Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is a systemic disorder with an immunological basis caused by the ingestion of gluten and other related proteins affecting genetically susceptible individuals. Comment: There must be a coherent spelling throughout the text IF English spelling is adopted then "Celiac" should also be used and not "celiac". Celiac disease (CD) affects about 1% of the population and is precipitated by ingestion of barley, rye, and wheat. Gluten-free diet (GFD) is the cornerstone treatment of CD.
Despite advances in its knowledge and the development and improvement of serological tests, CD remains an underdiagnosed entity. This is largely due to the systemic nature of the disease, with involvement of multiple organs and systems, and the non-specificity of its manifestations. Clinical characteristics of the disease differ considerably depending on the age of presentation. Digestive symptoms and growth retardation are frequent in the paediatric population diagnosed within the first years of life. In more advanced stages, the development of the disease in childhood is marked by the appearance of extraintestinal symptoms. Clinical presentation of CD in the adult is heterogeneous and depends to a large extent on the length of the affected intestine and on the intensity of the histological lesions.
The presence of specific circulating antibodies when the patient is consuming gluten and their disappearance after suppressing gluten from the diet is a biological fact that supports the diagnosis but not a sufficient diagnostic criterion per se.
The pathogenesis of CD is one of the best understood among autoimmune diseases, given our knowledge of the environmental, genetic, and immunologic basis of the disease.
Currently, CD diagnosis can be accurately established with or without duodenal biopsies if recommendations are carefully followed. However, in many circumstances, diagnosis still requires duodenal biopsies that show the classically described findings for CD: increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, crypt hyperplasia and villous atrophy, as well as a favourable clinical and humoral response to the removal of the gluten from the diet.
A strict diet without gluten leads to the disappearance of symptoms, normalization of serological tests and resolution of histological lesions in the vast majority of patients. In addition, the permanent gluten-free diet prevents complications and reduces long-term morbidity/mortality.
Clinical follow-up of patients is necessary to monitor the evolution of symptoms and compliance with diet as well as control growth in children. In those patients who continue with symptoms or relapse despite the gluten-free regimen, it is mandatory to carry out an intentional search for hidden sources of gluten in the diet or minimal transgressions. Both situations explain the majority of cases that persist symptomatic or maintain high levels of autoantibodies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Celiac disease
- Pathogenesis
- Diagnosis
- Clinical presentation
- Serological and genetic tests
- Histological lesions
- Gluten-free diet
Celiac disease (CD) is known since ancient times. It was given its name by Aretaeus the Cappadocian in the first or second century A.D (Fig. 1) [1]. It was not until 1887, Samuel Gee described the disease in children [2] (Fig. 2). Later, in 1950, Willem Karel Dicke presented his thesis (Celiac Disease: investigation of harmful effects of certain types of cereal on patients with celiac disease) and the role of gluten was discovered [3].
The development of devices to obtain jejunal biopsies in children (Fig. 3) and interpreting the histology [4], the identification of serological markers [5, 6] and the association between CD and the HLA complex [7, 8] are only some of the milestones that have allowed the progress in the knowledge of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of CD. Later, endoscopy replaced the use of biopsy capsules, providing the additional value of observing the macroscopic aspect of the mucosa and allowing for multiple biopsies from different locations.
CD is an autoimmune disorder characterized by enteropathy in response to intestinal exposure to gluten in genetically predisposed individuals. Just a few decades ago, it was thought to be an uncommon disease of childhood affecting predominantly European populations. It has since been shown to be present universally and can develop at any age in individuals consuming gluten-containing foods [9,10,11]. Furthermore, it is also now clear that CD may have variable presentation patterns ranging from no symptoms to a wide range of gastrointestinal or extra-digestive signs and symptoms. CD affects ~ 1% of the global population but, despite its rising prevalence, the majority of patients remain undiagnosed [11]. Currently, most patients with suspected CD are screened serologically for antibody positivity, in particular for IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase 2 (tTG) and antiendomysial (EMA) IgA antibodies [9]. As these serological markers are not 100% specific for detecting intestinal lesions compatible with CD, positive celiac serology is confirmed by duodenal biopsies demonstrating the hallmark pathological changes of mucosal remodelling, such as villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia and intraepitelial lymphocytosis [12].
In 1969 in Interlaken, during the annual meeting of the then called ESPGAN (European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition), strict diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of celiac disease in the paediatric population were established for the first time. These were called the “Interlaken criteria (1969)”, also known as the “three-biopsy rule” [13]. In fact, these criteria established that it was mandatory to demonstrate a typical intestinal lesion (hyperplasic jejunal villous atrophy) while the patient was on a gluten-containing diet, followed by complete histological recovery after removing gluten from the diet and subsequent histologic damage upon gluten re-exposure (challenge test). The demand for the three biopsies aimed at differentiating CD from other frequent causes of enteropathy and to demonstrate the permanent nature of the intolerance to gluten.
The wide application of these criteria by paediatric gastroenterologists in the subsequent years allowed to accumulate large experience. The additional result from relevant multicentre studies and the identification of a biological parameter—antigliadin antibodies (AGA)—as a marker for active CD led to a revision of these criteria 20 years later [14]. According to these, a single biopsy might be enough for a solid diagnosis of CD. Additional biopsies would only be needed in cases that were classified as CD without previous biopsy or the clinical response to gluten elimination was unclear.
The identification of more specific antibodies—anti-transglutaminase IgA (tTG IgA)—allowed further refinement in the diagnostic criteria. In 2012, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) published new guidelines for the diagnosis of CD challenging the wide necessity for duodenal biopsies in paediatric patients [15]. It was then suggested that anti-tTG IgA antibody titre greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), in combination with a positive EMA antibody test and compatible human leucocyte antigen (HLA) genotype, is sufficient to support the diagnosis of CD in symptomatic individuals. This eliminated the need for endoscopy and its associated costs/risks in selected paediatric patients.
The recent 2020 guidelines removed the requirement for the presence of symptoms and HLA testing in the diagnostic pathway [16]. This underscores the specificity of a serology-based or ‘no-biopsy’ approach for the diagnosis of paediatric CD.
Studies have evaluated whether this strategy can be applied in symptomatic adult patients [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. These studies have suggested that tTG levels of ≥ 10 × ULN could be predictive of CD in adults, and the recently published Finnish national guidelines for the diagnosis of CD have incorporated this diagnostic pathway into their practice (Working group appointed by the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and the Finnish Gastroenterology Society, Celiac disease. Current care guidelines, 2018. Available at https://www.kaypahoito.fi/en/ccs00086). However, this approach has not been widely adopted into adult clinical practice or guidelines [28].
The clinical spectrum of celiac disease is wide, including cases with either classical intestinal (e.g. chronic diarrhoea, weight loss) or extraintestinal (e.g. anaemia, osteoporosis, neurological disturbances) features, as well as silent forms that are occasionally discovered because of serological screening [29, 30].
Clinical features of CD differ considerably depending on the age at presentation. Intestinal symptoms and failure to thrive are common in children diagnosed within the first years of life. Presentation of the disease later in childhood is characterized by the prevalence of extraintestinal signs, among which are short stature, delayed puberty, anaemia, enamel hypoplasia, osteopenia or bilateral occipital calcifications, related to the presence of gluten in the diet. In adults, all the above signs and symptoms may occur as well as osteoporosis and infertility [31, 32]. The broad spectrum of symptoms contributes to the large proportion of undiagnosed cases found in screening-studies.
Celiac disease is the only known treatable autoimmune disease, provided that a correct diagnosis is achieved and a strict, lifelong gluten-free diet is implemented, as this has become the cornerstone of the management of CD patients and must be recommended for life in both, symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals [33].
Implementation of a GFD should be monitored by a dietician, in order to ensure nutritional adequacy and prevent potential risks including micronutrient deficiencies, high fat, sugar and salt intake [34,35,36,37].
Family members of CD patients or those suffering from another immune-mediated disease are at higher risk of developing CD. Unrecognized and therefore untreated CD patients have a greater risk of developing associated complications or other immune-mediated diseases (e.g. type 1 diabetes, autoimmune hepatitis or thyroid disease) [38]. The antibodies used as markers for CD have a relatively high sensitivity and specificity, but those with mild lesions, partial villous atrophy, or children younger than 2 years may be missed by these tests [39, 40], so careful clinical judgement by a paediatric gastroenterologist is needed to evaluate all possible patients.
There is ongoing investigation in all fields of aetiology, pathogenesis, genetics and additional therapeutic options in this fascinating unique example of controllable auto-immune disease. This book aims at providing the reader with an updated overview of current status and future prospects in Celiac Disease.
References
Adams F. The extant works of Aretaeus, the Cappadocian. London: London: Printed for the Sydenham Society; 1856.
Gee SJ. On the coeliac affection. St Bartholomew’s Hospital Reports 1988;24:4.
Dicke WK. Coeliakie. Een onderzoek naar de nadelige invloed van sommige graansoorten op de lijder aan coeliakie (Coeliac disease. Investigation of the harmful effects of certain types of cereal on patients with coeliac disease). Utrecht: Utrecht; 1950.
Shiner M. Duodenal biopsy. Lancet. 1956;270(6906):17–9.
Berger E. [Allergic pathogenesis of celiac disease with studies of the splitting up of pathogenic antigens by enzymes]. Bibl Paediatr 195867):1–55.
Burgin-Wolff A, Gaze H, Hadziselimovic F, et al. Antigliadin and antiendomysium antibody determination for coeliac disease. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66(8):941–7.
Falchuk ZM, Rogentine GN. Strober W Predominance of histocompatibility antigen HL-A8 in patients with gluten-sensitive enteropathy. J Clin Invest. 1972;51(6):1602–5.
Stokes PL, Asquith P, Holmes GK, et al. Histocompatibility antigens associated with adult coeliac disease. Lancet. 1972;2(7769):162–4.
Lebwohl B, Sanders DS. Green PHR coeliac disease. Lancet. 2018;391(10115):70–81.
Leonard MM, Sapone A, Catassi C, et al. Celiac disease and nonceliac gluten sensitivity: a review. JAMA. 2017;318(7):647–56.
Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA, et al. Global prevalence of celiac disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16(6):823–36 e2.
Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex, and the small intestine. A molecular and immunobiologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity (‘celiac sprue’). Gastroenterology 1992;102(1):330–54.
Meeuwisse GW. Diagnostic criteria in coeliac disease. Acta Paediatr Scand 1970;59:461–63.
Walker-Smith JA, Guandalini S, Schmitz J et al. Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease. Report of Working Group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Arch Dis Child 1990;65(8):909–11.
Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabo IR, et al. European society for Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology, and nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(1):136–60.
Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabo I, et al. European society paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition guidelines for diagnosing coeliac disease 2020. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70(1):141–56.
Alessio MG, Tonutti E, Brusca I, et al. Correlation between IgA tissue transglutaminase antibody ratio and histological finding in celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55(1):44–9.
Beltran L, Koenig M, Egner W, et al. High-titre circulating tissue transglutaminase-2 antibodies predict small bowel villous atrophy, but decision cut-off limits must be locally validated. Clin Exp Immunol. 2014;176(2):190–8.
Efthymakis K, Serio M, Milano A, et al. Application of the biopsy-sparing ESPGHAN guidelines for celiac disease diagnosis in adults: a real-life study. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62(9):2433–9.
Hill PG. Holmes GK Coeliac disease: a biopsy is not always necessary for diagnosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;27(7):572–7.
Holmes GKT, Forsyth JM, Knowles S, et al. Coeliac disease: further evidence that biopsy is not always necessary for diagnosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(6):640–5.
Oyaert M, Vermeersch P, De Hertogh G, et al. Combining antibody tests and taking into account antibody levels improves serologic diagnosis of celiac disease. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(10):1537–46.
Previtali G, Licini L, D’Antiga L, et al. Celiac disease diagnosis without biopsy: Is a 10x ULN Antitransglutaminase result suitable for a chemiluminescence method? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66(4):645–50.
Sugai E, Moreno ML, Hwang HJ, et al. Celiac disease serology in patients with different pretest probabilities: is biopsy avoidable? World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(25):3144–52.
Tortora R, Imperatore N, Capone P, et al. The presence of anti-endomysial antibodies and the level of anti-tissue transglutaminases can be used to diagnose adult coeliac disease without duodenal biopsy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(10):1223–9.
Wakim-Fleming J, Pagadala MR, Lemyre MS, et al. Diagnosis of celiac disease in adults based on serology test results, without small-bowel biopsy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(5):511–6.
Zanini B, Magni A, Caselani F, et al. High tissue-transglutaminase antibody level predicts small intestinal villous atrophy in adult patients at high risk of celiac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44(4):280–5.
Al-Toma A, Volta U, Auricchio R, et al. European Society for the Study of Coeliac Disease (ESsCD) guideline for coeliac disease and other gluten-related disorders. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019;7(5):583–613.
Maki M, Mustalahti K, Kokkonen J, et al. Prevalence of Celiac disease among children in Finland. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(25):2517–24.
Myleus A, Ivarsson A, Webb C, et al. Celiac disease revealed in 3% of Swedish 12-year-olds born during an epidemic. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(2):170–6.
Lasa JS, Zubiaurre I. Soifer LO Risk of infertility in patients with celiac disease: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014;51(2):144–50.
Leffler DA, Green PH. Fasano A Extraintestinal manifestations of coeliac disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(10):561–71.
Tack GJ, Verbeek WH, Schreurs MW, et al. The spectrum of celiac disease: epidemiology, clinical aspects and treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7(4):204–13.
Potter MDE, Brienesse SC, Walker MM, et al. Effect of the gluten-free diet on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coeliac disease: a systematic review. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(4):781–91.
Skodje GI, Minelle IH, Rolfsen KL, et al. Dietary and symptom assessment in adults with self-reported non-coeliac gluten sensitivity. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2019;31:88–94.
Vici G, Belli L, Biondi M, et al. Gluten free diet and nutrient deficiencies: a review. Clin Nutr. 2016;35(6):1236–41.
Wild D, Robins GG, Burley VJ, et al. Evidence of high sugar intake, and low fibre and mineral intake, in the gluten-free diet. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(4):573–81.
Rubio-Tapia A, Kyle RA, Kaplan EL, et al. Increased prevalence and mortality in undiagnosed celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(1):88–93.
Sanders DS, Hurlstone DP, McAlindon ME, et al. Antibody negative coeliac disease presenting in elderly people–an easily missed diagnosis. BMJ. 2005;330(7494):775–6.
Sweis R, Pee L, Smith-Laing G. Discrepancies between histology and serology for the diagnosis of coeliac disease in a district general hospital: is this an unrecognised problem in other hospitals? Clin Med (Lond) 2009;9(4):346–8.
Funding
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Polanco, I., Amil-Dias, J. (2022). Celiac Disease: Background. In: Amil-Dias, J., Polanco, I. (eds) Advances in Celiac Disease . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82401-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82401-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82400-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82401-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)