Abstract
Baccharis L. is one of the largest and most diversified genera of Asteraceae. Two groups of species, namely, “vassouras” and “carquejas,” are generally recognized based on their habit and branching pattern. “Vassouras” plants possess regular stems and leaves and are often broom-like in appearance, whereas “carquejas” have stems that are modified as cladodes and are devoid of leaves or have diminutive, scalelike leaves. Despite these major differences in their growth forms, stems, and leaves, the species within these groups show close resemblances in their morphologies. This chapter provides a comprehensive review of the morphology and anatomy of the genus and discusses the main morpho-anatomical features helpful in the identification of various Baccharis species. Further research involving comparative morpho-anatomical studies are required to better understand the species diversity as well as to develop a more accurate classification of Baccharis as well as of Asteraceae.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Morpho-anatomy is the study of morphological and anatomical forms and structures with emphasis on features, which may be useful in distinguishing the species. A morphological examination is considered the first and preferred method of botanical authentication when the required features are available.
Plant anatomy is valuable for the evaluation of dried plant material, especially for fragmented or powdered material. Dried or fragmented plant parts do not result in the loss of most microscopic characteristics, which makes plant anatomy the most stable technique for the evaluation of plant characteristics when it comes to authentication.
Morphological and anatomical analyses are inherent procedures in almost all pharmacopoeias and are the main identification tests required for the herbal industry. Even though the individual structural elements are relatively common within the same type of plant parts, how the elements are organized gives a plant species its characteristic fingerprint (Upton et al. 2011). Additionally, morphology and microscopy of botanical samples and microscopic descriptions of impurities are included in most pharmacopoeias demonstrating the importance of these characteristics in the quality control of medicinal plants.
Previous workers have stated that many Baccharis species have analogous morphologies making their morphological identification problematic (Freire et al. 2007; Budel et al. 2008). Species within the section Caulopterae, such as B. crispa Spreng. and B. articulata (Lam.) Pers., show a high degree of phenotypic plasticity leading to difficulties in species identification even in flowering stages (Simões-Pires et al. 2005).
In this context, microscopic characteristics can provide helpful information in solving taxonomic problems (Bobek et al. 2016; Budel et al. 2018a).
Another problem is that different species of Baccharis are called by the same folk names and used indiscriminately for the same therapeutic indications (Budel and Duarte 2010; Bobek et al. 2015a, 2016; Budel et al. 2018a). Considering traditional names, “carquejas” (plants with winged stems or cladodes) and “vassouras” (plants with broom-like and without winged stems) are the most common, creating confusion in the identification of Baccharis species. The confusion due to similar popular names is one of the main causes of misidentification of plant drugs (Upton et al. 2011).
2 Morphology
Baccharis L. is one of the largest genera in the subfamily Asteroideae Lindley within the family Asteraceae (Compositae) and comprises about 440 species (Heiden et al., 2019). All of the species are native to New World with about 90% of them occurring in South America (Nesom 1990). It is also introduced into several parts of the world including Europe, Transcaucasus, and Australia. Baccharis is commonly called “Groundsel tree” although the name “Groundsel” is also applied to different species of Senecio L. (Asteraceae). Species of Baccharis comprise mostly dioecious shrubs and show a wide range of morphological diversity. The most important morphological characters useful in Baccharis species identification include the growth form; branching pattern; the shape, size, and margins of leaves; type of indumentum; shape and arrangement of flower heads; and number of nerves on cypselae (fruits). Both staminate and pistillate specimens are important for species identification. Natural hybridization between different species occurs, resulting in the development of intermediate forms showing interspecific variations. For example, hybridization between B. halimifolia L. and B. neglecta Britton and between B. halimifolia and B. angustifolia Michx. has been reported. Intermediate forms between B. thesioides Kunth and B. bigelovii A. Gray have been observed in southern Arizona (eFloras 2008).
The genus is broadly characterized by the tufted indumentums of the leaves and stems, which consists of fused trichomes with a single adjoining basal cell. Dioecy is a common occurrence (Müller 2006).
The genus Baccharis has not been taxonomically revised, as a whole. Due to the high number of species, the revisionary works in the past have been carried out at the level of geographical regions. In South America, there are works in Colombia (Cuatrecasas 1969), central Argentina (Ariza-Espinar 1973), and Brazil (Barroso and Bueno 2002). Barroso (1976) and Oliveria et al. (2006) have studied the species for Brazil and reported 125 and 146 species, respectively. Nesom (1990) studied 43 species from the USA, Mexico, and Central America and grouped those under 6 sections.
Several authors have proposed different infrageneric classifications of Baccharis mainly based on morphological characters. De Candolle (1836) was the first author to classify Baccharis into eight sections based on leaf morphology. Baker (1882–1884) classified the Brazilian species into six series also using leaf characteristics. Cuatrecasas (1967) revised the Colombian species into sections. Giuliano (2001) subdivided 96 Argentinean species of Baccharis into 15 sections. Of these, the sect. Caulopterae DC. is characterized by the presence of longitudinal wings on the stems. This section was previously named Alatae Less. (Ariza-Espinar 1973) and Trimera group (Barroso 1976).
Heering (1904) provided the first subgeneric classification of Baccharis with five subgenera, namely, Baccharis, Molina, Pteronioides, Stephananthus, and Tarchonanthoides. In the most recent subgeneric classification of the genus, Müller (2006) accepted four of the five subgenera proposed by Heering (1904) and placed the subgenus Stephananthus as incertae sedis (“of uncertain placement”). Heiden and Pirani (2012) provided a taxonomic revision of the subgen. Tarchonanthoides with four sections, namely, Canescentes, Coridifoliae, Curitybensis, and Tarchonanthoides. This subgenus consists of 21 species and is characterized mainly by the corollas of the female florets with 5 papillose teeth and the male florets with a stigma nearly fully divided into lanceolate or ovate branches (Heiden and Pirani 2012). Recently, based on phylogenetic studies, Heiden et al. (2019) classified Baccharis species into 7 subgenera and 47 sections.
In some instances, different species of Baccharis exhibit similar morphological features leading to confusion in species identification. For example, B. brevifolia DC., B. microdonta DC., B. pauciflosculosa DC., and B. trilobata A.S. Oliveira & Marchiori are all commonly called “vassouras” (meaning “broom”) in Brazil, due to their similar appearances (Bobek et al. 2016) as well as their use as brooms to clean the house. The name “carqueja” is applied to multiple species, including B. crispa, B. articulata, and B. pentaptera (Less.) DC. (Budel et al. 2005), due to their close resemblances in the morphological features. As a result, different species are used interchangeably (Gianello et al. 2000).
The number of striations (ribs) on the stems can be useful in recognizing species. Bobek et al. (2016) observed 5-6- ribbed stems in B. brevifolia and B. pauciflosculosa and 4-ribbed stems in B. microdonta and B. trilobata , using anatomical evaluation. The shape of the stem in the cross section is determined by the number of ribs.
2.1 Morphological Description
Baccharis are perennial subshrubs, shrubs, or trees, growing 0.1–6 m tall, usually dioecious and rarely monoecious, usually woody at base, rarely rhizomatous [e.g., B. acaulis (Wedd. ex R.E.Fr.) Cabrera and B. davidsonii Cuatrec.]. In the “vassouras” group of species, including B. sarothroides A. Gray, B. brevifolia (Fig. 9.1a), B. dracunculifolia DC. (Fig. 9.1b), B. microdonta (Fig. 9.1c), B. pauciflosculosa (Fig. 9.1d), and B. trilobata, the plants are often much-branched and broom-like (Fig. 9.1a–d).
Stems in Baccharis are erect, ascending, procumbent (B. caespitosa (Ruiz & Pav.) Pers., B. alpina Kunth, B. humifusa Kunth, and B. pumila Joch. Müll.) or rarely prostrate (B. acaulis), short or well developed, simple (B. texana (Torrey & A.Gray) A.Gray) or many-branched, usually striated, rarely terete and smooth, glabrous to hispidulous or villous (B. plummerae A.Gray subsp. plummerae), often resinous (B. plummerae A.Gray subsp. glabrata, B. pteronioides DC.); young stems are usually green.
In the “carqueja” group of species, the stems are modified into cladodes with 2–5 wings (B. glaziovii, B. junciformis DC. (syn. B. usterii Heering), B. trimera, B. pentaptera (Fig. 9.2a), and B. sagittalis (Less.) DC.), which run along the longitudinal axis of the stem. These stems are either leafless or with sparse leaves that are reduced to scales, such as in B. glaziovii (Fig. 9.2b).
Leaves cauline, sometimes deciduous and sparse or absent at flowering (B. vanessae R.M.Beauch.), sometimes reduced to scales distally (B. sarothroides), simple, alternate, rarely in rosettes, sessile (B. sergiloides A. Gray), or petiolate; lamina 1–3-nerved, linear, oblong, lanceolate, ovate, obovate or rhomboid, glabrous or rarely hispidulous or villous, often gland-dotted and resinous, usually acute or obtuse at apex, acute or tapering at base, entire or finely to coarsely serrate along margins (eFloras 2008).
Inflorescences are head-like, sessile or stalked, unisexual, discoid, solitary (B. acaulis, B. alpina, B. davidsonii, B. pumila, and B. tola Phil.), or in paniculiform, corymbiform, or racemiform (B. pteronioides) arrays; involucres cylindrical to campanulate or hemispheric, 3–9 mm in diameter; phyllaries 15–40 arranged in 2–5 series, mid usually green, sometimes red or purple, 1-nerved, ovate to lanceolate, oblique, scarious along margins, often erose, ciliate or keeled, midrib conspicuous or not, obtuse, acute, acuminate or keeled at apex, glabrous or hispid; receptacles flat, tholiform or conical, pitted or smooth, glabrous, tomentose or glandular, and usually epaleate. Staminate florets 10–50; corollas white to pale yellow, tubular; lobes 5, spreading-reflexed, triangular to ovate; pappi 20–40, equal, minutely barbellate or distally with plumose bristles. Pistillate florets 20–150; corollas whitish, narrowly tubular; lobes 5, spreading-reflexed, triangular to ovate; styles glabrate, flattened, and unappendaged (eFloras 2008).
Fruits are cypselae or achenes, obovoid to cylindrical, slightly compressed or 5-angled, 5–10-nerved, glabrous or hispid, light brown; pappi 25–50, whitish, tawny or brownish, minutely barbellate, apically attenuate bristles in 1–3 series, persistent or deciduous, accrescent in fruit (eFloras 2008).
3 Anatomy
Anatomical characteristics are important in the authentication of plants, especially when the plants are dried or fragmented. The drying and the fragmentation of the plants do not result in the loss of the most relevant microscopic characteristics, that is, the anatomical markers. Therefore, these are the reliable characters helpful in the identification and quality control of the botanical samples. Also, microscopy has the advantage of requiring small amounts of material. Microscopic analysis is helpful in the detection of inorganic materials adhered to parts of the plant, such as roots. Microscopy can also detect when different parts of the same plant are present in the sample.
Certain anatomical characteristics helpful in the discrimination of species of Baccharis include the epidermal features (contour of anticlinal epidermal cell walls, type of stomata, type of trichomes), the organization of mesophyll and vascular tissues, and the secretory ducts and morphotypes of crystals.
3.1 Epidermal Characters
The epidermis is a permanent and complex tissue, including different kinds of cells. Epidermal features can show many different anatomical markers, which may help in the diagnosis of the plant. Several authors have contributed to resolving taxonomic problems in Baccharis through the micromorphological analysis of leaves (Muller 2006; Freire et al. 2007; Bobek et al. 2016; Budel et al. 2018b; Almeida et al. 2021).
Epidermal characteristics, such as cuticle, epidermal cells, stomata, and trichomes, have been identified as important tools in the delimitation of some complex genera, such as Passiflora (Wosch et al. 2015) and Piper (Gogosz et al. 2012), and so is Baccharis. They also help in distinguishing medicinal species, since drugs of pharmaceutical use are made up of dried and fragmented parts in which the different macroscopic features of the species are not generally distinguishable (Jackson and Snowdon 1990; Jorge 2000).
3.1.1 Epidermal Cells
The epidermis is the outermost cell layer of a plant protecting against evaporation and attack by microorganisms and herbivores. In a surface view of the epidermis, the anticlinal cell walls may be straight, wavy, or sinuous. Cutin, in the form of the cuticle layer, is deposited on the outer surface of the epidermis to offer a waterproof surface enabling water retention. The cuticle may have a flat surface or display characteristic ornamentation.
In Baccharis, the leaves have straight (Fig. 9.3a) to wavy (Fig. 9.3b) anticlinal epidermal cell walls as seen in B. illinita DC. (Fig. 9.3a), B. microdonta, B. punctulata DC. (Fig. 9.3b), B. sphenophylla Dusén ex Malme (Budel et al. 2018a), B. uncinella DC. (Budel and Duarte 2008a), B. junciformis (Budel and Duarte 2010), B. trilobata, and B. brevifolia (Bobek et al. 2016). However, sinuous anticlinal epidermal walls (Fig. 9.3c) were reported for B. anomala DC. (Budel and Duarte 2008b), B. decussata (Klatt) Hieron., and B. pentlandii DC. (Freire et al. 2007). All of these species belong to Baccharis subgen. Molina (Pers.) Heering. This characteristic can be helpful for the identification of the species, as well as for the delimitation of Baccharis sections.
In Baccharis, the cuticle is typically striated (Fig. 9.3e–i), but it can also be smooth as observed in the leaves of B. microdonta (Fig. 9.3d), and winged stems of B. articulata (Cortadi et al. 1999) and B. myriocephala Baker (Sá and Neves 1996). The striate cuticle can occur on both surfaces or either on the abaxial or the adaxial sides (Bobek et al. 2016; Budel et al. 2018a; Almeida et al. 2021). Besides, species of this genus can show different cuticle orientation around the stomata (Fig. 9.3g, h) and the trichomes (Fig. 9.3i). For example, B. punctulata presents the cuticle striations arranged in a perpendicular orientation around stomata (Fig. 9.3g); cuticle striations can also occur perpendicular to trichome bases (Fig. 9.3i) or as concentric rings around the stomata (Fig. 9.3h), as reported in B. pentaptera (Budel et al. 2015). The cuticle is generally smooth in B. microdonta (Fig. 9.3d), but it is striated and radiated around stomata and trichome bases (Budel et al. 2018a).
In Baccharis, the leaf epidermis is usually unilayered and covered by a thin cuticle (Budel et al. 2018a). However, a thick cuticle was observed on both sides of B. coridifolia DC. (Budel and Duarte 2007), B. ochracea Spreng. (Barreto et al. 2015), and B. spicata (Lam.) Baill. (Oliveira et al. 2011) and on the adaxial leaf surface of B. uncinella (Budel and Duarte 2008a). Thick cuticles are also observed in the stems of some Baccharis species, for example, B. spicata (Oliveira et al. 2011).
3.1.2 Stomata
According to the arrangement of the surrounding epidermal or subsidiary cells, numerous stomatal types are distinguished. Types of stomata can help narrow the possible identity of unknown plant material. The presence or absence of stomata, size of stomata, stomatal index, and types of stomata are important features for characterizing and differentiating the species. In that sense, Rodriguez et al. (2010) reported that the density of stomata can help differentiate B. articulata out of B. crispa.
In Baccharis, anomocytic (Fig. 9.4a, e) and anisocytic (Fig. 9.4b) stomata types are the most common. However, other types of stomata have also been reported, such as cyclocytic type in B. articulata, B. brevifolia, B. illinita, B. microdonta (Fig. 9.4c), and B. notosergila Griseb.; actinocytic in B. brevifolia (Fig. 9.4d), B. boliviensis (Wedd.) Cabrera, B. conferta Kunth, and B. pauciflosculosa; hexacytic in B. brevifolia (Fig. 9.4h); tetracytic (Fig. 9.4f) in B. reticularioides Deble & A.S.Oliveira, B. sphenophylla, and B. trilobata; and staurocytic in B. conferta, B. microdonta (Fig. 9.4g), and B. pauciflosculosa (Freire et al. 2007; Pereira et al. 2014; Bobek et al. 2016; Budel et al. 2018a).
Amphistomatic leaves frequently occur in Baccharis (Freire et al. 2007; Molares et al. 2009; Budel et al. 2013; Bobek et al. 2015a, b; Barreto et al. 2015). However, some species, including B. coridifolia (Budel and Duarte 2007) and B. punctulata (Budel et al. 2018a), possess hypostomatic leaves. This characteristic is helpful in the diagnosis of Baccharis species, as demonstrated in the studies of Oliveira et al. (2011), Bobek et al. (2016), and Budel et al. (2018a).
Micro-measurements of stomata revealed that the majority of the species have stomata between 20 and 60 μm long (Freire et al. 2007; Rodriguez et al. 2013; Budel et al. 2018a). However, some species , such as B. articulata (60–75 μm) and B. illinita (75–105 μm), have larger stomata measuring more than 60 μm in length (Freire et al. 2007). The value of the stomatal index (percentage stomata out of the total number of epidermal cells plus stomata) is reported to range from 5 (B. articulata) to 16 (B. punctulata) (Rodriguez et al. 2013; Budel et al. 2018a).
3.1.3 Trichomes
Trichomes are small hairs or other outgrowths from the epidermis of plants. The two primary types of trichomes are glandular and non-glandular. Glandular trichomes possess the apical cells modified to secrete or store substances. Commonly, the secretions of these trichomes are responsible for biological activities. The recognition of the type and form of trichomes has been helpful in species identification. Non-glandular trichomes, or the covering trichomes, are generally characterized by having an acute apical cell. In Baccharis, trichomes are more common in leaves, but they are also sometimes present in stems and flowers.
Trichomes are considered to be the most important anatomical markers for the diagnosis of Baccharis species, followed by stomata type and epidermal cell walls (Freire et al. 2007). They usually appear isolated (Figs. 9.3i, and 9.5a, c–g) or in clusters (Figs. 9.3d, e, and 9.5h, i, k, l), arising from epidermal depressions (Fig. 9.5f, g, j). Simple non-glandular trichomes (Fig. 9.5a) formed by around six cells were present only in B. anomala (Budel and Duarte 2008b). Considering glandular trichomes, flagelliform (Figs. 9.3e, and 9.5b, c, e, f, g, i) and biseriate (Fig. 9.5f, h–l) types of trichomes have been commonly reported in Baccharis species (Budel et al. 2005; Freire et al. 2007; Bobek et al. 2016; Budel et al. 2018a; Almeida et al. 2021).
Biseriate glandular trichomes are formed by two pairs of basal cells and a head with up to four pairs of secretory cells. They appear singly as in B. uncinella (Budel and Duarte 2008a), in clusters of a single trichome type (Fig. 9.5l) as in B. sphenophylla (Budel et al. 2018a) or in clusters mixed with flagelliform trichomes (Fig. 9.5h, i, k) as seen in B. illinita (Budel et al. 2018a). Some species of Baccharis possess a pair of druses within each of the secretory head cells (Fig. 9.5i, k, l), as observed in B. microdonta, B. punctulata, and B. sphenophylla (Budel et al. 2018a).
Flagelliform glandular trichomes have some variations, including simple flagelliform with straight body (Fig. 9.5b, e, f, g, i), as seen in B. microdonta (Budel et al. 2018a), B. pentaptera (Budel et al. 2015), B. ochracea (Budel et al. 2012), B. singularis (Souza et al. 2011), B. spicata (Oliveira et al. 2011), B. trilobata (Bobek et al. 2016), B. aracatubaensis, and B. organensis (Zuccolotto et al. 2019); branched with straight body (Fig. 9.3c, e), as observed in B. coridifolia (Budel and 2007), B. uncinella (Fig. 9.5c), and B. erioclada (Fig. 9.5e); aseptate simple flagellate in B. artemisioides Hook. & Arn. (Freire et al. 2007) and B. caprariifolia DC. (Bobek et al. 2015a); filiform flagellate with pointed terminal cell in B. multiflora Kunth or pear-like and rounded at the apex (Fig. 9.5d) in B. megapotamica (Budel et al. 2012); and flagellate with C-shaped curved body (Fig. 9.5h), as observed in B. punctulata (Budel et al. 2018a). The body in these trichomes is secretory, voluminous, and made up of 3–9 cells. The apical cell is whip-like, tubular, and translucent, containing dense oil substances (Fig. 9.5g).
3.2 Mesophyll
In Baccharis, the organization of leaf mesophyll has correspondence to the chlorenchyma arrangement in the wings of cladodes. The majority of the species of Baccharis possesses isobilateral mesophyll (Fig. 9.4a). However, dorsiventral arrangement (Fig. 9.4b) was observed in B. anomala (Budel and Duarte 2008b), B. singularis (Vell.) (Souza et al. 2011), B. ochracea (Fig. 9.6b), and B. punctulata (Budel et al. 2018a).
Oil bodies in the leaf mesophyll (Fig. 9.6c) are present in some Baccharis species, e.g., B. illinita, B. microdonta, B. punctulata, B. reticularioides, and B. sphenophylla. They are specifically located in palisade parenchyma cells and some spongy parenchyma cells (Budel et al. 2018a). Minor collateral vascular bundles surrounded by an endodermis traverse the spongy parenchyma (Fig. 9.6d) in all Baccharis species studied (Bobek et al. 2016; Budel et al. 2018a).
In the “carquejas,” the chlorenchyma in the wing of cladodes consists of palisade parenchyma, comprising approximately three layers of short cells beneath both sides of the epidermis, and spongy parenchyma in the central region (Fig. 9.6e). The isobilateral arrangement of the photosynthetic parenchyma is in correspondence to what is described for the wings of B. articulata, B. myriocephala, B. crispa (Rodriguez et al. 2008), and B. sagittalis (Less.) DC. (Petenatti et al. 2007).
At the wing edges, “carquejas” usually have 2–3 layers of angular collenchyma below the epidermis, a collateral vascular bundle with a perivascular fiber cap adjoining the phloem and secretory ducts (Fig. 9.6f), as observed in B. junciformis (Budel and Duarte 2010). However, only sclerenchymatous tissue consisting of fibers can be found at the wing edges of some species, such as B. myriocephala (Sá and Neves 1996).
3.3 Midrib Shape in Cross Section
The shape of the midrib in a transverse section helps in the diagnosis of species as reported for different genera, including Passiflora (Wosch et al. 2015), Mikania (Almeida et al. 2017), and Baccharis (Bobek et al. 2016; Budel et al. 2018a) (Fig. 9.7a–i). Different shapes were reported for Baccharis species, such as plano-convex and prominently rounded on the abaxial side (Fig. 9.7a) in B. anomala; biconvex in B. illinita (Fig. 9.7c), B. junciformis (Fig. 9.7i), B. cognata (Budel et al. 2013), and B. reticularioides (Budel et al. 2018a); biconvex with a rounded projection on the adaxial side in B. pauciflosculosa (Budel et al. 2018a); slightly concave-convex in B. rufescens (Fig. 9.7f); concave-convex in B. microdonta (Fig. 9.7h); almost flat-convex in B. caprariifolia (Fig. 9.7b) and B. megapotamica (Fig. 9.7c); flat-convex, but truncate on the abaxial side, in B. ochracea (Fig. 9.7e); flat on both sides in B. trilobata (Bobek et al. 2016); and convex-flat in B. cultrata (Fig. 9.7g).
3.4 Vascular System
In the leaves, collateral vascular bundles traverse the mesophyll and are commonly encircled by a parenchymatous sheath (Fig. 9.8a). The midrib vascular system is frequently represented by one collateral and circular bundle that is surrounded by ground parenchyma with lignified perivascular fibers abutting the xylem and phloem, as observed in B. illinita (Fig. 9.8b) and B. microdonta (Fig. 9.8c).
In the petiole, the vascular system is collateral and commonly similar to the midrib. Otherwise, they can show different organization, such as in B. singularis that presents one vascular bundle in open arc (Souza et al. 2011), whereas three or more collateral vascular bundles arranged in an open arc (Fig. 9.8d) are observed in B. spicata (Oliveira et al. 2011), B. glaziovii (Jasinski et al. 2014), and B. microdonta (Bobek et al. 2016).
In the regular stem (Fig. 9.8e) as well as the central axis of the cladodes (Fig. 9.8f), the vascular cylinder presents phloem outward and xylem inward. The xylem tracheary elements are arranged in radial rows and separated by parenchyma cells and fibers (Oliveira et al. 2011; Souza et al. 2011; Jasinski et al. 2014; Budel et al. 2015; Bobek et al. 2015a, b, 2016).
3.5 Secretory Ducts
Internal secretory structures may have various forms; some are isodiametric, such as the secretory cells and cavities, while others are elongated, such as the secretory ducts. In Baccharis, these ducts have uniseriate epithelium of 6–10 cells (Fig. 9.8a, b, c, e, f) containing dense cytoplasm and lipophilic contents. In the mesophyll, the secretory ducts are associated with the minor vascular bundles (Fig. 9.8a), adjacent to the phloem and the parenchyma sheath (Fig. 9.8a, b). In the midrib, usually, a single secretory duct occurs near the phloem (Fig. 9.8b), as observed in B. coridifolia (Budel and Duarte 2007), B. ochracea (Barreto et al. 2015), and B. aracatubaensis Malag. (Zuccolotto et al. 2019). However, B. pauciflosculosa (Budel et al. 2018a) has two secretory ducts, and B. organensis Baker has three secretory ducts in the midrib (Zuccolotto et al. 2019). Independent of whether regular stems or cladodes are examined, the secretory ducts are localized in the inner portion of the cortex next to the parenchyma sheathes (Fig. 9.8e, f) in all Baccharis species (Budel et al. 2003, 2004a, b, 2013; Budel and Duarte 2009; Oliveira et al. 2011; Souza et al. 2013; Pereira et al. 2014; Bobek et al. 2015a, b; Almeida et al. 2021).
3.6 Crystals
Several plants accumulate a variety of shapes and sizes of insoluble calcium salts, which, based on their morphology, can be crystalline sand, druses, raphides, styloids, and prismatic crystals. Typically, the morphotypes of crystals as well as their distribution in plant tissues are constant within a specific taxon (Franceschi and Horner 1980; Nakata 2003).
Crystals in plants have several functions, including the elimination of the excess of calcium ions, detoxification of heavy metals and aluminum, cellular ion balance, osmotic regulation, tissue mechanical support, and promotion of mechanical defense (Franceschi and Nakata 2005). Although calcium oxalate is more common in plants, calcium sulfate, magnesium oxalate, and other elements, such as potassium and silicon, can also be found in the crystals (He et al. 2012).
The identification of calcium oxalate crystals is done using a light microscope (LM), polarizing microscope, or scanning electron microscope (SEM). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) coupled with SEM (Brito et al. 2021) is used to identify the elemental chemical composition of the crystals (as shown in Fig. 9.9).
Crystals of calcium oxalate are considered important for authentication purposes because the form, shape, and occurrence of these crystals in plants are species- and tissue-specific; hence, the presence or absence of a particular type of crystal can be used as a taxonomic character (Lersten and Horner 2011; Horner et al. 2012). They are also relevant in the systematic investigations and phylogenetic and ecophysiological characteristics of several plant families (Lersten and Horner 2011).
Different crystals morphotypes have been reported for several species of Baccharis and are often found in the stem pith (Budel and Duarte 2008b; Souza et al. 2011; Oliveira et al. 2011; Jasinski et al. 2014; Barreto et al. 2015; Bobek et al. 2015a, b; Budel et al. 2015; Almeida et al. 2021). The most common types are styloids (Fig. 9.10a, d, e, h, i, j, k), bipyramids (Fig. 9.10b, c, e, i), square bipyramids (Fig. 9.10f, l), and elongated square bipyramids (Fig. 9.10j); however, other types such as tile-shaped crystals (Fig. 9.10g) are also rarely observed.
Several species of Baccharis show different shapes of crystals within the same species. For example, crystal sand, styloids and square dipyramids in B. brevifolia; rare styloids in B. microdonta; crystal sand and square dipyramids in B. pauciflosculosa; and crystal sand, square dipyramids, elongated square dipyramids, styloids, and tabular crystals in piles that look like a tower in B. trilobata (Bobek et al. 2016) are observed. Additionally, a pair of druses is found within the secretory head of biseriate glandular trichomes (Fig. 9.5i, k, l) in some species of Baccharis (Budel et al. 2018a).
Morphotypes of calcium oxalate crystals have been described in the caulinar axis of carquejas, for instance, crystal sand and square bipyramids in B. junciformis (Budel and Duarte 2010); elongated square bipyramids in B. articulata; elongated square bipyramids, square bipyramids, cubes, and tetragonal prisms in B. crispa (Cortadi et al. 1999); raphides and hexagonal and tetragonal prisms in B. triangularis; raphides and tetragonal prisms in B. sagittalis (Petenatti et al. 2007) and square bipyramids in B. microcephala (Budel and Duarte 2009); and raphides, styloids, and elongated square bipyramids in B. glaziovii (Jasinski et al. 2014).
3.7 Other Stem Characteristics
The cortex in Baccharis, not only in the stems but also in the caulinar axis, has collenchyma in alternation with chlorenchyma in several species, e.g., B. anomala, B. microcephala, B. ochracea, B. spicata, B. stenocephala, B. uncinella, and B. junciformis. This characteristic was also found in B. sagittalis and B. triangularis (Petenatti et al. 2007). However, a continuous stratum of collenchyma could be observed in some members of the genus, such as B. caprariifolia and B. singularis (Souza et al. 2011). In addition, one to five layers of angular collenchyma were found in B. brevifolia, B. microdonta, B. pauciflosculosa, and B. trilobata, particularly in the ribs (Bobek et al. 2016).
The endodermis is present in stems and roots and occurs as a continuous uniseriate layer separating the central cylinder from the cortical tissues. Ariza-Espinar (1973) reported that Casparian strips were absent in Baccharis. On the contrary, endodermis with Casparian strips was observed in the central axis of B. myriocephala (Sá and Neves 1996) and B. crispa (Cortadi et al. 1999).
3.8 Root Characteristics
Anatomical studies involving Baccharis roots are uncommon in literature, except for the root of B. crispa (syn. B. trimera (Less.) DC.), which has been previously studied. In a transverse section, the roots of this species exhibit early secondary growth with persistent unilayered rhizodermis. The cortex has 6–8 layers of assimilation parenchyma containing starch grains, followed by endodermis and pericycle layers. The vascular system is formed by a continuous ring of phloem with fiber caps. The xylem is porous and diffuse with solitary or rarely small groups of vessel elements and numerous fibers (Minteguiaga et al. 2018).
4 Final Considerations
Even though the two groups, carquejas and vassouras, are easily distinguishable by their stem and leaf morphological features, it is often difficult to distinguish the species within the same group due to their close resemblances. To address this problem, anatomical and micromorphological features of the whole plants and their parts can be used. The most important features that can help in the identification of different species of Baccharis include the habit of the plant, branching pattern, features of stems, presence or absence of cladodes and wings, leaf characters, and arrangement of the floral heads.
Anatomical and micromorphological features have played important roles in the identification of complex species. Numerous reports stress the usefulness of anatomical characteristics in the identification of Baccharis species. Noteworthy features that can help in the quality control and authentication of Baccharis species include the epidermis (contour of anticlinal epidermal cell walls and type of stomata and trichomes), mesophyll, vascular tissue, secretory ducts, and the type and macro pattern of calcium oxalate crystals.
Despite the importance of morpho-anatomical studies in solving taxonomic problems, a large portion of the genus remains unexplored. Therefore, future studies focusing on comparative anatomy and micromorphology of Baccharis species from different sections will not only help in the quality control and species identification but also aid in the development of a more accurate classification of this large and diversified genus.
References
Almeida VP, Hirt AA, Raeski PA et al (2017) Comparative morphoanatomical analysis of Mikania species. Rev Bras Farmacogn 27:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2016.05.002
Almeida VP, Heiden G, Raman V et al (2021) Microscopy and histochemistry of leaves and stems of Baccharis subgenus Coridifoliae (Asteraceae) through LM and SEM-EDS. Microsc Microanal 27:1273–1289
Ariza-Espinar L (1973) Las especies de Baccharis (Compositae) de Argentina Central. Bol Acad Nac Cienc Córdoba 50:176–305
Barreto IF, Paula JP, Farago PV et al (2015) Pharmacobotanical study of leaves and stems of Baccharis ochracea Spreng for quality control. Lat Am J Pharm 34:1497–1502
Barroso GM (1976) Compositae – Subtribo Baccharidinae Hoffmann – Estudo das espécies ocorrentes no Brasil. Rodriguésia 28:1–273
Barroso GM, Bueno OL (2002) Compostas. Subtribo: Baccharidinae. Flora Ilustrada Catarinense. Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues, Santa Catarina, pp 1–302
Bobek VB, Almeida VP, Pereira CB et al (2015a) Comparative pharmacobotanical analysis of Baccharis caprariifolia DC. and B. erioclada DC. from Campos Gerais, Parana, Southern of Brazil. Lat Am J Pharm 34:1396–1402
Bobek VB, Budel JM, Nakashima T (2015b) Contribution to the pharmacobotanical study of Baccharis: B. cultrata Baker. Visão Acadêmica 16:18–29. https://doi.org/10.5380/acd.v16i1.40371
Bobek VB, Heiden G, Oliveira CF et al (2016) Comparative analytical micrographs of vassouras (Baccharis, Asteraceae). Rev Bras Farmacogn 26:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2016.05.001
Brito PS, Sabedotti C, Flores TB, Raman V, Bussade J, Farago P, Manfron J (2021) Light and scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and histochemistry of Eucalyptus tereticornis. Microsc Microanal 27:1295–1303
Budel JM, Duarte MR (2007) Caracteres morfoanatômicos de partes vegetativas aéreas de Baccharis coridifolia DC. (Asteraceae-Astereae). Lat Am J Pharm 26:723–731
Budel JM, Duarte MR (2008a) Estudo farmacobotânico de folha e caule de Baccharis uncinella DC., Asteraceae. Lat Am J Pharm 27:740–746
Budel JM, Duarte MR (2008b) Estudo farmacobotânico de partes vegetativas aéreas de Baccharis anomala DC., Asteraceae. Rev Bras Farmacogn 18:761–768. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2008000500022
Budel JM, Duarte MR (2009) Análise morfoanatômica comparativa de duas espécies de carqueja: Baccharis microcephala DC. e B. trimera (Less.) DC., Asteraceae. Braz J Pharm Sci 45:75–85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-82502009000100009
Budel JM, Duarte MR (2010) Macro and microscopic characters of the aerial vegetative organs of carqueja: Baccharis usterii Heering. Braz Arch Biol Technol 53:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132010000100016
Budel JM, Duarte MR, Santos CAM et al (2003) Macro and microscopical identification of four species of Baccharis from Trimera group. Rev Bras Farmacogn 13:42–43. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2003000400014
Budel JM, Duarte MR, Santos CAM et al (2004a) Morfoanatomia foliar e caulinar de Baccharis dracunculifolia DC., Asteraceae. Acta Farm Bonaer 23:477–483
Budel JM, Duarte MR, Santos CAM (2004b) Stem morphoanatomy of Baccharis cylindrica (Less.) DC., Asteraceae. Rev Bras Cienc Farm 40:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-93322004000100014
Budel JM, Duarte MR, Santos CAM et al (2005) O progresso da pesquisa sobre o gênero Baccharis, Asteraceae: I – estudos botânicos. Rev Bras Farmacogn 15:268–271. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-695X2005000300018
Budel JM, Matzenbacher NI, Duarte MR (2008) Genus Baccharis (Asteraceae): a review of chemical and pharmacological studies. In: Singh VK, Govil JN (eds) Phytopharmacology and therapeutic values III. Studium Press LLC, Houston, pp 1–18
Budel JM, Duarte MR, Döll-Boscardin PM et al (2012) Composition of essential oils and secretory structures of Baccharis anomala, B. megapotamica and B. ochracea. J Essent Oil Res 24:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.2012.645634
Budel JM, Farago PV, Duarte MR (2013) Pharmacobotanical study of Baccharis cognata DC. (Asteraceae: Astereae). Lat Am J Pharm 32:540–544
Budel JM, Paula JP, Santos VLP et al (2015) Pharmacobotanical study of Baccharis pentaptera. Rev Bras Farmacogn 25:314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.07.007
Budel JM, Raman V, Monteiro LM et al (2018a) Foliar anatomy and microscopy of six Brazilian species of Baccharis (Asteraceae). Microsc Res Tech 88:832–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23045
Budel JM, Wang M, Raman V et al (2018b) Essential oils of five Baccharis species: investigations on the chemical composition and biological activities. Molecules 23:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23102620
Cortadi A, Di Sapio O, McCargo J et al (1999) Anatomical studies of Baccharis articulata, Baccharis crispa and Baccharis trimera, “Carquejas” used in folk medicine. Pharm Biol 37:357–365. https://doi.org/10.1076/phbi.37.5.357.6054
Cuatrecasas J (1967) Revisión de las especies colombianas del género Baccharis. Rev Acad Colomb Cienc Exact Fis Nat 13:5–102
Cuatrecasas J (1969) Notas adicionales, taxonómicas y corológicas sobre Baccharis. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales 13:201–226
De Candolle AP (1836) Compositae: Baccharis. In: Candolle D (ed) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 5. Treuttel & Würtz, Paris, pp 398–429
eFloras (2008) Published on the Internet. http://www.efloras.org. Accessed 4 Mar 2019
Franceschi VR, Horner-Jr HT (1980) Calcium oxalate crystals in plants. Bot Rev 46:361–427
Franceschi VR, Nakata PA (2005) Calcium oxalate in plants: formation and function. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:41–71. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144106
Freire SE, Urtubey E, Giuliano DA (2007) Epidermal characters of Baccharis (Asteraceae) species used in traditional medicine. Caldasia 29:23–38
Gianello JC, Ceñal JP, Giordano OS et al (2000) Medicamentos herbarios en el centro-oeste argentino II. “Carquejas”: control de calidad de las drogas oficiales e sustituyentes. Acta Farm Bonaer 19:99–103
Giuliano DA (2001) Classificación infragenérica de las espécies Argentinas de Baccharis (Asteraceae, Astereae). Darwin 39:131–154
Gogosz AM, Boeger MRT, Negrelle RRB (2012) Anatomia foliar comparativa de nove espécies do gênero Piper (Piperaceae). Rodriguésia 63:405–417. https://doi.org/10.1590/S2175-78602012000200013
He H, Bleby TM, Veneklaas EJ et al (2012) Morphologies and elemental compositions of calcium crystals in phyllodes and branchlets of Acacia robeorum (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Ann Bot 109:887–896. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs004
Heering W (1904) Die Baccharis-Arten des Hamburger Herbars. Jahrbuch der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Anstalten 21:1–46
Heiden G, Pirani JR (2012) Novelties towards a phylogenetic infrageneric classification of Baccharis (Asteraceae, Astereae). Phytotaxa 289:285–290. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.289.3.9
Heiden G, Antonelli A, Pirani JR (2019) A novel phylogenetic infrageneric classification of Baccharis (Asteraceae: Astereae), a highly diversified American genus. Taxon 68:1048–1081
Horner HT, Wanke S, Samain MS (2012) A comparison of leaf crystal macropatterns in the two sister genera Piper and Peperomia (Piperaceae). Am J Bot 99:983–997
Jackson BP, Sonwdon DW (1990) Atlas of microscopy of medicinal plants, culinary herbs and spices. CBS, New Delhi
Jasinski VCG, Silva RZ, Pontarolo R (2014) Morpho-anatomical characteristics of Baccharis glaziovii in support of its pharmacobotany. Rev Bras Farmacogn 24:609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2014.11.003
Jorge LIF (2000) Botânica aplicada ao controle de qualidade de alimentos e de medicamentos. Atheneu, São Paulo
Lersten NR, Horner HT (2011) Unique calcium oxalate “duplex” and “concretion” idioblasts in leaves of tribe Naucleeae (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 98:1–11. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000247
Minteguiaga M, Mercado MI, Ponessa GI et al (2018) Morphoanatomy and essential oil analysis of Baccharis trimera (Less.) DC. (Asteraceae) from Uruguay. Ind Crop Prod 112:488–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.040
Molares S, Gonzalez SB, Ladio A et al (2009) Etnobotánica, anatomía y caracterización físico-química del aceite esencial de Baccharis obovata Hook. et Arn. (Asteraceae: Astereae). Acta Bot Bras 23:578–589. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062009000200030
Müller J (2006) Systematics of Baccharis (Compositae, Astereae) in Bolivia, including an overview of the genus. Syst Bot Monogr 76:1–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/25027945
Nakata PA (2003) Advances in our understanding of calcium oxalate crystal formation and function in plants. Plant Sci 164:901–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00120-1
Nesom GL (1990) Infrageneric taxonomy of North and Central American Baccharis (Asteraceae: Astereae). Phytologia 69:40–46. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.part.19647
Oliveira AMA, Santos VLP, Franco CRC et al (2011) Comparative morpho-anatomical study of Baccharis curitybensis Heering ex Malme and Baccharis spicata (Lam.). Baill. Lat Am J Pharm 30:1560–1566
Oliveira AS de, Deble LP, Shneider AA et al (2006) Checklist do gênero Baccharis L. para o Brasil (Asteraceae-Astereae). Balduinia 9:17–27
Pereira CB, Farago PV, Budel JM et al (2014) New contribution to the pharmacognostic study of carquejas: Baccharis milleflora DC., Asteraceae. Lat Am J Pharm 33:841–847
Petenatti EM, Petenatti ME, Cifuente DA et al (2007) Medicamentos herbarios en el centro-oeste Argentino. VI. Caracterización y control de calidad de dos espécies de “carquejas”: Baccharis sagittalis y B. triangularis (Asteraceae). Lat Am J Pharm 26:201–208
Rodriguez MV, Gattuso S, Gattuso M (2008) Baccharis crispa y Baccharis trimera (Asteraceae): revisión y nuevos aportes para su normalización micrográfica. Lat Am J Pharm 27:387–397
Rodriguez MV, Martínez ML, Cortadi AA et al (2010) Characterization of three sect. Caulopterae species (Baccharis-Asteraceae) inferred from morphoanatomy, polypeptide profiles and spectrophotometry data. Plant Syst Evol 286:175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0297-y
Rodriguez MV, Gattuso SJ, Gattuso MA (2013) Micrographic standarization of Baccharis L. species (Asteraceae). Dominguezia 29:39–54
Sá MFA, Neves LJ (1996) Contribuição ao estudo das plantas medicinais: Baccharis myriocephala DC. Rev Bras Farm 77:88–96
Simões-Pires CA, Debenedetti S, Spegazzini E et al (2005) Investigation of the essential oil from eight species of Baccharis belonging to sect. Caulopterae (Asteraceae, Astereae): a taxonomic approach. Plant Syst Evol 253:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-005-0296-6
Souza CA, Farago PV, Duarte MR et al (2011) Pharmacobotanical study of Baccharis singularis (Vell.) G.M. Barroso, Asteraceae. Lat Am J Pharm 30:311–317
Souza JP, Santos VLP, Franco CRC et al (2013) Baccharis rufescens Spreng. var. tenuifolia (DC.) Baker: contribuição ao estudo farmacognóstico. Rev Bras Plantas Med 15:566–574. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-05722013000400013
Upton R, Graff A, Jolliffe G, Länger R, Williamson E (eds) (2011) American herbal pharmacopoeia botanical pharmacognosy – microscopic characterization of botanical medicines. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Wosch L, Imig DC, Cervi AC et al (2015) Comparative study of Passiflora taxa leaves. I. A morpho-anatomic profile. Rev Bras Farmacogn 25:328–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.06.004
Zuccolotto T, Bressana J, Lourenço AVF et al (2019) Chemical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial evaluation of essential oils and an anatomical study of the aerial parts from Baccharis species (Asteraceae). Chem Biodiv 16:e1800547. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201800547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Manfron, J., Farago, P.V., Khan, I.A., Raman, V. (2021). Morpho-anatomical Characteristics of Species of Baccharis. In: Fernandes, G.W., Oki, Y., Barbosa, M. (eds) Baccharis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83511-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83511-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83510-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83511-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)