found that Bacillus was a rapid coloniser under hydroponic, sand and soil conditions, which inhibited the development of Fusarium sp. in the treated banana plant. Many studies have been conducted on the role of competition and colonisation in establishing Bacillus species as successful bio-control agents (Table 6.1).
6.3.2 Synthesis and Excretion of Lytic Enzymes
Aside from the production of lipoproteins and antibiotics, Bacillus has been known to produce a number of defense-related oxidative enzymes like peroxidase (PO) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO), which bring about structural changes in the host cell wall, thus strengthening the defense barriers against the invading pathogen. Several studies conducted so far have revealed that Bacillus synthesizes a large number of phytosanitary enzymes, which are enlisted in Table 6.2. Phenol oxidase enzymes produce quinones and release hydrogen peroxide. These enzymes trigger the release of toxic free radicals and polymerise the phenolic compounds into lignin like substances. The resulted metabolites are then deposited in the host cell wall, which affect the growth of the pathogen. In many instances, Bacillus spp. have been found to be highly effective in the production of these oxidative enzymes. According to a study by Ramyabharathi et al. (2012), the liquid formulation of B. subtilis EPCO16 was capable of eliciting defense related enzymes like catalase and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) in tomato plants infected with F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Spectrophotometric analysis of plants revealed the activity of defense enzymes at their highest on the seventh day after inoculation by the pathogen.
Chitin is an important polysaccharide, which imparts structural rigidity and integrity to the fungal cell wall. But, the presence of hydrolysing enzymes like chitinase and glucanase breaks down the glycosidic bonds holding the constituting polysaccharides together, that leads to cell leakage and cell lysis. Many species of the Bacillus spp. are known to produce chitinolytic enzymes and suppress the phytopathogens (Podile and Prakash 1996). Wang et al. (2004) observed that two types of chitinase were produced by B. amyloliquefaciens V656, which were highly effective in inhibiting the growth of F. oxysporum growth. B. thuringiensis is known to inhibit the growth of Sclerotium rolfsii in soybean plant by a similar mechanism. Studies by Liu et al. (2010) revealed the production of chitinase from B. thuringiensis sub sp. colmeri, which was instrumental in preventing spore germination of various phytopathogenic fungi. Generally, bacteria possess a variety of chitinases for breaking down the wide array of chitin molecules that naturally exist in nature. Ruiz-Sanchez (2007) observed that five different types of chitinase (with 42, 49, 53, 62, and 66 kDa) were synthesised by B. licheniformis.
6.3.3 Production of Lipopeptides and Antibiotics
Bacillus spp. are considered to be the producers of a vast array of antimicrobial compounds such as bacillomycin and zwittermycin A (Mondol et al. 2013). According to studies, 4-5% of the Bacillus genome is devoted for the production of antimicrobial compounds (Stein 2005). Among these compounds, lipopepetides of the surfactins, iturins, and fengycin group are most widely studied. Surfactins are antiviral, antibacterial agents, while iturins and fengycins, also known as plipastatins, exhibit highly effective antifungal activities. The lipopeptides (LPs) interact with the each other in a synergistic way, and bring about an alteration of the cell membrane permeability of the microorganisms. The LPs produced by Bacillus are non-ribosomal in nature and are produced by non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) or hybrid polyketide synthases and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (PKSs/NRPSs). The efficacy of biocontrol of plant diseases by lipopeptides produced by Bacillus spp. is well established (Chakraborty et al. 2020a, b).
The surfactins are excellent biosurfactants, with notable foaming ability. They attach themselves to the lipid layers, and thus hamper the integrity of the microbial membranes. The surfactins induce pore formation, which is followed by complete solubilisation and disruption of the membranes. Studies also reveal that the surfactins are unable to function in the presence of cholesterol in the phospholipid bilayer, which explains why they are inactive as antifungal compounds (Meena and Kanwar 2015).
Iturins are a group of heptapepetides linked to a β-amino fatty acid chain. They are named so after their place of discovery, Ituri, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The family of iturins mainly include iturins A, C, D, and E; bacillopeptin; bacillomycins D, F, L and LC; and mycosubtilin (Mnif and Ghribi 2015). They are highly fungitoxic in nature but with limited antiviral and antibacterial activity. The iturins are known to form ion-conducting pores, which lead to the permeablilisation of the membranes, leading to fungal toxicity.
The fengycins, also known as plipastatins , are a group of lipodecapeptides attached to a β hydroxy fatty acid chain (Wang et al. 2015). Fengycins are highly fungitoxic in nature, especially against filamentous fungi; however, they are less effective as compared to surfactins and iturins. The mechanism of fungitoxicity of the fengycins is elusive so far. However, these natural compounds have been shown to induce structural imbalance in the microbial membrane (Ongena and Jacques, 2008). Other antibiotics produced by Bacillus species include bacteriocins, bacillaene, difficidin, oxidifficidin, sporulenes A–C, bacisubin, and bacilysocin. All these antibiotics exhibit antifungal and antibacterial activity at varying levels of concentrations.
The antibiotics produced by Bacillus have a crucial role in its biocontrol activities. The LPs are attributed to biofilm formation by the bacteria in the soil and water surfaces. They bring about the flagella-driven motility of the bacteria, leading to biofilm spread over the plant and soil surfaces. They are also responsible for reducing the surface tension, which helps in further spread of the bacteria. Bais and collaborators (2004) reported that B subtilis strain 6051 produced surfactin molecules that resulted in biofilm formation in the roots of Arabidopsis plant.
It has been reported by Asaka and his co-workers (1996) that B subtilis strain RB14 produces iturin A, which is instrumental in inhibiting the growth of Rhizoctonia solani in tomato. Leclere and co-workers (2005) found that mycosubtillin, produced by B. subtilis ATCC, helps in the reduction of Pythium aphanidermatum infection. The combined role of fengycin and iturin in inhibiting the growth of Podosphaera fusca in melon leaves was demonstrated by Romero and co-workers (2007). Ongena and Jacques (2008) observed that B. subtilis S499 produces all three families of LPs that help in the management of plant diseases by this strain. This strain also inhibits the growth of Botrytis cinerea in wounded apple fruits by the production of lipopeptide-enriched extracts, which contained high doses of fengycins in it.
The production of antibiotics was also linked to the induction of defense reactions in a number of treated plants. In tomato and bean, fengycins and surfactins were directly attributed to induce ISR . B subtilis S499 inhibited the growth of Colletotrichum lagenarium in cucumber plants by the stimulation of systemic resistance. Potato tubers exhibited an accumulation of phenolics when being treated with purified fengycins, which activate the phenylpropanoid pathway. The activation of phenylpropanoid pathway leads to the accumulation of mRNAs, encoding phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL).
Although the antibiotics are highly potent in inhibiting the growth of harmful microorganisms, they have not been reported to produce any phytotoxicity in the host plants. These compounds are able to induce a cascade of biochemical reactions that stimulated the defense system of the plant against the pathogen, without causing any adverse effects on the cellular integrity of the plant. Researchers believed that the differing compositions of phytosterol from that of bacterial and fungal compositions are mainly responsible for the attenuation of the disruption of plant membranes.
6.4 Induction of Resistance in Plants
Several lines of evidence suggest that strains of Bacillus spp. elicit systemic resistance in the plants. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) was elicited in plants by Bacillus spp. in response to a number of biotic stresses like fungi, bacteria, viruses, nematodes, and insects. Bacillus spp. produce LPs which are considered to be the key components in ISR elicitation in plants (Rahman et al. 2015). The ISR modulates a number of cytological and biochemical processes in the host plant such as lignin deposition in the plant cell wall, production of phytoalexins, and synthesis of other antimicrobial substances like peroxidases and β-1, 3-glucanases (GarcíaGutiérrez et al. 2013). Among the LPs produced, surfactin is essential for ISR elicitation as observed by Chowdhury and his collaborators in 2015. As discussed earlier, the iturin and surfactin family of lipopepetides are highly effective in suppressing phytopathogens. After analysis of gene expression, it was observed that surfactin activated salicylic acid (SA) regulated pathway, while mycosubtillin of the iturin family, had the ability to activate both jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) pathways in grapevine (Farace et al. 2015). Similar results were observed in strawberry, which helped in the successful inhibition of Colletotrichum gleosporioides (Yamamoto et al. 2015). The role of LPs was also demonstrated in maize (Gond et al. 2015), rice (Chandler et al. 2015), and tomato (Abdallah et al. 2017). The ISR generally leads to plant growth promotion as seen in strain B. subtilis 21-1. Lee and his co-workers (2014) observed that B. subtilis 21-1 helps in disease suppression of vegetable crops, by activating the plant defense system, as well as helps in plant growth promotion. It can be concluded that B. subtilis elicited plant defense system and growth promotion of the host, which collaborates to inhibit the phytopathogens.
The phytopathogens differ considerably in their morphology and cellular compositions. Hence, Bacillus employs different mechanisms against these phytopathogens (Fig. 6.2). It synthesises lipopeptides against some, while it produces enzymes for managing other pathogens. A brief description of the mechanisms used by Bacillus against phytopathogens is provided in the following section.
6.4.1 Bacillus Against Fungi
Extensive research has been conducted on the mechanism of Bacillus for the inhibition of fungal growth. Chitin forms a major constituent of the cell wall of all pathogenic fungi; hence, biocontrol agents such as Trichoderma, Alteromonas, and Serratia produce different type of chitinases (Elad et al. 1982). Bacillus has also been reported to produce chitinolytic enzymes for lysing the fungal cell wall (Mitchell and Alexander, 1962). Bacillus species was observed to reduce the radial growth of Penicillium sp. (72%), Aspergillus niger (64.58%), Aspergillus fumigatus (51.61%), Fusarium sp. (39.13%), Curvularia sp. (37.50%), Aspergillus flavus (35.43%), and Alternaria sp. (31.82%), after 6 days of incubation. The inhibitory action was attributed to chitinolytic activity and hyperparasitism as concluded by Basha and Ulaganathan (2002). It was observed by Bargabus et al. (2002, 2004) that B. mycoides isolate BacJ and B. pumilus isolate 203–7 were highly effective in controlling the Cercospora leaf spot of sugar beet to a considerable extent.
Studies revealed that many Bacillus strains such as B. lentimorbus and B. cereus are able to inhibit the development of coffee rust. It has been observed that the bacterium prevented the pathogen from developing uredospores, which resulted in suppression of the pathogen up to 50% (Shiomi et al. 2006). The wide array of volatile compounds produced by B. velezensis ZSY-1 was studied by Gao et al. in 2017. They observed that these compounds possessed significant antifungal activities. Bacillus was able to inhibit the growth of B. cinerea, Monilinia fructicola, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, Alternaria solani, and F. oxysporum f. sp. capsicum. It was also observed that benzothiazole, pyrazine, and phenolic compounds played a crucial role in inhibiting fungal diseases in tomato such as grey mould and early blight.
6.4.2 Bacillus Against Nematodes
Limited studies have been conducted on the interaction between Bacillus and plant pathogenic nematodes. In some instances, the involvement of LPs has been correlated with the reduction in nematode infestation (Hallmann 2001). Hallmann (2001) observed that bacterial endophytes successfully inhibit the infestation of Meloidogyne incognita through extensive root colonisation and elicitation of ISR in the host plant. Reitz et al. (2000) observed that the bacterial endophytes, including Bacillus, produced a number of lipopeptides, which successfully controlled potato cyst nematode, Globodera pallida. Hallmann and his co-workers (1997) studied the role of endophytic bacteria in inhibiting root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, in cotton roots. They also observed that the nematodes helped the endophytic bacteria in entering the host plant which aided in successful colonisation of the plant roots. Mendoza and Sikora (2009) observed a significant reduction in Radopholus similis infestation in banana plants, when a combined treatment of B. firmus and F. oxysporum was applied on the banana plant.
6.4.3 Bacillus Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phytopathogenic bacteria communicate among each other by the production of density-dependent autoinducers (AI), which is known as quorum sensing. Quorum sensing plays a crucial role in establishing the virulence factors in bacteria, which determines the disease severity. In the case of Gram-negative bacteria, N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHL) are mostly used as signalling molecules during quorum sensing. Bacillus species , however, have the ability to produce quorum quenching molecules that modify the AIs and hinder the bacterial signalling, thus affecting the virulence of the pathogen. Bacillus possesses aiiA gene encoding N-acyl homoserine lactonase (AiiA) enzyme , which brings about the hydrolysis of AHLs. Bacillus species, such as B. cereus, B. subtilis , B. firmus, and B. toyonensis, have been known to suppress a number of plant pathogenic bacteria by inhibiting quorum sensing, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and Pectobacterium carotovorum (Erwinia carotovora). In addition to directly using the AiiA-producing Bacillus species to suppress the virulence of phytopathogenic bacteria (Dong et al. 2004), aiiA can be heterologously expressed in other bacterial strains (Molina et al. 2003) or in genetically modified plants (Ouyang and Li 2016).
6.4.4 Bacillus Against Viral Phytopathogens
Bacillus species has been found to provide resistance in plants against many viruses, such as Tomato Mottle Virus (ToMov) and cucumber mosaic virus. The application of Bacillus leads to the reduction in visible symptoms as well as reduced viral accumulation as is evident from ELISA analysis (Murphy et al. 2000). Some studies indicate that the Bacillus species results in an accumulation of IAA, leading to growth enhancement in the plants, that results in systemic protection against the virus as observed by Murphy and his co-workers (2000), in tomato against CMV. However, according to some researchers, Bacillus elicits ISR in the virus affected plants, that triggers the expression of PR genes, leading to an accumulation of PR proteins like chitinase and β 1,3-glucanase, as observed by Wang et al. (2009) in tobacco plant against TMV. It is known that NPR1 regulates SAR and ISR resistance pathways while Coi1 regulated ISR pathway. Bacillus species has been observed to induce the expression of both NPR1 and Coi1 genes in the TMV-resistant tobacco plants, indicating a correlation between the gene expression and disease resistance.
6.5 Genomics and Molecular Basis of Induction Resistance by Bacillus on Plant
Bacillus has been known to produce a number of antimicrobial compounds that aid in plant disease management. B. subtilis has been considered to be a model microorganism for the analysis of gene functions, as it encodes for a number of antibiotics and lytic enzymes in order to manage phytopathogens. Research on the genomics and molecular basis of resistance induction may help in the development of biologically feasible weapons against plant diseases. Fungal cell walls are made of chitin that provides mechanical strength to the fungus. According to a study, B. subtilis CHU26, isolated from a potato field in Taiwan, exhibited strong chitinase activity in vitro, that was successful in inhibiting the growth of Rhizoctonia solani. Further investigations revealed the presence of chitinase encoding gene chi18 that was responsible for this antimicrobial activity (Yang et al. 2009).
Hydrogen peroxide is known to exhibit cytotoxic activity in organisms by the production of hydroxyl radicals that react to lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. However, B. subtilis has been able to mitigate the H2O2 stress by the production of enzymes catalase and an alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, encoded by genes katA and ahpC, respectively (Broden et al. 2016).
For evaluating the role of Bacillus in stimulation of ISR , Lee and co-workers (2015) studied strain HK34 of B. amyloliquefaciens against Phytophthora cactorum by applying Bacillus on the leaves and roots of Panax ginseng. It was observed that the bacterium was able to reduce the pathogen growth up to 99.1%. The inhibition of the pathogen was found to correlate with the expression of PgCAT, PgPR5, and PgPR10 genes. These outcomes showed the ISR-eliciting potential of strain HK34.
Ryu et al. (2004) worked on the production of volatile compounds, produced by Bacillus species. They observed that B. subtilis GB03 synthesised 2,3-butanediol and 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (acetoin) in abundance, which helped in the induction of ISR . Furthermore, the volatiles produced by the bacteria were controlled by the expression of genes CHIB, GST2, and ERF1, which were known for the biosynthesis of ethylene. Recent studies have been able to discover a number of gene clusters in Bacillus species, which are shown in Table 6.3.
6.6 Commercial Applications of Bacillus Species
Bacillus strains have been utilised commercially for the generation of a variety of products. It is used not only as a potent host for genetic modifications but also as a source of naturally obtained biocontrol compounds (Bunk et al. 2010). Furthermore, Bacillus species produces stress-resistant endospores that contribute towards better environmental stability and longer shelf-life of the products. Among the wide array of Bacillus species discovered so far, B. thuringiensis is the most widely exploited with more than 70% of the market share (Ongena and Jacques 2008). Different companies utilise different mechanisms of the biocontrol agent in developing its products. For example, Bio-Yield, produced by 3Bar Biologics Inc., USA, contains a combination of two Bacillus species, B. amyloliquefaciens GB99 which is responsible for the elicitation of ISR . The B. subtilis GB122 inhibits soil-borne pathogens by the production of lipopeptide iturin. Also the product contains chitosan, which is effective against insects and nematodes (Kloepper et al. 2004a, b). Another product, Yield Shield produced by Bayer CropScience Inc., USA, is composed of B. pumilus GB34, which activates the plant defense system and promotes plant growth as well (Jeong et al. 2014). Similarly, many other Bacillus-based products have been developed commercially that can be utilised for the successful management of phytopathogens (Table 6.4).
6.7 Mode of Application of Bacillus Species
The method of application of the biocontrol agent depends on its mode of action. Among the different methods of application, seed coating is the most extensively used, as it is easy to use and can be applied efficiently with a little quantity of inoculum. When the microbes are introduced as granular applications, the biocontrol agent is applied with a mixture of marble, peat, perlite, charcoal, and soil, with an aim of enhancing the contact between the plant roots and the biocontrol agent.
In case of Bacillus, both liquid and powdered formulations are available commercially, which are applied in the form of pellets, as well as soil drench, foliar spray, or as seed dressing. When Bacillus was applied as liquid formulation on tomato plant, it was able to successfully reduce the symptoms of wilt, as well as increase the shelf-life of Bacillus (Ramyabharti et al. 2016). Gao and his co-workers (2015) researched upon the most successful method of B. subtilis application against Blumeria graminis in wheat. They observed that all the preparations, i.e., cell-free culture, non-protein fermentation liquid, and crude proteins, were able to reduce the infection to some extent. However, fermentation liquid formulation was the most effective among all the preparations studied. Hsieh and his collaborators (2009) observed that talc-based formulation of B. subtilis and P. fluorescens was able to reduce the Banana Bunchy Top Virus incidence up to about 52% and helped in growth promotion of the plant under field conditions.
According to the studies conducted by Selim and his co-workers (2017), the application of endophytic bacteria as both soil drench and talc-based formulations was able to manage Rhizoctonia solani in cotton. But among the two formulations studied, soil drench was found to be more effective. However, Yamamoto and co-workers (2015) found that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S13–3 was highly efficient in managing anthracnose in strawberry when applied as foliar spray. Spraying of fermentation liquid formulation of Bacillus sp . significantly improves growth, yield, and content of antioxidants in strawberry fruit (Rahman et al. 2015).
After the analysis of each method, Hallman and his co-workers (1997) observed that every method had its pros and cons. However, seed treatment was found to be the most efficient when ease of application, economic feasibility, and environmental stability was taken into consideration. They further stated that the combined application as seed treatment, soil drench, and foliar spray would be able to enhance the colonisation of the bacteria and also increase the benefits manifold.
6.8 Conclusion
Bacillus sp. is considered as the new tools for the promotion of sustainable agricultural system. A lot of information on biocontrol of plant diseases by Bacillus spp. has been generated so far by different researchers throughout the world. In this chapter, we summarised the details of the recent advances on mode of action, molecular basis of pathogenic antagonism, application in field level and formulations with their stability potential of Bacillus spp. In these aspects, this chapter is unique, informative and a good source of molecular insights for the future researchers to deal with the Bacillus biocontrol agent in the crop field without harming the nature.
In this chapter, we summarised the mode of actions involved in successful antagonism and the PGPR activities that include – secretion of lytic enzymes, production of lipoproteins, and antibiotics that are explained with examples. The mechanism of induced systemic resistance against plant pathogens depends on interactions of host-pathogen and environment. One or more Bacillus strains can work synergistically with plant and environment in suppressing the phytopathogens. The mechanism is varied according to the application of Bacillus sp. against fungus, bacteria, virus and nematodes. The most important part of this chapter is the genomics and molecular basis of induction of systemic resistance by the Bacillus spp. Bacillus is known to produce a number of antimicrobial compounds that deal with plant diseases resistance mechanism. In this case, the spore producing ability and genetically modified host with Bacillus genes may provide an effective solution in their colonisation simultaneously along with other beneficial microbes. But for successful colonisation, understanding ecological requirements are mandatory.
Among the wide functional assay of Bacillus sp. so far, B. thuringiensis is the most widely exploited even more than 70% of the market shares. But there are lots of conflicts on its commercialisation and acceptation country to country. So, successful application and commercialisation depends on the practical understanding on mode of action, methods of application, ecological distribution and interacting environment. But for more popularity among the farmers, a perfect demonstration of benefit:cost ratio would be mostly required.
References
Abdallah RAB, Stedel C, Garagounis C, Nefzi A, Jabnoun-Khiareddine H, Papadopoulou KK, Daami-Reamadi M (2017) Involvement of lipopeptide antibiotics and chitinase genes and induction of host defense in suppression of fusarium wilt by endophytic Bacillus spp. in tomato. Crop Prot 99:45–58
Adhikari TB, Joseph CM, Yang G, Phillips DA, Nelson LM (2001) Evaluation of bacteria isolated from rice for plant growth promotion and biological control of seedling disease of rice. Can J Microbiol 47:916–924
Akram W, Anjum T (2011) Quantitative changes in defense system of tomato induced by two strains of Bacillus against fusarium wilt. Indian J Fund Appl Life Sci 1:7–13
Arias RS, Sagardoy MA, van Vuurde JWL (1999) Spatio-temporal distribution of naturally occurring Bacillus spp. and other bacteria on the phylloplane of soybean under field conditions. J Basic Microbiol 39:283–292
Asaka O, Shoda M (1996) Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off of tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:4081–4085
Ash C, Farrow JAE, Priest FG, Collins MD (1993) Molecular identification of rRNA group 3 bacilli using a PCR probe test. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 64:253–260
Bacon CW, Hinton DM (2002) Endophytic and biological control potential of Bacillus mojavensis and related species. Biol Control 23:274–284
Bais HP, Park SW, Weir TL, Callaway RM, Vivanco JM (2004) How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway. Trends Plant Sci 9:26–32
Baker CJ, Stavely J, Thomas CA, Sasser M, Macfall JS (1983) Inhibitory effect of Bacillus subtilis on Uromyces phaseoli and on development of rust pustules on bean leaves. Phytopathology 73(8):1148–1152
Barbieri G, Albertini AM, Ferrari E, Sonenshein AL, Belitsky BR (2016) Interplay of CodY and ScoC in the regulation of major extracellular protease genes of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 198:907–920
Bargabus RL, Zidack NK, Sherwood JE, Jacobsen BJ (2002) Characterization of systemic resistance in sugar beet elicited by a nonpathogenic, phyllosphere-colonizing Bacillus mycoides, biological control agent. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 61:289–298
Bargabus RL, Zidack NK, Sherwood JE, Jacobsen BJ (2004) Screening for the identification of potential biological control agents that induce systemic acquired resistance in sugar beet. Biol Control 30:342–350
Basha S, Ulaganathan K (2002) Antagonism of Bacillus species (strain BC121) towards Curvularia lunata. Curr Sci 82(12):1457–1462
Benhamou N, Kloepper JW, Quadt-Hallman A, Tuzun S (1996) Induction of defense-related ultrastructural modifications in pea root tissues inoculated with endophytic bacteria. Plant Physiol 112(3):919–929
Blagoeva-Nikolaeva V, Slavov S, Varsano L (1995) Possibilities for biological control of black-shank disease in tobacco with Bacillus cereus. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 9(1):36–39
Broden NJ, Flury S, King AN, Schroeder BW, Coe GD, Faulkner MJ (2016) Insights into the function of a second, nonclassical Ahp peroxidase, AhpA, in oxidative stress resistance in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 198:1044–1057
Bunk B, Schulz A, Stammen S, Munch R, Warren MJ, Jahn D, Biedendieck R (2010) A short story about a big magic bug. Bioeng Bugs 1:85–89
Cao Y, Zhang Z, Ling N, Yuan Y, Zheng X, Shen B, Shen Q (2011) Bacillus subtilis SQR 9 can control fusarium wilt in cucumber by colonizing plant roots. Biol Fertil Soils 47(5):495–506
Chakraborty S, Debnath D, Mahapatra S, Das S (2020a) Role of endophytes in plant disease management. In: Singh KP, Jahagirdar S, Sarma BK (eds) Emerging trends in plant pathology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6275-4
Chakraborty M, Mahmud NU, Gupta DR, Tareq FS, Shin HJ, Islam T (2020b) Inhibitory effects of linear lipopeptides from a marine Bacillus subtilis on the wheat blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum. Front Microbiol 11:665
Chandler S, Van Hese N, Coutte F, Jacques P, Monica H, De Vleesschauwer D (2015) Role of cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis in mounting induced immunity in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 91:20–30
Choudhary DK, Johri BN (2008) Interactions of Bacillus spp. and plants – with special reference to induced systemic resistance (ISR). Microbiol Res 164:493–513
Chowdhury SP, Uhl J, Grosch R, Alqueres S, Pittroff S, Dietel K, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Borriss R, Hartmann A (2015) Cyclic Lipopeptides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum colonizing the lettuce rhizosphere enhance plant defense responses toward the bottom rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 28:984–995
Clayton MK, Hudelson BD (1991) Analysis of spatial patterns in the phyllosphere. In: Andrews JH, Hirano SS (eds) Microbial ecology of leaves. Springer, New York, pp 111–131
Crowley DE, Rengel Z (1999) Biology and chemistry of rhizosphere influencing nutrient availability. In: Rengel Z (ed) Mineral nutrition of crops: fundamental mechanisms and implications. The Haworth, New York, pp 1–40
Dong YH, Zhang XF, Xu JL, Zhang LH (2004) Insecticidal Bacillus thuringiensis silences Erwinia carotovora virulence by a new form of microbial antagonism, signal interference. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:954–960
Duineveld BM, Kowalchuk GA, Keijzer A, van Elsas JD, van Veen JA (2001) Analysis of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of chrysanthemum via denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR amplified 16S rRNA as well as DNA fragments coding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:172–178
Elad Y, Chet I, Henis Y (1982) Parasitism of Trichoderma spp. on Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii - scanning electron microscopy and fluorescence microscopy. Phytopathology 28:719–725
El-Bendary MA (2006) Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus sphaericus biopesticides production. J Basic Microbiol 46(2):158–170
Farace G, Fernandez O, Jacquens L, Coutte F, Krier F, Jacques P, Clement C, Barka EA, Jacquard C, Dorey S (2015) Cyclic lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis activate distinct patterns of defence responses in grapevine. Mol Plant Pathol 16:177–187
Gao Y, Liu Q, Zang P, Li X, Ji Q, He Z, Zhao Y, Yang H, Zhao X, Zhang L (2015) An endophytic bacterium isolated from Panax ginseng CA meyer enhances growth, reduces morbidity, and stimulates ginsenoside biosynthesis. Phytochem Lett 11:132–138
Gao SF, Wu HJ, Yu XF, Qian LM, Gao XW (2016) Swarming motility plays the major role in migration during tomato root colonization by Bacillus subtilis SWR01. Biol Control 98:11–17
Gao Z, Zhang B, Llu H, Han J, Zhang Y (2017) Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea. Biol Control 105:27–39
García-Gutiérrez L, Zeriouh H, Romero D, Cubero J, de Vicente A, Perez-Garcia A (2013) The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate- and salicylic acid-dependent defence responses. Microb Biotechnol 6:264–274
Gond SK, Bergen MS, Torres MS, White JF Jr (2015) Endophytic Bacillus spp. produce antifungal lipopeptides and induce host defence gene expression in maize. Microbiol Res 172:79–87
Hallman J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW (1997) Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can J Microbiol 43:895–914
Hallmann J (2001) Plant interactions with endophytic bacteria. In: Jeger MJ, Spence NJ (eds) Biotic interactions in plante pathogen associations. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 87–119
Hallmann J, Rodríguez-Kábana R, Kloepper JW (1997) Nematode interactions with endophytic bacteria. In: Ogoshi A, Kobayashi K, Homma Y, Kodama F, Kondo N, Akino S (eds) Plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria-present status and future prospects. Nakanishi Printing, Sapporo, pp 243–245
Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttila AM, Compant S, Campisano A, Doring M, Sessitsch A (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:293–320
Hsieh FC, Li MC, Lin TC, Kao SS (2004) Rapid detection and characterization of surfactin- producing Bacillus subtilis and closely related species based on PCR. Curr Microbiol 49:186–191
Hsieh PW, Hsu LC, Lai CH, Wu CC, Hwang TL, Lin YK, Wu YC (2009) Evaluation of the bioactivities of extracts of endophytes isolated from Taiwanese herbal plants. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 25:1461–1469
Hu X, Roberts DP, Xie L, Maul JE, Yu C, Li Y, Zhang S, Liao X (2013) Bacillus megaterium A6 suppresses Sclerotinia sclerotiorum on oilseed rape in the field and promotes oilseed rape growth. Crop Protect 52:151–158
Islam MT, Croll D, Gladieux P, Soanes DM, Persoons A, Bhattacharjee P et al (2016a) Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a south American lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Biol 14:84
Islam MT, Rahman PP, Jha CK, Aeron A (2016b) Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology. Springer
Islam MT, Kim KH, Choi J (2019a) Wheat blast in Bangladesh: the current situation and future impacts. Plant Pathol J 35(1):1–10
Islam T, Rahman MM, Pandey P, Boehme MH, Haesaert G (2019b) Bacilli and agrobiotechnology: phytostimulation and biocontrol. Bacilli in climate resilient agriculture and bioprospecting, vol 2. Springer
Islam MT, Gupta DR, Hossain A et al (2020) Wheat blast: a new threat to food security. Phytopathol Res 2(2020):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-020-00067-6
Jaeger CH III, Lindow SE, Miller W, Clark E, Firestone MK (1999) Mapping of sugar and amino acids availability in soil around roots with bacterial sensors of sucrose and tryptophan. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2685–2690
Jangir M, Pathak R, Sharma S, Sharma S (2018) Biocontrol mechanisms of Bacillus sp., isolated from tomato rhizosphere, against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Biol Control 123:60–70
Jayaraj J, Yi H, Liang G, Muthukrishnan S, Velazhahan R (2004) Foliar application of Bacillus subtilis AUBS1 reduces sheath blight and triggers defense mechanisms in rice. J Plant Dis Prot 111(2):115–125
Jeong H, Choi SK, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2014) Genome sequence of the plant endophyte Bacillus pumilus INR7, triggering induced systemic resistance in field crops. Genome Announc 2:e01093–e01014
Jiang CH, Wu F, Yu ZY, Xie P, Ke HJ, Li HW, Yu YY, Guo JH (2015) Study on screening and antagonistic mechanisms of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 54 against bacterial fruit blotch (BFB) caused by Acidovorax avenae subsp. citrulli. Microbiol Res 170:95–104
Kasahara J, Kiriyama Y, Miyashita M, Kondo T, Yamada T, Yazawa K, Yoshikawa R, Yamamoto H (2016) Teichoic acid polymers affect expression and localization of DL-endopeptidase LytE required for lateral cell wall hydrolysis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 198:1585–1594
Kloepper JW, Reddy MS, Rodríguez-Kabana R, Kenney DS, KokalisBurelle N, MartinezOchoa N (2004a) Application for rhizobacteria in transplant production and yield enhancement. Acta Hortic 631:219–229
Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S (2004b) Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 94(11):1259–1266
Leclere V, Bechet M, Adam A, Guez JS, Wathelet B, Ongena M, Thonart P, Gancel F, Chollet-Imbert M, Jacques P (2005) Mycosubtilin overproduction by Bacillus subtilis BBG100 enhances the organism’s antagonistic and biocontrol activities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4577–4584
Lee SW, Lee SH, Balaraju K, Park KS, Nam KW, Park JW, Park K (2014) Growth promotion and induced disease suppression of four vegetable crops by a selected plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strain Bacillus subtilis 21-1 under two different soil conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 36:1353–1362
Lee BD, Dutta S, Ryu H, Yoo SJ, Suh DS, Park K (2015) Induction of systemic resistance in Panax ginseng against Phytophthora cactorum by native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens HK34. J Ginseng Res 39(3):213–220
Li S, Zhang N, Zhang Z, Luo J, Shen B, Zhang R, Shen Q (2013) Antagonist Bacillus subtilis HJ5 controls Verticillium wilt of cotton by root colonization and biofilm formation. Biol Fertil Soils 49(3):295–303
Liu XY, Ruan LF, Hu ZF, Peng DH, Cao SY, Yu ZN, Liu Y, Zheng JS, Sun M (2010) Genome-wide screening reveals the genetic determinants of an antibiotic insecticide in Bacillus thuringiensis. J Biol Chem 285(50):39191–39200
Luo C, Zhou H, Zou J, Wang X, Zhang R, Xiang Y, Chen Z (2015) Bacillomycin L and surfactin contribute synergistically to the phenotypic features of Bacillus subtilis 916 and the biocontrol of rice sheath blight induced by Rhizoctonia solani. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(4):1897–1910
Mahapatra S, Rayanoothala P, Solanki MK, Das S (2020) Wheat microbiome: present status and future perspective. In: Solanki M, Kashyap P, Kumari B (eds) Phytobiomes: current insights and future vistas. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3151-4_8
Mcspadden Gardener BB (2004) Ecology of Bacillus and Paenibacillus species in agricultural systems. Phytopathology 94:1252–1258
Meena KR, Kanwar SS (2015) Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: applications in food safety and therapeutics. Biomed Res Int 2015:473050
Mendoza A, Sikora R (2009) Biological control of Radopholus similis in banana by combined application of the mutualistic endophyte Fusarium oxysporum strain 162, the egg pathogen Paecilomyces lilacinus strain 251 and the antagonistic bacteria Bacillus firmus. Biol Control 54(2):263–272
Mitchell R, Alexander M (1962) Lysis of soil fungi by bacteria. Can J Microbiol 9:689–696
Mnif I, Ghribi D (2015) Review lipopeptides biosurfactants: mean classes and new insights for industrial, biomedical, and environmental applications. J Pept Sci 104(3):129–147
Molina L, Constantinescu F, Michel L, Reimmann C, Duffy B, Defago G (2003) Degradation of pathogen quorum-sensing molecules by soil bacteria: a preventive and curative biological control mechanism. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 45:71–81
Mondol MA, Shin HJ, Islam MT (2013) Diversity of secondary metabolites from marine Bacillus species: chemistry and biological activity. Mar Drugs 11(8):2846–2872
Mora I, Cabrefiga J, Montesinos E (2011) Antimicrobial peptide genes in Bacillus strains from plant environments. Int Microbiol 14:213–223
Muller S, Strack SN, Hoefler BC, Straight PD, Kearns DB, Kirby JR (2014) Bacillaene and sporulation protect Bacillus subtilis from predation by Myxococcus xanthus. Appl Environ Microb 80:5603–5610
Murphy JF, Zehnder GW, Schuster DJ, Sikora EJ, Polston JE, Kloepper JW (2000) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial mediated protection in tomato against tomato mottle virus. Plant Dis 84:779–784
Nielsen TH, Christopheresen C, Anthoni U, Sørensen J (1999) Viscosinamide, a new cyclic depsipeptide with surfactant and antifungal properties produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens DR54. J Appl Microbiol 87:80–90
Nielsen TH, Thrane C, Christophersen C, Anthoni U, Sørensen J (2000) Structure, production characteristics and fungal antagonism of tensin — a new antifungal cyclic lipopeptide from Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 96.578. J Appl Microbiol 89:992–1001
Nihorimbere V, Ongena M, Cawoy H, Brostaux Y, Kakana P (2010) Beneficial effects of Bacillus subtilis on field-grown tomato in Burundi: reduction of local Fusarium disease and growth promotion. Afr J Microbiol Res 4:11–19
Ongena M, Jacques P (2008) Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol 16(3):115–125
Ouyang LJ, Li LM (2016) Effects of an inducible aiiA gene on disease resistance in Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis. Transgenic Res 25:441–452
Panda AK, Bisht SS, DeMondal S, Kumar NS, Gurusubramanian G, Panigrahi AK (2014) Brevibacillus as a biological tool: a short review. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 105(4):623–639
Parashar V, Konkol MA, Kearns DB, Neiditch MB (2013) A plasmid-encoded phosphatase regulates Bacillus subtilis biofilm architecture, sporulation, and genetic competence. J Bacteriol 195:2437–2448
Park JW, Balaraju K, Kim JW, Lee SW, Park K (2013a) Systemic resistance and growth promotion of chili pepper induced by an antibiotic producing Bacillus vallismortis strain BS07. Biol Control 65(2):246–257
Park K, Park JW, Lee SW, Balaraju K (2013b) Disease suppression and growth promotion in cucumbers induced by integrating PGPR agent Bacillus subtilis strain B4 and chemical elicitor ASM. Crop Protect 54:199–205
Podile A, Prakash A (1996) Lysis and biological control of Aspergillus niger by Bacillus subtilis AF 1. Can J Microbiol 42(6):533–538
Priest F (1993) Systematics and ecology of Bacillus. In: Sonenshein AL, Hoch J, Losick R (eds) Bacillus subtilis and other gram positive bacteria, biochemistry, physiology and molecular genetics. American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–16
Rahman A, Uddin W, Wenner NG (2015) Induced systemic resistance responses in perennial ryegrass against Magnaporthe oryzae elicited by semi-purified surfactin lipopeptides and live cells of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Mol Plant Pathol 16:546–558
Ramarathnam R, Bo S, Chen Y, Fernando WGD, Gao XW, de Kievit T (2007) Molecular and biochemical detection of fengycin- and bacillomycin D-producing Bacillus spp., antagonistic to fungal pathogens of canola and wheat. Can J Microbiol 53:901–911
Ramyabharathi S, Meena B, Raguchander T (2012) Induction of chitinase and b-1,3-glucanase PR proteins in tomato through liquid formulated Bacillus subtilis EPCO 16 against Fusarium wilt. J Today Biol Sci: Res Rev 1(1):50–60
Ramyabharathi S, Rajendran L, Karthikeyan G, Raguchander T (2016) Liquid formulation of endophytic Bacillus and its standardization for the management of Fusarium wilt in tomato. Bangladesh J Botany 45:283–290
Rayanoothala P, Divya M, Mahapatra S, Das S (2020) Microbial biofilm:formulation, quorum sensing and its application.In. In: Singh KP, Jahagirdar S, Sarma BK (eds) Emerging trends in plant pathology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6275-4
Reitz M, Rudolph K, Schroder I, Hoffmann-Hergarten S, Hallmann J, Sikora RA (2000) Lippolsaccharides of Rhizobium etli strain G12 act in potato roots as an inducing agent of systemic resistance to infection by the cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3515–3518
Romero D, de Vicente A, Rakotoaly RH, Dufour SE, Veening JW, Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Kuipers OP, Paquot M, Perez-Garcia A (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis towards Podosphaera fusca. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20:430–440
Rosado AS, de Azevedo FS, da Cruz DW, van Elsas JD, Seldin L (1998) Phenotypic and genetic diversity of Paenibacillus azotofixans strains isolated from the rhizoplane or rhizosphere soil of different grasses. J Appl Microbiol 84:216–226
Ruiz-Sanchez R, Blake R, Castro-Gamez H, Sanchez F, Montaldo HH, Castillo-Juarez H (2007) Short communication: changes in the association between milk yield and age at first calving in Holstein cows with herd environment level for milk yield. J Dairy Sci 90(10):4830–4834
Ryu CM, Hu CH, Reddy M, Klopper JW (2003) Different signaling pathways of induced resistance by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana against two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae. New Phytol 160(2):413–420
Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Klopper JW, Pare PW (2004) Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134(3):1017–1026
Salas-González I, Reyt G, Flis P, Custódio V, Gopaulchan D, Bakhoum N, Dew TP, Suresh K, Franke RB, Dangl JL, Salt DE, Castrillo G. (2020) Coordination between microbiota and root endodermis supports plant mineral nutrient homeostasis. Science 19 Nov 2020: eabd0695. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd0695
Seldin L (1992) Primary characterization of the bacteriophage BA-4 from a nitrogen fixing Bacillus azotofixans strain. Microbios 71:167–177
Seldin L, Soares Rosado A, da Cruz DW, Nobrega A, van Elsas JD, Paiva E (1998) Comparison of Paenibacillus azotofixans strains isolated from rhizoplane, and non-root-associated soil from maize planted in two different Brazilian soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:3860–3868
Selim MM, Hend Nafisa Gomaa M, Essa AMM (2017) Application of endophytic bacteria for the biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani (Cantharellales: ceratobasidiaceae) damping-off disease in cotton seedlings. Biocontrol Sci Tech 27(1):81–95
Shiomi HF, Silva HSA, de Melo IS, Nunes FV, Bettiol W (2006) Bioprospecting endophytic bacteria for biological control of coffee leaf rust. Scientia Agricola (Piracicaba, Braz) 63:32–39
Stein T (2005) Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Mol Microbiol 56(4):845–857
Surovy MZ, Gupta DR, Mahmud NU, et al (2019) Genomics and post-genomics approaches for elucidating molecular mechanisms of plant growth-promoting Bacilli. Bacilli in Climate Resilient Agriculture and Bioprospecting Bacilli and Agrobiotechnology: Phytostimulation and Biocontrol 161–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15175-1_10
Tong-Jian XI, Fang C, Chao GA, Quin-Yun ZH, Qi-Rong SH, Wei RA (2013) Bacillus cereus X5 enhanced bio-organic fertilizers effectively control rootknot nematodes (Meloidogyne sp.). Pedosphere 23(2):160–168
Trotel-Aziz P, Couderchet M, Biagianti S, Aziz A (2008) Characterization of new bacterial biocontrol agents Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Pantoea and Pseudomonas spp. mediating grapevine resistance against Botrytis cinerea. Environ Exp Bot 64(1):21–32
Udayashankar A, Nayaka SC, Reddy MS, Srinivas C (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria mediate induced systemic resistance in rice against bacterial leaf blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Biol Control 59(2):114–122
Van Gestel J, Vlamakis H, Kolter R (2015) New tools for comparing microscopy images: quantitative analysis of cell types in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 197:699–709
Van Overbeek L, van Elsas JD (2008) Effect of plant genotype and growth stage on the structure of bacterial communities associated with potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:283–296
Vargas-Ayala R, Rodriguez-Kaban R, Morgan-Jones G, McInroy JA, Kloepper JW (2000) Shifts in soil microflora induced by velvetbean (Mucuna deeringiana) in cropping systems to control root-knot nematodes. Biol Control 17:11–22
Vlamakis H, Chai Y, Beauregard P, Losick R, Kolter R (2013) Sticking together: building a biofilm the Bacillus subtilis way. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(3):157–168
Wang J, Liu J, Wang X, Yao J, Yu Z (2004) Application of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in rapid typing of fengycin homologues produced by Bacillus subtilis. Lett Appl Microbiol 39(1):98–102
Wang Y, Ohara Y, Nakayashiki H, Tosa Y, Mayama S (2005) Microarray analysis of the gene expression profile induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens FPT9601-T5 in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 18:385–396
Wang S, Wu H, Qiao J, Ma L, Liu J, Xia Y, Gao X (2009) Molecular mechanism of plant growth promotion and induced systemic resistance of tobacco mosaic virus by Bacillus spp. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19(10):1250–1258
Wang X, Wang L, Wang J, Jin P, Liu H, Zheng Y (2014) Bacillus cereus AR156induced resistance to Colletotrichum acutatum is associated with priming of defense responses in loquat fruit. PLoS One 9(11):e112494
Wang T, Liang Y, Wu MB, Chen ZJ, Yang LR (2015) Natural products from Bacillus subtilis with antimicrobial properties. Chin J Chem Eng 23(4):744–754
Wieland G, Neumann R, Backhaus H (2001) Variation of microbial communities in soil, rhizosphere and rhizoplane in response to crop species, soil type and crop development. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5849–5854
Williams-Wagner RN, Grundy FJ, Raina M, Ibba M, Henkin TM (2015) The Bacillus subtilis tyrZ gene encodes a highly selective Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase and is regulated by a MarR regulator and T box riboswitch. J Bacteriol 197:1624–1631
Wulff BB, Horvath DM, Ward ER (2011) Improving immunity in crops: new tactics in an old game. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14(4):468–476
Yamamoto S, Shiraishi S, Suzuki S (2015) Are cyclic lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S13–3 responsible for the plant defence response in strawberry against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides? Lett Appl Microbiol 60:379–386
Yang CY, Ho YC, Pang JC, Huang SS, Tschen JSM (2009) Cloning and expression of an antifungal chitinase gene of a novel Bacillus subtilis isolate from Taiwan potato field. Bioresour Technol 100:1454–1458
Yang L, Quan X, Xue B, Goodwin PH, Lu S, Wang J, Du W, Wu C (2015) Isolation and identification of Bacillus subtilis strain YB-05 and its antifungal substances showing antagonism against Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Biol Control 85:52–58
You C, Zhang C, Kong F, Feng C, Wang J (2016) Comparison of the effects of biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis and fungicide metalaxyl–mancozeb on bacterial communities in tobacco rhizospheric soil. Ecol Eng 91:119–125
Zhang N, Wu K, He X, Li SQ, Zhang ZH, Shen B, Yang XM, Zhang RF, Huang QW, Shen QR (2011) A new bioorganic fertilizer can effectively control banana wilt by strong colonization with Bacillus subtilis N11. Plant Soil 344(1–2):87–97
Zheng X, Sinclair J (2000) The effects of traits of Bacillus megaterium onseed and root colonization and their correlation with the suppression of Rhizoctonia root rot of soybean. BioControl 45(2):223–243
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mahapatra, S., Chakraborty, S., Samanta, M., Das, S., Islam, T. (2022). Current Understanding and Future Directions of Biocontrol of Plant Diseases by Bacillus spp., with Special Reference to Induced Systemic Resistance. In: Islam, M.T., Rahman, M., Pandey, P. (eds) Bacilli in Agrobiotechnology. Bacilli in Climate Resilient Agriculture and Bioprospecting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85465-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85465-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85464-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85465-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)