Keywords

1 Introduction

Endophytic fungi are a group of fungi that live inside plant tissues without causing harm to the host (Faeth and Fagan 2002; Hyde and Soytong 2008). They produce a variety of enzymes and secondary compounds, which favor nutrient cycling (Sun et al. 2011; Behie and Bidochka 2014), improve plant performance and resistance to adverse conditions such as droughts and high temperatures (Rodriguez et al. 2004; Hubbard et al. 2014; Bilal et al. 2020), and minimize damage caused by herbivores and pathogenic microorganisms (Breen 1992, 1993, 1994; Fernandes and Price 1992; Hammon and Faeth 1992; Faeth and Hammon 1997; Raps and Vidal 1998; Faeth 2002; Meister et al. 2006; Oki et al. 2008, 2021; Grunseich et al. 2020). These cryptic organisms have been ignored for a long time, and their importance in species interactions and to biodiversity has been rarely studied until recently (Oki et al. 2016). According to a survey of the Web of Science database, it wasn’t until the 1990s that scientific articles started to regularly use the term “endophytic fungi” (Fig. 6.1). Although the number of studies on endophytic fungal communities has progressively increased since then, there were still only 557 publications in the first decade of the twenty-first century. Approximately 75% of all the articles about endophytes retrieved by the survey (3043 articles published from 1945 to 2019) were published in the last 10 years (2279 articles between 2010 and 2019). The discovery of the importance of endophytes in nature has captured the attention of researchers and brought a wide prospective for research and applied perspectives.

Fig. 6.1
figure 1

Number of articles found in the Web of Science database (1945 to 2020) published with the term “endophytic fungi” per year and cumulatively

Although scientific knowledge about these microorganisms is relatively recent, investigations have highlighted their remarkable diversity and wide distribution. Hundreds of species of endophytic fungi may inhabit a given host plant, with their richness being influenced by the phylogeny, ontogeny, and organs, among other factors, of the host species (Arnold et al. 2000; Cannon and Simmons 2002; Arnold and Herre 2003; Arnold and Lutzoni 2007; Banerjee 2011; Oki et al. 2016; Griffin and Carson 2018). The high diversity of endophytes indicates a wide variety of relationships with host plants and possibly a large number of ecological functions as well (Caruso et al. 2020). In this chapter we focus on the diversity and distribution of endophytic fungi found in association with species of Baccharis, a genus of shrubs and herbs that occupy many different habitats and ecosystems in their native range in the Americas, and highlight their ecological and economic potential.

2 Distribution and Diversity of Endophytic Fungi of Species of Baccharis

Despite there being 422 described species in the genus Baccharis, the associated endophytic fungal community is known for only 5: Baccharis artemisioides, B. coridifolia, B. dracunculifolia, B. megapotamica, and B. trimera (Table 6.1) (Heiden and Pirani 2016, see also Chap. 2 in this book). Nevertheless, 31 genera of endophytic fungi have already been reported from these 5 species: Alternaria, Aureobasidium, Acremonium, Aspergillus, Biscogniauxia, Ceratopicnidium, Cercospora, Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Cochliobolus, Colletotrichum, Coriolopsis, Cylindrocladium, Diaporthe, Epicoccum, Eutypella, Fusarium, Glomerella, Myrothecium, Nigrospora, Penicillium, Phoma, Phomopsis, Podospora, Preussia, Rhizoctonia, Talaromyces, Trichoderma, Scopulariopsis, Sporormiella, and Xylaria (Table 6.1). Even though none of these fungus genera were reported in all five Baccharis species, there are similarities among these plant species. Baccharis dracunculifolia and B. trimera were found to have the most similar endophytic fungi communities, sharing the following seven genera (Jaccard Index = 33%): Chaetomium, Diaporthe, Nigrospora, Phoma, Phomopsis, Preussia, and Xylaria (Fig. 6.2). Of the genera of endophytic fungi known for species of Baccharis, only 24 taxa have been identified to the species level: Aureobasidium pullulans, Aureobasidium melanogenum, Aspergillus versicolor, Aspergillus spinulosporus, Ceratopicnidium baccharidicola, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Cladosporium halotolerans, Cladosporium endophytica, Cochliobolus lunatus, Coriolopsis rigida, Diaporthe phaseolorum, Epicoccum nigrum, Eutypella scoparia, Myrothecium verrucaria, Myrothecium roridum, Penicillium citrinum, Preussia africana, Preussia pseudominima, Talaromyces muroii, Trichoderma reesei, Xylaria adscendens, Xylaria apiculata, and Xylaria venosula. Thus, the possibility exists for the description of unknown fungal species associated with Baccharis spp. and evidence of coevolution events.

Table 6.1 Taxa of endophytic fungi found among species of Baccharis.
Fig. 6.2
figure 2

Diagram showing fungal genera associated and shared among Baccharis dracunculifolia, Baccharis trimera, Baccharis artemisioides, Baccharis coridifolia, and Baccharis megapotamica

Currently, the most studied species of Baccharis is B. dracunculifolia, with 24 endophytic fungus genera reported in 5 published studies: Aureobasidium, Acremonium, Aspergillus, Biscogniauxia, Cercospora, Chaetomium, Cladosporium, Colletotrichum, Coriolopsis, Cylindrocladium, Diaporthe, Eutypella, Fusarium, Glomerella, Nigrospora, Penicillium, Phoma, Phomopsis, Preussia, Rhizoctonia, Talaromyces, Trichoderma, Scopulariopsis, and Xylaria. The species of endophytic fungi known for B. dracunculifolia are Aureobasidium pullulans, Aureobasidium melanogenum, Aspergillus versicolor, Aspergillus spinulosporus, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Cladosporium halotolerans, Cladosporium endophytica, Coriolopsis rigida, Diaporthe phaseolorum, Eutypella scoparia, Penicillium citrinum, Preussia africana, Talaromyces muroii, Trichoderma reesei, Xylaria adscendens, Xylaria apiculata, and Xylaria venosula (Figs. 6.3 and 6.4). Many of these species (e.g., A. pullulans, P. africana, and X. venosula) play important ecological roles such as improving their hosts’ defenses against herbivores and phytopathogens.

Fig. 6.3
figure 3

Endophytic fungus genera found for Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae): (a) Xylaria adscendens (Xylariaceae); (b) Biscogniauxia sp. (Xylariaceae); (c) Preussia africana (Sporormiaceae); (d) Aureobasidium pullulans (Dothioraceae); (e) Cladosporium endophytica (Cladosporiaceae); (f) Phomopsis sp. (Diaporthaceae); (g) Penicillium citrinum (Trichocomaceae); (h) Xylaria venosula (Xylariaceae); (i) Diaporthe phaseolorum (Diaporthaceae); (j) Nigrospora sp. (Trichosphaeriaceae); (k) Phoma sp. (Didymellaceae); (l) Fusarium sp. (Nectriaceae); (m) Aureobasidium melanogenum (Dothioraceae); (n) Aspergillus versicolor (Trichocomaceae); (o) Acremonium sp. (Hypocreaceae)

Fig. 6.4
figure 4

Endophytic fungi of the family Xylariaceae found in leaves of Baccharis dracunculifolia (Asteraceae)

All together, these results indicate that the taxonomic diversity of endophytic fungi associated with species of Baccharis is enormous and likely underestimated. The array of functions associated with interactions between endophytic fungi and Baccharis hosts is also expected to be very large. Thus, there is a broad perspective for future studies to address, besides their biotechnological importance, the phylogenetic relationships of endophytes and hosts and the evolution and stability of associations across species and habitats.

3 Leaf Age, Plant Sex, and the Endophytic Fungus Community

The richness of endophytic fungi found among Baccharis spp. varies according to plant organ (Oki et al. 2009; Jia et al. 2016) and organ age (Arnold and Herre 2003; Fernandes et al. 2011; Sanchez-Azofeifa et al. 2012; Nascimento et al. 2015; Christian et al. 2019). For instance, endophytic fungus richness in mature leaves of B. dracunculifolia was seven times higher than that of leaves of intermediate age growing at high altitudes of Serra do Cipó, Brazil. No endophytic fungi were found in young leaves (Oki et al. 2008).

Another relevant factor that can affect the composition of endophytic mycota, particularly in the genus Baccharis, is host plant gender. The endophytic fungi found exclusively in female plants of B. dracunculifolia did not develop from extracts from male individuals of the same species (Fernandes et al. 2018). It is likely that chemical differences between female and male plants (Darwin 1877; Wallace and Rundel 1979; Van Etten et al. 2008) determine the endophytic species that are capable of co-inhabiting these plants. Generally, female plants invest less in growth and more in resistance against herbivory than male plants (Wallace and Rundel 1979; Herms and Mattson 1992; Van Etten et al. 2008) (but see Chap. 4). Nonetheless, these questions remain to be fully addressed in this system.

4 Untapped Potential of Endophytic Fungi: Enzymes and Bioactive Compounds

4.1 Enzymes

Despite the high diversity of endophytic fungi found among species of Baccharis, knowledge regarding their enzymatic makeup is scarce. This knowledge gap undermines a better understating of the physiological relationships between endophytes and their hosts (Sun et al. 2011) and their potential for industrial application (Côrrea et al. 2014). Endophytic fungi, such as species of the genus Xylaria, have a high production of enzymes such as cellulases and ligninases, which can degrade important components of plant cell walls (e.g., cellulose and lignin) (Carroll and Carroll 1978). These enzymes could assist in the decomposition of fallen leaves and promote nutrient cycling in nature. The accumulation of endophytic fungi themselves in leaves as age progresses (e.g., Fernandes et al. 2011; Sanchez-Azofeifa et al. 2012; Nascimento et al. 2015; Christian et al. 2019) seems to be important and in need of further evaluation, as well as the relevance of these fungi to key ecosystem functions such as decomposition.

The endophyte Aureobasidium pullulans found in B. dracunculifolia can produce lipases that belong to the class of serine hydrolases and do not need the presence of cofactors in order to act, unlike most extracellular enzymes of microbial origin (Nascimento 2010). The biological function of lipases is to hydrolyze triglycerides to form free fatty acids, mono- and diacylglycerols and glycerol (Kwon and Rhee 1986; Berger and Schnelder 1992; Bornscheuer 1995; Carvalho et al. 2003). Currently, lipases are of great interest to food (e.g., aroma improvement, food conservation, reduction of saturated fat), agricultural (e.g., herbicide synthesis), energy (e.g., biodiesel and hydrocarbon production), pharmaceutical (e.g., digestive aid), and cosmetics (e.g., active ingredient in the formulation and synthesis of specific cosmetics) industries, among others (Höfelmann et al. 1985; Cortez et al. 2017). Lipases can also play an important role in plant defense since lipids and lipid metabolites released in plant membranes function as signal molecules in the activation of plant defense responses (Shah 2005).

Recent studies have also indicated that some strains of endophytic fungi, such as Fusarium sp. and Cercospora sp. in B. dracunculifolia, can produce phenoloxidases that are capable of degrading phenolic compounds such as petroleum hydrocarbons and industrial effluents (Onofre and Steilmann 2012). These are important findings for bioremediation initiatives since these contaminants can be found at ca. 35 million metric tons per year in the oceans (Rosenberg and Ron 1996). These contaminants severely impact marine biodiversity over a time span of decades and even centuries (Goldberg and Bertine 2000; Pinheiro et al. 2019; Magris and Giarizzo 2020). Much of this contamination comes from oil in municipal and industrial waste and runoff, leaks in pipelines and storage tanks, and sewage and ballast water discharge (Telli Karakoç and Ediger 2020; Pokazeev et al. 2021).

Many endophytic fungi have proven to be excellent bioremediators of heavy metals that can harm human health, such as arsenic. Some of these endophytes are resistant to arsenic and arsenate and possess the ability to transform them into volatile arsenic gases (Páez-Espino et al. 2009). Aspergillus , Cladosporium , Fusarium , Penicillium , and Trichoderma are some of the endophytic fungus genera known for their bioremediation potential. They are frequently found in plants that have tolerance to, or the ability to bioaccumulate, heavy metals (Deng et al. 2014). Coincidentally, these fungus genera are also found among species of Baccharis, mainly B. dracunculifolia. Baccharis dracunculifolia has been shown to have great phytostabilization potential for areas contaminated with arsenic (Gilberti et al. 2014). This phytostabilization potential is likely associated with the endophytic fungi in this species; however, no studies have evaluated this relationship.

4.2 Endophytic Fungi as a Source of Bioactive Compounds

Endophytic fungi represent a promising source of natural bioactive products. Researchers around the world have been intrigued by the diversity of secondary compounds produced by endophytic fungi and by the similarity between the metabolites produced by endophytic fungi and their host plants (Kusari et al. 2013). This similarity in the production of secondary compounds may be due to several factors, including (1) host plant metabolism being induced by the fungus; (2) fungus metabolism being induced by the host plant; (3) fungus sharing specific biosynthesis pathways with the host plant; and (4) host plant being able to metabolize substances of fungal origin or vice versa (e.g., Ludwig-Müller 2015).

Among the best-known examples of bioactive compounds produced by endophytic fungi is palictaxel (commercialized as Taxol) produced by Taxomyces andreanae from the medicinal tree Taxus brevifolia (Stierle et al. 1993). Palictaxel is one of the most effective chemotherapeutic compounds used in the treatment of various types of cancer (i.e., ovary, breast, and lung) (Stierle et al. 1993, see Chap. 18). Before this discovery, the supply of this diterpenic substance was limited to the slow-growing barks of T. brevifolia that grow in moist soils close to lakes and rivers in some regions of the Pacific Northwest (Guchelaar et al. 1994). Thus, the possibility of extracting palictaxel from T. andreanae significantly reduced the production costs of this compound and increased its supply and availability. In addition, other species of endophytic fungi have also been reported to produce palictaxel in plant species of the genera Taxus and Podocarpus and even in Ginkgo biloba (Zhao et al. 2010; Naik 2019). One of these endophytic fungi is Cladosporium cladosporioides isolated from Taxus media (Zhang et al. 2009), which, coincidentally, is also found in B. dracunculifolia, although there is no information on whether it produces palictaxel. Future studies could attempt to propagate this fungus species from B. dracunculifolia and isolate its products to evaluate if the chemotherapeutic palictaxel is also produced by C. cladosporioides when it occurs in different host plant species. Such studies would generate a cascade of interesting and innovative investigations of major economic and medical relevance.

Among the endophytic fungi most frequently found among species of Baccharis, the genera Xylaria and Preussia deserve to be highlighted with regard to their metabolism. Species of Xylaria are known to produce several chemical constituents of the terpene class (Smith et al. 2002), xanthones (Healy et al. 2004), cyclopeptides (Huang et al. 2007), and xyloketals (Lin et al. 2001), among others. Species of this genus are found in other plant species of the family Asteraceae and are known for their inhibitory activity against phytopathogens such as Penicillium expansum (Bleicher and Bernardi 1985; Costa and Veiga 1996) and Aspergillus niger (Lock 1962; Santos et al. 2010). Furthermore, species of the genus Preussia are known to produce the metabolite preussomerin A, which is active against pathogens (Chen et al. 2009). A variety of substances produced by Preussia spp. have been identified in the last 10 years, including coumarins (Gonzalez-Menendez et al. 2017), anthraquinones (Gonzalez-Menendez et al. 2017), chronomes (Zhang et al. 2012; Gonzalez-Menendez et al. 2017), and preussochromones (Zhang et al. 2012). Some preussochromones have shown activity against lung cancer cell lines (Zhang et al. 2012).

Unfortunately, knowledge about the metabolites produced by endophytic fungi of species of Baccharis is still incipient and restricted to the endophytes found in B. megapotamica, B. coridifolia, and B. dracunculifolia. For instance, B. megapotamica and B. coridifolia produce certain macrocyclic trichothecenes, which are also produced by their endophytic fungi Myrothecium verrucaria and Myrothecium roridum (Jarvis et al. 1987, see Chaps. 14 and 15). These substances have been responsible for causing the death of cattle through necrosis of their ruminal epithelium and some lymphoid tissues (Varaschin et al. 1998, see also Chap. 15). On the other hand, some of these trichothecenes have been reported as effective in the treatment of lymphocytic leukemia (Kupchan et al. 1976; Jarvis et al. 1987, Carvalho et al. 2016, see also Chap. 14).

Among the endophytic fungi found in B. dracunculifolia, A. pullulans and Xylaria venosula stand out for the production of phenols and triterpenes, while Preussia africana for fatty acids (Oki et al. 2016, 2021). Chromatographic analysis showed that a group of triterpenes found in extracts from A. pullulans was similar to those found in B. dracunculifolia.

In addition, host plant metabolism can induce endophytic fungi of different genera and classes to produce similar secondary compounds (Ludwig-Müller 2015). A study with endophytic fungi of species of Baccharis revealed that a group of triterpenes present in extracts of A. pullulans was similar to those found in extracts of X. venosula (Oki et al. 2021). This similarity in the production of secondary compounds between different genera of endophytic fungi from the same plant species indicates a synergistic biochemical relationship between fungus species. Explanations for these findings include (1) endophytes sharing specific biosynthesis pathways with the host plant, and (2) endophytes producing the same secondary compounds as the host plant (see Ludwig-Müller 2015; Stierle and Stierle 2015). Aureobasidium pullulans is also used in the production of aureobasidin A, a cyclic peptide substance that has antifungal properties (Takesako et al. 1993). This fungus also releases volatile organic compounds that are capable of suppressing the growth of phytopathogens (Don et al. 2020).

Due to its arsenal of secondary metabolites, A. pullulans has been considered an effective biological control agent against several phytopathogenic fungi that affect numerous agricultural crops, including Alternaria alternata (Don et al. 2020), Botrytis cinerea (Di Francesco et al. 2015; Don et al. 2020; Oki et al. 2021), Colletotrichum acutatum (Di Francesco et al. 2015; Oki et al. 2021), Neofusicoccum parvum (Rusin et al. 2019), Penicillium digitatum (Di Francesco et al. 2015; Oki et al. 2021), Penicillium expansum (Di Francesco et al. 2015), Penicillium italicum (Di Francesco et al. 2015), and Rhizoctonia solani (Di Francesco et al. 2020). Aureobasidium pullulans is also highlighted for stimulating the growth of beans and soybean (Di Francesco et al. 2020), which may be attributed to improving host plant nitrogen fixation or a greater release of hormones such as auxins, gibberellins, and cytokinins by A. pullulans (Ali et al. 2019). Furthermore, this fungus can improve plant resistance in soil with heavy metals through the release of enzymes that assist in reducing metal absorption and enhance the plant’s antioxidant system (Ali et al. 2019).

5 Endophytic Fungi-Baccharis-Herbivore Interaction

Some endophytic mycota (i.e., A. pullulans, P. africana, and X. venosula) from B. dracunculifolia can produce secondary compounds that reduce the survival of herbivores such as the aphid Uroleucon erigeronensis (Oki et al. 2021). On the other hand, a study with B. dracunculifolia leaf buds indicated that herbivory can be a gateway for endophytic fungi through horizontal transmission (Fernandes et al. 2018).

Although herbivores often favor the infection of the host plant with endophytic fungi, this was not found to be the case for galling insects on Baccharis reticularia . Individuals of B. reticularia with and without galls showed no difference in endophytic fungus richness (Formiga 2013). However, a higher richness of endophytic fungi was found in gall samples that had a higher content of nitrogen and potassium (Formiga 2013). Nevertheless, a relationship between endophytic fungus richness and nitrogen and phosphorus content was not observed. These results suggest that endophytes can increase the nutritional status of galled plants by improving plant vigor and reducing the effects of gall infestation (Formiga 2013). This mutualistic relationship has not been reported so far in the literature and certainly needs further studies.

All together, these findings suggest that although endophytic fungi are often imperceptible inside plants, they are important mediators in the relationships between herbivores and their host plants and apparently very important among species of the genus Baccharis.

6 Climate Change and Endophytic Fungus Diversity

Growing concerns about the impacts that climate change will have on endophytes have increased research interest in this group with searches for strategies that could mitigate these effects. Recent studies on the endophytes of B. dracunculifolia and Baccharis platypoda grown under increased CO2 concentration did not find differences in mycota richness (Oki et al. 2020). On the other hand, endophytic community composition changed by 50% when compared to individual plants developed under conditions of ambient CO2 (Oki et al. 2016). Thus, several species of endophytic fungi that play fundamental roles in plant performance and resistance may disappear or be replaced by other species of unknown functional roles. These changes in species composition are associated with structural and chemical changes (Sanchez-Azofeifa et al. 2012) that may occur in plants under increased CO2 concentration, such as increased biomass, greater leaf thickness, and higher phenolic content, among other aspects (Oki et al. 2020). Despite these recent studies of endophytic fungi under conditions of predicted climate change, there is still no clear long-term notion of the impacts that increased atmospheric CO2 concentration might exert on the symbiosis between endophytic fungi and their host plants.

7 Final Considerations and Ways Forward

Despite the limited number of studies on endophytic fungus communities of species of Baccharis, this chapter has shown how relevant these microorganisms are to ecological relationships, as well as their great potential in industrial research and developments involving their bioactive compounds. Further investigations into the diversity of endophytic fungi among species of Baccharis are needed to better understand the phylogenetic, ecological, and metabolic relationships among them, as well as their prevalence under certain environmental conditions. The relationship between endophyte and host attributes is also of major relevance, and the Baccharis system represents an interesting system to be evaluated in this regard. Some of these aspects could be intrinsic to the host plant (e.g., genetics, sex, age, resistant/susceptibility) or of the environment (e.g., seasonality, microhabitat conditions, climate change influence). The association between a host plant and its endophytes may be subject to certain genetic expressions that can vary seasonally and/or spatially (Faeth 2002, Mejía et al. 2014). Another relevant aspect yet to be studied in detail is the ability of endophytic fungi to signal one another triggering silent biosynthetic pathways (Scherlach and Hertweck 2009). Understanding these very interesting relationships and their intrinsic and extrinsic factors would certainly contribute to solidifying knowledge of endophytic fungi and contribute to better exploration of their potential uses for industrial/pharmaceutical purposes.