Abstract
This chapter combines a neo-Gramscian approach with analysis of imperialism to analyze transformations of the state-sosciety complex in Ukraine throughout geopolitical shifts. It describes the interaction of Ukraine and the “empire of capital” through connections between local kleptocracy, lobbyist groups, international organizations, and transnational capital. From this perspective, the author addresses the four main important political myths circulating in discussions around Ukraine: the myth of necessary transition; democracy; “two Ukraines”; and the Russian and communist “Other”. It places these myths into a chronology of Ukraine’s postsocialist development in terms of a struggle between competing oligarchic networks, leading up to Maidan and the events that followed, meaning both a crisis of the domestic legitimacy of oligarchic rule and also a crisis of the international position of Ukraine, which effectively lost its national sovereignty in various areas. In the last parts of the chapter, the author argues for her prognosis of a “third Maidan” which she published in late 2017. This “third Maidan” took the unexpected form of Zelensky’s presidential campaign, and alongside the Orange Revolution and Maidan underlines the domestic and international problems of Ukraine.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A study which consists of:
(1) a materialist philosophy of history … which leads to the ontological primacy of “social relations of production”, (2) a rejection of separation between subject and object… and adoption of a dialectic understanding of reality as dynamic totality and as a unity of opposites […], and (3) the method of abstraction as outlined by Marx in the Introduction to the Grundrisse.
- 2.
cf. “Trumpgate”: the scandal involving records of phone conversations where political pressure was applied on Ukraine in exchange for military aid.
References
caмыx бoгaтыx людeй Укpaины: Пoлный cпиcoк [100 Richest Ukrainians]. (2016). Focus. https://focus.ua/ratings/350253/. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Bond, I. (2019). Will the “Servant of the People” be the Master of the People, Centre for European Reform. https://www.cer.eu/insights/will-servant-people-be-master-ukraine. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Clarke, D. (2019, July 29). Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky cannot be a Servant of the People and of Oligarchy. The New Statesman. https://www.newstatesman.com/world/europe/2019/07/ukraine-s-volodymyr-zelensky-cannot-be-servant-people-and-oligarchy. Accessed 20 February 2021.
D’Anieri, P. J. (2007). Understanding Ukrainian Politics: Power, Politics, and Institutional Design. M.E. Sharpe.
Dyczok, M. (2005). Breaking through the information blockade: Elections and revolution in Ukraine 2004. Canadian Slavonic Papers, 47(3–4), 241–264.
Dyczok. (2006). Was Kuchma’s censorship effective? Mass media in Ukraine before 2004. Europe-Asia Studies, 58(2), 215–238.
Dyczok. (2009). Do the media matter? focus on Ukraine. In Dyczok, M. & Gaman-Golutvina, O. (Eds.), Media, democracy and freedom: The post-communist experience (pp.17–42). Peter Lang.
Foreign-Born Ministers in Ukraine’s New Cabinet. (2014). BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-30348945. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Golstein, V. (2014, May 19). Why everything you’ve read about Ukraine is wrong. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesleadershipforum/2014/05/19/why-everything-youve-read-about-ukraine-is-wrong/?sh=1483aa2b510e. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Havlik, P. (2014). Economic consequences of the Ukraine conflict. Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche, Policy Notes and Reports. https://wiiw.ac.at/economic-consequences-of-the-ukraine-conflict-dlp-3427.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Ishchenko, V. (2014, May–June). Ukraine’s fractures. New Left Review, 87.
Ishchenko. (2016). The Ukrainian left during and after the Maidan protests, a report for the DIE LINKE delegation, GUE/NGL. http://cslr.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/The_Ukrainian_Left_during_and_after_the.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Ishchenko, V., & Yurchenko, Y. (2019). Ukraine, US hegemony and inter-imperialist rivalry. In I. Ness & Z. Cope (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of imperialism and anti-imperialism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Katchanovski, I. (2014). The separatist conflict in donbas: A violent break-up of Ukraine? European Politics and Society, 17(4), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2016.1154131. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Kudelia, S. (2014). Domestic sources of the donbas insurgency. PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo, 351. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/domestic-sources-donbas-insurgency. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Kuzio, T. (1999). State and institution building in Ukraine. St. Martin’s Press.
Kuzio, T. (2005). Regime Type and Politics in Ukraine under Kuchma. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38, 167–190
Levy, G. (2016, October 4). Slave labour in Lugansk: What war in Ukraine has “Achieved”. https://peopleandnature.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/slave-labour-in-lugansk-what-war-in-ukraine-has-achieved/. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Menon, R., & Rumer, E. B. (2015). Conflict in Ukraine: The unwinding of the post-cold war order. MIT Press.
Overbeek, H. (2002). Transnational historical materialism: Theories of transnational class formation and world order. In M. Rupert (Ed.), Historical materialism and globalization. Routledge.
Petersen, R. (2002). Understanding ethnic violence: Fear, hatred, and resentment in twentieth-century Eastern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Petrov, R., van der Loo, G., & van Elsuwege, P. (2015). The EU–Ukraine association agreement: A new legal instrument of integration without membership?, Kyiv-Mohyla Law and Politics Journal, 1.
Plokhy, S. (2015). The gates of Europe. Penguin.
Powell, J., & Yurchenko, Y. (2020). The evolution of private provision in urban drinking water: New geographies, institutional ambiguity and the need for political economy. New Political Economy, 25(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1562432
Riabchuk, M. (2001). Двi Укpaїни [Two Ukraines], Krytyka, 4.
Shevel, O. (2015). The parliamentary elections in Ukraine, October 2014. Electoral Studies, 39, 159.
Solomon, P. (2011, March 2). Yanukovych’s judicial reform: Power and justice. Ukraine Watch. https://ukrainewatch.wordpress.com/2011/03/02/yanukovychs-judicial-reform-power-policy/. Accessed 20 February 2021.
Wilson, A. (2005). Virtual politics: Faking democracy in the post-soviet world (1st ed.). Yale University Press.
Wilson. (2014). Ukraine crisis: What the west needs to know. Yale University Press.
Yurchenko, Y. (2012). “Black holes” in the political economy of Ukraine: The neoliberalization of europe’s “wild east”. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 20(2–3), 125–149.
Yurchenko, Y. (2018). Ukraine and the empire of capital: From marketisation to armed conflict. Pluto Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yurchenko, Y. (2022). Ukraine and the (Dis)integrating “Empire of Capital”. In: Gagyi, A., Slačálek, O. (eds) The Political Economy of Eastern Europe 30 years into the ‘Transition’. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78915-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78915-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78914-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78915-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)