Skip to main content

Introduction: Forgiveness and Other Elements of Moral Repair

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Guilt, Forgiveness, and Moral Repair
  • 409 Accesses

Abstract

In current debates about coming to terms with individual and collective wrongdoing, the concept of forgiveness has played an important but controversial role. For a long time, the idea was widespread that a forgiving attitude—overcoming feelings of resentment and the wish for revenge—was always virtuous. Recently, however, this idea has been questioned. In this volume, we neither take sides for nor against forgiveness, but rather examine its meaning and function against the backdrop of a more complex understanding of moral repair in a variety of social, circumstantial, and cultural contexts. On the one hand, the volume aims to gain a differentiated understanding of the European traditions regarding forgiveness, revenge, and moral repair that have shaped our moral intuitions today. On the other, we will examine examples from other cultural contexts (Asia and Africa, in particular) to explore how different cultural traditions deal with the need for moral repair after wrongdoing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Derrida, in turn, draws on Jankélévitch’s Le Pardon (1967).

  2. 2.

    Cf. www.france24.com/en/20170411-france-role-deporting-jews-political-stances-through-70-years.

  3. 3.

    Hannah Arendt is an exception in that she limited forgiveness to the realm of what can be explained by ordinary human weaknesses, that is, what can ultimately be excused.

  4. 4.

    With regard to the role of emphathy in processes of moral repair and reconciliation cf. Eisikovits (2010).

References

  • Arendt, Hannah. 2018. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Augustine. 1955. Enchiridion On Faith, Hope, and Love. Trans. and ed. Albert Outler. London: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, Rajeev. 2000. Restoring Decency to Barbaric Societies. In Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions, ed. Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson, 45–67. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brudholm, Thomas. 2008. Resentment’s Virtue. Jean Amery and the Refusal to Forgive. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Joseph. 1969. Fifteen Sermons and Other Writings on Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celermajer, Danielle. 2009. The Sins of the Nation and the Ritual of Apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, Myisha. 2018. The Nature and Appropriateness of Forgiveness Requests. Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2001. On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisikovits, Nir. 2010. Sympathizing with the Enemy: Reconciliation, Transitional Justice, Negotiation. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, Ernst, and Gächter, Simon. 2000. Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments (June 1999). Institute for Empirical Research in Economics Working Paper No. 10; CESifo Working Paper Series No. 183. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=203194. Accessed 14 March 2021.

  • Grieco, Mary Hayes. 2011. Unconditional Forgiveness: A Simple and Proven Method to Forgive Everyone and Everything. New York and London: Atria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankélévitch, Vladimir. 1967. Le Pardon. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Should We Pardon Them? Critical Inquiry 22 (3): 552–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, David. 2010. Before Forgiveness: The Origins of a Moral Idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lotter, Maria-Sibylla. 2021. The Art of Apology. On the True and the Phony in Political Apology. In Guilt. A Force of Cultural Transformation, ed. Matthias Buschmeier and Katharina von Kellenbach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan, Alice. 2009. Practicing Imperfect Forgiveness. In Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal, ed. Lisa Tessmann, 185–204. Dordrecht and Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Ian Williams. 2006. Eye for an Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, Martha. 1998. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, Adam. 2012. What is Forgiveness? In Ancient Forgiveness, ed. Charles Griswold and David Konstan, 3–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Jeffry. 2003. Getting Even: Forgiveness and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrove, Glen. 2006. Hannah Arendt and Collective Forgiving. Social Philosophy 37 (4): 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radzik, Linda. 2011. Making Amends: Atonement in Morality, Law, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmel, Solomon. 2002. Wounds not Healed by Time. The Power of Repentance and Forgiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Meinolf. 2021. Guilt as a Positive Motivation for Action? On Vicarious Penance. In Guilt. A Force of Cultural Transformation, ed. Matthias Buschmeier and Katharina von Kellenbach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, Richard, et al. 1997. The ‘Big Three’ of Morality (Autonomy, Community, Divinity), and the ‘Big Three’ Explanations of Suffering. In Morality and Health, ed. Allan M. Brandt and Paul Rozin, 119–169. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Margaret Urban. 2006. Moral Repair. Reconstructing Moral Relations after Wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Richard. 2001. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Legitimizing the Post Apartheid State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Susan. 1990. Freedom Within Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria-Sibylla Lotter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lotter, MS. (2022). Introduction: Forgiveness and Other Elements of Moral Repair. In: Lotter, MS., Fischer, S. (eds) Guilt, Forgiveness, and Moral Repair. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84610-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics