Skip to main content

The Organisation of l’Assistance Judiciaire, the Politics of Poverty, and the Rewriting of History in Nineteenth-Century France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Histories of Legal Aid

Part of the book series: World Histories of Crime, Culture and Violence ((WHCCV))

  • 183 Accesses

Abstract

In 1851, French legislators enacted a law organising the public provision of legal aid to the poor. This chapter examines the kinds of political ghosts that surfaced when the law on l’assistance judiciaire and the history in which it was grounded were proclaimed mid-century and then repeated and retold as part of quite different conceptual chains at the century’s end. Both the debates on the law organising l’assistance judiciaire in the early 1850s and the late-century commentary on its failings reveal how retrospective narratives of invention and inauguration can ground politically powerful new claims of genealogical authenticity, authority, and plenitude, even in a code law regime that does not rely, at least formally, on precedent in the making of law. This chapter argues that French jurists and lawmakers performed complex, unavoidable historical work as they sought to write—and later overwrite—the history of legal aid into political narratives linking past, present, and future. In the first moment, they aimed to repudiate the revolutionary demands of the poor. In the second, their successors aspired to retell the history of the law’s incomplete or primitive “origins” in a story that would anchor their claims of founding a moderate, just, and well-regulated republican democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Schnapper (1980), p. 172. See also Schnapper (1984).

  2. 2.

    Kleinberg (2017), p. 2.

  3. 3.

    Kleinberg (2017), p. 7.

  4. 4.

    On the positing of origins, historical narrative, and law’s authority, see Constable (1994), pp. 68–75. See also Kleinberg (2017), pp. 2–3.

  5. 5.

    Yvernes (1895).

  6. 6.

    Dreyfus (1904). See also Schnapper (1984), pp. 108–110.

  7. 7.

    Schnapper (1984), p. 112.

  8. 8.

    On the question of a distinctive French liberalism, see Geenens and Rosenblatt (2012). See also Schafer (2014).

  9. 9.

    Wolloch (1994), p. 353. See also Schnapper (1981).

  10. 10.

    These issues were laid out with particular force in Du Beux (1847), esp. pp. 94–115.

  11. 11.

    Du Beux (1847), pp. 21–45. On the bar’s obligations in civil matters as laid out in Napoleon’s decrees of 9 frimaire, an IX and 14 décembre 1810, see Blandin [Auguste-Pierre-Marie] (1850), p. 220, and Schnapper (1984), p. 113. See also Le Code d’instruction criminelle (1808), art. 294–420, in France (1812).

  12. 12.

    Lynch (1988), pp. 88–100. See also Fuchs (1992), pp. 103–105.

  13. 13.

    France, Ministère de la Justice (1849), p. 329, and Dreyfus (1904), pp. 171–172.

  14. 14.

    Doublet (1862), pp. 486–500.

  15. 15.

    On the Academy’s legal projects and its parliamentary sway, see Barksdale (1986).

  16. 16.

    Beaumont (1847) and Vivien (1847). Republished in the Moniteur universel, the official record of the French Government, see Vivien (1848).

  17. 17.

    See also Du Beux’s earlier work (1845). Schnapper notes that avocats des pauvres had been appointed in the French cities of Grenoble and Nîmes in the early nineteenth century. The Nîmes avocat was supported by a privately endowed foundation. Schnapper (1984), p. 108.

  18. 18.

    Beaumont (1847), p. 25.

  19. 19.

    Vivien (1848), p. 358.

  20. 20.

    Vivien (1847), p. 464.

  21. 21.

    Jardin (1985), pp. 343–365.

  22. 22.

    Agulhon (1983), p. 119. On legal aid and the liberal sense of 1848 as “catastrophe,” see Schafer (2007).

  23. 23.

    For the founding documents of the Second Republic, see Bastide (1945).

  24. 24.

    On the legalism of the anti-revolutionary reaction between 1848 and 1852, see Agulhon (1983), p. 118. On the ideological chasm between socialist projects of transformation and liberal visions of assistance in the wake of 1848, see Schnapper (1984), p. 116, and Dreyfus (1907), pp. 88–95.

  25. 25.

    Bioche (1849), p. 89.

  26. 26.

    Delapalme (1850), p. 667.

  27. 27.

    Bioche (1849), p. 90.

  28. 28.

    On the liberal fear of revolution after 1848 and the liberal distrust of the popular and labouring classes more generally, see Rosenblatt (2018), pp. 94–155.

  29. 29.

    On understandings of poverty and charity in this era, see Gueslin (1998), pp. 112–118. Jacques Rancière argues that in the western political tradition, “the poor” “does not designate an economically disadvantaged part of the population; it simply designates the category of peoples who do not count, those who have no qualifications to part-take in arche, no qualification for being taken into account.” Rancière (2001), §12.

  30. 30.

    Vatimesnil (1850), p. 3365.

  31. 31.

    Vatimesnil (1850), p. 3365.

  32. 32.

    Vatimesnil (1850), p. 3365.

  33. 33.

    Chambre des Députés (1851), p. 232.

  34. 34.

    Vatimesnil (1850), p. 3665.

  35. 35.

    Sirey (1851), p. 43. The term “huissier” is difficult to translate into English. Serving as something like a court bailiff, the French huissier also acts in ways similar to American process servers and marshals. See Dahl (1995), p. 221.

  36. 36.

    Sirey (1851), p. 43.

  37. 37.

    Roux noted as well that when the 1851 law was enacted, the practical effect of this article was the dissolution of the professional associations’ private, gratis consultation services. Roux (1896), pp. 115–116, 209.

  38. 38.

    Duvergier et al. (1851), pp. 16–26.

  39. 39.

    On this genealogy and earlier attempts to domesticate and govern the explosive issue of the inequality of the poor, see Procacci (1993).

  40. 40.

    Kleinberg (2017), p. 2.

  41. 41.

    Schnapper (1984), pp. 122–123.

  42. 42.

    Many late-nineteenth-century commentators cited numbers published in the annual Compte général de l’administration de la justice civile et commerciale, based, according to Schnapper, on data submitted to the Ministry of Justice by public prosecutors across the country. Schnapper (1979). See also Vieillard-Baron (1900), pp. 9–10 and Roux (1896), pp. 216–217.

  43. 43.

    Roux (1896), pp. 216–217.

  44. 44.

    Vieillard-Baron (1900), pp. 9–10.

  45. 45.

    See, for example, Yvernes (1895). On the history and functioning of the French Conseil d’État, see Parodi (1974), Massot (1999), and Latour (2002).

  46. 46.

    Schnapper (1978), pp. 459–460 and Schnapper (1984), pp. 130–132.

  47. 47.

    On the importance of numbers as a language of governance in nineteenth-century France, see especially Bourguet (1988) and Cole (2000).

  48. 48.

    On the republican tradition, see, among other, Agulhon (1993), Lehning (2001), and Saint Victor and Branthôme (2018). On the longer history of republicanism and liberalism in France, see Jainchill (2008).

  49. 49.

    Mestre-Mel (1883), p. 5.

  50. 50.

    Roux (1896), pp. 94–96.

  51. 51.

    Mestre-Mel (1883), p. 14.

  52. 52.

    Mestre-Mel (1883), pp. 12–15; Roux (1896), p. 180.

  53. 53.

    On mechanisation and industrial accidents after 1860, see Le Roux (2013).

  54. 54.

    Brousse et al. (1882). The question of aid that would support workers seeking compensation for industrial accidents likely returned to the table in 1888 when left Deputies Brousse and Blanc brought another draft bill to the chamber, only to see it defeated. Vieillard-Baron (1900), p. 11. Roux fervently opposed this use of l’assistance judiciaire, seeing in it only the return of the civil war of procedure between poor workers and rich industrialists . Roux (1896), pp. 205–206. On aid to foreigners, see Mestre-Mel (1883), p. 24. With the passage of the 1898 law on accidents at work, the matter of compensation passed largely from the domain of contentious suits to the realm of insurance and risk management. On this law and its implications, see Ewald (2020).

  55. 55.

    An earlier proposal from May 1878 sought to expand the use of legal assistance to the oversight of the legal affairs of indigent minors. This revision was not supported by the Minister of Justice, who claimed that ministerial circulars already addressed this problem. The Senate also rejected the amendment on the grounds that it was overly expansive and would change the nature of legal guardianship as outlined in the Civil Code. Roux (1896), pp. 172–176.

  56. 56.

    Million et al. (1888), p. 950.

  57. 57.

    Mestre-Mel (1883), pp. 22–23. See also Roux (1896), pp. 71–74.

  58. 58.

    Levesque (1856), pp. 134–135.

  59. 59.

    Levesque (1856), p. 131.

  60. 60.

    Mestre-Mel (1883), p. 23. See also Monteux (1897–1898), p. 41.

  61. 61.

    Bompard (1898), p. 241.

  62. 62.

    Roux (1896), pp. 189, 213–214.

  63. 63.

    Roux (1896), p. 168. See also Bompard (1898), p. 241.

  64. 64.

    Mestre-Mel (1883), p. 38.

  65. 65.

    On the importance of Roux’s thesis, see Bompard (1898), p. 241.

  66. 66.

    Roux (1896), pp. 5–9.

  67. 67.

    Roux (1896), p. 23.

  68. 68.

    Sheradin (2000).

  69. 69.

    On Solidarism, see Bourgeois (1902).

  70. 70.

    Roux (1896), p. 38.

  71. 71.

    Roux (1896), pp. 10, 221.

  72. 72.

    Bompard (1898), pp. 240–243.

  73. 73.

    Vieillard-Baron (1900), pp. 7–9.

  74. 74.

    Vieillard-Baron (1900), p. 16.

  75. 75.

    For the draft laws proposed in the 1880s and 1890s, see Vieillard-Baron (1900), pp. 11–12 and Bompard (1898), p. 240.

  76. 76.

    Monteux (1897–1898), p. 50.

  77. 77.

    On the 1898 law and the governance of risk, see Ewald (2020).

  78. 78.

    For the full text of the law, see Duvergier et al. (1901), pp. 313–321.

  79. 79.

    Bompard (1898), pp. 240–241.

  80. 80.

    Vieillard-Baron (1900), pp. 13–14.

  81. 81.

    Roux (1896), p. 222.

  82. 82.

    Mestre-Mel (1883), p. 38.

Bibliography

Printed Sources

  • Beaumont, Gustave de. 1847. Rapport sur l’administration de la justice civile et commerciale en Sardaigne, suivi d’observations par MM. Charles Lucas, G. de Beaumont et Cousin. Séances et travaux de l’Académie des sciences morales et politiques: compte rendu XI: 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bioche, Charles. 1849. Proposition relative à l’institution du bureau de l’avocat des pauvres. Journal de procédure civile et commerciale 15: 89–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blandin [Auguste-Pierre-Marie]. 1850. L’avocat des pauvres à Pau. Annales de la charité 6: 220–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bompard, Raoul. 1898. Proposition de loi relative à la revision de la loi du 22 janvier 1851 sur l’assistance judiciaire. Documents parlementaires annexes aux procès-verbaux des séances, Chambre des députés, Journal officiel: 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, Léon. 1902. L’Idée de solidarité et ses consequences sociales. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousse, Emile, and Louis Blanc, et al. 1882. Proposition de loi ayant pour objet de modifier la loi du 22 janvier, 1851 sur l’assistance judiciaire. Documents parlementaires annexes aux procès-verbaux des séances, Chambre des deputes, Journal officiel: 1511–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambre des Députés. 1851. 3e deliberation. Moniteur universel, 22 January: 231–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delapalme, Émile. 1850. De l’assistance judiciaire. Annales de la Charité 6: 666–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doublet, G. 1862. Étude sur la loi des 22–30 janvier 1851 relative à l’assistance judiciaire. Revue pratique de droit française 13: 481–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Ferdinand. 1904. L’Association de Bienfaisance Judiciaire (1787–1791). Paris: Imprimerie de la cour d’appel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1907. L’Assistance sous le seconde république. Paris: Cornély.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Beux, Jean-César-Maxime-Gustave. 1845. De l’institution de l’avocat des pauvres dans le royaume de Sardaigne, et de l’utilité d’une institution de ce genre en France, discours pronounce le 5 novembre 1845 à l’audience de rentrée du tribunal civil de Troyes. Troyes: Bouquet.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1847. Études sur l’institution de l’avocat des pauvres: et sur les moyens de defense des indigents dans les process civils et criminals en France, en Sardaigne et dans les principaux pays de l’Europe. Paris: Rey et Belhatte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvergier, Jean-Baptiste, et al., eds. 1851. Collection complète des lois, décrets, ordonnances, règlemens, et avis du conseil d’état 51. Paris: Guyot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvergier, J.-B., et al., eds. 1901. Collection complete des lois, décrets, ordonnances, règlements et avis du conseil d’état. Paris: Libraire de la société du recueil general des lois et des arrêts.

    Google Scholar 

  • France. 1812. Les Cinq codes de l’Empire français. Paris: Chez F. Guitel.

    Google Scholar 

  • France. Ministère de la Justice. 1849. Rapport du ministre de la justice relatif à la formation d’une commission chargée d’étudier le meilleur système de rendre accessible aux pauvres le recours à la justice. Journal de procédure civile et commerciale, XV: 328–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, Alfred. 1856. De la loi du 22 janvier 1851 sur l’assistance judiciaire et des modifications qu’elle réclame. Revue pratique de droit français: jurisprudence, doctrine, législation 2: 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mestre-Mel, Louis-Joseph-Marie. 1883. De l’assistance judiciaire. Discours de rentrée a l’audience solonelle de la Cour d’appel de Toulouse, 3 novembre 1883. Toulouse: Douladoure-Privat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Million, Louis, et al. 1888. Rapport fait au nom de la commission charge d’examiner la proposition de loi de MM. Louis Million et Remoiville, ayant pour objet d’organiser l’assistance judiciaire devant les justices de paix. Documents parlementaires annexes aux procès-verbaux des séances, Chambre des deputes, Journal official: 949–951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteux, Benjamin. 1897–1898. L’Assistance judiciaire: son organization; son fonctionnement; des réformes à apporter à la loi du 22 janvier 1851. La Revue philanthropique 2: 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roux, Fernand. 1896. L’Assistance judiciaire et sa réforme. Paris: Librairie de la société du Recueil Gal. des lois et des arrêts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirey, J.B., ed. 1851. Recueil general des lois et des arrêts: en matière civile, criminelle, commnerciale et de droit public. Paris: n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatimesnil, Antoine de. 1850. Rapport fait par M. de Vatimesnil, au nom de la commission charge d’examiner le projet de loi sure l’assistance judiciaire, et la proposition de M. Favreau. Moniteur Universel, 26 November: 3364–3369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieillard-Baron, Joseph-Camille-Léon. 1900. De l’assistance judiciaire: etude du projet de réforme de la loi du 22 janvier 1851. Discours de rentrée à l’audience solonelle de la Cour d’appel de Dijon, 16 Octobre 1900. Dijon: Imprimerie Darantière.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivien, Alexandre. 1847. Mémoire sur la défense des indigents dans les procès civils et criminels, suivi d’observations présentées par MM. Cousin, Dupin, De Beaumont et Giraud. Séances et travaux de l’Académie des sciences morales et politiques: compte rendu, XII: 446–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1848. Memoire sur le defense des indigents dans les process civils et criminels. Moniteur universel, 11–12 February: 357–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yvernes, Emile. 1895. L’assistance judiciaire (1851–1891). Journal de la société de statistique de Paris (June): 220–225.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Agulhon, Maurice. 1983. The Republican Experiment, 1848–1852. Trans. Janet Lloyd. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. The French Republic, 1879–1992. Trans. Antonia Neville. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barksdale, Dudley Channing. 1986. Liberal Politics and Nascent Social Science in France: The Academy of Moral and Political Sciences. Ph.D. Diss. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastide, Paul. 1945. Doctrines et institutions politiques de la seconde république. Paris: Hachette.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguet, Marie-Noëlle. 1988. Déchiffrer la France: La statistique départementale à l’époque Napoléonienne. Paris: Editions des archives contemporaines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Joshua. 2000. The Power of Large Numbers: Population, Politics, and Gender in Nineteenth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Constable, Marianne. 1994. The Law of the Other: The Mixed Jury and Changing Conceptions of Citizenship, Law, and Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Henry Saint. 1995. Dahl’s Law Dictionary/Dinctionnaire Juridique Dahl. Buffalo: William S. Hein and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald, François. 2020. The Birth of Solidarity: The History of the French Welfare State. Trans. Timothy Scott Johnson. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Rachel G. 1992. Poor and Pregnant in Paris. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geenens, Raf, and Helena Rosenblatt, eds. 2012. French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueslin, André. 1998. Gens pauvres, pauvres gens dans la France du xixe siècle. Paris: Aubier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jainchill, Andrew. 2008. Reimagining Politics After the Terror: The Republican Origins of French Liberalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardin, André. 1985. Histoire de liberalism politique: De la crise de l’absolutisme à la constitution de 1875. Paris: Hachette.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinberg, Ethan. 2017. Haunting History: For a Deconstructive Approach to the Past. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2002. La fabrique du droit: une ethnologie du Conseil d’Etat. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, Thomas. 2013. Hygienists, Workers’ Bodies and Machines in Nineteenth-Century France. European Review of History: Revue Europeenne D’histoire 20 (2): 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehning, James R. 2001. To Be a Citizen: The Political Culture of the Early French Third Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Katherine A. 1988. Family, Class, and Ideology in Early Industrial France: Social Policy and the Working-Class Family, 1825–1848. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massot, Jean. 1999. Le Conseil d’Etat: de l’an VIII à nos jours. Livre jubiliaire de deuxième centenaire. Paris: A. Biro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parodi, Alexandre, ed. 1974. Le Conseil d’Etat: Son histoire à travers les documents d’époque, 1799–1974. Paris: Editions du centre national de la recherche scientifique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Procacci, Giovanna. 1993. Gouverner la misère: La question sociale en France, 1789–1848. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2001. Ten Theses on Politics. Trans. Rachel Bowlby and Dave Panagia. Theory and Event 5 (3). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/32639. Accessed 25 June 2020.

  • Rosenblatt, Helena. 2018. The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saint Victor, Jacques de, and Thomas Branthôme. 2018. Histoire de la république en France: des origins à la Ve République. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, Sylvia. 2007. Political Catastrophe and Liberal Legal Desire: Two Stories of Revolution, Remediation, and Return from the French Nineteenth Century. In Law and Catastrophe, ed. Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, and Martha Merrill Umphrey, 56–90. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. L’Assistance judiciaire et l’étranger civil 1840–1851. Trans. Stéphane Bouquet. Sociétés et representations 38: 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnapper, Bernard. 1978. La Séparation de corps de 1837 à 1914. Revue historique 259 (2): 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Pour une géographie des mentalités judicaires: la litigiosité en France au XIXe siècle. Annales: Economies, sociétés, civilizations 34 (2): 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. L’Assistance judiciaire dans la partie méridoniale de la France au XIXe siècle. Receuil des mémoires et travaux publié par la société d’histoire du droit et des institutions des anciens pays de droit écrit XI: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1981. Le coûte des process civil au milieu de XIXe siècle. Revue historique de droit français et étranger LIX: 621–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. De la charité à la solidarité: l’assistance judiciaire française 1851–1972. Revue d’histoire de droit/Legal History Review LII: 105–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheradin, Kristin A. 2000. Reforming the Republic: Solidarism and the Making of the French Welfare State, 1871–1914. Ph.D. Diss. Rochester: University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolloch, Isser. 1994. The New Regime: Transformations of the French Civic Order, 1789–1820s. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvia Schafer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schafer, S. (2021). The Organisation of l’Assistance Judiciaire, the Politics of Poverty, and the Rewriting of History in Nineteenth-Century France. In: Batlan, F., Vasara-Aaltonen, M. (eds) Histories of Legal Aid. World Histories of Crime, Culture and Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80271-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80271-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80270-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80271-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics