Abstract
The study of text authenticity is, along with authorship attribution, one of the most important areas in forensic linguistics. In the case of suicide notes, these two matters seem to overlap. To determine the authenticity of a suicide note, it is necessary to establish whether linguistic features in the text confirm that the author, while writing the text, experienced a suicidal situation, leading him or her to express this intent.
This chapter presents the current state of research on the analysis of suicide notes. Specifically, it focuses on genre theory and its relevance for the examination of the suicide note and its generic features, as well as on the concept of idiolect. Furthermore, this chapter outlines the methodology for analysing the authenticity of suicide notes, with special attention to corpus linguistics and qualitative methods. At the core of the chapter, there is an analysis of the authenticity of a suicide note and a proposal for an analysis of a contested suicide note. The analysis is supplemented with questions addressed to the reader as food for thought.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
All the calculations were made for the texts in the original Polish language version.
- 2.
The texts are literal translations of the Polish texts.
- 3.
Polish is a null-subject language, with rich subject agreement marking on the verb, so the subject pronoun is normally dropped in the clause.
- 4.
Quotations marked with (1) were taken from the suicide note to everyone, whereas quotations marked with (2) were taken from the suicide note to the girlfriend.
- 5.
All the calculations were made for the texts in the original Polish language version.
References
Abaalkhail, A. (2020). An investigation of suicide notes: An ESP genre analysis. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.3p.1
Ainsworth, J. & Juola, P. (2019). Who wrote this? Modern forensic authorship analysis as a model for valid forensic science. Washington University Law Review, 96(5), 1159–1187. Retrieved from https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol96/iss5/10
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
Callanan, V. J., & Davis, M. S. (2009). A comparison of suicide note writers with suicide who did not leave notes. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 39(5), 558–568.
Chaski, C. (2007). Empirical evaluations of language-based author identification techniques. Forensic Linguistics, 8(1), 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2001.8.1.1
Chávez-Hernández, A. M., Leenaars, A., Chávez-de Sánchez, M. L., & Leenaars, L. (2009). Suicide notes from Mexico and the United States: A thematic analysis. Salud pública de México, 51(4), 314–320. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0036-36342009000400008
Coulthard, M. (1988). Making text speak: The work of forensic linguist. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 33, 117–130. Retrieved from http://ifa.amu.edu.pl/sap/Studia_Anglica_Posnaniensia_contents_33
Coulthard, M. (2004). Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics, 25(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.4.431
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2017). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ghosh, S., Ekbal, A., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2020). CEASE, a corpus of emotion annotated suicide notes in English. In N. Calzolari, F. Béchet, P. Blache, K. Choukri, C. Cieri, T. Declerck, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020) (pp. 1618–1626). The European Language Resources Association. Retrieved from http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2020/LREC-2020.pdf
Girdhar, S., Leenaars, A., Dogra, T. D., Leenaars, L., & Kumar, G. (2004). Suicide notes in India: What do they tell us? Archives of Suicide Research, 8(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811110490271362
Grant, T., & MacLeod, N. (2018). Resources and constraints in linguistic identity performance: A theory of authorship. Language and Law/Linguagem e Direito, 5(1), 80–96. Retrieved from http://ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/LLLD/article/view/4548
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173–192. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1461445605050365
Jones, J. N., & Bennell, C. (2007). The development and validation of statistical prediction rules for discriminating between genuine and simulated suicide notes. Archives of Suicide Research, 11(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811110701250176
Johnston, B. (2009). Stance, style, and linguistic individual. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 29–52). Oxford University Press.
Kniffka, H. (2007). Working in language and law: A German perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kredens, K. (2002). Idiolect in forensic authorship attribution. In P. Stalmaszczyk (Ed.). Folia Linguistica Anglica, 4, 192–212.
Kredens, K., & Coulthard, M. (2012). Corpus linguistics in authorship identification. In P. Tiersma & L. M. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 504–516). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0037
Leenaars, A. (1988). Suicide notes: Predictive clues and patterns. Human Sciences Press.
Lester, D. (Ed.). (2004). Katie’s diary: Unlocking the mystery of a suicide. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Lester, D. (2014). The “I” of the storm: Understanding the suicidal mind. De Gruyter Open Ltd..
Litvinova, T., Litvinova, O., & Seredin, P. (2018). Assessing the level of stability of idiolectal features across modes, topics and time of text production. In S. Balandin, T. S. Cinotti, F. Viola, & T. Tyutina (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of Open Innovations Association FRUCT (pp. 223–230). FRUCT. https://doi.org/10.23919/FRUCT.2018.8588092
Marcińczuk, M., Zaśko-Zielińska, M., & Piasecki, M. (2011). Structure annotation in the Polish corpus of suicide notes. In I. Habernal & V. Matoušek (Eds.), Text, speech and dialogue (pp. 419–426). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23538-2_53
McMenamin, G. R. (2002). Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. CRC Press.
O’Connor, R. C., Sheehy, N. P., & O’Connor, D. B. (1999). A thematic analysis of suicide notes. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 20(3), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.20.3.106
Olsson, J. (2004). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language, crime and the law. Continuum.
Oravetz, R. (2004). Roots of discoursive suicidology. Horizons of Psychology, 13(1), 151–161.
Osgood, C. E., & Walker, E. G. (1959). Motivation and language behavior: A content analysis of suicide notes. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047078
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pestian, J. P., Matykiewicz, P., & Linn-Gust, M. (2012). What’s in a note: Construction of a suicide note corpus. Biomedical Informatics Insights, 5, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4137/BII.S10213
Piasecki, M., Młynarczyk, K., & Kocoń, J. (2017). Recognition of genuine Polish suicide notes. In R. Mitkov & G. Angelova (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing RANLP 2017 (pp. 583–591). Varna, Bulgaria: INCOMA Ltd. doi: 10.26615/978-954-452-049-6_076
Samraj, B., & Gawron, J. M. (2015). The suicide note as a genre: Implications for genre theory. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 88–101.
Schneider, K. P., & Barron, A. (Eds.). (2014). Pragmatics of discourse. Mouton de Gruyter.
Shapero, J. J. (2011). The language of suicide notes (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom). Retrieved from https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/1525/1/Shapero11PhD.pdf
Shneidman, E. S., & Farberow, N. L. (Eds.). (1957). Clues to suicide. McGraw-Hill.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45–58). John Benjamins Publishing.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Turell, T. & Gawalda, N., (2013). Towards an index of idiolectal similitude (or distance) in forensic authorship analysis. Journal of Law and Policy, 21(2), 495–514. Retrieved from http://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/jlp/vol21/iss2/10
Van Dijk, T. (1995). On macrostructures, mental models and other inventions: A brief personal history of the Kintsch-Van Dijk theory. In C. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C. R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 383–410). Erlbaum.
Van Halteren, H. (2019). Benchmarking author recognition systems for forensic application. Linguistic Evidence in Security Law and Intelligence, 3, Retrieved from http://www.lesli-journal.org/ojs/index.php/lesli/article/view/20/20
Zaśko-Zielińska, M. (2012). Tabu w listach pożegnalnych samobójców [Taboo in the suicide notes of suicidal persons]. In N. Długosz & Z. Dimoski (Eds.), Tabu w oku szeroko otwartym [Taboo in the eye wide open] (pp. 85–93). Wydawnictwo Rys.
Zaśko-Zielińska, M. (2013). Listy pożegnalne: W poszukiwaniu lingwistycznych wyznaczników autentyczności tekstu [Suicide notes: On the search for linguistic indicators of text authenticity]. Quaestio.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zaśko-Zielińska, M. (2022). The Linguistic Analysis of Suicide Notes. In: Guillén-Nieto, V., Stein, D. (eds) Language as Evidence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84329-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84330-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)