Abstract
Despite the discovery of several new therapeutic interventions, heart disease remains the number one cause of death worldwide. Many forms of heart disease are associated with loss of functional heart muscle cells, cardiac hypertrophy, remodeling and chamber dilation as well as deterioration in cardiac function. Significant changes in the levels of mediators regulating apoptosis and autophagy have been reported in both patients and experimental models of heart disease. Endogenous catecholamines, norepinephrine and epinephrine have been shown to play a critical role in cell death and pro-survival pathways in the heart by binding to β1-, β2- and α1- adrenergic receptors (ARs). While there is scant information on the mechanisms regulating cell death and pro-survival pathways, a deeper understanding of these processes and their interplay is essential for development of new therapies for patients suffering from heart disease. Here, we have briefly reviewed various signal transduction mechanisms linking adrenergic receptors with apoptosis and autophagy in the heart. Notably, elevated plasma levels of norepinephrine or β1-AR autoantibodies can induce apoptosis via stimulation of the β1-AR/cAMP/protein kinase A dependent and independent pathways and activation of β2- or α1-ARs can have pro-survival functions in cardiomyocytes. Whereas both AR agonists and antagonists can either increase or decrease autophagy depending on the cardiovascular cell type and experimental model system used. In addition, we have provided a comprehensive survey of the literature relevant to the effects of various adrenergic drugs on the signaling mechanisms regulating apoptosis and autophagy and discussed the relevance of these events in heart disease.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Cell death and survival pathways
- Heart disease
- Adrenergic receptors
- Catecholamines
- Adrenergic receptor agonists and α- and β-adrenergic receptor blockers
Introduction
The adrenergic system consists of the endogenous catecholamines norepinephrine and epinephrine and the adrenergic receptors. Norepinephrine from nerve endings and epinephrine from the adrenal gland are secreted when the sympathetic nervous system is activated [1]. The systemic effects of the sympathetic nervous system, particularly on the heart and circulatory system, enable the human body’s fight or flight response. To this end, sympathetic activation elicits an increased heart rate, increased contractility and relaxation of the heart, and it causes vasoconstriction with a subsequent increase in blood pressure. These effects are caused by the actions of epinephrine and norepinephrine on the adrenergic receptors [2]. Given that norepinephrine is the catecholamine released at the cardiac sympathetic nerve terminals, it can modulate the heart’s activity more directly than epinephrine which is released by the adrenal glands in a systemic manner [2, 3]. In addition, some of the norepinephrine released from the postganglionic fibers innervating the heart can also reach the general circulation when it is produced in large amounts in the myocardium [2, 4]. Primarily epinephrine, as well as a small amount of norepinephrine, are produced by chromaffin cells located in the medulla of the adrenal glands [3, 4]. Under normal physiological circumstances 80% of catecholamine production will consist of epinephrine with the remaining 20% being norepinephrine [2].
Heart failure results from the heart’s inability to function effectively as a pump due to diseases such as a myocardial infarction or ischemia. Chronic activation of adrenergic signaling is an important feature of many forms of heart disease. Elevated plasma norepinephrine levels in individuals with heart failure are strongly correlated with decreased survival and increased risk of death from chronic heart failure [5]. In heart failure, overactivation of the sympathetic system occurs with the primary goal of maintaining cardiac output in the failing heart [1, 4]. A study by Chidsey et al. [6] was one of the first to highlight the association between heart failure and increased functioning of sympathetic nervous system, as illustrated by higher norepinephrine secretion [6]. Decreased cardiac output in heart failure patients can also impact on the clearance of catecholamines from the plasma, and this, along with increased activation of the adrenal gland further contributes to increased catecholamines in the plasma of heart failure patients [2]. In untreated heart failure patients, the levels of circulating norepinephrine can reach approximately 50 times when compared to those in normal individuals who are exercising to their maximum ability [2, 7]. Plasma levels of norepinephrine in patients with congestive heart failure are significantly higher than those reported for angina patients with no clinical features of heart failure [8, 9]. Elevated epinephrine and norepinephrine levels have also been found in patients with hypertension [10]. In addition to the overactivation of adrenergic system in heart failure, decreased cardiac output increases production of angiotensin II and endothelin, which collectively promote systemic vasoconstriction and increase the afterload. These systemic changes further reduce ejection fraction and cardiac output, and the cycle repeats. The downward spiral is continued until a new steady state is reached in which cardiac output is lower and afterload is higher than optimal for normal activity.
Despite the discovery of several therapeutic interventions, heart failure due to ischemia remains the number one cause of death worldwide [11]. In adults, cardiomyocytes (CMs) that die in response to aging and pathological insults are replaced by scar tissue instead of new muscle cells [12, 13]. While recent reports suggest an intrinsic capacity for the mammalian myocardium to regenerate via endogenous stem/progenitor cells, the magnitude of such response appears to be minimal and not yet realized in CV patients [14, 15]. Current therapies can increase the life expectancy of end-stage heart failure patients by 2–3 years [16]. Considering these issues, a deeper understanding of molecular mechanisms regulating cell death and survival is essential to combat the increasing burden of heart failure. Studies from multiple laboratories revealed that ischemia and cytotoxic levels of catecholamines can induce autophagy and programmed cell death or apoptosis in many forms of heart disease [17,18,19]. These two events can account in part for the loss of function in the diseased heart. In this chapter, we have briefly reviewed various signal transduction mechanisms linking adrenergic receptors with apoptosis and autophagy in the heart. In addition, we have provided a brief survey of the literature related to the effects of adrenergic receptor blockers on apoptosis and autophagy in the heart. Subsequently, we have identified some important research questions for future studies.
Adrenergic Receptors in the Heart
Norepinephrine and epinephrine elicit their effects by binding to α- and β-adrenergic receptors (AR). The β-adrenergic receptors (β-ARs) that are located in the mammalian heart are of three subtypes β1, β2, and β3 [20]. Under normal physiological circumstances only β1 and β2 receptors are active [1, 21]. Additionally, α1-ARs of the subtypes 1A, 1B, and 1D are also present in the heart, although their levels of expression are lower than the β-ARs. α1-AR subtypes 1A and 1B are found on cardiomyocytes whereas 1D receptors are found on smooth muscle cells in the coronary arteries. The role of α1-ARs in the heart is not well defined, but studies have shown that they have a protective effect against apoptosis and necrosis and these receptors are also reported to increase the strength of cardiac contractions. Through interactions with α1-ARs in blood vessels epinephrine and norepinephrine can elicit vasoconstriction [1, 22].
Both β1- and β2-ARs are coupled to adenylyl cyclase (AC) through the stimulatory G protein, Gs. Activation of AC leads to an increase in the intracellular levels of the second messenger, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) which can subsequently activate protein kinase A (PKA). β2-ARs can also interact with the inhibitory G protein, Gi. Under normal conditions, cardiomyocytes predominantly express the β1 subtype, whereas cardiac fibroblasts predominantly express the β2 subtype [23,24,25,26,27]. The β3-ARs are believed to interact with the Gi protein and subsequently inhibit the activation of adenylyl cyclase, ultimately resulting in myocardial relaxation. These receptors are thought to counteract the effects that the β1- and β2-ARs have on heart rate, conduction speed and inotropy. However, the β3-AR mediated actions are more relevant in disease states as these receptors become activated in response to higher concentrations norepinephrine compared with β1- or β2-ARs [28].
In the failing heart, the adrenergic signalling system changes in response to chronically increased levels of catecholamines. During heart failure, the ratio of β1 to β2 receptors changes from 3:1 to 1:1. Additionally, β1-AR expression at the plasma membrane is decreased and both β1- and β2-ARs become uncoupled from their associated G proteins and this process is termed as β-AR desensitization [2, 29]. The expression level of α1-ARs has been found to either remain constant or increase during heart failure [22].
Role of Adrenergic Receptor Signaling in the Regulation of Apoptosis and Autophagy in the Heart
Apoptosis is a controlled form of cell death. Unlike necrotic cell death where the contents of a dying cell leak out, apoptotic cells are not detrimental to surrounding cells nor do they initiate an inflammatory response [30]. Apoptosis is initiated by a cascade of caspase enzymes ultimately leading to the cleavage of critical proteins required for cell survival and the release of caspase activated DNAse enzymes. Subsequently, cells undergoing apoptosis shrink, lose their cytoskeleton and the cellular DNA is fragmented to the nucleosomal level. Apoptotic cells are then phagocytosed by surrounding cells or macrophages which recognize specific proteins on the surface of dying cells [30]. Autophagy is a cellular process activated in response to cellular stress and is also active in a form of non-apoptotic programmed cell death known as autophagic cell death [23]. Levine and Kroemer [31] suggested that autophagy is an adaptive mechanism used by cells to deal with injurious cellular components such as injured organelles or aggregates of protein. The pathway by which autophagy occurs can be different according to the cell type/environment [31]. The adrenergic signaling pathways associated with cardiovascular apoptosis and autophagy are discussed in subsequent sections.
Chronic catecholamine stimulation can lead to apoptosis in the heart [26, 32, 33]. When cardiomyocytes die, cardiac fibroblasts proliferate to maintain the architecture of the heart and this results in pathological remodeling and contributes to the development of heart failure [34]. Norepinephrine-induced apoptosis occurs via stimulation of the β1-AR and subsequent activation of cAMP-PKA signaling as well as via PKA independent pathways (Fig. 2.1). Conversely, activation of the β2-AR opposes apoptosis. The anti-apoptotic actions of the β2-AR stimulation occur via activation of the Gi protein and subsequent phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) and Akt activity [2, 32, 33, 35, 36] (Fig. 2.1). The p38 MAP kinase, a known downstream target of PKA, has been shown to play both pro- and anti-apoptotic roles in β-AR mediated apoptosis in cardiomyocytes [37, 38]. Notably, chronic stimulation of β1-ARs can also promote cardiomyocyte apoptosis independent of PKA via activation of Ca2+/calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) [39]. Other studies found that stimulation of β1-ARs can increase cardiomyocyte apoptosis via activation of either Rac1/c-jun N-terminal kinase pathway [40] or GSK-3β [41]. Stimulation of the β1-ARs in neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures by isoproterenol (ISO) or 8-Br-cAMP induced apoptosis [35]. Notably, ISO induced apoptosis could be blocked by co-treatment with a PKA inhibitor and 8-Br-cAMP induced apoptosis was blocked by co-treatment with an α1-AR agonist, phenylephrine via the Gαq/PKC/MEK-1 pathway (Fig. 2.1) [35].
In addition to the increased levels of catecholamines, autoantibodies against the β1-ARs are frequently generated in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy [42] and experimental models of heart disease [43]. Recent studies indicated that myocardial damage is sufficient to stimulate the generation of β1-AR specific autoantibodies in rats subjected for aortic banding or adriamycin treatment [43] and the long-term presence of these antibodies can significantly decrease cardiac function [44]. While these autoantibodies were shown to activate canonical β1-AR associated cAMP and PKA signaling pathway, sustained stimulation of β1-ARs with these antibodies was shown to increase levels of activated caspase-3 and cardiomyocytes apoptosis [45, 46]. Notably, β1-AR autoantibodies were also shown to increase the cardiomyocyte endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis via β1-AR coupled CaMKII, p38 MAPK and ATF6 pathway [47]. Long-term exposure to β1-AR autoantibodies was also shown to decrease the myocardial autophagy response and the cardiac dysfunction associated with autoantibodies could be reversed by upregulation of autophagy using the mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin [48].
Consistent with a role for adrenergic receptor signaling in the modulation of cardiomyocyte autophagy, stimulation of β-ARs using a non-selective agonist, isoproterenol was shown to activate Epac1 and increase autophagy in mouse hearts as well as primary rat cardiomyocytes [49]. Notably, pharmacological inhibition or germline deletion of Epac1 prevented the induction of β-AR mediated remodeling and cardiomyocyte autophagy in response to isoproterenol treatment. Specifically, it was shown that agonist actions on β-ARs can activate Epac1 via cAMP, leading to activation of Rap2B and phospholipase C which subsequently activate the Ca2+/CaMKKβ/AMPK pathway (Fig. 2.2). This pathway is proposed to inhibit mTORC1 and thereby stimulate autophagy [49]. In this scenario, autophagy is proposed to be an adaptive response of cardiomyocytes to oppose the effects of Epac1 induced pathological cardiac remodeling [49]. Activation of the β2-ARs in adult rat cardiac fibroblasts by both isoproterenol and salbutamol (a β2-AR selective agonist) stimulated autophagy (Fig. 2.2), which augmented type I collagen degradation [23]. This study proposed that autophagy in response to high levels of catecholamines may be an attempt to decrease the fibrosis by balancing the changes in extracellular matrix composition resulting from increased adrenergic stimulation [23]. A recent study demonstrated that stimulation of α1-ARs with phenylephrine in cardiomyocyte cultures or in vivo can suppress autophagy and promote hypertrophy (Fig. 2.2) via focal adhesion kinase mediated phosphorylation of Beclin1 and subsequent disruption of Beclin1-Atg14L interaction required for autophagosome formation (Fig. 2.2) [50]. While these observations underscore the importance of α1-AR signaling mediated suppression of cardiomyocyte autophagy in compensatory hypertrophy, it is not known whether this pathway plays any regulatory role in pathological hypertrophy and heart failure.
β-AR Blockers and Heart Disease
Three generations of β-AR blocking drugs have been developed over the past several decades. The first generation of β-blockers are non-selective, meaning that they block both the β1- and β2-AR subtypes. These drugs include propranolol, nadolol and timolol. The second generation β-blockers bind preferentially to the β1-AR subtype and include metoprolol, atenolol and bisoprolol. The third-generation blockers are either selective for the β1 subtype (e.g. celiprolol and nebivolol) or non-selective (e.g. carvedilol). Importantly, the third-generation blockers can also cause vasodilation in the periphery. Carvedilol does so by blocking the α1-AR, while nebivolol elicits this effect by interacting with the endothelium and increasing production of nitric oxide (NO) [28, 51]. Additionally, carvedilol also has antioxidant properties due to its ability to “scavenge free radicals” [52, 53]. β-blockers are effective in treating chronic heart failure as can be seen by their ability to mitigate adverse left ventricular remodeling, decreasing heart rate which then decreases the amount of oxygen required by the heart and the workload of the heart. These outcomes are accomplished by decreasing the toxic actions of the elevated levels of norepinephrine, upregulating the number of β-ARs, among others [1, 2].
The difference in β-AR selectivity between the various β-blockers must be considered when selecting a drug for clinical use. The majority of the “therapeutic actions” of these drugs are due to interactions with β1-ARs, whereas many “adverse effects” are caused by interactions with the β2-AR such as blockade of this receptor in lungs can lead to bronchoconstriction [52]. This interaction has important implications for selecting an appropriate β-blocker for patients suffering from both heart disease and asthma [54, 55]. Additionally, it is important to note that while some drugs are cardioselective by preferentially binding to the β1-AR, such selectivity can be overcome at higher doses as in the case with metoprolol. Nebivolol was found to be more cardioselective compared to other β-blockers such as metoprolol or bisoprolol [52, 56]. The ability of third generation β-blockers to cause vasodilation may be of use in certain circumstances, as discussed below.
A meta-analysis conducted on the use of atenolol to treat uncomplicated hypertension found that it had no impact on the occurrence of myocardial infarction or mortality compared to placebo or no treatment, despite an ability to decrease blood pressure [57]. It was found that treatment of hypertension with third generation β-blockers had lower incidence of mortality compared with atenolol [57, 58]. Okamoto et al. investigated the actions of nebivolol versus metoprolol on hypertension in patients with autonomic failure to distinguish the β-AR effects from the vasodilatory effects through increasing NO. Nebivolol was able to significantly decrease the systolic blood pressure compared to control whereas metoprolol did not, and thus the authors concluded that nebivolol elicited these antihypertensive effects independent of its actions at the β1-AR [59]. Although another study found that nebivolol decreased the incidence of cardiovascular events more effectively than did metoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) and left ventricular dysfunction, there was no large difference between treatment with metoprolol and treatment with carvedilol with respect to cardiovascular events, nor was there a difference between the carvedilol and nebivolol groups [60]. The authors of this study suggest that carvedilol may be less effective in MI patients since blocking of β2-ARs can impair the pro-survival pathways [33]. Whereas, β2-AR blocking, and antioxidant properties of carvedilol are thought to be beneficial for the treatment of heart failure patients since β2-AR levels and oxidative stress are elevated in those patients [60]. Based on recent reports, it may be beneficial to keep both β2- and α1-AR signaling pathways intact in acute MI patients, as stimulation of β2-AR can increase autophagy and collagen degradation in cardiac fibroblasts [23] and α1-AR stimulation can promote hypertrophy by decreasing cardiomyocyte autophagy [50]. It is possible that blocking both β2- and α1-AR pathways in acute MI patients using carvedilol may lead to precocious fibrosis and impaired compensatory hypertrophic responses in addition to loss of pro-survival signals (Figs. 2.1 and 2.2), subsequently increasing adverse cardiovascular events. Thus, more research should be conducted to confirm the effects of these new generation β-blockers on pathways linking autophagy and apoptosis in addition to a clear focus on clinical outcomes.
New Mechanistic Insights for the Actions of β-AR Blockers in the Regulation of Apoptosis and Autophagy
It is clear from both experimental and clinical literature that β-AR blockers are highly effective in decreasing cardiac workload, oxidative stress, apoptosis, remodeling and arrhythmias in animal models or patients suffering from heart disease. Although β-AR blockers were initially not preferred for the treatment of heart failure due to their negative inotropic effects, positive results from clinical trials combined with new findings related to the novel actions of these drugs have increased a great deal of interest in the development of new generation drugs for the treatment of several forms of heart disease. Notably, the third-generation β-AR blockers nebivolol and carvedilol are also shown to act as antioxidants and increase the activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS). These additional features are helpful since heart disease is often accompanied by oxidative stress [61, 62].
Carvedilol has been implicated in modulating levels of microRNAs (miR), which are known to repress the expression of certain genes following transcription [61]. A study by Xu et al. [63] found that carvedilol upregulated miR-133 in the infarcted rat heart as well as in hydrogen peroxide treated neonatal rat cardiomyocyte cultures [63]. Further, co-treatment of cardiomyocyte cultures with hydrogen peroxide and carvedilol resulted in suppression of caspase 9 expression and associated apoptosis which were normally seen with peroxide treatment alone [63]. However, the mechanistic link between carvedilol treatment and miR-133 upregulation is yet to be established. Activation of β1-ARs in neonatal cardiomyocyte cultures using ISO was shown to induced apoptosis via cAMP/PKA mediated suppression of myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) transcriptional activity and expression of pro-survival genes such as KLF6 [24]. Whereas, inhibition of β-ARs using atenolol enhanced the MEF2 transcriptional activity and promoted cardiomyocyte survival (Fig. 2..1) [34]. Although clinical use of atenolol over other β-AR blockers in the treatment of hypertension is debated [57, 58], new findings related to atenolol mediated pro-survival pathways could be of use shortly after a myocardial infarction as this could prevent cardiomyocyte apoptosis and the subsequent pathological remodeling [34].
Ahmet and colleagues investigated the long-term effects of β1-AR antagonism in combination with β2-AR agonism using a rat model of chronic heart failure over a period of one year [64]. Rats treated in this manner had a 34% increase in survival when compared to rats that were not treated. Left ventricular remodeling and function were improved with the combination treatment. Additionally, the size of the infarct did not increase, and cardiomyocyte apoptosis was significantly decreased in the combination treatment group [64]. In a rat model of coronary artery ligation and cardioplegia-induced cardiac arrest, carvedilol treatment was found to decrease the amount of cardiomyocyte apoptosis that occurred following the cardioplegia and subsequent reoxygenation via activation of PI3K and MEK (mitogen activated protein kinase kinase) [65]. These observations underscore the potential for carvedilol to be used prior to cardiac surgery for prevention of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Using a rat model of acute MI, another study found that carvedilol treatment can mitigate the upregulation of toll like receptor 4 (TLR-4) that is commonly seen following an infarction. TLR4 activates inflammatory pathways and has been implicated in pro-apoptotic signaling in the infarcted heart, suggesting this may be the mechanism by which carvedilol decreases apoptosis [66].
Compared to the effects of β-AR blockers on apoptosis, there is scant information on the effects of these drugs on autophagy in the heart. In a rat cardiac resuscitation model, treatment with a short acting β1-AR blocker, esmolol, was effective in reducing the levels of epinephrine induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and this protective effect was also correlated with a significant reduction in cardiomyocyte autophagy, as evidenced by reductions in Beclin-1 and parkin expression levels [67]. In a mouse model of pressure-overload induced cardiac dysfunction, treatment with metoprolol (β1-AR blocker) in combination with quiliqiangxin (QL; a Chinese herbal medication) over a 4-week period significantly improved cardiac function, decreased remodeling and apoptosis compared to QL treatment alone [68]. Although QL+ metoprolol treatment was effective in reducing the levels of an autophagy marker protein (LC3-II) in the diseased heart when compared to no drug treatment group, this combination was not as effective as other combination treatments such as QL+ an angiotensin II receptor blocker or an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor [68]. In contrast to the suppressive effects of esmolol and metoprolol on autophagy, an earlier study showed that acute treatment of healthy rats with propranolol (a non-selective β-AR blocker) can significantly increase the volume fraction and density of autophagic vacuoles (AVs) in the left ventricular myocardium compared to the control hearts within 2–4 h after treatment. This study suggested that autophagy is an early cardiac adaptation response to reduced workload since similar effects on AVs were also observed after acute treatment with a calcium channel blocking drug verapamil [69]. Similar to the effects of propranolol on AVs, treatment of rats subjected to acute MI with carvedilol for 2 weeks also revealed a significant increase in the number of AVs, autophagy- and anti-apoptosis related proteins (e.g. Beclin-1 and Bcl-XL) in the infarct region and the region bordering infarction compared to those regions in untreated MI hearts [70]. Notably, treatment of non-cardiac HepG2 cells with propranolol in the absence or presence of a β2-AR agonist clenbuterol significantly increased the LC3-II protein levels [71]. However, propranolol treated HepG2 cells also revealed a significant increase in SQSTM1/p62 protein levels as well as a significant decrease in the number of autolysosomes suggesting that autophagosome flux was blocked at late stages such as lysosomal fusion, acidification or protease digestion [71]. Future studies on autophagosome flux with regards to the status of SQSTM1/p62 levels and autolysosome formation may provide additional insights into the mechanisms underlying protective effects of β-AR blockers in different cardiovascular cell types.
Conclusion
Here, we provide evidence from the literature that adrenergic signaling plays a critical role in the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy in cardiovascular system and both adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists can be used to modulate the levels of apoptosis and autophagy in the heart. Although common signaling mediators can be readily identified for both pathways, more work needs to be done to define the relationship between apoptosis and autophagy and their relative significance in the context of cardiovascular disease. Some studies suggest that upregulation of autophagy can improve cardiac function [72] while other studies suggest that downregulation of autophagy may be beneficial during disease states [73, 74]. It has also been suggested that inadequate autophagy responses may contribute to cardiac dysfunction [75]. Some in vitro studies suggest that the degree of ischemic injury may dictate the manifestations of autophagy, apoptosis and necrosis in the heart. For example, mild ischemic injury may result in autophagy and apoptosis whereas moderate or severe ischemia may cause apoptosis and necrosis [76]. Thus, it is generally thought that autophagy can be an early adaptive response to disease and increased autophagy can delay the onset of both apoptotic and necrotic cell death. However, increased autophagy is not always associated with a concomitant decrease in apoptosis as seen with the in vitro effects of different adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists on these processes. A better understanding of molecular events involved in autophagy and apoptosis and the interplay between these pathways in heart disease as well as additional mechanistic information related to the effects of adrenergic drugs specifically on these processes will enable us to develop efficacious treatments.
References
Triposkiadis F, Karayannis G, Giamouzis G et al (2009) The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure physiology, pathophysiology, and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1747–1762
Lymperopoulos A, Rengo G, Koch WJ (2013) Adrenergic nervous system in heart failure: pathophysiology and therapy. Circ Res 113:739–753
Lymperopoulos A, Rengo G, Koch WJ (2007) Adrenal adrenoceptors in heart failure: fine-tuning cardiac stimulation. Trends Mol Med 13:503–511
Pepper GS, Lee RW (1999) Sympathetic activation in heart failure and its treatment with beta-blockade. Arch Intern Med 159:225–234
Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT et al (1984) Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 311:819–823
Chidsey CA, Braunwald E, Morrow AG (1965) Catecholamine excretion and cardiac stores of norepinephrine in congestive heart failure. Am J Med 39:442–451
Morris MJ, Cox HS, Lambert GW et al (1997) Region-specific neuropeptide Y overflows at rest and during sympathetic activation in humans. Hypertension 29:137–143
Levine TB, Francis GS, Goldsmith SR et al (1982) Activity of the sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin system assessed by plasma hormone levels and their relation to hemodynamic abnormalities in congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 49:1659–1666
Viquerat CE, Daly P, Swedberg K et al (1985) Endogenous catecholamine levels in chronic heart failure. Relation to the severity of hemodynamic abnormalities. Am J Med 78:455–460
de Champlain J, Farley L, Cousineau D et al (1976) Circulating catecholamine levels in human and experimental hypertension. Circ Res 38:109–114
Mathers C, Stevens G, Mahanani WR et al (2017) WHO methods and data sources for country-level causes of death 2000–2015. Glob Health Esitmates Tech Pap Ser 1–85
Pasumarthi KB, Nakajima H, Nakajima HO et al (2005) Targeted expression of cyclin D2 results in cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis and infarct regression in transgenic mice. Circ Res 96:110–118
Gaspard GJ, Pasumarthi KB (2008) Quantification of cardiac fibrosis by colour-subtractive computer-assisted image analysis. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 35:679–686
McMullen NM, Pasumarthi KB (2007) Donor cell transplantation for myocardial disease: does it complement current pharmacological therapies? Can J Physiol Pharmacol 85:1–15
Murry CE, Field LJ, Menasche P (2005) Cell-based cardiac repair: reflections at the 10-year point. Circulation 112:3174–3183
Lloyd-Jones DM (2001) The risk of congestive heart failure: sobering lessons from the Framingham heart study. Curr Cardiol Rep 3:184–190
Lavandero S, Chiong M, Rothermel BA et al (2015) Autophagy in cardiovascular biology. J Clin Invest 125:55–64
Mughal W, Dhingra R, Kirshenbaum LA (2012) Striking a balance: autophagy, apoptosis, and necrosis in a normal and failing heart. Curr Hypertens Rep 14:540–547
Mughal W, Kirshenbaum LA (2011) Cell death signalling mechanisms in heart failure. Exp Clin Cardiol 16:102–108
Lohse MJ, Engelhardt S, Eschenhagen T (2003) What is the role of beta-adrenergic signaling in heart failure? Circ Res 93:896–906
Skeberdis VA, Gendviliene V, Zablockaite D et al (2008) beta3-adrenergic receptor activation increases human atrial tissue contractility and stimulates the L-type Ca2+ current. J Clin Invest 118:3219–3227
Jensen BC, O’Connell TD, Simpson PC (2014) Alpha-1-adrenergic receptors in heart failure: the adaptive arm of the cardiac response to chronic catecholamine stimulation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 63:291–301
Aranguiz-Urroz P, Canales J, Copaja M et al (2011) Beta(2)-adrenergic receptor regulates cardiac fibroblast autophagy and collagen degradation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1812:23–31
Gustafsson AB, Brunton LL (2000) beta-adrenergic stimulation of rat cardiac fibroblasts enhances induction of nitric-oxide synthase by interleukin-1beta via message stabilization. Mol Pharmacol 58:1470–1478
Lau YH, Robinson RB, Rosen MR et al (1980) Subclassification of beta-adrenergic receptors in cultured rat cardiac myoblasts and fibroblasts. Circ Res 47:41–48
Lefkowitz RJ, Rockman HA, Koch WJ (2000) Catecholamines, cardiac beta-adrenergic receptors, and heart failure. Circulation 101:1634–1637
Leicht M, Greipel N, Zimmer H (2000) Comitogenic effect of catecholamines on rat cardiac fibroblasts in culture. Cardiovasc Res 48:274–284
Rehsia NS, Dhalla NS (2010) Mechanisms of the beneficial effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in congestive heart failure. Exp Clin Cardiol 15:e86-95
Bristow MR, Ginsburg R, Umans V et al (1986) Beta 1- and beta 2-adrenergic-receptor subpopulations in nonfailing and failing human ventricular myocardium: coupling of both receptor subtypes to muscle contraction and selective beta 1-receptor down-regulation in heart failure. Circ Res 59:297–309
Fink SL, Cookson BT (2005) Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells. Infect Immun 73:1907–1916
Levine B, Kroemer G (2009) Autophagy in aging, disease and death: the true identity of a cell death impostor. Cell Death Differ 16:1–2
Chesley A, Lundberg MS, Asai T et al (2000) The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor delivers an antiapoptotic signal to cardiac myocytes through G(i)-dependent coupling to phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase. Circ Res 87:1172–1179
Communal C, Singh K, Sawyer DB et al (1999) Opposing effects of beta(1)- and beta(2)-adrenergic receptors on cardiac myocyte apoptosis: role of a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein. Circulation 100:2210–2212
Hashemi S, Salma J, Wales S et al (2015) Pro-survival function of MEF2 in cardiomyocytes is enhanced by beta-blockers. Cell Death Discov 1:15019
Iwai-Kanai E, Hasegawa K, Araki M et al (1999) alpha- and beta-adrenergic pathways differentially regulate cell type-specific apoptosis in rat cardiac myocytes. Circulation 100:305–311
Zhu WZ, Zheng M, Koch WJ et al (2001) Dual modulation of cell survival and cell death by beta(2)-adrenergic signaling in adult mouse cardiac myocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:1607–1612
Communal C, Colucci WS, Singh K (2000) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway protects adult rat ventricular myocytes against beta-adrenergic receptor-stimulated apoptosis. Evidence for Gi-dependent activation. J Biol Chem 275:19395–19400
Peter PS, Brady JE, Yan L et al (2007) Inhibition of p38 alpha MAPK rescues cardiomyopathy induced by overexpressed beta 2-adrenergic receptor, but not beta 1-adrenergic receptor. J Clin Invest 117:1335–1343
Zhu WZ, Wang SQ, Chakir K et al (2003) Linkage of beta1-adrenergic stimulation to apoptotic heart cell death through protein kinase A-independent activation of Ca2+/calmodulin kinase II. J Clin Invest 111:617–625
Ito M, Adachi T, Pimentel DR et al (2004) Statins inhibit beta-adrenergic receptor-stimulated apoptosis in adult rat ventricular myocytes via a Rac1-dependent mechanism. Circulation 110:412–418
Menon B, Johnson JN, Ross RS et al (2007) Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta plays a pro-apoptotic role in beta-adrenergic receptor-stimulated apoptosis in adult rat ventricular myocytes: role of beta1 integrins. J Mol Cell Cardiol 42:653–661
Magnusson Y, Wallukat G, Waagstein F et al (1994) Autoimmunity in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Characterization of antibodies against the beta 1-adrenoceptor with positive chronotropic effect. Circulation 89:2760–2767
Liu HR, Zhao RR, Jiao XY et al (2002) Relationship of myocardial remodeling to the genesis of serum autoantibodies to cardiac beta(1)-adrenoceptors and muscarinic type 2 acetylcholine receptors in rats. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1866–1873
Zuo L, Bao H, Tian J et al (2011) Long-term active immunization with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the second extracellular loop of beta1-adrenoceptor induces both morphological and functional cardiomyopathic changes in rats. Int J Cardiol 149:89–94
Jane-wit D, Altuntas CZ, Johnson JM et al (2007) Beta 1-adrenergic receptor autoantibodies mediate dilated cardiomyopathy by agonistically inducing cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Circulation 116:399–410
Gao Y, Liu HR, Zhao RR et al (2006) Autoantibody against cardiac beta1-adrenoceptor induces apoptosis in cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 38:443–449
Mao W, Fukuoka S, Iwai C et al (2007) Cardiomyocyte apoptosis in autoimmune cardiomyopathy: mediated via endoplasmic reticulum stress and exaggerated by norepinephrine. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293:H1636-1645
Wang L, Hao H, Wang J et al (2015) Decreased autophagy: a major factor for cardiomyocyte death induced by beta1-adrenoceptor autoantibodies. Cell Death Dis 6:e1862
Laurent AC, Bisserier M, Lucas A et al (2015) Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 1 promotes autophagy during cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res 105:55–64
Cheng Z, Zhu Q, Dee R et al (2017) Focal adhesion Kinase-mediated phosphorylation of beclin1 protein suppresses cardiomyocyte autophagy and initiates hypertrophic growth. J Biol Chem 292:2065–2079
Maffei A, Di Pardo A, Carangi R et al (2007) Nebivolol induces nitric oxide release in the heart through inducible nitric oxide synthase activation. Hypertension 50:652–656
Mason RP, Giles TD, Sowers JR (2009) Evolving mechanisms of action of beta blockers: focus on nebivolol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 54:123–128
Yue TL, Cheng HY, Lysko PG et al (1992) Carvedilol, a new vasodilator and beta adrenoceptor antagonist, is an antioxidant and free radical scavenger. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 263:92–98
Baker JG, Gardiner SM, Woolard J et al (2017) Novel selective beta1-adrenoceptor antagonists for concomitant cardiovascular and respiratory disease. FASEB J 31:3150–3166
Matthys H, Doshan HD, Ruhle KH et al (1985) The bronchosparing effect of celiprolol, a new beta 1-alpha 2-receptor antagonist on pulmonary function of propranolol-sensitive asthmatics. J Clin Pharmacol 25:354–359
Gupta S, Wright HM (2008) Nebivolol: a highly selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blocker that causes vasodilation by increasing nitric oxide. Cardiovasc Ther 26:189–202
Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH (2004) Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 364:1684–1689
Pedersen ME, Cockcroft JR (2009) What is the role, if any, for beta-blockers as initial therapy for uncomplicated hypertension? Curr Opin Cardiol 24:325–332
Okamoto LE, Gamboa A, Shibao CA et al (2014) Nebivolol, but not metoprolol, lowers blood pressure in nitric oxide-sensitive human hypertension. Hypertension 64:1241–1247
Ozaydin M, Yucel H, Kocyigit S et al (2016) Nebivolol versus carvedilol or metoprolol in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction. Med Princ Pract 25:316–322
Kurdi M, Booz GW (2014) Carvedilol protects the infarcted heart by upregulating miR-133: first evidence that disease state affects beta-adrenergic arrestin-biased signaling? J Mol Cell Cardiol 76:12–14
Vanhoutte PM, Gao Y (2013) Beta blockers, nitric oxide, and cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Pharmacol 13:265–273
Xu C, Hu Y, Hou L et al (2014) beta-Blocker carvedilol protects cardiomyocytes against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by up-regulating miR-133 expression. J Mol Cell Cardiol 75:111–121
Ahmet I, Krawczyk M, Zhu W et al (2008) Cardioprotective and survival benefits of long-term combined therapy with beta2 adrenoreceptor (AR) agonist and beta1 AR blocker in dilated cardiomyopathy postmyocardial infarction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 325:491–499
Yeh CH, Chen TP, Wang YC et al (2013) Carvedilol treatment after myocardial infarct decreases cardiomyocytic apoptosis in the peri-infarct zone during cardioplegia-induced cardiac arrest. Shock 39:343–352
Liu Q, Zhang J, Xu Y et al (2013) Effect of carvedilol on cardiomyocyte apoptosis in a rat model of myocardial infarction: a role for toll-like receptor 4. Indian J Pharmacol 45:458–463
Lu J, Shen Y, Liu LJ et al (2015) Combining epinephrine and esmolol attenuates excessive autophagy and mitophagy in rat cardiomyocytes after cardiac arrest. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 66:449–456
Ye Y, Gong H, Wang X et al (2015) Combination treatment with antihypertensive agents enhances the effect of qiliqiangxin on chronic pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling in male mice. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 65:628–639
Bahro M, Pfeifer U (1987) Short-term stimulation by propranolol and verapamil of cardiac cellular autophagy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 19:1169–1178
Zhang JL, Lu JK, Chen D et al (2009) Myocardial autophagy variation during acute myocardial infarction in rats: the effects of carvedilol. Chin Med J (Engl) 122:2372–2379
Farah BL, Sinha RA, Wu Y et al (2014) beta-Adrenergic agonist and antagonist regulation of autophagy in HepG2 cells, primary mouse hepatocytes, and mouse liver. PLoS One 9:e98155
Bhuiyan MS, Pattison JS, Osinska H et al (2013) Enhanced autophagy ameliorates cardiac proteinopathy. J Clin Invest 123:5284–5297
Sun A, Cheng Y, Zhang Y et al (2014) Aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 ameliorates doxorubicin-induced myocardial dysfunction through detoxification of 4-HNE and suppression of autophagy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 71:92–104
Zhu H, Tannous P, Johnstone JL et al (2007) Cardiac autophagy is a maladaptive response to hemodynamic stress. J Clin Invest 117:1782–1793
Nakai A, Yamaguchi O, Takeda T et al (2007) The role of autophagy in cardiomyocytes in the basal state and in response to hemodynamic stress. Nat Med 13:619–624
Loos B, Genade S, Ellis B et al (2011) At the core of survival: autophagy delays the onset of both apoptotic and necrotic cell death in a model of ischemic cell injury. Exp Cell Res 317:1437–1453
Acknowledgements
We thank the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada for the grant support (G-15-0009233 and G-18-0022140).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacLean, J., Pasumarthi, K.B.S. (2022). Adrenergic Receptor Signaling Pathways in the Regulation of Apoptosis and Autophagy in the Heart. In: Kirshenbaum, L.A. (eds) Biochemistry of Apoptosis and Autophagy. Advances in Biochemistry in Health and Disease, vol 18. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78799-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78799-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78798-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78799-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)