Abstract
As cyber attacks continue to escalate in terms of frequency, impact, and level of refinement so do the efforts of state actors to acquire new offensive capabilities to defend, counter or retaliate incoming attacks. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a key technology both for attacking and defending in cyberspace. When considered in the current regulatory vacuum this is problematic, as AI-enabled cyber conflict may escalate and threaten national security and international stability. This is why this article argues for the need to define regulation for state use of AI for defence purposes and calls on regional forums, such as NATO and the European Union, to revive efforts and prepare the ground for an initiative led by the United Nations. It concludes by offering three recommendations as key aspects to regulate. There are: legal boundaries that distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate targets and define proportionality of responses; promote testing strategies with allies to organize sparring exercises among allies to test AI-based defence tactics; monitor and enforce rules, a third-party authority with teeth, should rule on whether red lines, proportionality, responsible deployment or disclosure norms have been breached.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
References
Defence Science Board. 2016. Summer study on autonomy. US Department of Defense, June. https://fas.org/irp/agency/dod/dsb/autonomy-ss.pdf.
Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2017. Ransomware prevention and response for CISOs. https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/ransomware-prevention-and-response-for-cisos.pdf/view.
Floridi, Luciano. 2016. Faultless responsibility: On the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374 (2083): 20160112. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0112.
MarketsandMarkets. n.d. Artificial intelligence in cybersecurity market by technology machine learning, context awareness – 2025 | MarketsandMarkets. MarketsandMarkets. Accessed 7 March 2019. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/ai-in-cybersecurity-market-224437074.html.
Taddeo, Mariarosaria. 2017a. Deterrence by norms to stop interstate cyber attacks. Minds and Machines 27 (3): 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9446-1.
———. 2017b. The limits of deterrence theory in cyberspace. Philosophy & Technology, October. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0290-2.
Yang, Guang-Zhong, Jim Bellingham, Pierre E. Dupont, Peer Fischer, Luciano Floridi, Robert Full, Neil Jacobstein, et al. 2018. The grand challenges of science robotics. Science Robotics 3 (14): eaar7650. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aar7650.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taddeo, M., Floridi, L. (2021). Regulate Artificial Intelligence to Avert Cyber Arms Race. In: Floridi, L. (eds) Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81906-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81907-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)