Skip to main content

Transformations of Trust Under Caused by Instabilities of Educational Interactions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Natural, Human-Made, and Coupled Human-Natural Systems Research

Abstract

The digital mass media update is taking place in almost all spheres of society’s life and causes an expanded interest in the consequences of this truly global process. For such spheres of public activity as production (business), science, and education, which particularly determine the “breakthrough” nature of the technologies used today, the consequences of the development, and the digital mass media [DMM] usage volume have a differentiated nature. This differentiation reflects “many-in-one,” as it is clearly (especially in the advanced organizational forms of consolidation of business—science—education) combined with the integration of the mentioned industries and their “attachment” to changing human potential and the processes of its capitalization. The development of distance/e-learning is one of the consequences of using the DMM in education. Considering the DMM as the material basis for a new education ecosystem, we can clearly see the need to research the consequences of this process to manage and forecast the learning and education itself and determine the future architecture of educational interactions. In this regard, arises the significant research trend—to forecast the attitude of the main subjects of educational interactions (individuals (educators and learners), family, civil society, government, and business) towards the updated DMM. The present article aims to trace a trend based on sociological research that can be characterized as a “form of interaction with a teacher” or consulting activity. Consultation is considered a special type of informative and teaching activity distinguished by two qualities—individualization and a high degree of trust. Besides, the consultation is a universal type of pedagogical work with many levels (student–teacher; scientific supervisor—postgraduate student; head of the laboratory—intern, etc.). Naturally arises the question of dominant trust: whom to trust—the educator (“live” communication) or the technologies and information of the Internet (final form of formalized algorithms)? As a result of independently conducted and involved research, the authors formulated a hypothesis that with the development of DMM usage volume and distance learning, the need for live communication with the educator decreases, and “digital literacy” both among learners and educators—increases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barbashina EV, Gulyaevskaya NV (2019) Distance/e-learning: minimizing complexity. Prof Edu Mod World 9(3):2997–3008

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin AD (2019) Five perspectives of trust. Confidence in five ways. Materials of the scientific seminar “Realistic modeling.” November 29, 2018 Moscow, USSR. Anal Bull 2(716):6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Borisenko IG, Chernykh SI (2016) Virtualization of domestic educational space: a monograph. Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernykh SI, Parshikov V (2016) Innovative education in Russia. Int J Econ Finan Issues 6(15):239–242. http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/2386/pdf

  • Chernykh SI (eds) (2020) Digitalization of education as a disruptive innovation. The problem of higher education and modern problems of socio-humanitarian knowledge. In: Proceedings from VIII Arsent’ev readings. Materials All-Russian. Scientific conf. (Cheboksary, Dec 15, 2019) (254–259). Cheboksary USSR: Sreda. https://phseda.com/ru/actiow/104/info

  • Caplan B (ed) (2018) The case against education: why the education system is a waste of time and money? Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkina V (n d) Generation Z does not want to immediately go to college and dreams about his business. Retrieved from: https://rb.ru/young/generation-z-education/

  • Fisher JF, Fisher D (2018) Who you know? Unlocking innovations that expand students’ networks. Published by Jossey-Bass, San-Francisco

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1999) Trust: social virtues and building wealth. A new post-industrial wave in the West. Anthology. USSR: Academia, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2008) Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity. USSR: ZAO NPP Ermak, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Haqqbloom SI et al (2002) The 100 most eminent psyhologists of the 20th century. Rev General Psyhol 6(2):139–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.6.2.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1993) Time and being: articles and speeches. The Republic, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozyreva PM (2009) Interpersonal trust in the context of the formation of social capital. Sociol Stud 1:43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupreychenko AB, Mersiyanova IV (eds) (2013) Trust and distrust in the development of civil society. National Research. University Higher School of Economics, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Makeev VA (2009) Business reputation development strategy and its influence on the image of the organization. Vlast 3:52–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Russian youth are patriotic and apolitical. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://newizy.ru/news/society.

  • Seligman A (2002) The problem of trust. Ideal Press, Moscow, USSR

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shabunova AA (ed) (2013) The youth of modern Russia is a key resource for modernization. Institute of Socio-Economic Development of Territories of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vologda USSR

    Google Scholar 

  • Shtompka P (2002) Trust: sociological theory. Sociol Rev 2(3):56–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Who does Russian youth trust? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://zen-yandex.ru/mtdia/pstat/komu-doveriaet

  • Yakovleva LS, Kudashov VI (2019) The role of personality self-determination in online education. Prof Edu Mod World 9(4):3215–3223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina G. Borisenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chernykh, S.I., Borisenko, I.G. (2023). Transformations of Trust Under Caused by Instabilities of Educational Interactions. In: Maximova, S.G., Raikin, R.I., Chibilev, A.A., Silantyeva, M.M. (eds) Advances in Natural, Human-Made, and Coupled Human-Natural Systems Research. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 250. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78083-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics