Skip to main content

Penal Populism: The End of Reason

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Get Your Knee Off Our Necks
  • 1977 Accesses

Abstract

The phenomenon of penal populism was first identified as a characteristic of English-speaking Western democracies around the end of the twentieth century—specifically, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, New Zealand, Australia and Canada (see Roberts et al., 2003; Pratt, 2007). Since that time, however, various strands of it—the exact form that it takes and the impact it has varies from society to society—have been identified in a diverse range of countries. Generally, it demands a much more punitive approach to law breaking. This has been manifested in the form of dramatically rising imprisonment rates, as in the Anglophone world; but it has also led to clamourings for a more vigorous use of the death penalty in some Asian societies, particularly Japan (Johnson, 2006), or chemical castration of child sex offenders, as in South Korea (Koo et al., 2014) and the Czech Republic (Haney, 2016).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Robinson v California 370 US 660 (1962).

  2. 2.

    422 US 563.

  3. 3.

    408 US 238, 296–297.

  4. 4.

    The World Prison Brief has been used as the source for all prison statistics. Here, the US rate represents a decline from its high of 755 in 2008.

  5. 5.

    Marriage rates (i.e. number of marriages occurring among the population of a given geographical area during a given year, per 1000 mid-year total population) are as follows: Australia, 1980: 7.4, 2013, 5.1; Canada, 1981, 7.7; 2008, 4.4; New Zealand, 1980, 7.3; 2014, 4.4; UK, 1980, 7.4, 2012, 4.4; USA, 1985, 10.1; 2012, 6.8. Ratio of marriages to divorce over the same period is as follows: Australia, 1980, 2.75:1; 2013, 2.3:1; Canada, 1980, 3:1; 2008, 2:1; New Zealand, 1980, 3:1; 2014, 2.5:1; UK, 1980, 2.7:1; 2012, 2:3:1; USA, 1980, 2:1; 2012, 2.2:1. Couples in de facto relationships in Australia increased from 5% in 1982 to 15% in 2006; in Canada, 6% in 1981 to 16.7% in 2011; in the UK, from 8.9%in 1996 to 16.4% in 2014. One-parent families increased in Australia from 8.6% in 1981 to 15% in 2011; in Canada, from 11.3% in 1981 to 16.3% in 2011; in New Zealand from 12% in 1981 to 17.8% in 2013in the UK, 13.9% in 1981 to 25% in 2014; in the USA, from 19.5% in 1980 to 29.5% in 2008. Meanwhile, average household size declined across all these societies: in Australia, from 2.8 in 1986 to 2.6 in 2006; in Canada, from 3.3 in 1981 to 2.9 in 2011; in New Zealand from 3.0 in 1981 to 2.7 in 2013; in the UK, from 2.7 in in 1981 to 2.4 in 2012; in the USA, from 19.5 in 1980 to 29.5 in 2008.

  6. 6.

    See note 4 regarding the decline in the US imprisonment rate. See also Goode (2013).

  7. 7.

    Quoted in Daily Mail, 27 December 2016.

  8. 8.

    Quoted in The Financial Times, 3 June 2016.

  9. 9.

    Quoted by New York Times, 12 August 2016.

  10. 10.

    William Shakespeare, Henry IV, Part I, Act 5, sc 4, p. 7.

  11. 11.

    The percentage of people living alone has increased from 18.8% of the Australian population in 1986 to 23% in 2013; from 11.4% in Canada in 1981 to 27.6% in 2011; from 16% in New Zealand in 1980 to 23.5% in 2013; from 22% in the UK in 1981 to 28% in 2014; from 22.7% in the US in 1980 to 27.4% in 2012.

  12. 12.

    Cf Bauman (2001, p. 62) “Individuals who are untied to place, who can travel light and move fast, win all the competitions that matter and count”.

References

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Violence in the age of uncertainty. In A. Crawford (Ed.), Crime and insecurity (pp. 52–74). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, C. (1872/1764). On crimes and punishments. W.C. Little & Co. (Original work published in 1764).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. (1991). The legitimation of power. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H. G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. H. (1942). Social insurance and allied services: Report [The Beveridge report]. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A. E. (1977). Reflections on the renaissance of dangerousness. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 70–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A. E. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing. In C. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform (pp. 17–49). Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. (1991). Guidance, counselling, therapy: Responses to “marital problems” 1950–90. The Sociological Review, 39(4), 765–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (1945). Full employment in Australia. Australian Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D. (1753/1966). On the interpretation of nature, No. 15. In L. Crocker (Ed.), Diderot’s selected writings. Macmillan. (Original work published 1753).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D. (1967). Denis diderot’s the encyclopedia: Selections. (S. J. Gendzier, Ed. & Trans.). Harper Torchbooks. (Original work published 1751).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T. S. (1943). Four quartets. Harcourt, Brace & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, G., Tilley, N., & Tseloni, A. (2014). Why the crime drop? Crime and Justice, 43(1), 421–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedland, J. (2016, November 9). The U.S. has elected its most dangerous leader: We all have plenty to fear. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/donald-trump-us-president-nightmare

  • Garland, D. (1996). The limits of the Sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 445–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and responsibility. Modern Law Review, 62(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E. (2013, July 25). U.S. prison populations decline, reflecting new approaches to crime. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/26/us/us-prison-populations-decline-reflecting-new-approach-to-crime.html

  • Gray, J. (1993). Beyond the new right: Markets, government and the common environment. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1979). Drifting into a law and order society. Cobden Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1988). The hard road to renewal: Thatcherism and the crisis of the left. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis. Mugging, the state and law and order. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, L. (2016). Prisons of the past: Penal nationalism and the politics of punishment in Central Europe. Punishment & Society, 18(3), 346–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, M. (2013, July 10). The danger is we’ve become immune to human rights lunacy. It’s vital we stay angry, =says Max Hastings. Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2359048/The-danger-weve-immune-Human-Rights-lunacy-Its-vital-stay-angry-says-MAX-HASTINGS.html

  • Hay, D. (1976). Property, authority, and the criminal law. In D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, & E. P. Thompson (Eds.), Albion’s fatal tree: Crime and society in 18th century England (pp. 17–63). Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (1994). The age of extremes. Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1959). Penal practice in a changing society. HMSO. [Cmnd. 645].

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (1988). Punishment, custody and the community. HMSO. [Cm 424].

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, C., & Morris, N. (1964). Studies in criminal law. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, E. (1946). Garden cities of to-morrow. Faber & Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Y. (2004). Media and crime. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. T. (2006). Japan’s secretive death penalty policy: Contours, origin, justifications, and meanings. Asia-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 7, 62–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T., & Newburn, T. (2006). Policy transfer and criminal justice. Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2007). Postwar: A history of Europe since 1945. Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1797/1887). The philosophy of law: An exposition of the fundamental principles of jurisprudence. (W. Hastie, Trans.). T & T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, K. C., Ahn, J. H., Hong, S. J., Lee, J. W., & Chung, B. H. (2014). Effects of chemical castration on sex offenders in relation to the kinetics of serum testosterone recovery: Implications for dosing schedule. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(5), 1316–1324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kynaston, D. (2007). Austerity Britain, 1945–51. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (2008). The prisoners’ dilemma: Political economy and punishment in contemporary democracies. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1690/2016). Second treatise of government. Enhanced Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, L. (1943). Report on social security for Canada [The Marsh report]. King’s Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marwick, A. (1971). The explosion of British society, 1914–1970. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miao, M. (2013). Capital punishment in China: A populist instrument of social governance. Theoretical Criminology, 17(2), 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, C. (1914/2011). The spirit of laws (T. Nugent, Trans.). Cosimo Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M.-M. (2012). The rise of the penal state in Latin America. Contemporary Justice Review, 15(1), 57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1945). City development: Studies in disintegration and renewal. Harcourt, Brace & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, L. (2009). El Populismo Punitivo En Espana: del Estado. [The penal populism in Spain: From welfare state to punishment state]. http://www2.pucpr.br/ssscla/papers/SessaoC_A33_pp219-245.pdf

  • Nevitte, N. (1996). The decline of difference: Canadian value change in cross national perspective. Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand First. (2014). Manifesto. Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, G. (2016, October 31). Hillary Clinton and the populist revolt. The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/31/hillary-clinton-and-the-populist-revolt

  • Paine, T. (1794). The age of reason: Being an investigation of true and fabulous theology. Barrois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (1997). Governing the dangerous. Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2000). Emotive and ostentatious punishment. Punishment & Society, 2(4), 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2007). Penal populism. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2008). When penal populism stops: Legitimacy, scandal and the power to punish in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 364–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (2016). Risk control, rights and legitimacy in the limited liability state. British Journal of Criminology, 57, 1322–1339. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J., & Clark, M. (2005). Penal populism in New Zealand. Punishment and Society, 7, 303–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawnsley, A. (2016a, November 20). The shock lessons for liberals from Brexit and the Trumpquake. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/20/lessons-liberals-brexit-trumpquake-demagogues-rules-electoral-politics

  • Rawnsley, A. (2016b, June 26). Brexit: A journey into the unknown for a country never before so divided. The Observer. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/26/brexit-eu-referendum-disunited-kingdom

  • Reiner, R. (2001). The rise of virtual vigilantism: Crime reporting since World War II. Criminal Justice Matters, 43, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Penal Policy Review Committee, 1981. (1982). Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. V., Stalans, L., Indermaur, D., & Hough, M. (2003). Penal populism and public opinion. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles-Brise, S. E. (1921). The English prison system. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. (1956). The torment of secrecy. Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2014). The precariat. The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappan, P. (1957). Sexual offences and the treatment of sexual offenders in the United States. In L. Radzinowicz (Ed.), Sexual offences. A report of the Cambridge department of criminal science (pp. 500–516). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T., & Boeckmann, R. (1997). Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law and Society Review, 31, 237–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hirsch, A. (1976). Doing justice. Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolffe, R. (2016, November 9). Trump’s Victory is nothing short of a revolution. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/donald-trump-victory-us-election-result-revolution

  • Zimring, F. E. (2012). The city that became safe: New York’s lessons for urban crime and its control. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Pratt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pratt, J., Miao, M. (2022). Penal Populism: The End of Reason. In: Johansen, B.E., Akande, A. (eds) Get Your Knee Off Our Necks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85155-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics