Skip to main content

Improved Students’ Performance in an Online Robotics Class During COVID-19: Do only Strong Students Profit?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Robotics in Education (RiE 2021)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1359))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 985 Accesses

Abstract

Observations from the online teaching of a robotics class during the CoViD-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 also known as the Corona virus are presented. The online teaching of the course lead to an unexpected increase in the grade performance of the students – despite the fact that the exams were at the same level of difficulty as in the years before. There is some evidence that the asynchronous online teaching catered for some of the general interests and learning trends in generation-Z students. This paper addresses the question whether the general study performance of a student is a possible factor in whether the student profited more or less from the online version, i.e., whether there is a correlation between the improved course grade with the Grade Performance Average (GPA) of students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aristovnik, A., Kerzic, D., Ravselj, D., Tomazevic, N., Umek, L.: Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: a global perspective. Sustainability 12(20), 8438 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bai-Yun, C.: The effects of COVID-19 on international secondary assessment (2020). https://www.naric.org.uk/downloads/The%20Effects%20of%20COVID-19%20on%20International%20Secondary%20Assessment%20-%20UK%20NARIC.pdf

  3. Birk, A., Dineva, E., Maurelli, F., Nabor, A.: A robotics course during COVID-19: Lessons learned and best practices for online teaching beyond the pandemic. Robotics 10(1), 5 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Buzzetto-More, N.A.: An examination of undergraduate student’s perceptions and predilections of the use of YouTube in the teaching and learning process. Interdiscip. J. e-Skills Lifelong Learn. 10, 17–32 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter, S.K., Witherby, A.E., Tauber, S.K.: On students’ (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 9(2), 137–151 (2020). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211368120300024

  6. Clayson, D.E.: Student evaluations of teaching: are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature. J. Market. Educ. 31(1), 16–30 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308324086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Costello, E.: Opening up to open source: looking at how Moodle was adopted in higher education. Open Learn. J. Open Distance e-Learn. 28(3), 187–200 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2013.856289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crawford, J., et al.: COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. J. Appl. Learn. Teach. 3(1), 1–20 (2020)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies, P.: What is evidence-based education? Br. J. Educ. Stud. 47(2), 108–121 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.00106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dougiamas, M., Taylor, P.C.: Moodle: using learning communities to create an open source course management system. In: EdMedia. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. IAU: Regional/national perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on higher education (2020). https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid-19_regional_perspectives_on_the_impact_of_covid-19_on_he_july_2020_.pdf

  12. Ilag, Balu N.: Microsoft Teams Overview. In: Understanding Microsoft Teams Administration, pp. 1–36. Apress, Berkeley (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5875-0_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Linse, A.R.: Interpreting and using student ratings data: guidance for faculty serving as administrators and on evaluation committees. Stud. Educ. Eval. 54, 94–106 (2017). http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X16300232

  14. Nicholas, A.J.: Preferred learning methods of the millennial generation. Int. J. Learn. Ann. Rev. 15(6), 27–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearson: The global learner survey (2020). https://www.pearson.com/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/global/Files/news/gls/Pearson_Global-Learners-Survey_2020_FINAL.pdf

  16. Perry, R.P., Smart, J.C.: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5742-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Poll, T.H.: Beyond Millennials: The Next Generation of Learners. Pearson, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schneider, M., Preckel, F.: Variables associated with achievement in higher education: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Psychol. Bull. 143(6), 565–600 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Slavin, R.E.: Evidence-based education policies: transforming educational practice and research. Educ. Res. 31(7), 15–21 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031007015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Stroebe, W.: Why good teaching evaluations may reward bad teaching: on grade inflation and other unintended consequences of student evaluations. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11(6), 800–816 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stroebe, W.: Student evaluations of teaching encourages poor teaching and contributes to grade inflation: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42(4), 276–294 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1756817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Symonds, Q.: The coronavirus crisis and the future of higher education (2020). https://www.qs.com/portfolio-items/the-coronavirus-crisis-and-the-future-of-higher-education-report/

  23. Symonds, Q.: International student survey - global opportunities in the new higher education paradigm (2020). https://info.qs.com/rs/335-VIN-535/images/QS_EU_Universities_Edition-International_Student_Survey_2020.pdf

  24. Xu, D., Jaggars, S.S.: Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: differences across types of students and academic subject areas. J. High. Educ. 85(5), 633–659 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Birk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Birk, A., Dineva, E. (2022). Improved Students’ Performance in an Online Robotics Class During COVID-19: Do only Strong Students Profit?. In: Merdan, M., Lepuschitz, W., Koppensteiner, G., Balogh, R., Obdržálek, D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2021. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1359. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82544-7_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics